RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: There is a paucity of studies reporting the epilepsy spectrum using the 2017 and 2022 ILAE classification systems in everyday clinical practice. To identify gaps and opportunities in care we evaluated a hospital-based cohort applying these epilepsy classification systems, including aetiology and co-morbidity, and the utility of molecular genetic diagnosis to identify available precision therapies. METHODS: Cross sectional retrospective study of all children with epilepsy (≤16 years) attending University Hospital Galway (2017-2022). Data collection and analysis of each case was standardised to ensure a systematic approach and application of the recent ILAE categorisation and terminology (2017 and 2022). Ethics approval was obtained. RESULTS: Among 356 children, epilepsy was classified as focal (46.1 %), generalised (38.8 %), combined (6.2 %), and unknown (9 %). Epilepsy syndrome was determined in 145/356 (40.7 %), comprising 24 different syndromes, most commonly SeLECTS (9 %), CAE (7 %), JAE (6.2 %) and IESS (5.9 %). New aetiology-specific syndromes were identified (e.g. CDKL5-DEE). Molecular diagnosis was confirmed in 19.9 % (n = 71) which encompassed monogenic (13.8 %) and chromosomopathy/CNV (6.2 %). There was an additional 35.7 % (n = 127) of patients who had a presumed genetic aetiology of epilepsy. Remaining aetiology included structural (18.8 %, n = 67), infectious (2 %, n = 7), metabolic (1.7 %, n = 6) and unknown (30.3 %, n = 108). Encephalopathy categorisation was determined in 182 patients (DE in 38.8 %; DEE in a further 11.8 %) associated with a range of co-morbidities categorised as global delay (29.2 %, n = 104), severe neurological impairment (16.3 %, n = 58), and ASD (14.6 %, n = 52). Molecular-based "precision therapy" was deemed available in 21/356 (5.9 %) patients, with "molecular precision" approach utilised in 13/356 (3.7 %), and some benefit noted in 6/356 (1.7 %) of overall cohort or 6/71 (8.5 %) of the molecular cohort. CONCLUSION: Applying the latest ILAE epilepsy classification systems allow comparison across settings and identifies a major neuro-developmental co-morbidity rate and a large genetic aetiology. We identified very few meaningful molecular-based disease modifying "precision therapies". There is a monumental gap between aetiological identification, and impact of meaningful therapies, thus the new 2017/2022 classification clearly identifies the major challenges in the provision of routine epilepsy care.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: Pathogenic variants in SETD1B have been associated with a syndromic neurodevelopmental disorder including intellectual disability, language delay, and seizures. To date, clinical features have been described for 11 patients with (likely) pathogenic SETD1B sequence variants. This study aims to further delineate the spectrum of the SETD1B-related syndrome based on characterizing an expanded patient cohort. METHODS: We perform an in-depth clinical characterization of a cohort of 36 unpublished individuals with SETD1B sequence variants, describing their molecular and phenotypic spectrum. Selected variants were functionally tested using in vitro and genome-wide methylation assays. RESULTS: Our data present evidence for a loss-of-function mechanism of SETD1B variants, resulting in a core clinical phenotype of global developmental delay, language delay including regression, intellectual disability, autism and other behavioral issues, and variable epilepsy phenotypes. Developmental delay appeared to precede seizure onset, suggesting SETD1B dysfunction impacts physiological neurodevelopment even in the absence of epileptic activity. Males are significantly overrepresented and more severely affected, and we speculate that sex-linked traits could affect susceptibility to penetrance and the clinical spectrum of SETD1B variants. CONCLUSION: Insights from this extensive cohort will facilitate the counseling regarding the molecular and phenotypic landscape of newly diagnosed patients with the SETD1B-related syndrome.