Public Health and Hospitals: Lessons Learned From Partnerships in a Changing Health Care Environment.

Recent changes in policymaking, such as the passage of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, have ushered in a new era in community health partnerships. To investigate characteristics of effective collaboration between hospitals, their parent systems, and the public health community, with the support of major hospital, medical, and public health associations, we compiled a list of 157 successful partnerships. This set was subsequently narrowed to 12 successful and diverse partnerships. After conducting site visits in each of the partnerships' communities and interviews with key partnership participants, we extracted lessons about their success. The lessons we have learned from our investigation have the potential to assist others as they develop partnerships.

Content and criterion validity evaluation of National Public Health Performance Standards measurement instruments.

OBJECTIVE: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's National Public Health Performance Standards Program (NPHPSP) has developed instruments to measure the performance of local and state public health departments on the 10 "Essential Services of Public Health," which have been tested in several states. This article is a report of the evaluation of the content and criterion validity of the local public health performance assessment instrument, and the content validity of the state public health performance assessment instrument. METHODS: Health department performance is measured using a set of indicators developed for the 10 Essential Services of Public Health and a model standard for each indicator. Content validity of each model standard in the local instrument was addressed by community partners along the following dimensions: the importance of each standard as a measure of the associated Essential Service, its completeness as a measure, and its reasonableness for achievement. All standards for each Essential Service were then judged in terms of their completeness in measuring performance in that service. Content validity of the state instrument was evaluated in a group interview of health department staff members from three states. Criterion validity of the local instrument was assessed for a sample of eight public health departments in Florida and six in New York by examining documentary evidence for selected responses. Criterion validity was also evaluated for a sample of Florida local public health departments and one Hawaii public health department by comparing state health department staffs' judgments of performance against the instrument score. RESULTS: Criterion validity was upheld for a summary performance score on the local instrument, but was not upheld for performance judgments on individual Essential Services. The NPHPSP standards based on the Essential Services have validity for measuring local public health system performance, according to community partners. The model standards are valid measures of state performance, according to state public health departments in three states. CONCLUSIONS: Within the scope of the validity evaluations completed, the NPHPSP state and local performance assessment instruments were found to be valid measures of public health performance.

Recommendations from testing of the National Public Health Performance Standards instruments.

The National Public Health performance Standards Program (NPHPSP) has developed assessment instruments based on the ten essential public health services (EPHS) for state and local health departments. The article reviews validity testing of the state and local instruments. The study employed multiple approaches to validity testing with state and local health departments in Florida, Hawaii, Minnesota, Mississippi, and New York. The New York State validity checks included the judgments of community partners. The study found that the EPHS have content and face validity as a basis for measuring public health system performance. The article includes recommendations for continued development of the NPHPS.

Implementing the National Local Public Health System Performance Assessment: evaluation of a readiness process in Kentucky.

The objectives of the study described in this article were to test training and resource materials for preparing Kentucky public health agency staff to lead the National Local Public Health System Performance Assessment and to identify barriers encountered in implementation. Readiness supports provided to five Kentucky district and county health departments that led the system assessment process in 12 counties were evaluated using training pre- and posttests, performance assessment posttests, observations, and interviews. The training and materials provided in this study appeared to be the minimum needed for these Kentucky health departments. Training sequences need to allow time for independent study of assessment processes, and training in using and interpreting the assessment instrument should be included. Partner orientation materials targeted for nonpublic health partners would be useful. In Kentucky, barriers to completing the assessment included questions about its purpose and benefits and the lack of a self-identified local public health system. Formal training of health department staff, committed leadership, and adequate personnel resources can help overcome these barriers. The health departments that brought together system partners for the performance assessment considered it a valuable community-building educational event.

Local public health agency capacity and its relationship to public health system performance.

he study described in this article identifies local public health agency capacity characteristics that are related to their local public health systems' performance scores on the CDC's National Public Health Performance Standards Program assessment instrument. Public health system performance scores from a test version of the National Public Health Performance Standards instrument (5b) from county and city/county jurisdictions in three states were matched to organizational capacity data from the 1997 National Association of County and City Health Officials profile of health departments, resulting in a sample of 152 jurisdictions. Twenty-eight capacity variables from the profile and all 10 scores on the Essential Public Health Services plus the total performance score were analyzed in 11 separate multivariate regression models. Public health agency capacities in the areas of funding, organizational leadership, and certain nonprovider partnerships were found to be significantly related to public health system performance. Further study is needed to determine if these relationships between agency capacities and system performance are found, with data from other states now using the nationally released performance assessment instruments and with capacity measures that are more specific for evaluating public health system performance.