Aging-accumulated methylmalonic acid serum levels at breast cancer diagnosis are not associated with distant metastases.

PURPOSE: Recent evidence suggests that age-accumulated methylmalonic acid (MMA) promotes breast cancer progression in mice. This study aims to investigate the association between baseline serum MMA concentrations in patients with breast cancer and the development of subsequent distant metastases. METHODS: We included 32 patients with early Luminal B-like breast cancer (LumB, median age 62.4y) and 52 patients with early triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC, median age 50.5y) who developed distant metastases within 5 years. They were matched to an equal number of early breast cancer patients (median age 62.2y for LumB and 50.5y for TNBC) who did not develop distant metastases with at least 5 years of follow-up. RESULTS: Baseline serum MMA levels at breast cancer diagnosis showed a positive correlation with age (P < 0.001) and a negative correlation with renal function and vitamin B12 (all P < 0.02), but no statistical association was found with BMI or tumor stage (P > 0.6). Between matched pairs, no significant difference was observed in MMA levels, after adjusting for kidney function and age (P = 0.19). Additionally, in a mouse model, a significant decline in MMA levels was observed in the tumor-bearing group compared to the group without tumors before and after tumor establishment or at identical times for the control group (P = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Baseline serum MMA levels in patients with breast cancer are not correlated with secondary distant metastasis. Evidence in the mouse model suggests that the presence of a tumor perturbates MMA levels.

Incidence of falls and fall-related injuries and their predictive factors in frail older persons with cancer: a multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: Falls and fall-related injuries are a major public health problem. Data on falls in older persons with cancer is limited and robust data on falls within those with a frailty profile are missing. The aim of this study is to investigate the incidence and predictive factors for falls and fall-related injuries in frail older persons with cancer. METHODS: This study is a secondary data analysis from data previously collected in a large prospective multicenter observational cohort study in older persons with cancer in 22 Belgian hospitals (November 2012-February 2015). Patients ≥70 years with a malignant tumor and a frailty profile based on an abnormal G8 score were included upon treatment decision and evaluated with a Geriatric Assessment (GA). At follow-up, data on falls and fall-related injuries were documented. RESULTS: At baseline 2141 (37.2%) of 5759 included patients reported at least one fall in the past 12 months, 1427 patients (66.7%) sustained an injury. Fall-related data of 3681 patients were available at follow-up and at least one fall was reported by 769 patients (20.9%) at follow-up, of whom 289 (37.6%) fell more than once and a fall-related injury was reported by 484 patients (62.9%). Fear of falling was reported in 47.4% of the patients at baseline and in 55.6% of the patients at follow-up. In multivariable analysis, sex and falls history in the past 12 months were predictive factors for both falls and fall-related injuries at follow-up. Other predictive factors for falls, were risk for depression, cognitive impairment, dependency in activities of daily living, fear of falling, and use of professional home care. CONCLUSION: Given the high number of falls and fall-related injuries and high prevalence of fear of falling, multifactorial falls risk assessment and management programs should be integrated in the care of frail older persons with cancer. Further studies with long-term follow-up, subsequent impact on cancer treatment and interventions for fall prevention, and integration of other important topics like medication and circumstances of a fall, are warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION: B322201215495.

Priorities for the global advancement of care for older adults with cancer: an update of the International Society of Geriatric Oncology Priorities Initiative.

In 2011, the International Society of Geriatric Oncology (SIOG) published the SIOG 10 Priorities Initiative, which defined top priorities for the improvement of the care of older adults with cancer worldwide.1 Substantial scientific, clinical, and educational progress has been made in line with these priorities and international health policy developments have occurred, such as the shift of emphasis by WHO from communicable to non-communicable diseases and the adoption by the UN of its Sustainable Development Goals 2030. Therefore, SIOG has updated its priority list. The present document addresses four priority domains: education, clinical practice, research, and strengthening collaborations and partnerships. In this Policy Review, we reflect on how these priorities would apply in different economic settings, namely in high-income countries versus low-income and middle-income countries. SIOG hopes that it will offer guidance for international and national endeavours to provide adequate universal health coverage for older adults with cancer, who represent a major and rapidly growing group in global epidemiology.

Systematic review of self-management interventions for older adults with cancer.

AIM: The purpose of this systematic review was to determine the effectiveness of self-management interventions for older adults with cancer and to determine the effective components of said interventions. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of self-management interventions for older adults (65+) with cancer guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis statement. We conducted an exhaustive search of the following databases: Ageline, AMED, ASSIA, CINAHL, Cochrane, Embase, Medline, PsychINFO, and Sociological Abstracts. We assessed for quality using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool and Down & Black for quasi-experimental studies, with data synthesized in a narrative and tabular format. RESULTS: Sixteen thousand nine hundred and eight-five titles and abstracts were screened, subsequently 452 full-text papers were reviewed by two independent reviewers, of which 13 full-text papers were included in the final review. All self-management interventions included in this review measured Quality of Life; other outcomes included mood, self-care activity, supportive care needs, self-advocacy, pain intensity, and analgesic intake; only one intervention measured frailty. Effective interventions were delivered by a multidisciplinary teams (n = 4), nurses (n = 3), and mental health professionals (n = 1). Self-management core skills most commonly targeted included: problem solving; behavioural self-monitoring and tailoring; and settings goals and action planning. CONCLUSIONS: Global calls to action argue for increased emphasize on self-management but presently, few interventions exist that explicitly target the self-management needs of older adults with cancer. Future work should focus on explicit pathways to support older adults and their caregivers to prepare for and engage in cancer self-management processes and behaviours.

Oncology clinic nurses' attitudes and perceptions regarding implementation of routine fall assessment and fall risk screening: A survey study.

Falls in older adults with cancer are often under-recognized and under-reported. The objective of this study was to explore oncology clinic nurses' willingness and perceived barriers to implement routine falls assessment and falls screening in their practice. Nurses working in outpatient oncology clinics were invited to complete an online survey. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and sorted into thematic categories. The majority of respondents indicated willingness to routinely ask older patients about falls (85.7%) and screen for fall risks (73.5%). The main reasons for unwillingness included: belief that patients report falls on their own, lack of time, and lack of support staff. Findings from this study show many oncology nurses believe in the importance of routine fall assessment and screening and are willing to implement them routinely, although falls are not routinely asked about or assessed. Future work should explore strategies to address barriers nurses face given the implications of falls amongst this vulnerable population.

The added value of geriatric assessment in evaluating a patient's Health-Related Quality-of-Life: A study in ≥70-year-old early-stage invasive breast cancer patients.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess the relationship between geriatric assessment (GA) and health-related Quality-of-Life (HRQOL) in older patients with breast cancer. METHODS: Patients were assigned either to adjuvant chemotherapy (CTG) or to a control group (CG). Spearman rank coefficients (ρ) calculated correlations between HRQOL and GA at baseline, 3 months and 1 year. Multivariate regressions modelled the prognostic value of GA in evaluating of a patient's HRQOL and the accuracy of baseline GA in predicting HRQOL decline (change of ≥10 points). RESULTS: The analysis included 57 patients in the CTG and 52 in the CG. Strong correlations (ρ ≥ 0.5) were reported between the EORTC QLQ-C30 Physical Functioning Scale and Activities of Daily Living (ADL), Instrumental ADL (iADL) and Leuven Oncogeriatric Frailty Score Scale (LOFS). Multivariate models demonstrated that poor iADL, ADL and LOFS (CG) and ADL and iADL (CTG) contributed to a statistically (all p < .05) worse HRQOL. The relative gain in predicting 3-month and 1-year HRQOL decline was 24.1% and 4.7% (CG) and 6.1% and 18.3% (CTG). CONCLUSION: Our results show that the functional measures in the GA are strongly correlated with patient self-reported functioning. Poor baseline GA has a modest probability of predicting HRQOL deterioration.

The prognostic value of 3 commonly measured blood parameters and geriatric assessment to predict overall survival in addition to clinical information in older patients with cancer.

BACKGROUND: The current study was performed to evaluate the prognostic value of laboratory parameters and geriatric assessment (GA) in addition to a baseline model with clinical information regarding overall survival (OS) in patients with cancer. METHODS: GA was systematically performed in patients aged ≥70 years. The baseline model consisted of age, tumor type, and stage of disease. The incremental prognostic values of the GA as a whole (10-item GA) and laboratory parameters were assessed separately and combined. The parameters included hemoglobin (Hb), albumin, C-reactive protein (CRP), and the Glasgow Prognostic Score (GPS). Analyses were conducted with continuous and dichotomized variables. Cox models were compared based on Akaike information criterion (ΔAIC) and their discriminatory ability was assessed using the concordance probability estimate (CPE). RESULTS: A total of 328 patients were considered for this analysis. The baseline model had a CPE of 0.725. The addition of CRP, albumin, and Hb combined resulted in the best performing model (ΔAIC: 40.12 and CPE: 0.757) among the laboratory parameters. However, the 10-item GA improved the baseline model even more (ΔAIC: 46.03 and CPE: 0.769). Similar results were observed in the analysis with dichotomous variables. The addition of the 3 laboratory parameters (CRP, albumin, and Hb) improved the CPE by 1.4% compared with the baseline model already extended with the 10-item GA. The CPE increase (1.7%) was the highest with the GPS in the analysis with dichotomous variables. CONCLUSIONS: GA appears to add slightly more prognostic information than laboratory parameters in addition to clinical information. The laboratory parameters have an additional prognostic value beyond clinical and geriatric information.

The added value of geriatric screening and assessment for predicting overall survival in older patients with cancer.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine and compare the added prognostic value of screening tools, geriatric assessment (GA) components, and GA summaries to clinical information for overall survival (OS) in older patients with cancer. METHODS: A screening and a 10-item GA were systematically performed in patients ≥70 years old with cancer. Cox regression analyses were conducted to evaluate the added prognostic value for OS of screening tools, GA, and GA summaries to clinical information (age, stage, and tumor type) in 2 cohorts (A and B). Cox models were compared on the basis of the Akaike information criterion and the concordance probability estimate. The 2 cohorts for the analyses were similar but independent. RESULTS: A complete case analysis was available for 763 patients (median age, 76 years) in cohort A and for 402 patients (median age, 77 years) in cohort B. In both cohorts, most individual GA components were independent prognostic factors for OS. Nutritional status (assessed with the Mini Nutritional Assessment Short Form) and functional status (assessed with the Instrumental Activities of Daily Living) consistently displayed a strong capacity to predict OS. Less consistent results were found for screening tools. GA summaries performed the best in comparison with the screening tools and the individual GA components. CONCLUSIONS: Most individual GA components, especially nutritional status and functional status, are prognostic factors for OS in older patients with cancer. GA summaries provide more prognostic information than individual GA components but only moderately improve the prognostic baseline model with clinical information.

Age-related microRNAs in older breast cancer patients: biomarker potential and evolution during adjuvant chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are important regulators of cellular function and have been associated with both aging and cancer, but the impact of chemotherapy on age-related miRNAs has barely been studied. Our aim was to examine whether chemotherapy accelerates the aging process in elderly breast cancer patients using miRNA expression profiling. METHODS: We monitored age-related miRNAs in blood of women, aged 70 or older, receiving adjuvant chemotherapy (docetaxel and cyclophosphamide, TC) for invasive breast cancer (chemo group, CTG, n = 46). A control group of older breast cancer patients without chemotherapy was included for comparison (control group, CG, n = 43). All patients underwent geriatric assessment at inclusion (T0), after 3 months (T1) and 1 year (T2). Moreover, we analysed the serum expression of nine age-related miRNAs (miR-20a, miR-30b, miR-34a, miR-106b, miR-191, miR-301a, miR-320b, miR-374a, miR-378a) at each timepoint. RESULTS: Except for miR-106b, which behaved slightly different in CTG compared to CG, all miRNAs showed moderate fluctuations during the study course with no significant differences between groups. Several age-related miRNAs correlated with clinical frailty (miR-106b, miR-191, miR-301a, miR-320b, miR-374a), as well as with other biomarkers of aging, particularly Interleukin-6 (IL-6) and Monocyte Chemoattractant Protein-1 (MCP-1) (miR-106b, miR-301a, miR-374a-5p, miR-378a-3p). Moreover, based on their 'aging miRNA' profiles, patients clustered into two distinct groups exhibiting significantly different results for several biological/clinical aging parameters. CONCLUSIONS: These results further corroborate our earlier report, stating that adjuvant TC chemotherapy does not significantly boost aging progression in elderly breast cancer patients. Our findings also endorsed specific age-related miRNAs as promising aging/frailty biomarkers in oncogeriatric populations. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00849758 . Registered on 20 February 2009. This clinical trial was registered prospectively.

Loneliness in patients with cancer: the first year after cancer diagnosis.

OBJECTIVES: We studied the frequency and evolution of social and emotional loneliness in older cancer patients in comparison with younger cancer patients and older people without cancer. We evaluated if changes in common cancer-related and ageing-related problems such as fatigue, cognitive functioning and functional status contributed to the occurrence of loneliness. METHODS: This study was part of the KLIMOP study (Dutch acronym for project on older cancer patients in Belgium and the Netherlands) and included older (≥70 years) and younger cancer patients (50-69 years) and older people without cancer. Data were collected at baseline and 1-year follow-up. Loneliness was measured with the loneliness scale of De Jong-Gierveld. The relationship between loneliness after 1 year and changes in fatigue, cognitive functioning and functional status was tested in multivariate logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: Data were available for 475 participants. At baseline, older cancer patients were less lonely compared with older people without cancer. After 1 year, the frequency of emotional loneliness had significantly increased for older cancer patients (26-42%, p < 0.001) and had reached levels of older people without cancer. Emotional loneliness also increased for younger cancer patients (25-34%, p = 0.02), but not for older people without cancer (40-38%, p = 0.69). Frequency of social loneliness did not change significantly. People who were persistently fatigued and people who became or were persistently impaired on cognitive functioning were at increased risk of becoming lonely. CONCLUSION: Loneliness, in particular emotional loneliness, is a common problem in cancer patients, and its frequency changes considerably over time.

A cohort study on the evolution of psychosocial problems in older patients with breast or colorectal cancer: comparison with younger cancer patients and older primary care patients without cancer.

BACKGROUND: Although older cancer survivors commonly report psychosocial problems, the impact of both cancer and ageing on the occurrence of these problems remains largely unknown. The evolution of depression, cognitive functioning, and fatigue was evaluated in a group of older cancer patients in comparison with a group of younger cancer patients and older persons without cancer. METHODS: Older (≥70 years) and younger cancer patients (50-69 years) with breast or colorectal cancer stage I-III, and older persons without cancer (≥70 years) were included. Data were collected at baseline and one year follow-up and were available for 536 persons. Depression was evaluated with the 15-item Geriatric Depression Scale. Cognitive functioning was measured with the cognitive functioning subscale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer. Fatigue was measured with a Visual Analogue Scale. Risk factors for depression, cognitive functioning, and fatigue were analysed using multivariate logistic regression analyses. Risk factors included cancer- and ageing-related factors such as functional status, cancer treatment, and comorbidities. RESULTS: The evolution of psychosocial problems was similar for the group of older (N = 125) and younger cancer patients (N = 196): an increase in depression (p < 0.01), slight worsening in cognitive functioning (p = 0.01), and no clear change in fatigue. Also, compared to the group of people without cancer (N = 215), the differences were small and after one year of follow-up only depression was more frequent in older cancer patients compared to older persons without cancer (18% versus 9%, p = 0.04). In multivariate analyses the main risk factors for psychosocial problems after one year follow-up were changes in functional status and presence of baseline depression, fatigue, or cognitive impairment. CONCLUSION: Over the course of one year after a diagnosis of cancer, cancer patients face increasing levels of depression and increasing difficulties in cognitive functioning. The main risk factor for psychosocial problems was presence of the problem at baseline. This calls for regular screening for psychosocial problems and exchange of information on psychosocial functioning between different health care providers and settings during the treatment and follow-up trajectory of cancer patients.

Fall predictors in older cancer patients: a multicenter prospective study.

BACKGROUND: In the older population falls are a common problem and a major cause of morbidity, mortality and functional decline. The etiology is often multifactorial making the identification of fall predictors essential for preventive measures. Despite this knowledge, data on falls within the older cancer population are limited. The objective of this study was to evaluate the occurrence of falls within 2 to 3 months after cancer treatment decision and to identify predictors of falls (≥1 fall) during follow-up. METHODS: Older patients (70 years or more) with a cancer treatment decision were included. At baseline, all patients underwent geriatric screening (G8 and Flemish Triage Risk Screening Tool), followed by a geriatric assessment including living situation, activities of daily living (ADL), instrumental activities of daily living (IADL), fall history in the past 12 months, fatigue, cognition, depression, nutrition, comorbidities and polypharmacy. Questionnaires were used to collect follow-up (2-3 months) data. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify predictors for falls (≥1 fall) during follow-up. RESULTS: At baseline, 295 (31.5%) of 937 included patients reported at least one fall in the past 12 months with 88 patients (29.5%) sustaining a major injury. During follow-up (2-3 months), 142 (17.6%) patients fell, of whom 51.4% fell recurrently and 17.6% reported a major injury. Baseline fall history in the past 12 months (OR = 3.926), fatigue (OR = 0.380), ADL dependency (OR = 0.492), geriatric risk profile by G8 (OR = 0.471) and living alone (OR = 1.631) were independent predictors of falls (≥1 fall) within 2-3 months after cancer treatment decision. CONCLUSION: Falls are a serious problem among older cancer patients. Geriatric screening and assessment data can identify patients at risk for a fall. A patient with risk factors associated with falls should undergo further evaluation and intervention to prevent potentially injurious fall incidents.

Serum methylmalonic acid concentrations at breast cancer diagnosis significantly correlate with clinical frailty.

Methylmalonic acid (MMA), a by-product of propionate metabolism, is known to increase with age. This study investigates the potential of serum MMA concentrations as a biomarker for age-related clinical frailty in older patients with breast cancer. One hundred nineteen patients ≥ 70 years old with early-stage breast cancer were included (median age 76 years). G8 screening, full geriatric assessment, clinical parameters (i.e., estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and body mass index (BMI)), and serum sample collection were collected at breast cancer diagnosis before any therapy was administered. MMA concentrations were measured via liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry. MMA concentrations significantly increased with age and eGFR (all P < 0.001) in this older population. The group with an abnormal G8 (≤ 14, 51% of patients) had significantly higher MMA levels than the group with normal G8 (> 14, 49%): 260 nmol/L vs. 188 nmol/L, respectively (P = 0.0004), even after correcting for age and eGFR (P = 0.001). Furthermore, in the detailed assessment, MMA concentrations correlated most with mobility (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status and Activities of Daily Living (ADL) tools, all P ≤ 0.02), comorbidity (Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) tool, P = 0.005), and polypharmacy (P < 0.001), whereas no significant associations were noted for instrumental ADL (IADL), Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Geriatric Depression Scale-15 (GDS15), Mini Nutritional Assessment-Short Form (MNA-SF), and pain (all P > 0.1). In addition, our results showed that higher MMA levels correlate with poor overall survival in breast cancer patients (P = 0.003). Elevated serum MMA concentrations at initial diagnosis are significantly associated, not only with age but also independently with clinical frailty, suggesting a possible influence of MMA on clinical frailty in older patients with early-stage breast cancer.

Study protocol for two stepped-wedge interventional trials evaluating the effects of holistic information technology-based patient-oriented management in older multimorbid patients with cancer: The GERONTE trials.

INTRODUCTION: Current hospital-based care pathways are generally single-disease centred. As a result, coexisting morbidities are often suboptimally evaluated and managed, a deficiency becoming increasingly apparent among older patients who exhibit heterogeneity in health status, functional abilities, frailty, and other geriatric impairments. To address this issue, our study aims to assess a newly developed patient-centred care pathway for older patients with multimorbidity and cancer. The new care pathway was based on currently available evidence and co-designed by end-users including health care professionals, patients, and informal caregivers. Within this care pathway, all healthcare professionals involved in the care of older patients with multimorbidity and cancer will form a Health Professional Consortium (HPC). The role of the HPC will be to centralise oncologic and non-oncologic treatment recommendations in accordance with the patient's priorities. Moreover, an Advanced Practice Nurse will act as case-manager by being the primary point of contact for the patient, thus improving coordination between specialists, and by organising and leading the consortium. Patient monitoring and the HPC collaboration will be facilitated by digital communication tools designed specifically for this purpose, with the added benefit of being customisable for each patient. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The GERONTE study is a prospective international, multicentric study consisting of two stepped-wedge trials performed at 16 clinical sites across three European countries. Each trial will include 720 patients aged 70 years and over with a new or progressive cancer (breast, lung, colorectal, prostate) and at least one moderate or severe multimorbidity. The patients in the intervention group will receive the new care pathway whereas patients in the control group will receive usual oncologic care. DISCUSSION: GERONTE will evaluate whether this kind of holistic, patient-oriented healthcare management can improve quality of life (primary outcome) and other valuable endpoints in older patients with multimorbidity and cancer. An ancillary study will assess in depth the socio-economic impact of the intervention and deliver concrete implementation guidelines for the GERONTE intervention care pathway. TRIAL REGISTRATION: FRONE: NCT05720910 TWOBE: NCT05423808.

Loneliness in older adults living with cancer: A scoping review of the quantitative and qualitative evidence on behalf of the International Society of Geriatric Oncology Nursing and Allied Health Interest Group.

INTRODUCTION: Loneliness is common in older adults. Cancer and its treatments can heighten loneliness and result in poor outcomes. However, little is known about loneliness in older adults with cancer. Our objective was to provide an overview of the prevalence of loneliness, contributing factors, evolution during the cancer trajectory, impact on treatment, and interventions to reduce loneliness. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a scoping review including studies on loneliness in adults with cancer aged ≥65. Original, published studies of any designs (excluding case reports) were included. A two-step screening process was performed. RESULTS: Out of 8,720 references, 19 studies (11 quantitative, 6 qualitative, 2 mixed-methods), mostly from the United States, Netherlands, and/or Belgium, and most published from 2010, were included. Loneliness was assessed by the De Jong Gierveld Loneliness Scale, and the UCLA loneliness scale. Up to 50% of older adults felt lonely. Depression and anxiety were often correlated with loneliness. Loneliness may increase over the first 6-12 months during treatment. One study assessed the feasibility of an intervention aiming at reducing primarily depression and anxiety and secondarily, loneliness in patients with cancer aged ≥70 after five 45-min sessions with a mental health professional. No studies investigated the impact of loneliness on cancer care and health outcomes. DISCUSSION: This review documents the scarcity of literature on loneliness in older adults with cancer. The negative impacts of loneliness on health in the general population are well known; a better understanding of the magnitude and impact of loneliness in older adults with cancer is urgently warranted.

A scoping review of ageism towards older adults in cancer care.

INTRODUCTION: Ageism towards older adults with cancer may impact treatment decisions, healthcare interactions, and shape health/psychosocial outcomes. The purpose of this review is twofold: (1) To synthesize the literature on ageism towards older adults with cancer in oncology and (2) To identify interventions that address ageism in the healthcare context applicable to oncology. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a scoping review following Arksey and O'Malley and Levac methods and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We conducted an exhaustive multi-database search, screening 30,926 titles/abstracts. Following data abstraction, we conducted tabular, narrative, and textual synthesis. RESULTS: We extracted data on 133 papers. Most (n = 44) were expert opinions, reviews, and letters to editors highlighting the negative impacts of ageism, expressing the need for approaches addressing heterogeneity of older adults, and calling for increased clinical trial inclusion for older adults. Qualitative studies (n = 3) described healthcare professionals' perceived influence of age on treatment recommendations, whereas quantitative studies (n = 32) were inconclusive as to whether age-related bias impacted treatment recommendations/outcomes or survival. Intervention studies (n = 54) targeted ageism in pre/post-licensure healthcare professionals and reported participants' improvement in knowledge and/or attitudes towards older adults. No interventions were found that had been implemented in oncology. DISCUSSION: Concerns relating to ageism in cancer care are consistently described in the literature. Interventions exist to address ageism; however, none have been developed or tested in oncology settings. Addressing ageism in oncology will require integration of geriatric knowledge/interventions to address conscious and unconscious ageist attitudes impacting care and outcomes. Interventions hold promise if tailored for cancer care settings. 249/250.