RESUMO
In this work we propose a method for automatically discriminating between different types of tissue in MR mammography datasets. This is accomplished by employing a wavelet-based multiscale analysis. After the data has been wavelet-transformed unsupervised machine learning methods are employed to identify typical patterns in the wavelet domain. To demonstrate the potential of the proposed approach we apply a filtering procedure that extracts the wavelet-based image information related to tumour tissue. In this way we obtain a robust segmentation of suspicious tissue in the MR image.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/diagnóstico por imagem , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Mamografia/métodos , Educação Médica Continuada , Feminino , Humanos , Processamento de Imagem Assistida por Computador , Reprodutibilidade dos TestesRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the consistency and performance of radiologists interpreting breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two test sets of eight cases comprising cancers, benign disease, technical problems and parenchymal enhancement were prepared from two manufacturers' equipment (X and Y) and reported by 15 radiologists using the recording form and scoring system of the UK MRI breast screening study [(MAgnetic Resonance Imaging in Breast Screening (MARIBS)]. Variations in assessments of morphology, kinetic scores and diagnosis were measured by assessing intraobserver and interobserver variability and agreement. The sensitivity and specificity of reporting performances was determined using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. RESULTS: Intraobserver variation was seen in 13 (27.7%) of 47 of the radiologists' conclusions (four technical and seven pathological differences). Substantial interobserver variation was observed in the scores recorded for morphology, pattern of enhancement, quantification of enhancement and washout pattern. The overall sensitivity of breast MRI was high [88.6%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 77.4-94.7%], combined with a specificity of 69.2% (95% CI 60.5-76.7%). The sensitivities were similar for the two test sets (P=.3), but the specificity was significantly higher for the Manufacturer X dataset (P<.001). ROC curve analysis gave an area under the curve of 0.85 (95% CI 0.79-0.92) CONCLUSIONS: Substantial variation in all elements of the scoring system and in the overall diagnostic conclusions was observed between radiologists participating in MARIBS. High overall sensitivity was achieved with moderate specificity. Manufacturer-related differences in specificities possibly occurred because the numerical thresholds set for the scoring system were not optimised for both equipment manufacturers. Scoring systems developed on one equipment software may not be transferable to other manufacturers.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/diagnóstico , Competência Clínica , Interpretação de Imagem Assistida por Computador , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Feminino , Humanos , Programas de Rastreamento , Variações Dependentes do Observador , Curva ROC , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Sensibilidade e EspecificidadeRESUMO
AIMS: To measure hepatic concentrations of the fluorine-containing antimicrobial, sitafloxacin, using in vivo(19)F magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS). METHODS: Data were acquired from eight healthy subjects at 2, 5, 8 and 24 h following doses of 500 mg day(-1) for 5 days using a (1)H/(19)F surface coil in a 1.5T clinical MR system. Tissue water was used as a reference. RESULTS: Estimated liver concentrations at 2 h were 15.0 +/- 4.0 microg ml(-1) (mean +/- 95% CI), compared with 3.54 +/- 0.58 microg ml(-1) in plasma (n = 6), and fell below threshold concentrations (2 microg ml(-1)) by 24 h. CONCLUSIONS: (19)F MRS is able to detect and quantify sitafloxacin in the liver. There was no evidence for the hepatic retention of the drug.