Neck radiation is not associated with increased risk of perioperative adverse events after transcarotid artery revascularization or transfemoral carotid artery stenting.

OBJECTIVE: It is unclear whether patients with prior neck radiation therapy (RT) are at high risk for carotid artery stenting (CAS). We aimed to delineate 30-day perioperative and 3-year long-term outcomes in patients treated for radiation-induced stenotic lesions by the transfemoral carotid artery stenting (TFCAS) or transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR) approach to determine comparative risk and to ascertain the optimal intervention in this cohort. METHODS: Data were extracted from the Vascular Quality Initiative CAS registry for patients with prior neck radiation who had undergone either TCAR or TFCAS. The Student t-test and the χ2 test were used to compare baseline patient characteristics. Multivariable logistic regression and Cox Hazard Proportional analysis were used to compare perioperative and long-term differences between patients with and without prior neck radiation following TCAR and TFCAS. Kaplan-Meier estimator was used to determine the incidence of 3-year adverse events. RESULTS: A total of 72,656 patients (TCAR, 40,879; TFCAS, 31,777) were included in the analysis. Of these, 4151 patients had a history of neck radiation. Patients with a history of neck radiation were more likely to be younger, white, and have fewer comorbidities than patients with no neck radiation history. After adjustment for confounding factors, there was no difference in relative risk of 30-day perioperative stroke (P = .11), death (P = .36), or myocardial infarction (MI) (P = .61) between TCAR patients with or without a history of neck radiation. The odds of stroke/death (P = .10) and stroke/death/MI (P = .07) were also not statistically significant. In patients with prior neck radiation, TCAR had lower odds for in-hospital stroke/death/MI (odds ratio, 0.59; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.35-0.99; P = .05) and access site complications than TFCAS. At year 3, patients with prior neck radiation had an increased hazard for mortality after TCAR (hazard ratio [HR], 1.24; 95% CI, 1.02-1.51; P = .04) and TFCAS (HR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.12-1.58; P = .001). Patients with prior neck radiation also experienced an increased hazard for reintervention after TCAR (HR, 2.16; 95% CI, 1.45-3.20; P < .001) and TFCAS (HR, 1.67; 95% CI, 1.02-2.73; P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with prior neck radiation had a similar relative risk of 30-day perioperative adverse events as patients with no neck radiation after adjustment for baseline demographics and disease characteristics. In these patients, TCAR was associated with reduced odds of perioperative stroke/death/MI as compared with TFCAS. However, patients with prior neck radiation were at increased risk for 3-year mortality and reintervention.

Diabetes, Hypertension, and Smoking Do Not Affect Outcomes of Iliofemoral Vein Stenting for Chronic Proximal Venous Outflow Obstruction.

BACKGROUND: Diabetes, hypertension, and smoking are well-recognized risk factors for peripheral artery disease (PAD), but little is known of their impact on chronic venous insufficiency (CVI). This study evaluates these factors in patients undergoing iliac vein stenting (IVS) for CVI. METHODS: A registry of 708 patients who underwent IVS from August 2011 to June 2021 was retrospectively analyzed. Symptoms were quantified using venous clinical severity score (VCSS) and CEAP classification. Both major and minor reinterventions were recorded. Logistic regression models were used to determine the unadjusted and adjusted odds ratio of any reintervention. Log-rank test was used to assess differences in reintervention-free survival. RESULTS: The prevalence of hypertension was 51.1% (N = 362), diabetes was 23.0% (N = 163), and smoking was 22.2% (N = 157). Patients with diabetes (3.6 vs. 3.4; P = 0.062), hypertension (3.6 vs. 3.3; P < 0.001), and smoking (3.7 vs. 3.4; P = 0.003) had higher CEAP scores than those without these comorbidities. Improvement in VCSS composite scores showed no differences postoperatively (diabetes: P = 0.513; hypertension: P = 0.053; smoking: P = 0.608), at 1-year follow-up (diabetes: P = 0.666; hypertension: P = 0.681; smoking: P = 0.745), or at 5-year follow-up (diabetes: P = 0.525; hypertension: P = 0.953; smoking: P = 0.146). Diabetes (P = 0.454), smoking (P = 0.355), and hypertension (P = 0.727) were not associated with increased odds of major reintervention. Log-rank test similarly showed no differences in reintervention-free survival for major or minor reoperations between those with and without diabetes (P = 0.79), hypertension (P = 0.14), and smoking (P = 0.80). CONCLUSIONS: Diabetes, hypertension, and smoking were prevalent among CVI patients, but unlike in PAD patients, they had little to no impact on long-term outcomes or reinterventions after IVS.

Identifying venous clinical severity score thresholds for Clinical-Etiology-Anatomy-Pathophysiology classifications of venous edema and higher.

OBJECTIVE: Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS) is a widely used standard for assessing and grading the severity of chronic venous disease (CVD). Prior research highlighted its high validity in detecting and quantifying venous disease. However, there is little, if any, known about the precise thresholds at which VCSS discriminates important stages of deep venous disease. This study sought to elucidate the diagnostic accuracy, thresholds, and correlation at which VCSS detects salient CEAP (Clinical-Etiology-Anatomy-Pathophysiology) classes in deep venous disease progression. METHODS: A registry of 840 patients who presented with chronic proximal venous outflow obstruction (PVOO) secondary to non-thrombotic iliac vein lesions from August 2011 to June 2021 was retrospectively analyzed. VCSS and CEAP classifications were used to evaluate preoperative symptoms. VCSS was compared to CEAP classes to determine the precise VCSS composite values at which the instrument was able to detect CEAP C3 and higher, C4 and higher, and C5 and higher. Receiver operative characteristic (ROC) curve and area under the curve (AUC) were used to evaluate VCSS for its ability to discriminate disease at these stages of CEAP classification. Spearman's rank coefficient was used to determine the correlation between CEAP VCSS composite as well as individual VCSS components (pain, varicose vein, edema, pigmentation, inflammation, induration, ulcer number, ulcer size, ulcer duration, compression). RESULTS: VCSS composite was able to detect venous edema (C3) and higher at a sensitivity of 68.9% and a specificity of 54.8% at an optimized threshold of 8.5 (AUC = 0.648; 95% C.I. = 0.575-0.721). To detect changes in skin and subcutaneous tissue from CVD (C4) and higher, an optimal threshold of 11.5 was found with a sensitivity of 51.7% and specificity of 76.5% (AUC = 0.694; 95% C.I. = 0.656-0.731). Healed venous ulcer (C4) and higher was detectable at an optimized threshold of 13.5 at a sensitivity of 67.7% and a specificity of 88.9% (AUC = 0.819; 95% C.I. = 0.766-0.873). The correlation between VCSS composites and CEAP was weak (ρ = 0.372; p < .001). Attributes of VCSS that reflect more severe venous disease correlated more closely with CEAP classes, namely pigmentation (ρ = 0.444; p < .001), inflammation (ρ = 0.348; p < .001), induration (ρ = 0.352; p < .001), number of active ulcers (ρ = 0.497; p < .001), active ulcer size (ρ = 0.485; p < .001), and ulcer duration (ρ = 0.497; p < .001). The correlation between CEAP class and the other four components of VCSS were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: VCSS composite thresholds of 8.5, 11.5, and 13.5 are threshold values for detecting CEAP classification C3 and higher, C4 and higher, and C5 and higher, respectively. Consistent with prior work, VCSS appears to have a better ability to discriminate CVD at more severe CEAP classifications. In this registry, the correlation between VCSS and CEAP was found to be weak while components of VCSS that suggest more advanced disease exhibited the strongest correlation with CEAP.

Association of carotid revascularization approach with perioperative outcomes based on symptom status and degree of stenosis among octogenarians.

OBJECTIVE: Age ≥80 years is known to be an independent risk factor for periprocedural stroke after transfemoral carotid artery stenting (TF-CAS) but not after carotid endarterectomy (CEA). The objective of the present study was to compare the perioperative outcomes for CEA, TF-CAS, and transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR) among octogenarian patients (aged ≥80 years) overall and stratified by symptom status and degree of stenosis. METHODS: All patients aged ≥80 years with 50% to 99% carotid artery stenosis who had undergone CEA, TF-CAS, or TCAR in the Vascular Quality Initiative (2005-2020) were included. We compared the perioperative (30-day) incidence of ipsilateral stroke or death for CEA vs TF-CAS vs TCAR using analysis of variance and multivariable logistic regression models. The results were confirmed in a sensitivity analysis stratified by symptom status and degree of stenosis. RESULTS: Overall, 28,571 carotid revascularization procedures were performed in patients aged ≥80 years: CEA, n = 20,912 (73.2%), TF-CAS, n = 3628 (12.7%), and TCAR, n = 4031 (14.1%). The median age was 83 years (interquartile range, 81.0-86.0 years); 49.8% of the patients were symptomatic (51.9% CEA, 46.2% TF-CAS, 42.4% TCAR); and 60.7% had high-grade stenosis (59.0% CEA, 65.2% TF-CAS, 65.4% TCAR). Perioperative stroke/death occurred most frequently following TF-CAS (6.6%), followed by TCAR (3.1%) and CEA (2.5%; P < .001). After adjusting for baseline differences between groups, the odds ratio (OR) for stroke/death was greater for TF-CAS vs CEA (adjusted OR [aOR], 3.35; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.65-4.23), followed by TCAR vs CEA (aOR 1.49, 95% CI 1.18-1.87). The risk of perioperative stroke/death remained significantly greater for TF-CAS compared with CEA regardless of symptom status and degree of stenosis (P < .05 for all). In contrast, the risk of stroke/death was higher for TCAR vs CEA for asymptomatic patients (aOR, 2.04; 95% CI, 1.41-2.94) and those with high-grade stenosis (aOR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.11-2.05) but similar for patients with symptomatic and moderate-grade disease (P > .05 for both). The risk of myocardial infarction was lower with TCAR (aOR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.40-0.87) and TF-CAS (aOR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.40-0.87) compared with CEA overall. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, TCAR and CEA can be safely offered to older adults, in particular, symptomatic patients and those with moderate-grade stenosis. TF-CAS should be avoided in older patients when possible.

The safety of Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors in B-cell malignancies: A systematic review.

B-cell malignancies, most notably lymphomas, make up most of the non-Hodgkin lymphomas in the United States. There are limited randomized data comparing first- and second-generation Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors. Our aim was to compare the safety profiles of first versus second-generation BTK inhibitors. A systematic search was performed from database inception to January 13, 2020. Studies with BTK inhibitor monotherapy for the treatment of B-cell malignancies in the adult population (>18 years old) were utilized and the adverse events (AEs) were extracted. Fifty-five studies that met the inclusion criteria were included in the systematic review with 41 studies with first generation and 14 studies with second generation. The review included both clinical trials and retrospective studies with average time of follow-up of 2 years for the first-generation group and 18 months for the second-generation group. We found that the incidence of cardiovascular AEs was significantly higher in the first-generation group (20.8%) as compared to the second-generation group (6.3%). However, there was a higher incidence of hematologic/oncologic and gastrointestinal side effects in the second-generation group compared to the first (62.3% compared to 39.2% and 36.9% compared to 28.9%). The number of Grade 5 cardiovascular events (death) was same in the first-generation group compared to the second generation. Further research is needed to develop highly selective BTK inhibitors to avoid unwanted AEs by minimizing off-targets.

Partial In-Stent Thrombosis After Iliac Vein Stenting in Non-Thrombotic Vein Lesions.

OBJECTIVE: Iliac vein stenting is a safe and efficacious procedure for the correction of iliac vein stenosis. One of its known major complications is complete iliac vein stent thrombosis. However, we have noticed in our practice that a number of patients developed only early partial in-stent (<60%) thrombosis, within the first 30 days. In order to try to learn more about these lesions, we reviewed the data for possible causes of these lesions. MATERIALS/METHODS: From September 2012 to August 2018, we obtained 3518 iliac vein venograms using intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) for patients with venous insufficiency who failed to respond to conservative therapy. Patients were followed up with transcutaneous duplex ultrasound (DUS) every 3 months for the first year and every 6 - 12 months thereafter. Patients were prescribed clopidogrel for 3 months or were told to continue their pre-existing anticoagulants. RESULTS: There were 2234 women and 1284 men who received an iliac vein stent. The mean age was 65.7 ±14 years. Mean follow-up for this cohort was 17 months. Of 74 patients developed a full thrombosis, 38 developed a partial venous thrombosis and 3406 developed no thrombosis. When comparing those who developed a partial thrombus versus those who developed no thrombus/full thrombus, overall age, laterality, CEAP, gender, and whether the patient received clopidogrel prior to the procedure and after the procedure were not found to be statistically significant factors. However, patients with an ASA score of 2 or 3,were found to be at a higher risk of developing a partial thrombus(P = 0.0223) compared to those who had an ASA score of 1 or 4. CEAP Scores and ASA class breakdown can be seen in Table 1 and Table 2, respectively. Of the 38 partial venous thrombosis that developed,18 completely resolved within the first 3 months after the procedure and 20 remained chronic past 3 months after the procedure. Patients with partial venous thrombosis were asymptomatic upon clinical presentation, and none developed post thrombotic syndrome (PTS) or pulmonary embolism (PE). Male gender was associated with partial thrombus resolution(P = 0.0036) CONCLUSIONS: Patients with ASA scores of 2 or 3, seemed to be at a higher risk of developing a partial thrombus when compared to patients with ASA score of 1 or 4. Male gender was associated with partial thrombus resolution. All other factors appear to not be statistically significant in impacting the development of a partial thrombus. This has been the first attempt to look at this new clinical entity.

Fast-track thrombolysis protocol for acute limb ischemia.

OBJECTIVE: Catheter-directed thrombolysis in the treatment of acute lower extremity arterial occlusions often requires several interventional sessions to generate successful outcomes. It is typically an expensive procedure, necessitating extended hospital length of stay (LOS) that may be associated with an increase in both local and systemic hemorrhagic complications. Five years ago, we created the fast-track thrombolysis protocol for arteries (FTTP-A) to deal with these concerns. The goal of our protocol is to re-establish patency during the first session of thrombolysis, thus decreasing costs and complications associated with prolonged periods of thrombolytic exposure. METHODS: A retrospective study of 42 patients who were treated for acute limb ischemia at our institution by FTTP-A from January 2014 to February 2019 was performed. FTTP-A includes periadventitial lidocaine injection at the arterial puncture site under ultrasound guidance, contrast arteriography of the entire targeted segment, pharmacomechanical rheolytic thrombectomy of the occluded arterial segment, tissue plasminogen activator infusion along the occluded segment, balloon maceration of the thrombus, and (if deemed necessary) placement of a stent in an area of significant (≥30%) stenosis that is refractory to balloon angioplasty and thrombolysis. After the stenosis or thrombus is cleared, patients are prescribed an oral anticoagulant agent. RESULTS: Primary FTTP-A (50 total interventions) was performed in 42 patients. The median age of patients was 67.2 ± 12.2 years (range, 41-98 years), and 54.8% were male; 59.5% of the procedures were performed on the left lower extremity. Initial arterial access was obtained through the common femoral artery in 39 of 42 cases (92.9%); in the remaining 3 cases, it was obtained in a left bypass access site, a right femoral-popliteal graft, and a right femoral-femoral graft. The mean operative time was 148.9 ± 62.9 minutes (range, 83-313 minutes), and the mean volume of tissue plasminogen activator infused was 9.7 ± 4.0 mg (range, 2-20 mg). The median cost including medications and interventional tools was $4673.19 per procedure. The mean postoperative LOS was 3.1 ± 4.5 days (range, 1-25 days). Median postoperative LOS was 1 day. Mean postoperative follow-up was 27 ± 19.2 months (range, 0-62 months). Single-session FTTP-A was successful in 81% (n = 34/42) of patients; the remaining 8 patients (19%) required a single additional session. Of the 42 patients, 34 (81%) required arterial stenting. Periprocedural complications consisted of one patient with hematuria, which resolved, and one patient with thrombocytopenia, which resolved. No patients experienced rethrombosis within 30 days of FTTP-A. During the 5-year study period, there was no significant local or systemic hemorrhage, limb loss, or mortality related to this protocol. CONCLUSIONS: FTTP-A appears to be a safe, efficacious, and cost-effective procedure in the resolution of acute lower extremity arterial occlusions.

Physician impact on use of fluoroscopy during endovascular procedures to improve radiation safety.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether differences exist in fluoroscopy time and radiation exposure during lower extremity endovascular procedures performed by fellowship trained vascular surgeons vs general surgeons, to minimize radiation exposure to operating room staff. METHODS: A retrospective review of all lower extremity endovascular procedures was performed from August 1, 2014, to January 29, 2016. The procedures were performed by the surgical department's four surgeons with endovascular privileges: two vascular surgeons and two general surgeons. Only procedures involving lower extremity arterial angiograms with balloon angioplasty, stenting, or atherectomy were included. The operative records were reviewed for each case. The total fluoroscopy time and total radiation dose for each procedure were recorded. Procedures were grouped according to the number of endovascular interventions as one to two interventions, three to four interventions, and five or more interventions performed. Statistical analysis was performed with a P value of less than .05 considered significant. RESULTS: About 271 lower extremity endovascular procedures were performed during the study period by 4 surgeons. The average age of the patient population was 70 years. The total number of procedures performed over the study period were 112, 45, 91, and 25 for surgeons 1 through 4, respectively. On average, 3.24 interventions were performed during each procedure. Vascular surgeons were found to have shorter fluoroscopy time for procedures involving one to two (7.8 vs 30.1; P < .01), three to four (9.3 vs 34.2; P < .01), and five or more (11.5 vs 51.9; P < .01) interventions. Vascular surgeons were also found to have less radiation exposure compared with general surgeons in procedures with one to two (1.69 vs 3.53; P = .001) and five or more (2.3 vs 5.4; P = .003) interventions. There was no significant difference in radiation exposure between vascular and general surgeons for procedures with three to four interventions (5.86 vs 5.59; P = .95). CONCLUSIONS: In this small series at our institution, lower extremity endovascular procedures performed by specialty trained vascular surgeons were associated with both decreased operative fluoroscopy time and decreased radiation exposure when compared with general surgeons.

Safety of vascular interventions performed in an office-based laboratory in patients with low/moderate procedural risk.

OBJECTIVE: An exponential increase in number of office-based laboratories (OBLs) has occurred in the United States, since the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services increased reimbursement for outpatient vascular interventions in 2008. This dramatic shift to office-based procedures directed to the objective to assess safety of vascular procedures in OBLs. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed to include all procedures performed over a 4-year period at an accredited OBL. The procedures were categorized into groups for analysis; group I, venous procedures; group II, arterial; group III, arteriovenous; and group IV, inferior vena cava filter placement procedures. Local anesthesia, analgesics, and conscious sedation were used in all interventions, individualized to the patient and procedure performed. Arterial closures devices were used in all arterial interventions. Patient selection for procedure at OBL was highly selective to include only patients with low/moderate procedural risk. RESULTS: Nearly 6201 procedures were performed in 2779 patients from 2011 to 2015. The mean age of the study population was 66.5 ± 13.31 years. There were 1852 females (67%) and 928 males (33%). In group I, 5783 venous procedures were performed (3491 vein ablation, 2292 iliac vein stenting); with group II, 238 arterial procedures (125 femoral/popliteal, 71 infrapopliteal, iliac 42); group III, 129 arteriovenous accesses; and group IV, 51 inferior vena cava filter placements. The majority of procedures belonged to American Society of Anesthesiology class II with venous (61%) and arterial (74%) disease. A total of 5% patients were deemed American Society of Anesthesiology class IV (all on hemodialysis). There was no OBL mortality, major bleed, acute limb ischemia, myocardial infarction, stroke, or hospital transfer within 72 hours. Minor complications occurred in 14 patients (0.5%). Thirty-day mortality, unrelated to the procedure, was noted in 9 patients (0.32%). No statistically significant differences were noted in outcomes between the four groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that it is safe to use OBL for minimally invasive, noncomplex vascular interventions in patients with a low to moderate cardiovascular procedural risk.

Early vascular surgery response to the COVID-19 pandemic: Results of a nationwide survey.

OBJECTIVE: The COVID-19 pandemic has had major implications for the United States health care system. This survey study sought to identify practice changes, to understand current personal protective equipment (PPE) use, and to determine how caring for patients with COVID-19 differs for vascular surgeons practicing in states with high COVID-19 case numbers vs in states with low case numbers. METHODS: A 14-question online survey regarding the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on vascular surgeons' current practice was sent to 365 vascular surgeons across the country through REDCap from April 14 to April 21, 2020, with responses closed on April 23, 2020. The survey response was analyzed with descriptive statistics. Further analyses were performed to evaluate whether responses from states with the highest number of COVID-19 cases (New York, New Jersey, Massachusetts, Pennsylvania, and California) differed from those with lower case numbers (all other states). RESULTS: A total of 121 vascular surgeons responded (30.6%) to the survey. All high-volume states were represented. The majority of vascular surgeons are reusing PPE. The majority of respondents worked in an academic setting (81.5%) and were performing only urgent and emergent cases (80.5%) during preparation for the surge. This did not differ between states with high and low COVID-19 case volumes (P = .285). States with high case volume were less likely to perform a lower extremity intervention for critical limb ischemia (60.8% vs 77.5%; P = .046), but otherwise case types did not differ. Most attending vascular surgeons worked with residents (90.8%) and limited their exposure to procedures on suspected or confirmed COVID-19 cases (56.0%). Thirty-eight percent of attending vascular surgeons have been redeployed within the hospital to a vascular access service or other service outside of vascular surgery. This was more frequent in states with high case volume compared with low case volume (P = .039). The majority of vascular surgeons are reusing PPE (71.4%) and N95 masks (86.4%), and 21% of vascular surgeons think that they do not have adequate PPE to perform their clinical duties. CONCLUSIONS: The initial response to the COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in reduced elective cases, with primarily only urgent and emergent cases being performed. A minority of vascular surgeons have been redeployed outside of their specialty; however, this is more common among states with high case numbers. Adequate PPE remains an issue for almost a quarter of vascular surgeons who responded to this survey.

Prinzmetal-Like Acute Limb Ischemia.

Vasospasm-induced acute limb ischemia (ALI), also known as vasospastic limb ischemia (VLI), is a rare, underreported vascular event. Unlike thrombotic and embolic occlusive etiologies, which often warrant revascularization, vasospasm is a transient phenomenon that may be successfully managed conservatively without surgical intervention. Thus, prompt recognition and accurate diagnosis of VLI is imperative to avoid unnecessary surgical or endovascular procedures. This diagnosis, however, can pose as a challenge for clinicians, as it can present with clinical signs and symptoms near-identical to the presentation of thrombotic-induced ALI. In this report, we present a patient that experienced 2 vasospasm-induced ischemic events; the patient developed Rutherford IIb acute limb-threatening ischemia following cardiac catheterization for myocardial infarction. Computer tomography angiography findings of her right leg revealed acute occlusion suggesting the need for immediate operative intervention for limb salvage. However, due to her critical state, she instead was managed with medical treatments. Despite no intervention, the patient had full resolution of her right leg symptoms. We present this case to highlight the unusual multifocality of vasospastic events and to increase awareness of the diagnostic challenges associated with VLI.

Dyeless iliac vein stenting.

OBJECTIVE: Iliac vein stenting is increasingly being explored for the treatment of chronic venous insufficiency. While venography is considered the gold standard for assessing iliac veins, some have proposed that intravascular ultrasound should be utilized instead due to its greater sensitivity at detecting stenotic lesions. Routinely, our service uses both intravascular ultrasound and venography, but we have noted that some patients cannot tolerate dye due to allergy, renal insufficiency, or deemed high-risk by the interventionalist due to uncontrolled medical co-morbidities. This study aimed to investigate whether forgoing dye had an impact on iliac vein stent thrombosis. METHODS: From 2012 to 2016, 1482 iliac vein procedures (91 intravascular ultrasound-only and 1391 intravascular ultrasound plus venography) were performed on 992 patients who failed conservative treatment for chronic venous insufficiency. Our mean patient age was 65.8 years (range 21-99; SD ± 14.3) with 347 male and 645 female patients. The clinical presenting symptoms per clinical-etiology-anatomy-pathophysiology classification for the intravascular ultrasound-only cohort were C1:0, C2:3, C3:31, C433, C5:5, C6:20 and for the intravascular ultrasound plus venography cohort were C1:0, C2:24, C3:566, C4:583, C5:30, C6:188. Stent thrombi that developed within or at 30 days of stenting were categorized as early and greater than 30 days as late. Transcutaneous duplex ultrasound classified stent thrombi as either partial or occlusive. Our average follow-up time was 19.4 months (0-42, SD ± 12.5). RESULTS: A total of 2.2% intravascular ultrasound-only patients versus 2.75% intravascular ultrasound plus venogram patients developed early stent thrombosis, p = 0.35. Early partial stent thrombosis occurred in 1.1% of the intravascular ultrasound-only group versus 2.6% of the intravascular ultrasound plus venogram group, p = 0.38. Early occlusive stent thromboses occurred in 1.1% of intravascular ultrasound-only patients and 0.15% of intravascular ultrasound plus venogram patients, p = 0.06. Late stent thromboses developed in 4% of patients in the intravascular ultrasound-only cohort and 4% in the intravascular ultrasound plus venogram cohort, p = 0.97. Late partial stent thromboses occurred in 2.7% of intravascular ultrasound-only patients versus 2.6% in intravascular ultrasound plus venogram patients, p = 0.99. Late occlusive stent thromboses occurred in 1.3% of intravascular ultrasound-only patients versus 1.4% of intravascular ultrasound plus venogram patients, p = 0.95. Moreover, the formation of any stent was 6.2% in the intravascular ultrasound-only versus 6.75% in the intravascular ultrasound plus venogram group, p = 0.55. CONCLUSION: Results of our study show no significant difference in stent thrombosis between the intravascular ultrasound-only and intravascular ultrasound plus venogram cohorts. This concludes that using intravascular ultrasound alone is safe for iliac vein stenting.

A systematic review of the diagnosis, management, and outcomes of true profunda femoris artery aneurysm.

OBJECTIVE: True profunda femoris artery aneurysm (TPFAA) is rare. Most cases of profunda femoris artery aneurysm are classified as pseudoaneurysms. TPFAAs are mostly asymptomatic, but some are manifested with pain, swelling, paresthesia, gait and movement disturbances, thrombosis, and rupture. There is a paucity of evidence on the effectiveness of diagnostic and therapeutic measures for management of TPFAA. The aim of this paper was to systematically review the incidence, diagnosis, and management of TPFAA. METHODS: A comprehensive systematic review on the diagnosis and management of TPFAAs was conducted by a search through PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, and Google Scholar databases to identify and to evaluate publications on TPFAA since 2012. Only publications on TPFAA were included in this review. RESULTS: A total of 19 publications published from 2012 were included in the review. The studies were 18 case reports and a cadaver study reporting 27 TPFAAs in 26 patients with a mean age of 69.6 years. Rupture was reported in 18.5% of the cases (n = 5); the conventional clinical presentation of unruptured TPFAA was reported in 48% of cases (n = 13), with 40.9% of unruptured aneurysms being asymptomatic (n = 9). Computed tomography angiography was used as a diagnostic tool in 85.2% of the cases (n = 23); Doppler ultrasound was applied in 33.3% of cases (n = 9). The common therapeutic approaches were resection and revascularization (n = 13 [48.1%]) and ligation or resection without reconstruction (n = 6 [22.2%]). Cumulative analysis for cases reported before and after 2012 yielded similar results. CONCLUSIONS: Review of the current literature supports that computed tomography angiography and Doppler ultrasound are the mainstay diagnostic approaches for TPFAA. Surgical repair through ligation, resection, and revascularization remains the most common and effective therapeutic procedure. Endovascular embolization is recommended for aneurysms when surgery is not tenable because of the patient's comorbidities and the aneurysm's anatomy.

Open, percutaneous, and hybrid deep venous arterialization technique for no-option foot salvage.

OBJECTIVE: Deep venous arterialization (DVA) is a technique aimed at providing an option for chronic limb-threatening ischemia patients with no options except amputation. In patients with no outflow distal targets permitting bypass, DVA involves creating a connection between a proximal arterial inflow and a distal venous outflow in conjunction with disruption of the vein valves in the foot. This permits blood flow to reach the foot and potentially to resolve rest pain or to assist in healing of a chronic wound. We aimed to provide an up-to-date review of DVA indications; to describe the open, percutaneous, and hybrid technique; to detail outcomes of each of the available techniques; and to relay the postoperative considerations for the DVA approach. METHODS: A literature review of relevant articles containing all permutations of the terms "deep venous arterialization" and "distal venous arterialization" was undertaken with the MEDLINE, Cochrane, and PubMed databases to find cases of open, percutaneous, and hybrid DVA in the peer-reviewed literature. The free text and Medical Subject Headings search terms included were "ischemia," "lower extremity," "venous arterialization," "arteriovenous reversal," and "lower limb salvage." Studies were primarily retrospective case series but did include two studies with matched controls. Recorded primary outcomes were patency, limb salvage, wound healing, amputation, and resolution of rest pain, with secondary outcomes of complication and overall mortality. Studies were excluded if there was insufficient discussion of technical details (graft type, target vein) or lack of reported outcome measure. RESULTS: Studies that met inclusion criteria (12 open, 3 percutaneous, 2 hybrid) were identified, reviewed, and summarized to compare technique, patient selection, and outcomes between open, percutaneous, and hybrid DVA. For open procedures, 1-year primary patency ranged from 44.4% to 87.5%; secondary patency was less reported but ranged from 55.6% at 1 year to 72% at 25-month follow-up. Limb salvage rates ranged from 25% to 100%, wound healing occurred in 28.6% to 100% of cases, and rest pain resolved in 11.9% to 100% across cohorts. For the endovascular approach, primary patency ranged from 28.6% to 40% at 6-month and 10-month follow-up. Limb salvage rates ranged from 60% to 71%, with rates of major amputation ranging from 20% to 28.5%. CONCLUSIONS: This review provides an up-to-date review of DVA indications, description of various DVA techniques, patient selection associated with each approach, and outcomes for each technique.

Iliac Vein Stent Placement and the Iliocaval Confluence.

OBJECTIVE: Prior literature has recommended routine iliac vein stent extension into the inferior vena cava (IVC) to assure adequate outflow for iliac vein stenting procedures. Our bias was that only the lesion should be stented without routine stent extension up to the IVC. We report our experience with this limited stenting technique. METHODS: From 2012 to 2015, 844 patients (1,216 limbs) underwent iliac vein stenting for nonthrombotic iliac vein lesions (NIVLs). All limbs were evaluated in accordance with the presenting sign of the Clinical-Etiology-Anatomy-Pathophysiology (CEAP) score, and duplex scans and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) showing more than 50% cross-sectional area or diameter reduction. All study patients had failed 3 months of conservative management. The procedures of iliac vein stenting were all office based. Two techniques were compared: (1) placement of the iliac vein stent to cover the lesion and terminating cephalad into the IVC if the lesion involved the common iliac vein and (2) placement of the iliac vein stent to cover the lesion only and not passing the iliocaval confluence if the lesion only involved the external iliac vein. Complications were assessed during 30-day follow-up using the duplex scan technique to look for thrombosis. RESULTS: Of the total 844 patients, 543 (64%) were women. The average age was 66 (±14.2) years (range, 21-99 years). The stent was placed in the left lower limb in 474 patients and bilaterally in 370 patients. The presenting sign in accordance with the CEAP classification was C3 = 626, C4 = 404, C5 = 44, and C6 = 141. The average iliac vein stenosis by IVUS was 62% (±12% standard deviation [SD]). We had 715 patients with the iliac vein stent extending into the IVC, and of these, 8 patients had thrombosis within 30 days after the procedure. On the other hand, 501 patients had the iliac vein stent without crossing the iliocaval confluence, and of these, 4 patients had thrombosis within 30 days of the procedure. There was no difference between these 2 groups in regard to gender (P = 0.1) or age (P = 0.3). Laterality was statistically different (P < 0.0001) with more stents to be extended into the IVC if the lesion is in the left lower limb. Comparing these 2 groups in regard to 30-day thrombosis as a complication was not statistically significant (P = 0.6). There was no statistical difference between the 2 groups in regard to the presenting sign CEAP (P = 0.6). CONCLUSIONS: These results question the need for routine iliac vein stent extension into the IVC in patients with NIVLs. We were not able to demonstrate a significant risk of thrombosis with just placing the stent to cover the lesion only with short-term follow-up.

Compartment Syndrome of the Leg after Intraosseous (IO) Needle Insertion.

Intraosseous (IO) needles are used in patients who are critically ill when it is not possible to obtain venous access. While IO allows for immediate access, IO infusions are associated with complications including fractures, infections, and compartment syndrome. We present a case of an 87-year-old man who developed lower extremity compartment syndrome after receiving an IO needle insertion and had to be treated surgically with fasciotomy to correct the problem.

Radiofrequency Ablation Increases the Incidence of Endothermal Heat-Induced Thrombosis.

BACKGROUND: Endovenous thermal ablation has become the procedure of choice in the treatment of superficial venous reflux disease. The current armamentarium of devices and techniques aimed at the elimination of saphenous reflux offers surgeons and interventionalists a variety of treatment options; however, there is a lack of data comparing the safety of these products. The most concerning complication after endovenous thermal ablation is endothermal heat-induced thrombosis (EHIT) due to the risk of progression to deep venous thrombosis. This study aimed to compare the incidence rate of EHIT between radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and endovenous laser therapy (EVLT). METHODS: This was a single-center, office-based, retrospective study over the course of 5 years, in which 3,218 consecutive patients underwent 10,029 endovenous saphenous ablations. The patient cohort was 66.2% female, with an average age of 61.9 years. At the time of each individual intervention, 24, 212, 3,620, 4,806, 200, and 1,167 patients had Clinical-Etiology-Anatomy-Pathophysiology disease 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6, respectively. RESULTS: There was a total of 3,983 EVLT and 6,091 RFA procedures. The most common vessel treated was the great saphenous vein, 63.6% of the time, followed by the small saphenous vein (25.6%), accessory saphenous vein (6.1%), and perforator vein (4.6%). There were 186 cases of EHIT, with 137 (73.6%) identified as type 1 as per the Kabnick classification. Endovenous ablation performed via RFA resulted in significantly more cases of EHIT than of EVLT (109 vs. 77; P = 0.034; odds ratio = 1.52), which was confirmed by a multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: In the largest single-center study of endovenous saphenous ablations to date, RFA was shown to pose a significantly higher risk of EHIT than of EVLT.

Trends and Determinants of Readmissions to Another Facility After Endovascular Aortic Repair.

BACKGROUND: Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) has become the procedure of choice for abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs). It has been previously reported that significant percentage of patients were being readmitted to another hospital after complications after EVAR. We aimed to evaluate trends and clinical predictors of readmission to another (secondary) hospital after index EVAR. METHODS: The Nationwide Readmissions Database (NRD) was queried for all 30-day readmissions after an index EVAR procedure from 2012 to 2014. Readmission diagnosis, patient demographics, and hospital characteristics were collected regarding those patients who were admitted to another care facility after EVAR. Univariate analysis and multivariable logistic regression model was used to identify predictors for readmission to a different hospital. RESULTS: Between 2012 and 2014, 3,215 patients were readmitted to another hospital within 30 days of their index EVAR constituting 22.8% of a total 14,073 readmissions during that time period. Comorbidities of patients examined were similar between those patients readmitted to the primary hospital versus the secondary hospital except for the incidence of hypothyroidism (P < 0.001). Higher proportion of patients admitted to a different hospital had Medicare and Medicaid insurance (P < 0.047). In addition, higher proportion of patients readmitted to secondary hospitals had EVAR performed at smaller (<100 beds) hospitals (P = 0.002). Univariate analysis demonstrated that patients readmitted to another hospital were slightly older and had higher index length of stay and higher index hospital cost after EVAR (P < 0.001). In a multivariate model, index EVAR at a small hospital (odds ratio [OR]: 1.7) and the diagnosis of hypothyroidism (OR: 1.54) were independent determinants of readmission to another care facility. CONCLUSIONS: Significant proportion of patients is being readmitted elsewhere after elective EVAR adding complexity to the determination of appropriate healthcare resource allocation. In our study, index EVAR at a small hospital (<100 beds) and pre-existing medical comorbidity of hypothyroidism were significant predictors for unanticipated readmission to a different hospital.

Early Results of Duplex-Guided Transradial Artery Fistuloplasties.

BACKGROUND: Although arteriovenous fistulae (AVFs) are the preferred mode of hemodialysis access because of their high patency rates, they are associated with an appreciable rate of nonmaturation. Balloon-assisted maturation (BAM) has been described to treat this issue. BAM is defined as repeated sequential graduated dilatation of the outflow vein. This study aims to evaluate the short-term complications of using the radial artery as an access for BAM procedures and fisutloplasties. Transradial access was used preferentially with multiple lesions in the AVF that were difficult to access with a single venous puncture. METHODS: Data were collected over 3 years on 44 office-based duplex-guided transradial access BAM procedures in 27 patients of whom 19 were men. BAM with ultrasound guidance was performed in 324 cases using a venous puncture during this period. The indication for the procedures was a failure of AVF maturation, and 5 cases were with short segment thrombectomy. All procedures were performed with local anesthesia only. Access site puncture, vessel cannulation, wire placement, and balloon advancement and insufflation were duplex-guided. The radial artery was punctured with ultrasound guidance and a 4-5 French low-profile sheath was placed. After crossing the lesion(s), 5,000 units of heparin was given. The radial artery was used as the access vessel for all procedures except one, in which the brachial artery was used in addition. Vascular injuries were classified based on the postprocedural duplex assessment. All patients had follow-up duplex scans within a week. RESULTS: The average age was 79 years (±14 SD, range 39-99 years). The types of AVF were 35 radio-cephalic, 1 radio-basilic, 2 brachio-brachial, 2 brachio-cephalic, and 4 brachio-basilic. The number of sites of lesions was 17 on the venous outflow, 7 perianastomotic, and 6 in the radial artery. In the remaining 14 failing AVFs, we were not able to identify any lesion. The balloon size ranged from 3-6 mm (28 patients) and 7-12 mm (16 patients). The most common injury was outflow vein wall injury (25), the formation of wall hematoma of the outflow vein (11), localized extravasation or rupture at the balloon site (4), spasm of the AVF (3), the formation of a puncture-site hematoma (2), and intimal flap (3). Extravasation was controlled with duplex-guided compression. There were no radial artery thromboses, and all the AVFs were patent on completion duplex and follow-up duplex. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that the radial artery could be used as a safe access route for BAM procedures with relatively low rates of complication. This approach can be considered as an adjunct in the armamentarium for angioplasty of AVF.

Recanalization After Endovenous Thermal Ablation.

BACKGROUND: Endovenous thermal ablation in the form of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) or endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) has quickly ascended to a prime position in the treatment of venous insufficiency. Although there are good data examining the rates of thrombotic complications, there is a relative paucity of data examining the recanalization rates after endovenous thermal ablation (ETA). METHODS: Data analysis was performed for 1475 thermal ablations in 485 patients from 2012 to 2015 as a retrospective chart review. RFA was performed in 1027 patients and EVLA in 448 patients. The target veins included the great saphenous vein (GSV) (778), short saphenous vein (SSV) (401), accessory saphenous vein (ASV) (140), and perforator veins (PV) (156). Data were collected from follow-up visit within 1 week of procedure, every 3 months for the first year, and every 6 months thereafter. Recurrence was defined as >500 ms for the GSV, SSV, and ASV and as >350 ms for the PV. Data for recanalization were also correlated with age, gender, laterality, presenting symptoms, and treated targeted vein. RESULTS: The average age of the study population was 64.7 years (SD ± 15.6) with 66% women and 326 bilateral veins. At 1-week follow-up, women (2.6%) had higher recanalization rate (P = 0.018). Failure rate of obliteration for GSV and SSV were 0.8% and 0.8%, respectively (P = 0.98). PV had the highest failure rate (16.6%), followed by ASV (2.9%) (P < 0.001). At mean follow-up after 13.5 ± 12 months, PV (41.2%) and ASV (14.85) had higher recanalization rate than GSV (7.7%) and SSV (8.5%) (P < 0.001). Excluding PVs, no difference with recurrence rates between RFA (10%) and EVLA (8.8%) was observed at 1-week and 1-year follow-ups (P = 0.54). Also, 56% of patients with recanalization were symptomatic. Among these 1475 procedures, redo for recurrent symptoms were performed in 76. At 1 week, there was no difference between nonrepeated (92.7%) and repeated procedures (89.5%) (P = 0.41). However, 1 year later, there was significant difference between obliteration rate in nonrepeated (86.9%) and repeated (76.3%) procedures (P = 0.014). CONCLUSIONS: These data do suggest low overall rates of recanalization after thermal ablation of the GSV and SSV. However, at 1-year follow-up, accessory veins had almost twice the recurrence rate as compared with GSV and SSV, and PV had almost 5 times the recurrence rate. There was no significant difference between RFA and EVLA in recanalization rates. Redo procedures in recanalized veins after venous ablation are effective with a success rate at 76.5%.