Pharmacokinetics and safety of evogliptin in hepatically impaired patients.

AIMS: Evogliptin is a potent and selective dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor for glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Since evogliptin is mainly eliminated through hepatic metabolism, we investigated the pharmacokinetics (PKs) and safety characteristics of evogliptin in Korean patients with mild or moderate hepatic impairment. METHODS: An open-label, parallel-group study was conducted in patients with mild or moderate hepatic impairment and healthy control subjects matched to each patient for sex, age and body mass index. A single dose (5 mg) of evogliptin was administered orally, and serial blood samples were collected over 120 h to assess the PK profile of evogliptin and its main metabolites (M7 and M8). RESULTS: Patients with mild hepatic impairment and their matched healthy controls showed similar maximum concentration (Cmax ) and area under the concentration-time curve values from 0 to 120 h (AUClast ); the geometric mean ratio (GMR) and 90% confidence interval (CI) were 1.04 (0.80, 1.35) and 1.01 (0.90, 1.14), respectively. Exposure to evogliptin (Cmax and AUClast ) was increased by about 40% in patients with moderate hepatic impairment-the GMR and 90% CI were 1.37 (1.09, 1.72) and 1.44 (1.18, 1.75), respectively. The metabolic ratios of M7 and M8 were lower in patients with moderate hepatic impairment than in matched healthy controls. Evogliptin was well tolerated by both patients and healthy subjects. CONCLUSION: Although evogliptin exposure was increased in patients with moderate hepatic impairment, the increase is unlikely to affect safety and efficacy adversely, and no dose adjustment is warranted.

Dose Optimization of Cefpirome Based on Population Pharmacokinetics and Target Attainment during Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.

To obtain the optimal dosage regimen in patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), we developed a population pharmacokinetics model for cefpirome and performed pharmacodynamic analyses. This prospective study included 15 patients treated with cefpirome during ECMO. Blood samples were collected during ECMO (ECMO-ON) and after ECMO (ECMO-OFF) at predose and 0.5 to 1, 2 to 3, 4 to 6, 8 to 10, and 12 h after cefpirome administration. The population pharmacokinetic model was developed using nonlinear mixed effects modeling and stepwise covariate modeling. Monte Carlo simulation was used to assess the probability of target attainment (PTA) and cumulative fraction of response (CFR) according to the MIC distribution. Cefpirome pharmacokinetics were best described by a two-compartment model. Covariate analysis indicated that serum creatinine concentration (SCr) was negatively correlated with clearance, and the presence of ECMO increased clearance and the central volume of distribution. The simulations showed that patients with low SCr during ECMO-ON had lower PTA than patients with high SCr during ECMO-OFF; so, a higher dosage of cefpirome was required. Cefpirome of 2 g every 8 h for intravenous bolus injection or 2 g every 12 h for extended infusion over 4 h was recommended with normal kidney function receiving ECMO. We established a population pharmacokinetic model for cefpirome in patients with ECMO, and appropriate cefpirome dosage regimens were recommended. The impact of ECMO could be due to the change in patient status on consideration of the small population and uncertainty in covariate relationships. Dose optimization of cefpirome may improve treatment success and survival in patients receiving ECMO. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under identifier NCT02581280.).

Population pharmacokinetics of intravenous sufentanil in critically ill patients supported with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation therapy.

BACKGROUND: Sufentanil is commonly used for analgesia and sedation during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Both ECMO and the pathophysiological changes derived from critical illness have significant effects on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of drugs, yet reports of ECMO and sufentanil PK are scarce. Here, we aimed to develop a population PK model of sufentanil in ECMO patients and to suggest dosing recommendations. METHODS: This prospective cohort PK study included 20 patients who received sufentanil during venoarterial ECMO (VA-ECMO). Blood samples were collected for 96 h during infusion and 72 h after cessation of sufentanil. A population PK model was developed using nonlinear mixed effects modelling. Monte Carlo simulations were performed using the final PK parameters with two typical doses. RESULTS: A two-compartment model best described the PK of sufentanil. In our final model, increased volume of distribution and decreased values for clearance were reported compared with previous PK data from non-ECMO patients. Covariate analysis showed that body temperature and total plasma protein level correlated positively with systemic clearance (CL) and peripheral volume of distribution (V2), respectively, and improved the model. The parameter estimates of the final model were as follows: CL = 37.8 × EXP (0.207 × (temperature - 36.9)) L h-1, central volume of distribution (V1) = 229 L, V2 = 1640 × (total plasma protein/4.5)2.46 L, and intercompartmental clearance (Q) = 41 L h-1. Based on Monte Carlo simulation results, an infusion of 17.5 µg h-1 seems to reach target sufentanil concentration (0.3-0.6 µg L-1) in most ECMO patients except hypothermic patients (33 °C). In hypothermic patients, over-sedation, which could induce respiratory depression, needs to be monitored especially when their total plasma protein level is low. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first report on a population PK model of sufentanil in ECMO patients. Our results suggest that close monitoring of the body temperature and total plasma protein level is crucial in ECMO patients who receive sufentanil to provide effective analgesia and sedation and promote recovery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02581280 , December 1st, 2014.

A comparison of patients' and pharmacists' satisfaction with medication counseling provided by community pharmacies: a cross-sectional survey.

BACKGROUND: Medication counseling is a critical component of pharmaceutical care to promote the safe and effective use of medications and to maximize therapeutic outcomes. The assessment of patients' and pharmacists' satisfaction with medication counseling services could be one of the vital parameters for predicting the quality of pharmacy services. No study has measured and compared both patients' and pharmacists' satisfaction with medication counseling. The objectives of this study were to describe and compare patients' and pharmacists' levels of satisfaction with medication counseling services offered by community pharmacists in South Korea. METHODS: This was a descriptive, cross-sectional survey. The online survey was distributed to patients and community pharmacists using a structured questionnaire. The questionnaires consisted of 4 main areas: (1) responders' characteristics (2) current state of medication counseling methods provided by community pharmacies (3) overall satisfaction with medication counseling (4) demand for the development of medication counseling standards. A comparison between patients and pharmacists was made using either a chi-square test or a Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: Between June 13, 2014 and July 15, 2014, a total of 252 patients and 620 pharmacists completed the survey. It was found that 47.3% of pharmacists and 34.0% of patients were satisfied with the current medication counseling service. Pharmacists showed a higher degree of satisfaction with the medication counseling service compared to patients (p <0.05). A major reason for patients not being satisfied with the medication counseling from community pharmacists was the insufficient time spent on counseling (51.2%). The pharmacists' perception of a major barrier to providing appropriate medication counseling for patients was the lack of time (24.3%). Moreover, a substantial number of patients (88%) and pharmacists (73%) supported the development of medication counseling standards to improve community pharmacist counseling services (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that both patients and pharmacists have low levels of satisfaction with the current medication counseling service offered by community pharmacists. This study provides baseline data for the development of national guidelines for medication counseling by pharmacists.

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic drug-drug interactions between evogliptin and empagliflozin or dapagliflozin in healthy male volunteers.

Evogliptin (EV) is a novel dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor (DPP4i) for glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). This study evaluated the pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) interactions between EV and sodium glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) in healthy volunteers since combination therapy of DPP4i and SGLT2i has been considered as an effective option for T2DM treatment. A randomized, open-label, multiple-dose, two-arm, three-period, three treatments, two-sequence crossover study was conducted in healthy Korean volunteers. In arm 1, subjects were administered 5 mg of EV once daily for 7 days, 25 mg of empagliflozin (EP) once daily for 5 days, and the combination once daily for 5 days (EV + EP). In arm 2, subjects were administered 5 mg of EV once daily for 7 days, 10 mg of dapagliflozin (DP) once daily for 5 days, and the combination once daily for 5 days (EV + DP). Serial blood samples were collected for PK analysis, and oral glucose tolerance tests were conducted for PD analysis. In each arm, a total of 18 subjects completed the study. All adverse events (AEs) were mild with no serious AEs. The geometric mean ratio and confidence interval of the main PK parameters (maximum concentration of the drug in plasma at steady state and area under the plasma drug concentration-time curve within a dosing interval at a steady state) between EV and either EP or DP alone were not significantly altered by co-administration. Administration of EV + EP or EV + DP did not result in significant PD changes, as determined by the glucose-lowering effect. Administration of EV + EP or EV + DP had no significant effects on the PK profiles of each drug. All treatments were well-tolerated.

Evaluation of pharmacokinetic interactions between lobeglitazone, empagliflozin, and metformin in healthy subjects.

Concomitant administration of lobeglitazone, empagliflozin, and metformin is expected to enhance blood glucose-lowering effects and improve medication compliance in patients with diabetes mellitus. In this study, we investigated the pharmacokinetic (PK) interactions and safety of lobeglitazone and co-administered empagliflozin and metformin, which are approved agents used in clinical settings. Two randomized, open-label, multiple-dose, 2-treatment, 2-period, 2-sequence crossover clinical trials (parts 1 and 2) were conducted independently. In part 1, lobeglitazone monotherapy or lobeglitazone, empagliflozin, and metformin triple therapy was administered for 5 days. In part 2, empagliflozin and metformin dual therapy or the abovementioned triple therapy were administered for 5 days. Serial blood samples were collected up to 24 hours after the last dose in each period for PK evaluation. The primary PK parameters (AUCtau,ss, Cmax,ss) of treatment regimens in each study part were calculated and compared. For lobeglitazone, the geometric mean ratios (GMRs) with 90% confidence intervals (CI) for triple therapy over monotherapy were 1.08 (1.03-1.14) for Cmax,ss and 0.98 (0.90-1.07) for AUCtau,ss. For empagliflozin, the GMRs and 90% CIs for triple therapy over dual therapy were 0.87 (0.78-0.97) for Cmax,ss and 0.97 (0.93-1.00) for AUCtau,ss. For metformin, the GMRs and 90% CIs for triple therapy over dual therapy were 1.06 (0.95-1.17) for Cmax,ss and 1.04 (0.97-1.12) for AUCtau,ss. All reported adverse events were mild. The triple therapy consisting of lobeglitazone, empagliflozin, and metformin did not show any clinically relevant drug interactions in relation to the PKs and safety of each drug substance. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04334213.

The safety, pharmacodynamics, and pharmacokinetics of immediate-release formulation containing esomeprazole 20 mg/sodium bicarbonate 800 mg in healthy adult male.

BACKGROUND: Esomeprazole is the most effective treatment for acid-related disorders and is widely used with enteric coating due to rapid degradation in the acidic environment. However, the enteric-coated formulation delays absorption and onset of action. To overcome this limitation, an immediate-release formulation containing esomeprazole 20 mg and sodium bicarbonate 800 mg (IR-ESO) was developed. PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), and pharmacodynamics of IR-ESO compared to those of esomeprazole 20 mg (ESO). METHODS: A randomized, open-label, multiple-dose, two-treatment, two-sequence crossover study was conducted in 40 healthy male subjects. Subjects received either IR-ESO or ESO for 7 days. After single and multiple dosing, blood samples were collected for PK analysis, and intragastric pH was assessed by 24-hr pH monitoring. RESULTS: Plasma esomeprazole exposure of IR-ESO was similar to that of ESO after single and multiple dosing. Time to peak concentration of IR-ESO (0.50-0.75 hr) was shorter than that of ESO (1.25-1.50 hr). Percentage changes in 24-hr integrated gastric acidity from baseline for IR-ESO were similar to those for ESO. In addition, mean time to maintain gastric pH >4 for 24 hr was similar for both drugs (IR-ESO 55.5-69.9% vs ESO 56.8-70.2%). Evaluation of time to first reach pH 4 after dosing indicated that IR-ESO showed a faster onset than ESO. All subjects found the drug tolerable, and there were no significant differences in adverse events between two drugs. CONCLUSION: This study showed that IR-ESO produced a rapid, safe and sustained gastric acid suppression (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03211143).

Comparison of pharmacokinetics and safety of fixed-dose combination of SKI306X and aceclofenac versus separate tablets in healthy subjects.

JOINS (SKI306X) is an herbal anti-arthritic medicine that is widely used with aceclofenac for treating osteoarthritis in Korea. A fixed-dose combination (FDC) tablet containing SKI306X and aceclofenac was developed to improve patient compliance. This study aimed to compare the pharmacokinetics (PK) and safety of the FDC tablet with those of co-administered SKI306X and aceclofenac in healthy subjects. In this randomized, open-label, two-way crossover, single-dose study, the FDC tablet (SKI306X 300 mg/aceclofenac 100 mg) (test) was given or co-administration of 300 mg of SKI306X and 100 mg of aceclofenac (reference) was performed followed by a 7-day wash-out period. Blood samples were collected before and after drug administration to evaluate aceclofenac PK parameters, and safety was assessed throughout the study. A total of 54 healthy male subjects were enrolled in and completed the study. Tmax and t1/2 of aceclofenac of the FDC tablet were similar to those of aceclofenac co-administered with SKI306X (Tmax: test 2.96 h and reference 2.14 h; t1/2: test 3.46 h and reference 4.04 h). The geometric mean ratios (90% confidence intervals) of Cmax and AUClast (T/R) were 0.85 (0.81 to 0.91) and 1.03 (1.01 to 1.06) respectively; these results were within the predefined range (0.8 to 1.25). There was only one drug-related adverse event (dizziness) occurred after administration of the FDC tablet; however, it was mild in severity and resolved without any complications. The FDC tablet was well tolerated and exhibited an absorption rate and extent comparable to those of SKI306X and aceclofenac administered simultaneously.