A novel multi-modality imaging phantom for validating interstitial needle guidance for high dose rate gynecological brachytherapy.

PURPOSE: To design, manufacture, and validate a female pelvic phantom for multi-modality imaging (CT, MRI, US) to benchmark a commercial needle tracking system with application in HDR gynecological (GYN) interstitial procedures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A GYN needle-tracking phantom was designed using CAD software to model an average uterus from a previous patient study, a vaginal canal from speculum dimensions, and a rectum to accommodate a transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) probe. A target volume (CTVHR ) was designed as an extension from the cervix-uterus complex. Negative space molds were created from modeled anatomy and 3D printed. Silicone was used to cast the anatomy molds. A 3D printed box was constructed to house the manufactured anatomy for structural integrity and to accommodate the insertion of a speculum, tandem, needles, and TRUS probe. The phantom was CT-imaged to identify potential imperfections that might impact US visualization. Free-hand TRUS was used to guide interstitial needles into the phantom. The commercial tracking system was used to generate a 3D US volume. After insertion, the phantom was imaged with CT and MR and the uterus and CTVHR dimensions were verified against the CAD model. RESULTS/CONCLUSIONS: The manufactured phantom allows for accurate visualization with multiple imaging modalities and is conducive to applicator and needle insertion. The phantom dimensions from the CAD model were verified with those from each imaging modality. The phantom is low cost and can be reproducibly manufactured with the 3D printing and molding processes. Our initial experiments demonstrate the ability to integrate the phantom with a commercial tracking system for future needle tracking validation studies.

Optic disc dose reduction in ocular brachytherapy using 125 I notched COMS plaques: A simulation study based on current clinical practice.

PURPOSE: Although notched Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study (COMS) plaques have been widely used, optic disc dose reduction by notched COMS plaques has not been discussed in the literature. Therefore, this study investigated optic disc dose reduction in ocular brachytherapy using 125 I notched COMS plaques in comparison with optic disc dose for 125 I standard COMS plaques. METHODS: For this simulation study, an in-house brachytherapy dose calculation program was developed using MATLAB software by incorporating the American Association of Physicists in Medicine Task Group-43 Update (AAPM TG-43U1) dosimetry formalism with a line source approximation in a homogeneous water medium and COMS seed coordinates in the AAPM TG 129. Using this program, optic disc doses for standard COMS plaques (from 12 to 22 mm in diameter in 2 mm increments) and notched COMS plaques with one seed removed (Case #1, from 12 to 22 mm) and with two seeds removed (Case #2, from 14 to 22 mm) were calculated as a function of tumor margin-to-optic disc distance (DT) for various tumor basal dimensions (BDs) for prescription depths from 1 to 10 mm in 1 mm intervals. A dose of 85 Gy for an irradiation time of 168 h was prescribed to each prescription depth. Then absolute and relative optic disc dose reduction by notched COMS plaques (Cases #1 and #2) was calculated for all prescription depths. RESULTS: Optic disc dose reduction by notched COMS plaques (Cases #1 and #2) had five unique trends related to maximum optic disc dose reduction and corresponding optimal DT for each BD in each plaque. It increased with increasing prescription depth. CONCLUSIONS: The results presented in this study would enable the clinician to choose an adequate plaque type among standard and notched 125 I COMS plaques and a prescription depth to minimize optic disc dose.

Commissioning of a 3D image-based treatment planning system for high-dose-rate brachytherapy of cervical cancer.

The objective of this work is to present commissioning procedures to clinically implement a three-dimensional (3D), image-based, treatment-planning system (TPS) for high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy (BT) for gynecological (GYN) cancer. The physical dimensions of the GYN applicators and their values in the virtual applicator library were varied by 0.4 mm of their nominal values. Reconstruction uncertainties of the titanium tandem and ovoids (T&O) were less than 0.4 mm on CT phantom studies and on average between 0.8-1.0 mm on MRI when compared with X-rays. In-house software, HDRCalculator, was developed to check HDR plan parameters such as independently verifying active tandem or cylinder probe length and ovoid or cylinder size, source calibration and treatment date, and differences between average Point A dose and prescription dose. Dose-volume histograms were validated using another independent TPS. Comprehensive procedures to commission volume optimization algorithms and process in 3D image-based planning were presented. For the difference between line and volume optimizations, the average absolute differences as a percentage were 1.4% for total reference air KERMA (TRAK) and 1.1% for Point A dose. Volume optimization consistency tests between versions resulted in average absolute differences in 0.2% for TRAK and 0.9 s (0.2%) for total treatment time. The data revealed that the optimizer should run for at least 1 min in order to avoid more than 0.6% dwell time changes. For clinical GYN T&O cases, three different volume optimization techniques (graphical optimization, pure inverse planning, and hybrid inverse optimization) were investigated by comparing them against a conventional Point A technique. End-to-end testing was performed using a T&O phantom to ensure no errors or inconsistencies occurred from imaging through to planning and delivery. The proposed commissioning procedures provide a clinically safe implementation technique for 3D image-based TPS for HDR BT for GYN cancer.

Dosimetric evaluation of multilumen intracavitary balloon applicator rotation in high-dose-rate brachytherapy for breast cancer.

The objective of this work is to evaluate dosimetric impact of multilumen balloon applicator rotation in high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy for breast cancer. Highly asymmetrical dose distribution was generated for patients A and B, depending upon applicator proximity to skin and rib. Both skin and rib spacing was ≤ 0.7 cm for A; only rib spacing was ≤ 0.7 cm for B. Thirty-five rotation scenarios were simulated for each patient by rotating outer lumens every 10° over ± 180° range with respect to central lumen using mathematically calculated rotational matrix. Thirty-five rotated plans were compared with three plans: 1) original multidwell multilumen (MDML) plan, 2) multidwell single-lumen (MDSL) plan, and 3) single-dwell single-lumen (SDSL) plan. For plan comparison, planning target volume for evaluation (PTV_EVAL) coverage (dose to 95% and 90% volume of PTV_EVAL) (D95 and D90), skin and rib maximal dose (Dmax), and normal breast tissue volume receiving 150% (V150) and 200% (V200) of prescribed dose (PD) were evaluated. Dose variation due to device rotation ranged from -5.6% to 0.8% (A) and -6.5% to 0.2% (B) for PTV_EVAL D95; -5.2% to 0.4% (A) and -4.1% to 0.7% (B) for PTV_EVAL D90; -2.0 to 18.4% (A) and -7.8 to 17.5% (B) for skin Dmax; -11.1 to 22.8% (A) and -4.7 to 55.1% (B) of PD for rib Dmax, respectively. Normal breast tissue V150 and V200 variation was < 1.0 cc, except for -0.1 to 2.5cc (B) of V200. Furthermore, 30° device rotation increased rib Dmax over 145% of PD: 152.9% (A) by clockwise 30° rotation and 152.5% (B) by counterclockwise 30° rotation. For a highly asymmetric dose distribution, device rotation can outweigh the potential benefit of improved dose shaping capability afforded by multilumen and make dosimetric data worse than single-lumen plans unless it is properly corrected.

A practical method of estimating medium-heterogeneity corrected dose without a Monte Carlo calculation in ocular brachytherapy using 125I COMS plaques.

PURPOSE: To provide a practical method of estimating medium-heterogeneity corrected dose without a Monte Carlo (MC) calculation in ocular brachytherapy using 125I Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study (COMS) plaques. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Using egs_brachy, MC simulations (1) under task group-43 assumptions with fully loaded seed configurations in water (HOMO) and (2) with effects of plaque backing, insert and inter-seed interactions (HETERO) were performed for seven 125I COMS plaques (10 mm-22 mm in diameter), and homogeneous dose (DHOMO) and heterogeneous dose (DHETERO) for central-axis and off-axis points were determined. For DHOMO, 85 Gy was normalized to a depth of 5 mm. Central-axis heterogeneity correction factors (HCFs) from a depth of 0 mm (inner sclera) to 22 mm (opposite retina) were derived from a ratio of DHETERO to DHOMO. Off-axis HCFs for optic disc/macula and lens as a function of distance from optic disc/macula (DT/MT) for various basal dimensions of tumor (BD/BM) were derived from DHETERO/DHOMO. RESULTS: Central-axis HCF varied with a dose reduction of 10.3-19.8% by heterogeneity. Off-axis HCF for optic disc/macula varied significantly depending on DT/MT and BD/BM with a dose reduction of 11.3-38.3%. Off-axis HCF for lens had a dependence on MT and BM with its variation of 11.0-19.0%. A clinical example of using HCFs to estimate DHETERO was presented. CONCLUSIONS: The practical method of using depth-dependent central-axis HCF and DT/MT- and BD/BM-dependent off-axis HCF provided in this study will facilitate a heterogeneous dose estimate for 125I COMS plaques without MC calculations.

Association of Knowledge About Dementia with Two Dimensional Attitudes Among a Community Population in South Korea.

BACKGROUND: Providing correct information about dementia and people living with dementia and improving the attitude toward the disease have important implications in overcoming prejudice and negative perceptions and strengthening the social support system. However, studies are limited about which aspects of dementia knowledge affect attitudes toward it and the influence of such knowledge on particular aspects of such attitudes. OBJECTIVE: This study examined which part of dementia knowledge affects attitudes toward dementia and, furthermore, the influence of such knowledge on two aspects of attitudes in the general population. METHODS: A population-based cross-sectional survey of 1,200 participants aged 20 years or older was adopted. A landline and wireless telephone survey was conducted from October 12 to October 22, 2021. The survey data included self-report questions about dementia knowledge, dementia attitudes, demographics, and family information. Multiple linear regression analysis was performed. RESULTS: Dementia knowledge was positively associated with global dementia attitudes. In terms of the relationship between the two dimensions of dementia attitudes and knowledge, the latter displayed a significant positive association with accepting attitudes (ß= 0.121, p < 0.001) but not with affective attitudes (ß= 0.064, p = 0.084). Among dementia knowledge, dementia symptom/diagnosis and policy categories were positively associated with accepting attitudes (ß= 0.198, p = 0.006; ß= 0.357, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that people with more dementia knowledge have more accepting attitudes toward dementia. It may be effective to continue education on dementia to improve the public accepting attitudes. However, to improve negative emotional attitudes toward dementia, various approaches beyond education may be needed.

Field output correction factors of stereotactic cones for a diode detector: Dependence on cone size, measurement setup, reference field size and photon energy.

This study investigated if field output correction factors (FOCFs) of Varian stereotactic cones for Edge detectorTM had dependence on cone size, measurement setup, reference field size and/or photon energy. Field output factors (FOFs) of stereotactic cones were measured at three depths (1.5 cm, 5 cm and 10 cm) in two different setups (source-to-surface distance (SSD) and source-to-axis distance (SAD)) with two photon energies (6 MV and 6 MV flattening filter free) using the Edge detector and Exradin® W2 scintillator. Two reference fields (10 × 10 cm2 and 4 × 4 cm2) were chosen. FOCFs for the Edge detector were determined by calculating FOFW2/FOFEdge and compared among cones and between depths, setups, reference fields and energies. It is concluded that FOCFs for the Edge detector have dependence on cone size, SSD/SAD setup and energy for small cones, but do not have dependence on depth and reference field size.

Correction: Mineralized biomimetic collagen/alginate/silica composite scaffolds fabricated by a low-temperature bio-plotting process for hard tissue regeneration: fabrication, characterisation and in vitro cellular activities.

Correction for 'Mineralized biomimetic collagen/alginate/silica composite scaffolds fabricated by a low-temperature bio-plotting process for hard tissue regeneration: fabrication, characterisation and in vitro cellular activities' by HyeongJin Lee et al., J. Mater. Chem. B, 2014, 2, 5785-5798, https://doi.org/10.1039/c4tb00931b.

Ear, Nose, and Throat Foreign Bodies in Children: A Retrospective Study.

BACKGROUND: This study analyzed the presentation, characteristics, and management of foreign bodies in different age groups of pediatric patients with ear, nose, and throat foreign bodies. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed using data from October 2012 to September 2020. A total of 1285 patients with ear, nose, and throat foreign bodies who were less than 12 years of age and who presented to the emergency room were included in this study. Their biographical data, clinical presentations, foreign body types and locations, and management outcomes were obtained from medical records and analyzed as three age groups (infancy: <2 years old; early childhood: 2-5 years old; and late childhood: 6-12 years old). RESULTS: The early childhood group had the highest number of patients (n = 672; 52.2%). Throat was the most common location (59.2%), and bone was the most common type of foreign body. Among the children who visited our hospital, foreign bodies were actually found in only 657 patients (51.1%) and removed by an otolaryngologist in 625 (95.1%) cases. CONCLUSION: Our study could provide guidance for the diagnosis and management of pediatric patients who present to emergency departments with foreign bodies.

Dual-source strength seed loading for eye plaque brachytherapy using eye physics eye plaques: A feasibility study.

Purpose: This study quantifies the dosimetric impact of incorporating two iodine-125 (125I) seed source strengths in Eye Physics eye plaques for treatment of uveal melanoma. Material and methods: Plaque Simulator was used to retrospectively plan 15 clinical cases of three types: (1) Shallow tumors (< 5.5 mm) with large base dimensions (range, 16-19 mm); (2) Tumors near the optic nerve planned with notched plaques; and (3) Very shallow (< 3.0 mm) tumors with moderate base dimensions (range, 13.5-15.5 mm) planned with larger plaques than requested by the ocular oncologist. Circular plaques were planned with outer ring sources twice the source strength of inner sources, and notched plaques with the six seeds closest to the notch at twice the source strength. Results: In cases of type (1), the dual-source strength plan decreased prescription depth, and doses to critical structures were lower: inner sclera -25% ±2%, optic disc -7% ±3%, and fovea -6% ±3%. In four out of five cases of type (2), the dual-source strength plan decreased prescription depth, and dose to inner sclera was lower (-22% ±5%), while dose to optic disc (17% ±7%) and fovea (20% ±12%) increased. In cases of type (3), a smaller dual-source strength plaque was used, and scleral dose was lower (-45% ±3%), whereas dose to optic disc (1% ±14%) and fovea (5% ±5%) increased. Conclusions: Dual-source strength loading as described in this study can be used to cover tumor margins and decrease dose to sclera, and therefore the adjacent retina, but can either decrease or increase radiation dose to optic disc and fovea depending on location and size of the tumor. This technique may allow the use of a smaller plaque, if requested by the ocular oncologist. Clinical determination to use this technique should be performed on an individual basis, and additional QA steps are required. Integrating the use of volumetric imaging may be warranted.

Avoiding mastectomy: accelerated partial breast irradiation for breast cancer patients with pacemakers or defibrillators.

INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety, toxicity, and planning concerns involved in accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) for patients with breast cancer who have a pacemaker or an automatic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (AICD) and who desire breast conservation. METHODS: We performed a review of prospectively obtained data for patients with early-stage breast cancer with a pacemaker or AICD treated between April 2007 and July 2010. Patients were treated with either 3D conformal external beam irradiation (3D-CRT) or high-dose rate balloon brachytherapy (HDRBB) as performed in the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Nowel Project (NSABP) B-39/Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 0413 protocol. Device interrogation was performed after the first and last radiation treatment, with comparative cardiac monitoring performed before and after the first three treatments. RESULTS: Eight patients were treated and have a mean follow-up of 6 months. Three patients received HDRBB delivering 34 Gy in 10 fractions. Mean planning target volume for evaluation (PTV_EVAL) coverage was 93.6%. The maximum radiation dose delivered to any device was 1.03 Gy, with a mean pacemaker distance to lumpectomy cavity (DLC) of 9.1 cm. Five patients received 3D-CRT consisting of 38.5 Gy in 10 fractions. The mean 90% PTV_EVAL coverage was 97.3%. Maximum dose delivered to any device was 1.68 Gy at a DLC of 9 cm. Local toxicity did not exceed grade 1, and no adverse device events were noted. CONCLUSIONS: APBI in patients with pacemakers or AICDs who desire breast preservation seems to be a technically safe and reasonable application of targeted radiation therapy.

Objective method to report planner-independent skin/rib maximal dose in balloon-based high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy for breast cancer.

PURPOSE: An objective method was proposed and compared with a manual selection method to determine planner-independent skin and rib maximal dose in balloon-based high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy planning. METHODS: The maximal dose to skin and rib was objectively extracted from a dose volume histogram (DVH) of skin and rib volumes. A virtual skin volume was produced by expanding the skin surface in three dimensions (3D) external to the breast with a certain thickness in the planning computed tomography (CT) images. Therefore, the maximal dose to this volume occurs on the skin surface the same with a conventional manual selection method. The rib was also delineated in the planning CT images and its maximal dose was extracted from its DVH. The absolute (Abdiff = [D(max) Man - D (max)DVH]) and relative (Rediff[%] = 100 x ([D(max)Man-D(max)DVH])/D(max)DVH) maximal skin and rib dose differences between the manual selection method (D(max)Man) and the objective method (D(max)DVH) were measured for 50 balloon-based HDR (25 MammoSite and 25 Contura) patients. RESULTS: The average +/- standard deviation of maximal dose difference was 1.67% +/- 1.69% of the prescribed dose (PD). No statistical difference was observed between MammoSite and Contura patients for both Abdiff and Rediff[%] values. However, a statistically significant difference (p value < 0.0001) was observed in maximal rib dose difference compared with maximal skin dose difference for both Abdiff (2.30% +/- 1.71% vs 1.05% +/- 1.43%) and Rediff[%] (2.32% +/- 1.79% vs 1.21% +/- 1.41%). In general, rib has a more irregular contour and it is more proximally located to the balloon for 50 HDR patients. Due to the inverse square law factor, more dose difference was observed in higher dose range (D(max) > 90%) compared with lower dose range (D(max) < 90%): 2.16% +/- 1.93% vs 1.19% +/- 1.25% with p value of 0.0049. However, the Rediff[%] analysis eliminated the inverse square factor and there was no statistically significant difference (p value = 0.8931) between high and low dose ranges. CONCLUSIONS: The objective method using volumetric information of skin and rib can determine the planner-independent maximal dose compared with the manual selection method. However, the difference was < 2% of PD, on average, if appropriate attention is paid to selecting a manual dose point in 3D planning CT images.

A patient-specific QA comparison between 2D and 3D diode arrays for single-lesion SRS and SBRT treatments.

The purpose of this study is to compare patient-specific quality assurance (PSQA) results between two dimensional (2D) diode (SRS MapCHECK®) and 3D diode (ArcCHECK®) arrays. Twenty-eight intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and 26 lung stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) clinical plans with a single lesion were selected and categorized into 4 groups: 20 SRS dynamic conformal arc therapy (DCAT) plans (Group A), 8 SRS volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans (Group B), 6 SBRT DCAT plans (Group C) and 20 SBRT VMAT plans (Group D). An individual field of each plan was delivered on SRS MapCHECK and ArcCHECK and QA analysis was performed using 4 gamma criteria of dose difference/distance-to-agreement of 3%/3 mm, 3%/2 mm, 2%/2 mm and 2%/1 mm. Statistical analysis was performed to compare PSQA results between the 2 QA devices. For all 4 groups and all 4 gamma criteria, average gamma passing rates were higher with SRS MapCHECK.

Optic Disc Dose Comparison Between 125I and 103Pd Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study (COMS) Plaques Based on Current Clinical Practice.

Purpose The purpose of this study is to compare optic disc dose (ODD) between 125I and 103Pd Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study (COMS) plaques in ocular brachytherapy. Methods A previously validated in-house brachytherapy dose calculation program was used for ODD calculations. ODD was calculated as a function of tumor margin-to-optic disc distance (DT) up to 5 mm for various tumor basal dimensions (BDs), for a prescription depth of 5 mm, and for standard and notched COMS plaques loaded with 125I (model: IAI-125A) and 103Pd (model: IAPd-103A) seeds. ODD calculations were repeated for prescription depths from 2 mm to 10 mm in 1 mm intervals. A prescribed dose of 85 Gy (irradiation time: 120 hours) was normalized to each prescription depth. Dose conversion factors (DCFs) for each prescription depth were calculated by taking a ratio of [total reference air kerma (TRAK) per seed]prescription depth to [TRAK per seed]5 mm. ODD reduction by notched COMS plaques was calculated for each prescription depth by subtracting ODD for notched COMS plaques from ODD for standard COMS plaques. Results Trends of ODD as a function of DT for various BDs are similar between the two seed types in both standard and notched COMS plaques. However, due to the energy difference, there exists a transition distance (dt) for each BD in each plaque at which ODD for 125I COMS plaques equals that for 103Pd COMS plaques. For small BDs, at DT dt, the opposite is observed. For the largest 1-3 BD(s), contrarily, dt occurs within the tumor, and thus, ODD for 125I COMS plaquesis always higher. Trends of ODD reduction by notched COMS plaques as a function of DT for various BDs are the same for the two seed types except that maximum ODD reduction by 103Pd COMS notched plaques is larger. DCF increases with increasing prescription depth for both seed types. Conclusions There exist ODD differences between 125I and 103Pd COMS plaques and the differences depend on DT, BD, plaque size, and prescription depth.

Electronic brachytherapy for treatment of non-melanoma skin cancers: clinical results and toxicities.

PURPOSE: Although surgical approaches are standard for most non-melanomatous skin cancers, some patients are not candidates due to medical co-morbidities or functional or cosmetic or lesion location. High-dose-rate electronic brachytherapy (HDR-EBT) may be an alternative treatment modality. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted from April 2011 to April 2013. All lesions were pathologically confirmed as malignant basal cell or squamous cell carcinoma. A HDR-EBT system delivered a median biological equivalent dose of 50 Gy total to a depth of 0.1-0.5 cm using various sizes of applicators. Treatment feasibility, acute and late toxicity, cosmetic outcomes, and local recurrence were assessed. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients with a mean age of 76 years with 50 cutaneous lesions were treated. Locations included 17 extremity lesions and 33 head and neck lesions. After treatments, acute grade 3 moist desquamation developed in 9 of the lesions (18%). Acute grade 4 ulceration developed in 3 lesions in the lower extremity (6%) and 1 upper lip lesion (2%). These toxicities were improved after a median of 20 days. Amongst the 4 lesions with grade 4 toxicities, a greater proportion were in lower extremity lesions compared to head and neck lesions (75% vs. 25%). There was no difference in the rate of grade 3 and 4 toxicities between patients aged ≤ 75 years and aged > 75 years (p = 0.082). With a mean long-term follow-up of 45.6 months, there was 1 local recurrence treated with surgery and no reported late toxicities. CONCLUSIONS: Our experience with HDR-EBT for non-melanomatous skin cancers is encouraging in terms of efficacy and convenience for patients. Our long-term follow-up shows a good response in all treated sites. Caution should be used for extremity sites, and more fractionated regimens should be considered to avoid severe acute toxicities.

Recommendations for intraoperative mesh brachytherapy: Report of AAPM Task Group No. 222.

Mesh brachytherapy is a special type of a permanent brachytherapy implant: it uses low-energy radioactive seeds in an absorbable mesh that is sutured onto the tumor bed immediately after a surgical resection. This treatment offers low additional risk to the patient as the implant procedure is carried out as part of the tumor resection surgery. Mesh brachytherapy utilizes identification of the tumor bed through direct visual evaluation during surgery or medical imaging following surgery through radiographic imaging of radio-opaque markers within the sources located on the tumor bed. Thus, mesh brachytherapy is customizable for individual patients. Mesh brachytherapy is an intraoperative procedure involving mesh implantation and potentially real-time treatment planning while the patient is under general anesthesia. The procedure is multidisciplinary and requires the complex coordination of multiple medical specialties. The preimplant dosimetry calculation can be performed days beforehand or expediently in the operating room with the use of lookup tables. In this report, the guidelines of American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) are presented on the physics aspects of mesh brachytherapy. It describes the selection of radioactive sources, design and preparation of the mesh, preimplant treatment planning using a Task Group (TG) 43-based lookup table, and postimplant dosimetric evaluation using the TG-43 formalism or advanced algorithms. It introduces quality metrics for the mesh implant and presents an example of a risk analysis based on the AAPM TG-100 report. Recommendations include that the preimplant treatment plan be based upon the TG-43 dose calculation formalism with the point source approximation, and the postimplant dosimetric evaluation be performed by using either the TG-43 approach, or preferably the newer model-based algorithms (viz., TG-186 report) if available to account for effects of material heterogeneities. To comply with the written directive and regulations governing the medical use of radionuclides, this report recommends that the prescription and written directive be based upon the implanted source strength, not target-volume dose coverage. The dose delivered by mesh implants can vary and depends upon multiple factors, such as postsurgery recovery and distortions in the implant shape over time. For the sake of consistency necessary for outcome analysis, prescriptions based on the lookup table (with selection of the intended dose, depth, and treatment area) are recommended, but the use of more advanced techniques that can account for real situations, such as material heterogeneities, implant geometric perturbations, and changes in source orientations, is encouraged in the dosimetric evaluation. The clinical workflow, logistics, and precautions are also presented.

Comparison of single and multiple dwell position methods in MammoSite high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy planning.

The purpose of this study is to dosimetrically compare two plans generated using single dwell position method (SDPM) and multiple dwell position methods (MDPM) in MammoSite high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy planning for 19 breast cancer patients. In computed tomography (CT) image-based HDR planning, a surface optimization technique was used in both methods. Following dosimetric parameters were compared for fraction 1 plans: %PTV_EVAL (planning target volume for plan evaluation) coverage, dose homogeneity index (DHI), dose con-formal index (COIN), maximum dose to skin and ipsilateral lung, and breast tissue volume receiving 150% (V150[cc]) and 200% (V200[cc]) of the prescribed dose. In addition, a plan was retrospectively generated for each fraction 2-10 to simulate the clinical situation where the fraction 1 plan was used for fractions 2-10 without modification. In order to create nine derived plans for each method and for each of the 19 patients, the catheter location and contours of target and critical structures were defined on the CT images acquired prior to each fraction 2-10, while using the same dwell-time distribution as used for fraction 1 (original plan). Interfraction dose variations were evaluated for 19 patients by comparing the derived nine plans (each for fractions 2-10) with the original plan (fraction 1) using the same dosimetric parameters used for fraction 1 plan comparison. For the fraction 1 plan comparison, the MDPM resulted in slightly increased %PTV_EVAL coverage, COIN, V150[cc] and V200[cc] values by an average of 1.2%, 0.025, 0.5 cc and 0.7cc, respectively, while slightly decreased DHI, maximum skin and ipsilateral lung dose by an average of 0.003, 3.2 cGy and 5.8 cGy, respectively. For the inter-fraction dose variation comparison, the SDPM resulted in slightly smaller variations in %PTV_EVAL coverage, DHI, maximum skin dose and V150[cc] values by an average of 0.4%, 0.0005, 0.5 cGy and 0.2 cc, respectively, while slightly higher average variations in COIN, maximum ipsilateral lung dose and V200[cc] values by 0.0028, 0.2 cGy and 0.2 cc, respectively. All differences were too small to be clinically significant. Compared to the MDPM, the SDPM combined with a surface optimization technique can generate a clinically comparable fraction 1 treatment plan with a similar interfraction dose variation if a single source is carefully positioned at the center of the balloon catheter.

Evaluation of the interfractional biological effective dose (BED) variation in MammoSite high dose rate brachytherapy.

The objective of this work is to evaluate the interfractional biological effective dose (BED) variation in MammoSite high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy. Dose distributions of 19 patients who received 34 Gy in 10 fractions were evaluated. A method was employed to account for nonuniform dose distribution in the BED calculation. Furthermore, a range of alpha/beta values was utilized for specific clinical end points: fibrosis, telangiectasia, erythema, desquamation and breast carcinoma. Two scenarios were simulated to calculate the BED value using: i) the same dose distribution of fraction 1 over fractions 2-10 (constant case, CC), and ii) the actual delivered dose distribution for each fraction 1-10 (interfractiondose variation case, IVC). Although the average BED difference (IVC - CC) was < 0.7 Gy for all clinical endpoints, the range of difference for fibrosis and telangiectasia reached -11% to +3% and -9% to +9% for one of the patients, respectively. By disregarding high inhomogeneity in HDR brachytherapy, the conventional BED calculation tends to overestimate the BED for fibrosis by 16% on average, while it underestimates the BED for erythema (7.6%) and desquamation (10.2%). In conclusion, the BED calculation accounting for the nonuniform dose distribution provides a more clinically relevant description of the clinical delivered dose. Though the average BED difference was clinically insignificant, the maximum difference of BED for late effects can differ by a single fractional dose (10%) for a specific patient due to the interfraction dose variation in MammoSite treatment.

Surface brachytherapy: Joint report of the AAPM and the GEC-ESTRO Task Group No. 253.

The surface brachytherapy Task Group report number 253 discusses the common treatment modalities and applicators typically used to treat lesions on the body surface. Details of commissioning and calibration of the applicators and systems are discussed and examples are given for a risk-based analysis approach to the quality assurance measures that are necessary to consider when establishing a surface brachytherapy program.

The allegheny general modification of the Harvard Breast Cosmesis Scale for the retreated breast.

The use of brachytherapy--and to a lesser extent, external-beam radiotherapy--in the management of locally recurrent breast cancer following ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) followed by repeat breast-conservation surgery and irradiation is currently an area of intense study. The current cosmetic scoring system is inadequate to score the outcome resulting from retreatment because it does not account for the cosmetic effect of the initial treatment. We propose a modification of the scale for patients who undergo retreatment--the Allegheny General Modification of the Harvard/NSABP/RTOG scoring scale.