Effects of regular treatment with combination of salmeterol/fluticasone propionate and salmeterol alone in cough variant asthma.

OBJECTIVE: Cough variant asthma (CVA) is an important cause of chronic cough, and pathophysiological features of the disease appear to be similar to typical asthma. Because CVA is recognized as a precursor of asthma, early intervention with long-term anti-inflammatory agents may be recommended. However, the role of combination therapy with inhaled corticosteroid and ß2-agonist in the treatment of CVA has not been elucidated. To evaluate the effectiveness of the combination therapy, we investigated the clinical impact of regular treatment with salmeterol/fliticasone propionate combination (SFC) and inhaled salmeterol (SAL) alone in patients with CVA. METHODS: The study was a randomized, controlled, parallel-group multi-center trial. Forty-three CVA patients were assigned to SFC (50/100 µg once daily) or SAL (50 µg twice daily) for 12 weeks. Then, these medications were stopped for the next 24 weeks. Main outcome measures were cough symptoms, pulmonary function and airway inflammation. RESULTS: Treatment with each of SFC and SAL significantly decreased cough scores and increased FEV1 and PEF, where the efficacy was more pronounced with SFC than SAL. SFC also decreased sputum eosinophil counts and eosinophil cationic protein contents, whereas SAL had no effect. After discontinuation of the treatment, cough scores increased, pulmonary function and eosinophilic airway inflammation were aggravated and returned to the baseline levels. CONCLUSIONS: Maintenance therapy with SFC provides further improvements in cough symptoms, pulmonary function and airway inflammation, and discontinuation of the therapy causes worsening of the disease, indicating that stopping or interrupting anti-inflammatory therapy may not be advisable in patients with CVA.

Budesonide/formoterol maintenance and reliever therapy in moderate-to-severe asthma: effects on eosinophilic airway inflammation.

Although the budesonide and formoterol in a single inhaler for maintenance and reliever therapy has been evaluated in recent studies, the effects on eosinophilic airway inflammation remain uncertain. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy, including anti-inflammatory effects, of as-needed budesonide/formoterol with salbutamol in Japanese patients with moderate-to-severe asthma. Patients with asthma using an inhaled corticosteroid plus a long-acting beta2-agonist as a controller and at least one asthma exacerbation in the previous 12 months were randomized to budesonide/formoterol maintenance therapy (160/4.5 micrograms, 2 inhalations twice daily) plus either as-needed budesonide/formoterol (160/4.5 micrograms; n = 32) or salbutamol (100 micrograms; n = 31) up to 4 inhalation daily for 48 weeks. The time to first asthma exacerbation was significantly prolonged with as-needed budesonide/formoterol compared with salbutamol (log-rank test; p = 0.0342). There was a 66% reduction in the hazard ratio for a first exacerbation with as-needed budesonide/formoterol (p = 0.0334). The frequencies of both mild and severe exacerbations and reliever use were consistently less with budesonide/formoterol than salbutamol. As-needed budesonide/formoterol significantly improved in lung function and symptom scores compared with salbutamol. In addition, the contents of eosinophil cationic protein and B12 tryptase, as well as number of eosinophils and mast cells in induced sputum, decreased to a greater extent with budesonide/formoterol compared with salbutamol. In conclusion, the budesonide and formoterol for maintenance and reliever therapy seems more effective in controlling persistent asthma with a significant reduction of airway inflammation. Clinical trial 121104, www.clinicaltrials.gov.

Comparable effect of a leukotriene receptor antagonist and long-acting beta2-adrenergic agonist in cough variant asthma.

Cough variant asthma (CVA) is a common cause of chronic persistent cough, in which allergic airway inflammation may play a role. Although current guidelines recommend bronchodilators and anti-inflammatory drugs for the treatment, comparison of the efficacy of these medications has not been investigated. This study was designed to evaluate the effectiveness of pranlukast, a leukotriene receptor antagonist, and salmeterol, a long-acting beta2-adrenergic agonist, in the treatment of CVA. The study was a randomized, controlled, parallel-group, multicenter trial. After a 4-week run-in period, 49 patients with newly diagnosed CVA were assigned to receive oral pranlukast (225 mg, b.i.d.) or inhaled salmeterol (100 µg, b.i.d.) for 4 weeks. Primary outcome measure was cough symptom and secondary outcome measures were pulmonary function and eosinophilic airway inflammation. Treatment with pranlukast and salmeterol each decreased cough symptom scores, where the changes from baseline values were significantly greater in the pranlukast group than in the salmeterol group. Forced expiratory volume in 1 second and peak expiratory flow (PEF) increased in the two treatment groups with the same magnitudes, but significant decreases in diurnal variation of PEF and eosinophil counts and eosinophil cationic protein contents in the peripheral blood and induced sputum were observed only in the pranlukast group. In view of antitussive and anti-inflammatory actions, the leukotriene receptor antagonist pranlukast seems to be more effective than the long-acting beta2-adrenergic agonist salmeterol in the treatment of CVA.

[Case of precursor T-lymphoblastic lymphoma/leukemia diagnosed by endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration].

An 18-year-old man was found to have a mediastinal tumor on a chest X-ray film. Chest CT demonstrated a large tumor in the anterior mediastinum. Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) of the mediastinal tumor was performed. The microscopic appearance of EBUS-TBNA and bone marrow revealed identical findings. Immunohistochemical staining of these specimens were positive for both CD3 and terminal transferase (TdT). Therefore, a diagnosis of precursor T-lymphoblastic lymphoma/leukemia was made. To the best of our knowledge, there are no studies which report that EBUS-TBNA is useful in the diagnosis of precursor T-lymphoblastic lymphoma/leukemia, but EBUS-TBNA was useful in the diagnosis of mediastinal tumor in this case. It may also be useful in the diagnosis of hilar or mediastinal lymphadenopathy in hematological disorders such as precursor T-lymphoblastic lymphoma/leukemia.