Prevalence of Sjögren's syndrome in patients with dry mouth in the region of Central Hungary.

OBJECTIVE: One-third of the Hungarian population suffers from xerostomia. Since there is no evidence of the actual prevalence of Sjögren's syndrome (SS) in Hungary, this study aimed to evaluate the same. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data were collected from the Faculty of Dentistry, Semmelweis University from 2008 to 2015. A diagnosis of SS was established based on the American College of Rheumatology and European League Against Rheumatism criteria. RESULTS: Of the 1076 patients examined with sicca symptoms, 188 patients had confirmed SS. Primary SS (pSS) was diagnosed in 135 patients and secondary SS (sSS) was confirmed in 53 patients. According to the available statistical records of the public health service of Hungary, there were an average of 16 (0.0014%, 5-26) newly diagnosed SS cases in the entire population and 141 SS patient-practitioner consultations (49-232) per 100,000 inhabitants in the country over the past 10 years (based on the past 10 years: 2011-2020). CONCLUSION: Results revealed that approximately 1/5th-1/6th of patients with sicca symptoms have SS, among whom 72% and 285 have pSS and sSS, respectively. Global Hungarian records simultaneously revealed that the number of both new diagnoses and doctor-SS patient encounters has significantly decreased (by 50%) yearly over the last decade.

Oral Mucosal Human Papillomavirus and Epstein-Bar Virus Rates in Patients with Dry Mouth and/or Sjögren's Syndrome in a Hungarian Cohort.

PURPOSE: To find an association between oral mucosal human papilloma- and/or Epstein-Barr (HPV, EBV) virus infection in patients with dry mouth and/or Sjögren's syndrome (SS) compared to healthy controls and to find connections with salivary gland histopathological alterations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ninety-two participants were divided into four groups: 1. healthy controls (n = 32); 2. xerostomia (n = 28); 3. hyposalivation (n = 22); and 4. SS groups (n = 10). To detect virus infection brush biopsy was outlined in all groups. Detections of virus-specific sequences were achieved with polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Lip biopsy and histopathological assessment was performed in groups 2, 3 and 4. RESULTS: HPV positivity of oral mucosal cells was shown in group 1: 1 (3.12%); group 2: 3 (10.7%); group 3: 2 (8.26%); and in group 4: 0 of the samples. EBV was present in group 1: 14 (43.7%); group 2: 17 (60.7%); group 3: 6 (27.3%); and in group 4: 5 (50%) of the cases. There was no statistically significant difference between the attributes. Intact salivary gland in 28.2%, chronic sialadenitis in 28.2%, stromal fibrosis in 6.5%, lipomatous atrophy in 8.6%, fibrous atrophy in 6.5% and positive focus score (SS) in 26.1% were found in the subjects. Neither HPV nor EBV infection caused statistically significantly more histological abnormalities. CONCLUSION: Orofacial mucosal HPV and/or EBV DNA rates did not differ statistically significantly in patients with xerostomia or hyposalivation or SS compared to healthy controls, therefore, it cannot prove the provocative role of these viruses in dry mouth and/or SS. Neither dry mouth nor SS were accompanied by statistically significantly more salivary gland alterations in HPV- and/or EBV-positive subjects; these alterations are frequent in the virus-negative cases too.

Identifying Patient Access Barriers for Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha Inhibitor Treatments in Rheumatoid Arthritis in Five Central Eastern European Countries.

INTRODUCTION: Although there is a significant utilization gap of biologic medicines in the EU, many studies estimate equity in patient access to biopharmaceuticals only based on their availability on the national list of reimbursed medicines. Hidden access barriers may facilitate financial sustainability of pharmaceuticals in less affluent EU countries; however, they have rarely been documented in scientific publications. Our objective was to explore these access barriers for tumor necrosis factor (TNF) alpha inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in five Central and Eastern European countries. METHODS: A detailed interview guide was developed based on multi-stakeholder workshops and a targeted literature review. In each participant country 3-3-3-3 interviews with payers, rheumatologists, patients/patient representatives, and industry representatives were conducted. Responses were aggregated at a country level and validated by primary investigators in each country. RESULTS: Limited number of RA centers and consequently significant travelling time and cost for patients in distant geographical areas, uneven budget allocation among centers, limited capacity of nurses, narrowed patient population in national financial protocols compared to international clinical guidelines in initiating or continuing biologics, high administrative burden in prescribing biologics and limited health literacy of patients were the most relevant barriers to timely patient access in at least three participant countries. CONCLUSION: Assessing only the availability of TNF alpha inhibitors on the national list of reimbursed medicines provides limited information about real-world patient access to these medicines. Revealing hidden access barriers may contribute to initiate policy actions which could reduce inequity in patient access.

Devic's syndrome and SLE: challenges in diagnosis and therapeutic possibilities based on two overlapping cases.

Neuromyelitis optica (NMO, Devic's disease), an uncommon demyelinating neuro-immunological disease, can be associated with autoimmune diseases. In SLE associated forms anti-aquaporin-4 antibody positivity can help differentiating between SLE nerve system manifestation and NMO. In the literature rituximab, or immunoablative dose cyclophosphamide (CYC) was effective for the therapy resistant forms. Authors present 2 SLE overlapping NMO cases, one of them with SLE associated interstitial lung disease (ILD). In both cases neurological manifestations anticipated other SLE symptoms. Patients previously were treated with high dose corticosteroid therapy, plasmapheresis, and one of them with azathioprine, and the other one with oral CYC (which could not prevent flares). 0.5 g/m² body-surface monthly parenteral inductive CYC therapy was administered, in one patient followed by quarterly maintenance therapy. This patient completed her 18 month maintenance treatment and has been in neurological remission, but required steroid pulse and plasmapheresis for lung symptoms. The second patient had urogenital infection after the induction phase, followed by an exacerbation, requiring plasmapheresis and high dose parenteral corticosteroid treatment. After it he refused CYC therapy and has been taking azathioprine. He has no new symptoms, only residual ones. In our two patients conventional dose CYC therapy proved to be effective for NMO/SLE overlap, required only transient supportive therapy.