Intensive versus conventional blood pressure monitoring in a general practice population. The Blood Pressure Reduction in Danish General Practice trial: a randomized controlled parallel group trial.

Objective: To compare the effect of a conventional to an intensive blood pressure monitoring regimen on blood pressure in hypertensive patients in the general practice setting. Design: Randomized controlled parallel group trial with 12-month follow-up. Setting: One hundred and ten general practices in all regions of Denmark. Participants: One thousand forty-eight patients with essential hypertension. Intervention: Conventional blood pressure monitoring ('usual group') continued usual ad hoc blood pressure monitoring by office blood pressure measurements, while intensive blood pressure monitoring ('intensive group') supplemented this with frequent home blood pressure monitoring and 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. Primary outcome measures: Mean day- and night-time systolic and diastolic 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure. Secondary outcome measures: Change in systolic and diastolic office blood pressure and change in cardiovascular risk profile. Results: Of the patients, 515 (49%) were allocated to the usual group, and 533 (51%) to the intensive group. The reductions in day- and night-time 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure were similar (usual group: 4.6 ± 13.5/2.8 ± 82 mmHg; intensive group: 5.6 ± 13.0/3.5 ± 8.2 mmHg; P = 0.27/P = 0.20). Cardiovascular risk scores were reduced in both groups at follow-up, but more so in the intensive than in the usual group (P = 0.02). Conclusion: An intensive blood pressure monitoring strategy led to a similar blood pressure reduction to conventional monitoring. However, the intensive strategy appeared to improve patients' cardiovascular risk profile through other effects than a reduction of blood pressure. Trial registration: Clinical Trials NCT00244660.

An adverse drug event manager facilitates spontaneous reporting of adverse drug reactions.

INTRODUCTION: Spontaneous reporting of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) is used for continuous risk-benefit evaluation of marketed pharmaceutical products and for signal detection. The Adverse Drug Event Manager (ADEM) is a service offered to clinicians employed at hospitals in the Capital Region of Denmark. The ADEM assists healthcare professionals in reporting suspected ADRs to the Danish Health Authority. The aim of this retrospective observational study was to quantify and describe ADRs reported via the ADEM in 2014. METHODS: All ADR reports handled by the ADEM in 2014 were recorded anonymously and analysed descriptively. RESULTS: A total of 484 ADRs were reported through the ADEM in 2014 (the median number of reports per month was 37; range: 17-78). The majority of the reports came from departments of internal medicine (61%), psychiatry (14%) and dermatology, ophthalmology or otorhinolaryngology (11%). The drugs most frequently reported were lisdexamphetamine (n = 40), rivaroxaban (n = 16) and warfarin (n = 15) (vaccines excluded). In 13 out of 484 reports, the ADR was associated with a fatal outcome. CONCLUSION: The findings of this study indicate that an ADEM promotes and facilitates spontaneous ADR reporting and helps raise awareness about ADRs, including how and why they should be reported. Hopefully, this will assist national and European spontaneous reporting systems in their work to increase patient safety nationally and abroad. FUNDING: none. TRIAL REGISTRATION: not relevant. .

Short-acting sulfonamides near term and neonatal jaundice.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association between maternal use of sulfamethizole near term and the risk of neonatal jaundice. METHODS: We conducted a nationwide population-based retrospective cohort study using Danish registers. All Danish women giving birth between 1995 and 2007 were included from the Danish Fertility Database. Women redeeming a prescription for sulfamethizole up to 4 weeks before giving birth were identified from the National Prescription Register. The primary outcome was the number of neonates diagnosed with jaundice between birth and age 28 days identified in the National Hospital Register. Risk of neonatal jaundice was calculated as odds ratios (ORs) with linear logistic regression with and without adjustment for confounders. RESULTS: We identified 841,900 births. Of 1,823 (0.2%) neonates exposed to sulfamethizole up to 4 weeks before birth, 197 (10.8%) developed neonatal jaundice. The OR of developing neonatal jaundice after exposure to sulfamethizole was 2.35 (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.02-2.72). Adjustment for maternal age, education, household income, parity, and period of conception left OR unchanged at 2.29 (95% CI 1.97-2.67). After further adjustment for gestational age, the risk associated with sulfamethizole was rendered insignificant (OR 1.03, 95% CI 0.86-1.22). Narrowing exposure time to the last week before birth did not change the estimates. Broken into gestational age groups, the rate of neonates with jaundice after exposure was similar to the rate of unexposed neonates with jaundice. CONCLUSIONS: We found no association between redeeming a prescription of sulfamethizole near term and increased risk of neonatal jaundice. We showed that the presumed association is the result of preterm birth, which can be caused by maternal urinary tract infection. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.