Medicaid and Indigent Patients Experience Delayed Fixation of Distal Radius Fractures, Resulting in Worse Consequential Radiographic Outcomes.

Distal radius fractures are the most common upper extremity injury. Patients referred to safety-net tertiary facilities following a fracture experience significant delays in treatment because of financial and language barriers as well as poor access to care at outlying community hospitals. This delay in treatment can affect postoperative functional outcomes and complication rates because of failure to restore anatomic alignment. The purpose of this multicenter study was to assess for risk factors associated with delayed fixation of distal radius fractures and evaluate the impact of delayed treatment on radiographic alignment. Patients with a distal radius fracture treated surgically during a 2-year period were identified. Measures included time from injury to surgery, demographic information, fracture classification, and radiographic parameters. The effect of surgery delay on radiographic outcomes was assessed with delayed surgery defined as 11 or more days out from injury. A total of 183 patients met study inclusion criteria. Medicaid and indigent patients were more likely to experience a delay in surgical treatment. Specifically, 70% of these patients were treated in a delayed fashion. Delayed treatment of 11 days or more was associated with worse radial height and inclination on postoperative radiographic imaging. Medicaid and indigent patients are more likely to experience delayed fixation in the treatment of distal radius fractures. This delayed surgery negatively affects postoperative radiographic outcomes. These findings suggest a need to improve access to care for Medicaid and indigent patients and to proceed with operative intervention within 10 days for distal radius fractures. [Orthopedics. 2024;47(2):e93-e97.].

Henry Versus Thompson Approach for Fixation of Proximal Third Radial Shaft Fractures: A Multicenter Study.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the volar Henry and dorsal Thompson approaches with respect to outcomes and complications for proximal third radial shaft fractures. DESIGN: Multicenter retrospective cohort study. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Patients with proximal third radial shaft fractures ± associated ulna fractures (OTA/AO 2R1 ± 2U1) treated operatively at 11 trauma centers were included. INTERVENTION: Patient demographics and injury, fracture, and surgical data were recorded. Final range of motion and complications of infection, neurologic injury, compartment syndrome, and malunion/nonunion were compared for volar versus dorsal approaches. MAIN OUTCOME: The main outcome was difference in complications between patients treated with volar versus dorsal approach. RESULTS: At an average follow-up of 292 days, 202 patients (range, 18-84 years) with proximal third radial shaft fractures were followed through union or nonunion. One hundred fifty-five patients were fixed via volar and 47 via dorsal approach. Patients treated via dorsal approach had fractures that were on average 16 mm more proximal than those approached volarly, which did not translate to more screw fixation proximal to the fracture. Complications occurred in 11% of volar and 21% of dorsal approaches with no statistical difference. CONCLUSIONS: There was no statistical difference in complication rates between volar and dorsal approaches. Specifically, fixation to the level of the tuberosity is safely accomplished via the volar approach. This series demonstrates the safety of the volar Henry approach for proximal third radial shaft fractures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.