A Quality Improvement Innovation for Reproductive Health Planning in the Time of COVID.

OBJECTIVES: To see if an outreach approach with telehealth is feasible and acceptable to patients to talk about their reproductive health; and as a secondary outcome, capture data on time spent on the visit and what kind of information was discussed. METHODS: A registry was created from three family physicians' panels of all adult patients with anticipated ability to become pregnant ages 18-45 who had not had a documented reproductive health discussion in the previous 6 months. Using that registry, outreach was performed to schedule a telehealth visit to discuss their reproductive health with their primary care provider. The visit was standardized using the One Key Question approach. For patients who agreed to participate in the research, the patient completed a survey about their experience. The provider also completed a survey on the time spent and the issues addressed. RESULTS: Two hundred and six patients were called. Ninety patients (44%) could not be reached. Of the remaining patients, 34 scheduled either a telehealth or in-person visit and 7 also agreed to participate in the survey. New information was uncovered in the visit in 86% of participants. The most common need uncovered during the visit was unrelated medical needs (71%), followed by preconception health education/advice (43%) and contraception needs/counseling (29%). Most participants found the telehealth visit valuable. CONCLUSIONS: An outreach methodology can uncover unmet health needs, both reproductive and otherwise. We found that people who had the visit often needed something, but a majority of patients declined the visit saying that they did not think they needed it. It is possible that patients are not aware of the value of reproductive health discussions, and therefore clinicians need to take every opportunity to have these discussions whenever possible, whether through outreach or inreach (during already scheduled visits).

Interconception Care for Mothers at Well Child Visits After Implementation of the IMPLICIT Model.

INTRODUCTION: Interconception care (ICC) is recommended to reduce maternal risk factors for poor birth outcomes between pregnancies. The IMPLICIT ICC model includes screening and brief intervention for mothers at well child visits (WCVs) for smoking, depression, multivitamin use, and family planning. Prior studies demonstrate feasibility and acceptability among providers and mothers, but not whether mothers recall receipt of targeted messages. METHODS: Mothers accompanying their child at 12- and 24-month WCVs at four sites of a family medicine academic practice were surveyed pre (2012) and post (2018) ICC model implementation. Survey items assessed health history, behaviors, and report of whether their child's physician addressed maternal depression, tobacco use, family planning, and folic acid supplementation during WCVs. Pre and post results are compared using logistic regression adjusting for demographics and insurance. RESULTS: Our sample included 307 distinct mothers with 108 and 199 respondents in the pre and post periods, respectively. Mothers were more likely to report discussions with their child's doctor post-intervention for family planning (31% pre to 86% post; aOR 18.65), depression screening (63-85%; aOR 5.22), and taking a folic acid supplement (53-68%; aOR 2.54). Among mothers who smoked, the percentage that reported their child's doctor recommended cessation increased from 56 to 75% (aOR = 3.66). DISCUSSION: The IMPLICIT ICC model resulted in increased reported health care provider discussions of four key areas of interconception health by mothers attending WCVs. This model holds promise as a primary care strategy to systematically address maternal risks associated with poor pregnancy outcomes.

Implementation of Transgender/Gender Nonbinary Care in a Family Medicine Teaching Practice.

PURPOSE: Numerous studies have shown that transgender or gender nonbinary (TGNB) individuals encounter significantly more health care barriers, including overall lack of access to gender-affirming care providers. This study describes 2 assessments of transgender care services at a large family medicine teaching practice. METHODS: Staff and providers were invited to attend an optional, practice-wide, hourlong free training session on gender-affirming care offered on 3 different dates in 2019. A structured protocol was used to collect observational data from which key takeaways from the training sessions were developed. Separately, a retrospective chart review of patients with a gender dysphoria diagnosis was completed. Charts were reviewed for adherence to regional and international organization recommendations for comprehensive transgender care. RESULTS: Three main takeaways from the training sessions included lack of knowledge or familiarity with gender terminology and expression, fear of offending patients, and employee hesitation to change behaviors when interacting with patients. On chart review, the most common interventions identified were need to schedule a follow-up visit (61.5%), need for health maintenance screenings (osteoporosis screening, 50%; Papanicolaou smear, 56.3%; mammogram, 66.7%), need for mental health screening (41.5%), need for laboratory monitoring of testosterone therapy (20%), and corrected gender markers/names listed in the appropriate place in the patient chart (16.9%). CONCLUSIONS: This study highlighted hesitation to provide and lack of familiarity with transgender care among practice staff. Although some aspects of comprehensive transgender care are well implemented, maintaining follow-up, completing health maintenance and mental health screenings, and appropriate laboratory monitoring are areas for improvement.

75-year-old man • fatigue • unintentional weight loss • anemia • Dx?

► Fatigue ► Unintentional weight loss ► Anemia.