Performance characteristics of consensus approaches for small and minor paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria clone determination by flow cytometry.

BACKGROUND: Evaluation of paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH) clones by flow cytometry (FCM) is not standardized and is associated with consistent inter-laboratory variability. METHODS: In order to rule out the influence of particular approach in generating final results, we analyzed the performance characteristics of individual consensus strategies for small to intermediate (1%-20%) and minor (<1%) PNH clones within the white blood cell (WBC) and red blood cell (RBC) compartments with sensitivity up to 0.1%. RESULTS: Coefficient of variation (CV) for precision/reproducibility analysis ranged from 0.67%/1.49% to 2.56%/3.09% for granulocytes, from 0.93%/3.09% to 7.76%/12.06% for monocytes and from 0.41%/4.73% to 6.53%/5.1% for RBCs. Coefficient of determination (r2) for linear regression analysis ranged from 0.95 to 0.99, Wilcoxon ranks test showed no statistically significant differences (p>0.05), Bland-Altman analysis demonstrated performance agreement with mean bias ranging from -0.18 to 1.24. CONCLUSIONS: Our results confirmed very good performance characteristics for precision and reproducibility analysis, excellent correlation and favorable agreement between strategies, suggesting that reported inter-laboratory variability is related mainly to incorrect performance and/or insufficient experience with PNH testing by flow cytometry, rather than to relevant limitations of any particular approach.

Intra- and interlaboratory variability of paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria testing by flow cytometry following the 2012 Practical Guidelines for high-sensitivity paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria testing.

BACKGROUND: Sutherland et al. recently published the Practical Guidelines for high-sensitivity detection of paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH) clones by flow cytometry (FCM), containing concise protocols for PNH testing. METHODS: Using this approach, we studied the intra- and interlaboratory variability observed in a multicenter study in which fresh blood samples containing three clinically relevant PNH clone sizes within the granulocytic, monocytic, and red blood cell (RBC) populations were shipped to each participating center. RESULTS: Coefficients of variation (CVs) for precision/reproducibility analysis ranged from 0.01%/0.02% to 0.48%/0.45% (big clone), from 0.69%/1.52% to 4.24%/5.80% (small-intermediate clone), from 1.47%/3.91% to 15.01% /17.83% (minor clone) for PNH white blood cells (WBCs) and from 0.24%/0.48% to 1.76%/1.83% (big clone), from 0.80%/1.14% to 2.39%/4.45% (small-intermediate clone), from 1.09%/3.36% to 10.54%/10.23% (minor clone) for PNH RBCs, respectively. Linear regression analysis showed excellent performance correlation between centers (r > 0.99), Wilcoxon rank test revealed no statistically significant differences for PNH granulocytes, monocytes, and RBCs (P > 0.05%), Bland-Altman analysis demonstrated good performance agreement for all target PNH clones (mean bias ranging from -1.47 to 0.71). CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrate very good intra- and interlaboratory performance characteristics for both precision and reproducibility analyses and excellent correlation and agreement between centers for all target PNH clone sizes. Our data confirm the reliability and robustness of the recently published Practical Guidelines approach for high sensitivity PNH testing by flow cytometry and suggest that such an approach represents an excellent basis for standardization of PNH testing by flow cytometry.