Clinical outcomes of endoprosthetic reconstruction for proximal femoral resection.

INTRODUCTION: The proximal femur is a common site for primary sarcomas and metastatic lesions. Although the early results of tumor prostheses are promising, the long-term results of reconstruction are unknown. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the prognostic factors affecting prosthesis survival and complications after proximal femoral resection and reconstruction. METHODS: We reviewed the results of 68 patients who underwent proximal femoral resection and reconstruction with a modular bipolar-type tumor prosthesis between 2005 and 2017. The mean follow-up was 55.6 months (range 6-172 months). There were 50 male and 18 female patients with a mean age of 41.5 years (range 11-80 years). Cumulative survival analysis was performed to analyze the risk factors of prosthesis survival. We also evaluated the complications after operation. RESULTS: Fourteen (21%) patients required further surgery at a mean 37 months post-operatively (range 5-125 months). There were three cases of infection (4%), six of local recurrence (9%), three of acetabular erosion (4%) and two of stem loosening (3%). The implant survival rates were 83.9% at 5 years and 59.8% at 10 years. Prosthesis survivals did not differ based on fixation method (P = 0.085), age (P = 0.329) or resection length (P = 0.61). Acetabular chondrolysis was identified in 18 (26%) patients and longer resection length (≥20 cm) showed a trend for risk of acetabular wear (P = 0.132). CONCLUSION: The results of proximal femoral resection and reconstruction with a modular bipolar-type prosthesis were found to be acceptable with infection and local recurrence as short-term complications and loosening and acetabular erosion as long-term complications.

The Unfolded Protein Response: Neutron-Induced Therapy Autophagy as a Promising Treatment Option for Osteosarcoma.

Radiotherapy using high linear energy transfer (LET) radiation results in effectively killing tumor cells while minimizing dose (biological effective) to normal tissues to block toxicity. It is well known that high LET radiation leads to lower cell survival per absorbed dose than low LET radiation. High-linear energy transfer (LET) neutron treatment induces autophagy in tumor cells, but its precise mechanisms in osteosarcoma are unknown. Here, we investigated this mechanism and the underlying signaling pathways. Autophagy induction was examined in gamma-ray-treated KHOS/NP and MG63 osteosarcoma cells along with exposure to high-LET neutrons. The relationship between radiosensitivity and autophagy was assessed by plotting the cell surviving fractions against autophagy levels. Neutron treatment increased autophagy rates in irradiated KHOS/NP and MG63 cells; neutrons with high-LETs showed more effective inhibition than those with lower LET gamma-rays. To determine whether the unfolded protein response and Akt-mTOR pathways triggered autophagy, phosphorylated eIF2α and JNK levels, and phospho-Akt, phosphor-mTOR, and phospho-p70S6 levels were, respectively, investigated. High-LET neutron exposure inhibited Akt phosphorylation and increased Beclin 1 expression during the unfolded protein response, thereby enhancing autophagy. The therapeutic efficacy of high-LET neutron radiation was also assessed in vivo using an orthotopic mouse model. Neutron-irradiated mice showed reduced tumor growth without toxicity relative to gamma-ray-treated mice. The effect of high-LET neutron exposure on the expression of signaling proteins LC3, p-elF2a, and p-JNK was investigated by immunohistochemistry. Tumors in high-LET-neutron radiation-treated mice showed higher apoptosis rates, and neutron exposure significantly elevated LC3 expression, and increased p-elF2a and p-JNK expression levels. Overall, these results demonstrate that autophagy is important in radiosensitivity, cell survival, and cellular resistance against high-LET neutron radiation. This correlation between cellular radiosensitivity and autophagy may be used to predict radiosensitivity in osteosarcoma.

Prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in osteosarcoma using dual-phase (18)F-FDG PET/CT.

OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the ability of dual-phase (18)F-FDG PET/CT to predict the histological response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in osteosarcoma. METHODS: Thirty-one patients with osteosarcoma treated with NAC and surgery were prospectively enrolled. After injection of (18)F-FDG, both early (~60 min) and delayed (~150 min) PET were acquired before and after the completion of NAC. SUVmax, early/delayed SUVmax change (RImax), and early/delayed SUVmean change (RImean) of tumour were measured before (SUV1, RImax1, and RImean1) and after NAC (SUV2, RImax2, and RImean2). Then, we calculated the percentage changes between SUV1 and SUV2 (%SUV). RESULTS: Twelve patients (39%) exhibited good histological response after NAC. SUVmax, RImax, and RImean significantly decreased after NAC. Before NAC, only RImean1 predicted good histological response with the optimal criterion of < 10%, sensitivity of 92%, specificity of 57%, and accuracy of 71%. After NAC, %SUV, SUV2, and RImax2 predicted histological response. By using combined criterion of %SUV and RImax2 or SUV2 and RImean1 or SUV2 and RImax2, accuracies were 81%, 77%, and 77%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The histological response after NAC could be predicted by using RImean1 before the initiation of NAC in osteosarcoma. The combined use of SUV and RI values may provide a better prediction. KEY POINTS: • Pretreatment dual-phase FDG-PET was useful to predict histological response in osteosarcoma. • A combination of early and delayed PET may increase the predictive value. • Early/delayed SUV change of tumours significantly decreased after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Temporary hemiarthroplasty with a synthetic device in children with osteosarcoma around the knee as a bridging procedure until skeletal maturity.

BACKGROUND: We hypothesized that hemiarthroplasty with a synthetic device in skeletally immature patients with osteosarcoma around the knee would be functional due to high adaptability in the pediatric age group, and may decrease the number of surgeries until limb equalization by preserving the nearby physis. METHODS: We analyzed the outcomes of 25 hemiarthroplasties (12 distal femur, 13 proximal tibia). Average patient age was 11.8 years. We assessed (1) whether hemiarthroplasty could be considered as a viable option and could preserve growth of the nearby physis, and (2) whether these patients could reach the final goal of adult-type tumor prosthesis implantation within a preplanned number of surgeries. RESULTS: Three (12%) of 25 hemiarthroplasties showed failure. Average Musculoskeletal Tumor Society functional score of 23 patients was 25.1. Average tibial and femoral shortening for the corresponding reconstruction was 0.3 cm and 0.5 cm, respectively. In terms of number of surgeries for limb equalization, 19 patients (76%) had less, four (16%) had equal, and two (8%) had more surgeries than planned. CONCLUSIONS: Hemiarthroplasty is a sound option until skeletal maturity, allowing surgeons to choose the appropriate procedure based on the patient's growth status, and may reduce the amount of shortening by preserving nearby physis.

Usefulness of increased 18F-FDG uptake for detecting local recurrence in patients with extremity osteosarcoma treated with surgical resection and endoprosthetic replacement.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the changes of increased F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose ((18)F-FDG) uptake around the prosthesis and its ability to differentiate local recurrence from postsurgical change after endoprosthetic replacement in extremity osteosarcoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 355 positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) scans in 109 extremity osteosarcoma patients were retrospectively analyzed. All patients were followed up with (18)F-FDG PET/CT for more than 3 years after tumor resection. For semiquantitative assessment, we drew a volume of interest around the entire prosthesis of the extremity and measured the maximum standardized uptake value (SUV max). Independent samples t test was used to compare SUV max at each follow-up time. SUV max at 3 months (SUV1) and SUV max at the time of local recurrence in patients with recurrence or at the last follow-up in others (SUV2) were compared using the Mann-Whitney test. Diagnostic performances of PET parameters were assessed using ROC curve analyses. RESULTS: Nine patients (8 %) showed a local recurrence. Mean SUV max at 3, 12, 24, and 36 months was 3.1 ± 1.5, 3.8 ± 1.9, 3.6 ± 1.9, and 3.7 ± 1.5 respectively. In ROC curve analysis, the combination of SUV2 >4.6 and ΔSUV >75.0 was a more useful parameter for predicting local recurrence than SUV2 or ΔSUV alone. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for identifying local recurrence were 89, 76, 77 % for SUV2; 78, 81, 81 % for ΔSUV; and 78, 94, 93 % for the combined criterion respectively. CONCLUSION: The combination of SUV2 and ΔSUV was more useful than the SUV2 or ΔSUV used alone for the prediction of local recurrence.

Clinical outcome of low-grade central osteosarcoma and role of CDK4 and MDM2 immunohistochemistry as a diagnostic adjunct.

INTRODUCTION: Low-grade osteosarcoma encompasses parosteal osteosarcoma (POS) and low-grade central osteosarcoma (LCOS), with LCOS more rare than POS. LCOS is also more likely to be misdiagnosed and inappropriately treated with an intralesional procedure, due to its misleading radiological features and the overlap of its pathological characteristics with those of benign bone tumors. Therefore, as a diagnostic adjunct for LCOS, immunohistochemical assay with murine double-minute type 2 (MDM2) and cyclin-dependent kinase 4 (CDK4) have been tried with controversial results. We investigated (1) the clinical course and surgical outcome of LCOS, and (2) the diagnostic role of immune-histochemical markers (CDK4, MDM2) and their correlation with clinico-radiologic findings. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 16 LCOS patients with regard to age, gender, tumor location, plain radiographic pattern, tumor volume, extraosseous extension, initial diagnosis, initial treatment, definitive diagnosis, definitive treatment, surgical margins, histochemical markers, and oncological outcome. RESULTS: Final survival status was continuous disease-free in 14, alive with disease in 1, and remaining 1 patient died of other cancer. Except for 1 patient who had not undergone excision of their primary lesion, no patients developed a local recurrence. Eight tumors (50%) showed diffuse immunostaining for CDK4. Three of 8 tumors labeled for CDK4 were also positive for MDM2. Six (75%) of 8 CDK4-positive tumors displayed lytic lesions on a plain radiograph; in contrast, 2 (33%) of 6 tumors showing a sclerotic pattern on a plain radiograph were positive for CDK4. CONCLUSIONS: The diagnosis of LCOS is challenging; however, if it is properly diagnosed, there is a high chance of a cure with wide excision alone. Positive immunostaining for CDK4 or MDM2 may be used as a diagnostic adjunct, although negative immunostaining cannot rule out this tumor. The clinical, radiological, and typical pathological findings are vital in raising the suspicion of this rare tumor.

Spontaneous necrosis and additional tumor necrosis induced by preoperative chemotherapy for osteosarcoma: a case-control study.

BACKGROUND: Extent of spontaneous necrosis in untreated osteosarcoma may imply tumor aggressiveness. Reports regarding this issue are scarce and there are several points to be clarified; (1) the correlation between tumor size and extent of spontaneous necrosis displayed was conflicting, (2) whether there is difference in necrosis rate between intra- and extra-medullary portion of tumor is not described, if it does, its relation with other clinico-pathologic variables, (3) in patients with surgical treatment only, >20 % spontaneous necrosis was a poor prognostic factor, however, whether that cutoff is still valid in chemotherapy cohort remains to be determined, (4) expected additional tumor necrosis by chemotherapy was made by simply comparing the necrosis rates of untreated and treated osteosarcoma cohort. METHODS: We evaluated spontaneous necrosis in 43 osteosarcoma patients (39 Stage IIB, 4 Stage III). We evaluated overall necrosis rate and separately evaluated the necrosis rate of intra- and extra-medullary portion of tumor. These results were compared with other clinico-pathologic variables. To evaluate additional tumor necrosis induced by neoadjuvant chemotherapy, case (38 without preoperative chemotherapy)-control (76 with preoperative chemotherapy) study was performed. RESULTS: The mean spontaneous necrosis rate was 23 %. Overall spontaneous necrosis was not associated with tumor volume. Necrosis rate of extramedullary tumors was higher in cases of large tumors (p = 0.02). In patients with upfront surgery followed by chemotherapy, 5-year event-free survival rate of patients with >20 and <20 % spontaneous necrosis were 82 ± 17 and 79 ± 18.5 %, respectively (p = 0.75). After chemotherapy, regardless of tumor volume and location, control group tumors showed an increase in the tumor necrosis of approximately 50 %. CONCLUSION: In chemotherapy era, the extent of spontaneous necrosis has no relation with survival. The expected additional tumor-killing effect of preoperative chemotherapy is around 50 % of initial tumor volume.

Correlation between fluid-fluid levels on initial MRI and the response to chemotherapy in stage IIb osteosarcoma.

BACKGROUND: The presence of fluid-fluid levels (FFLs) on osteosarcoma magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is underestimated as a nonspecific finding; however, we hypothesized that FFL in conventional osteosarcoma may be indicative of chemoresistance. METHODS: In 567 stage IIB osteosarcoma patients, we evaluated the following: the incidence of FFL and their correlation with other clinicopathological variables; tumor volume change after chemotherapy and survival according to the presence of FFL; and the relationship between survival and the extent of FFL. RESULTS: One hundred eight (19 %) tumors showed FFL on initial MRI. FFL were correlated with proximal humeral location (P = 0.017), osteolytic on plain radiographs (P < 0.001), tumor enlargement after chemotherapy (P < 0.001), and poor histological response (P = 0.005). Large tumor (P < 0.01), proximal tumor location (P = 0.01), and presence of FFL (P < 0.01) were independent predictors of poor survival. Compared to the extensive FFL (more than one third of the tumor), small foci of FFL (less than one third of the tumor) showed a high tendency for tumor enlargement after chemotherapy (P < 0.001), poor histologic response (P = 0.001), and worse survival (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: FFL on initial MRI could predict tumor progression after chemotherapy. Notably, tumors with small foci of FFL (less than one third of the tumor) have a high propensity for poor outcome. Patients with this finding should be considered for risk-adapted therapy.

Early response monitoring to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in osteosarcoma using sequential ¹8F-FDG PET/CT and MRI.

PURPOSE: We evaluated the potential of sequential fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose ((18) F-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) and MRI (PET/MRI) after one cycle of neoadjuvant chemotherapy to predict a poor histologic response in osteosarcoma. METHODS: A prospective study was conducted on 30 patients with osteosarcoma treated with two cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery. All patients underwent PET/MRI before, after one cycle, and after the completion of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, respectively. Imaging parameters [maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), metabolic tumor volume (MTV), total lesion glycolysis (TLG), and tumor volume based on magnetic resonance (MR) images (MRV)] and their % changes were calculated on each PET/MRI data set, and histological responses were evaluated on the postsurgical specimen. RESULTS: A total of 17 patients (57%) exhibited a poor histologic response after two cycles of chemotherapy. Unlike the little volumetric change in MRI, PET parameters significantly decreased after one and two cycles of chemotherapy, respectively. After one cycle of chemotherapy, SUVmax, MTV, and TLG predicted the poor responders. Among these parameters, either MTV ≥ 47 mL or TLG ≥ 190 g after one cycle of chemotherapy was significantly associated with a poor histologic response on multivariate logistic regression analysis (OR 8.98, p = 0.039). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of these parameters were 71%, 85% and 77%; and 71%, 85% and 77 %, respectively. CONCLUSION: The histologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in osteosarcoma can be predicted accurately by FDG PET after one course of chemotherapy. Among PET parameters, MTV and TLG were independent predictors of the histologic response.

Examination of the cutoff value of postchemotherapy increase in tumor volume as a predictor of subsequent oncologic events in stage IIB osteosarcoma.

BACKGROUND: Tumor enlargement after chemotherapy is a predictor of a poor histological response, poor survival, and local recurrence. However, the cutoff point of tumor enlargement for predicting subsequent oncologic events has not been determined. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 567 patients who were treated at our institute for stage IIB osteosarcoma. We used receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis of tumor volume increase for the prediction of subsequent metastasis or local recurrence, and calculated diagnostic indices for different cutoff values. RESULTS: A tumor volume increase of >15% predicted subsequent metastasis or local recurrence with a sensitivity of 64.7%, a specificity of 81.5%, a positive predictive value of 71.6%, and a negative predictive value of 76.1%. Increases in tumor volumes based on this cutoff value were able to predict subsequent oncologic events in all clinical subgroups, except in cases of rare pathologic subtypes. However, for tumors in the proximal humerus, a cutoff value of 25% had optimal predictive value. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that a cutoff value of 15% for tumor volume increase is useful for predicting subsequent metastasis or local recurrence. Our results suggest that tumor enlargement after chemotherapy serves as an easily assessable clinical parameter for risk-adapted therapy.

Overlapping allograft for primary or salvage bone tumor reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Compared with end-to-end allograft coaptation, overlapping allograft offer a superior union rate by increasing the contact area. However, reports on overlapping allograft are scarce. Therefore, we attempted to confirm the usefulness of this technique either after primary tumor resection or in salvaging a failed reconstruction. METHODS: We analyzed the outcome of 35 overlapping allografts reconstructions. Indications were primary reconstruction of a skeletal defect (n = 19) and salvage of a failed reconstruction (n = 16). Graft survival, union rate, and time to union were evaluated as a function of clinical variables such as age, use of chemotherapy, type of junction, method of fixation, length of overlapped bone, and method of overlapping. RESULTS: All 35 overlapping allografts showed union at a mean of 5.6 months (range, 3-14 months). One allograft was removed with local recurrence at 19 months post-operatively. Average length of overlapped bone was 3.5 cm (range, 1.4-6.5 cm). Patient age <15-years (P = 0.001) and circumferential overlapping (P = 0.011) shortened the time to union. CONCLUSIONS: In terms of graft failure rate, union rate, and time to union, overlapping allograft is an excellent technique, which overcomes the limitations of end-to-end fixation.

Proximal tumor location and fluid-fluid levels on MRI predict resistance to chemotherapy in stage IIB osteosarcoma.

BACKGROUND: Primary tumor growth during neoadjuvant chemotherapy is believed to be a sign of resistance to chemotherapy (chemoresistance), and often is associated with poor histologic response, local recurrence, and poorer survival. Currently there are no proven indicators to predict poor response to chemotherapy at the time of diagnosis. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We asked (1) what clinicopathologic factors present at diagnosis predict primary tumor growth during neoadjuvant chemotherapy, (2) what factors at presentation predict survival, and (3) when the factors at presentation and the treatment-related factors are considered, what factors independently correlate with survival. METHODS: We studied 567 patients with Stage IIB osteosarcomas. The factors assessed included age, sex, location, pattern on plain radiographs (radiodense, radiolucent, mixed), MRI findings, pathologic subtype, initial tumor volume determined by MRI, tumor volume change after chemotherapy, surgical margin, and histologic response to preoperative chemotherapy. Logistic modeling was used to identify risk factors. RESULTS: Independent risk factors associated with primary tumor growth after neoadjuvant chemotherapy were proximal tumor location (p < 0.01; relative risk [RR], 2.41; 95% CI, 1.5-3.86) and fluid-fluid level on initial MRI (p < 0.01; RR, 5.56; 95% CI, 3.48-8.87). Among factors at presentation, large initial tumor volume (p < 0.01; RR, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.22-2.04), proximal tumor site (p < 0.01; RR, 1.61; 95% CI, 1.19-2.19), and presence of fluid-fluid level (p < 0.01; RR, 1.83; 95% CI, 1.37-2.5) independently predicted reduced event-free survival. When we consider the factors at presentation and treatment-related factors, large initial tumor volume (p < 0.01; RR, 1.54), tumor growth after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (p < 0.01; RR, 3.88), inadequate surgical margin (p < 0.01; RR, 2.42), and poor histologic response (p = 0.03; RR, 1.43) were independent poor prognostic factors of event-free survival. CONCLUSIONS: Proximal tumor location and the presence of the fluid-fluid level on initial MRI were predictors of tumor progression and poor survival in patients presenting with Stage IIB osteosarcomas. If confirmed in other studies, patients with these risk factors should be considered for trials of other treatment strategy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, prognostic study. See the Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Secondary hematological malignancies in patients with sarcoma: A single­center retrospective study.

The present retrospective study investigated the clinical features and prognosis of secondary hematological malignancies (SHMs) in patients with sarcoma at Korea Cancer Center Hospital (Seoul, South Korea). Patients who had been diagnosed with SHMs after having received treatment for sarcoma between January 2000 and May 2023 were enrolled. Clinical data were collected from the patients' medical records. Clinical characteristics were analyzed, including SHM incidence, type and prognosis. Of 2,953 patients with sarcoma, 18 (0.6%) were diagnosed with SHMs. Their median age at the time of sarcoma diagnosis was 39.5 (range, 9-72) years, and 74% (n=14) of these patients were male. The histological features of sarcoma varied, with osteosarcoma diagnosed in nine patients (50%). All patients with sarcoma underwent surgical treatment, and 16 (88.8%) received chemotherapy. The most common type of SHMs was acute myeloid leukemia (n=6; 33.3%), followed by myelodysplastic syndrome (n=5; 27.7%). The median latency period between the sarcoma diagnosis and SHM identification was 30 (range, 11-121) months. A total of 13 (72.2%) patients received treatment for the SHM. The median overall survival after SHM diagnosis was 15.7 (range, 0.4-154.9) months. The incidence of SHMs in sarcoma in the present study was consistent with that reported previously. The presence of SHMs was associated with a poor patient prognosis, especially if treatment for SHMs was not administered.

¹8F-FDG PET SUVmax as an indicator of histopathologic response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in extremity osteosarcoma.

PURPOSE: This study evaluated the usefulness of the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) as a measure of histologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with extremity osteosarcoma. The correlation between [(18) F]FDG PET SUVmax values and histologic response to preoperative chemotherapy was also assessed prospectively using PET/MRI. METHODS: A total of 26 consecutive patients with high-grade osteosarcoma were prospectively enrolled. All patients underwent parallel PET and MRI scans before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Using the PET and MRI images and pathologic mapping, we assessed the percentage necrosis by histology at the highest metabolic activity point in the tumors. This was defined as the minimum histologic response. The predictive values of SUVmax before (SUV1) and after (SUV2) chemotherapy and the SUV change ratio were determined. Correlations were also investigated among SUV2, minimum histologic response and histologic response. RESULTS: Histologically, 13 patients were classified as good responders and 13 as poor responders. Patients with an SUV2 of >5 showed a poor histologic response. A significant correlation was found between SUV2 and histologic response (Spearman's rho -0.642; P < 0.001), and SUV2 and histologic response were both found to be significantly correlated with minimum histologic response (Spearman's rho -0.515 and 0.911; P = 0.007 and P < 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSION: A SUVmax of more than 5 after neoadjuvant chemotherapy identified the majority of histologic nonresponders (sensitivity 61.3 %, PPV 88.9 %). Tumor necrosis at the point of maximum metabolic activity was found to be significantly correlated with the histologic response of entire resected specimen.

Comparison of (18)F-FDG PET/CT and (99 m)Tc-MDP bone scintigraphy for detection of bone metastasis in osteosarcoma.

OBJECTIVE: We compared the diagnostic performance of (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) and (99 m)Tc-methylene diphosphonate bone scintigraphy (BS) for the detection of bone metastasis in osteosarcoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 206 patients with stage II-IV osteosarcoma treated with surgery and chemotherapy as well as at least one paired PET/CT and BS scan (defined as an examination). PET/CT and BS images were interpreted separately. When analyzing the diagnostic yield of a combination of PET/CT and BS (PET/CT+BS), an examination was considered positive if either PET/CT or BS scored positive. The final diagnosis was obtained from histological findings or clinical follow-up with imaging studies for at least 6 months. Diagnostic performances of PET/CT, BS, and their combinations were calculated. RESULTS: Out of 833 examinations in 206 patients, 55 with 101 lesions in 38 patients were confirmed as bone metastases. The sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy were 95, 98, and 98%, respectively, for PET/CT; 76, 97, and 96%, respectively, for BS; and 100, 96, and 97%, respectively, for PET/CT+BS in an examination-based analysis. Lesion-based analysis demonstrated that the sensitivity of PET/CT+BS (100%) was significantly higher than that of PET/CT (92%) or BS (74%) alone. BS detected significantly less bone metastases in the growth plate region than outside the growth plate region (22 vs. 77%). CONCLUSIONS: PET/CT is more sensitive and accurate than BS for diagnosing bone metastases in osteosarcoma. The combined use of PET/CT and BS improves sensitivity.

Treatment outcomes of stereotactic body radiation therapy for primary and metastatic sarcoma of the spine.

PURPOSE: This study evaluated the treatment outcomes of spine stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in sarcoma patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 44 sarcoma patients and 75 spinal lesions (6 primary tumors, 69 metastatic tumors) treated with SBRT were retrospectively reviewed between 2006 and 2017. The median radiation dose was 33 Gy (range, 18-45 Gy) in 3 fractions (range, 1-5) prescribed to the 75% isodose line. RESULTS: The median follow-up duration was 18.2 months. The 1-year local control was 76.4%, and patients treated with single vertebral body were identified as a favorable prognostic factor on multivariate analyses. Progression-free survival at 1 year was 31.9%, with the interval between initial diagnosis and SBRT and extent of disease at the time of treatment being significant prognostic factors. The 1-year overall survival was 80.5%, and PTV and visceral metastases were independently associated with inferior overall survival. CONCLUSION: SBRT for spinal sarcoma is effective in achieving local control, particularly when treating a single vertebral level with a limited extent of disease involvement, resulting in an excellent control rate. The extent of disease at the time of SBRT is significantly correlated with survival outcomes and should be considered when treating spine sarcoma.

Local recurrence has only a small effect on survival in high-risk extremity osteosarcoma.

BACKGROUND: Tumor enlargement after chemotherapy is considered one of the high-risk factors for local recurrence and survival in osteosarcoma. We hypothesized patients with this risk factor will have similar survival regardless of the development of local recurrence. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We asked (1) the prognostic factors for survival in our cohort, (2) how much effect local recurrence has on survival among patients with similar preoperative risk factors, and (3) what prognostic factors are important for survival in these selected patients. METHODS: We analyzed the prognostic factors for survival in 449 patients with extremity osteosarcoma without metastatic disease at initial diagnosis and treatment (38 with local recurrence, 411 without local recurrence). We compared the survival difference between patients with local recurrence (n = 38) and without local recurrence (control, n = 76) matched for age, location, initial tumor volume, and tumor volume change after chemotherapy, and assessed prognostic factors in this subgroup. RESULTS: In a cohort study, multivariate analysis revealed initial tumor volume, tumor enlargement, inadequate margin, and local recurrence predicted poor survival. In the case-control study, the 10-year metastasis-free survival rates of two groups were 13.1 ± 10.7% and 19.3 ± 9%, respectively. In the case-controlled groups, tumor enlargement and initial tumor volume showed multivariate significance. CONCLUSIONS: Local recurrence has a small impact on survival in patients with high-risk osteosarcoma. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, prognostic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

A comparison of tumor prosthesis implantation and pasteurized autograft-prosthesis composite for proximal tibial tumor.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Although previous reports on composite biologic reconstruction in the proximal tibial location vary, we hypothesized that this type of reconstruction may reduce the late infection rate and have advantages in terms of longevity by restoring bone stock. METHODS: Primary analysis addressed differences between 62 tumor prosthesis (TP) and 25 pasteurized autograft-prosthesis composite (PPC) reconstructions in terms of survival rates, functional outcomes, and temporal patterns of infection. RESULTS: The 10-year survival rates of the TP and PPC groups were 73.9 ± 11.7 and 68.7 ± 20.1 %, respectively (P = 0.64). Reconstructive failure occurred in 16 (25.8 %) in the TP and in 7 (28 %) in the PPC group. The cause of failures in the TP group was infection (16), whereas those of PPC group were infection (5), loosening (1), and local recurrence (1). The mean functional scores of TP (52) and PPC (20) patients that maintained a mobile joint were 24.2 (81 %) and 25.1 (83.6 %), respectively. Infection rates in the two groups were similar (P = 0.328), but infections occurred earlier in the PPC group (P = 0.011). CONCLUSIONS: This comparative study suggests composite biological reconstruction shows a comparable long-term survival rate to TP reconstruction; however, the composite method has a tendency to a lower rate of late infection.

Cause of infection in proximal tibial endoprosthetic reconstructions.

INTRODUCTION: The underlying cause of proximal tibial prosthetic failure by infection is unclear. We asked: (1) Is resection amount related to prosthetic infection? (2) What other risk factors are related with infection? (3) What are the survivorship and functional outcomes of proximal tibial endoprosthetic reconstruction? METHODS: Sixty-two patients who underwent modular proximal tibial megaprosthesis reconstruction were analyzed. Follow-up duration averaged 98 months (range 26-240 months). Associations between prognostic variables and prosthesis survival were assessed. RESULTS: The 10-year prosthetic survival of the 62 implants was 73.9 ± 11.7%. Prostheses were removed in 16 (25.8%) patients for infection and 3 of the 16 underwent amputation. Resection of >37% (P = 0.016) of the tibia was found to be related to infection. Application of chemotherapy (P = 0.912) and use of synthetic material to fix the patella tendon (P = 0.2) were not found to influence prosthetic survival. Functional outcomes (determined by the MSTS system) of the 52 patients that maintained a mobile joint averaged 24.2 (81%) (range 18-28). CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that the amount of bone resection is related with prosthetic failure by infection, however, the contribution of other risk factors should not be underestimated.