Efficacy and safety evaluation of Shenmai injections for dilated cardiomyopathy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Shenmai Injection (SMI), a Chinese herbal injection, is widely used in China for the adjuvant treatment of patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), yet its clinical efficacy and safety remain controversial. PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of SMI in the treatment of DCM. METHODS: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of SMI in the treatment of DCM were searched for and collected from the PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, SinoMed, Wan Fang, CNKI, and VIP databases between the dates of establishment of each database and July 1, 2022. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed, while the risk of bias was based on the Cochrane Collaboration tool. All data were analysed using the R software. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was applied to rate the quality of the evidence. RESULTS: In total, 16 RCTs, including 1,455 participants, were examined in this study. Evidence showed that the combination of SMI treatment and conventional treatment appears to significantly increase the clinical efficacy rate (OR=3.65, 95%CI (2.52, 5.28), p < 0.01), improve cardiac function (e.g. increase left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (MD=5.31, 95%CI (4.21, 6.40), p < 0.01), decrease left ventricular end-diastolic dimension (LVEDD) (MD=-4.57, 95% CI (-7.10, -2.04); p < 0.01) and left ventricular end-systolic diameter (LVESD) (MD=-2.46, 95% CI (-3.60, -1.33); p < 0.01), decrease brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) (MD=-215.85, 95% CI (-241.61, -190.10); p < 0.01) and N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) (MD=-504.42, 95% CI (-687.73, -321.10); p < 0.01), and increase 6-min walk distance (6MWD) (MD=114.08, 95% CI (42.32, 185.85); p < 0.01).In addition, no serious adverse effects associated with SMI were observed during the study period, thus suggesting that SMI is safe. However, the quality of evidence for these results was rated as "very low" to "low", mainly due to the poor methodological quality of the included RCTs, the small sample size, the high heterogeneity, and potential publication bias. CONCLUSION: In the present work, we provide evidence that combined SMI therapy is beneficial and safe for improving cardiac function in patients with DCM. However, due to limitations posed by the low methodological quality of the included trials, more rigorous and high-quality RCTs are needed to provide solid evidence.

The best strategy for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients in second-line treatment: A network meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Varieties of systemic treatments in second-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients have showed an improvement on survival. In this study, we performed a systematic review with a pairwise and bayesian network meta-analysis to rank the best strategy for mCRC patients in second-line treatment. METHODS: A systematic literature search through 2007 was performed to evaluate the association between several treatment combinations and overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and disease control rate (DCR) in mCRC patients. Data were carried out and pooled into a statistical indirect comparison with Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA). RESULTS: 10 trials totally comprised 4183 patients were included in our study. In NMA, For PFS, Doublet+Bev showed benefits in comparing with Doublet, Doulblet+placebo and Doublet+Ramucirumab. Also, Doublet+Aflibercept demonstrated its superiority in comparing with Doulblet+placebo. For OS, Doublet+Bev represented its superiority when comparing with Double and Doublet+placebo. Doublet+Aflibercept and Doublet+Ramucirumab also done well when opposed to Doublet+placebo. For DCR, Doublet+bev showed unique superiority when compared with Doublet, And Doublet+targeted agent did not represent benefits to each other in DCR. Doublet+bev ranked highest in terms of PFS, OS and DCR followed by Doublet+panitumumab, Doublet+placebo was the lowest in terms of PFS and OS. CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that Doublet+Bev has the major probability to provide an improvement of survival in patients with mCRC.