High-Frequency Percussive Ventilation Rescue Therapy in Morbidly Obese Patients Failing Conventional Mechanical Ventilation.

BACKGROUND: Morbidly obese patients with respiratory failure who do not improve on conventional mechanical ventilation (CMV) often undergo rescue therapy with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). We describe our experience with high-frequency percussive ventilation (HFPV) as a rescue modality. METHODS: In a retrospective analysis from 2009 to 2016, 12 morbidly obese patients underwent HFPV after failing to wean from CMV. Data were collected regarding demographics, cause of respiratory failure, ventilation settings, and hospital course outcomes. Our end point data were pre- and post-HFPV partial pressure of arterial oxygen and PaO2 to fraction of inspired oxygen (PF) ratios measured at initiation, 2, and 24 hours. RESULTS: Twelve morbidly obese patients required HFPV for respiratory failure. Causes of respiratory failure overlapped and included cardiogenic pulmonary edema (n = 8), pneumonia (n = 5), septic shock (n = 5), and asthma (n = 1). After HFPV initiation, mean fraction of inspired oxygen FiO2 was tapered from 98% to 82% and 66% at 2 and 24 hours, respectively. Mean PaO2 increased from 60.9 mm Hg before HFPV to 175.1 mm Hg (P < .05) at initiation of HFPV, then sustained at 129.5 mm Hg (P < .05) and 88.1 mm Hg (P < .005) at 2 and 24 hours, respectively. Mean PF ratio improved from 66.1 before HFPV to 180.3 (P < .05), 181.0 (P < .05) and 148.9 (P < .0005) at initiation, 2, and 24 hours, respectively. The improvement in mean PaO2 and PF ratios was durable at 24 hours whether or not the patient was returned to CMV (n = 10) or remained on HFPV (n = 2). Survival to discharge was 66.7%. CONCLUSION: In our cohort of morbidly obese patients, HFPV was successfully utilized as a rescue therapy precluding the need for ECMO. Despite our small sample size, HFPV should be considered as a rescue therapy in morbidly obese patients failing CMV prior to the initiation of ECMO. Our retrospective analysis supports consideration for HFPV as another form of rescue therapy for obese patients with refractory hypoxemia and respiratory failure who are not improving with CMV.

Cardiac Amyloidosis in the Setting of a Sarcomatous Pericardial Mass.

Cardiac amyloidosis is a significantly underdiagnosed disease but should be suspected in anyone with restrictive heart physiology. Here, we present a case of a sarcomatous pericardial mass confounding the patient's progressive diastolic heart failure. Amyloidosis was eventually discovered by piecing together serial transthoracic echocardiogram, functional MRI, and technetium-99m (99mTc) pyrophosphate scintigraphy findings along with a negative lab workup. The presence of the sarcomatous pericardial mass raised the question of whether it played a role in the onset and progression of amyloidosis, but nonetheless, the presence of both diseases rendered multifaceted challenges regarding our patient's care. Anyone suspected to have amyloidosis should receive appropriate testing for a definitive diagnosis to catch the disease process and offer early treatment, as exciting research is emerging showing transthyretin stabilizers to have a reduction in all-cause mortality.

Sepsis in Immunocompromised Host and a Hematologic Complication.

CASE PRESENTATION: A 43-year-old Puerto Rican man with a kidney transplant presented to the ED with 2 weeks of flu-like symptoms, nausea, and vomiting. He had plasma exchange therapy 2 months before for acute transplant rejection and has been tolerating a heightened immunosuppressive regimen. CT scans characterized opacities as possibly early tree-in-bud opacities (Fig 1A). Patient remained stable throughout hospital stay with an unremarkable workup and was discharged with doxycycline for nonspecific pneumonia.

Inter-rater reliability and prognostic value of baseline Radiographic Assessment of Lung Edema (RALE) scores in observational cohort studies of inpatients with COVID-19.

OBJECTIVES: To reliably quantify the radiographic severity of COVID-19 pneumonia with the Radiographic Assessment of Lung Edema (RALE) score on clinical chest X-rays among inpatients and examine the prognostic value of baseline RALE scores on COVID-19 clinical outcomes. SETTING: Hospitalised patients with COVID-19 in dedicated wards and intensive care units from two different hospital systems. PARTICIPANTS: 425 patients with COVID-19 in a discovery data set and 415 patients in a validation data set. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOMES: We measured inter-rater reliability for RALE score annotations by different reviewers and examined for associations of consensus RALE scores with the level of respiratory support, demographics, physiologic variables, applied therapies, plasma host-response biomarkers, SARS-CoV-2 RNA load and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Inter-rater agreement for RALE scores improved from fair to excellent following reviewer training and feedback (intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.85 vs 0.93, respectively). In the discovery cohort, the required level of respiratory support at the time of CXR acquisition (supplemental oxygen or non-invasive ventilation (n=178); invasive-mechanical ventilation (n=234), extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (n=13)) was significantly associated with RALE scores (median (IQR): 20.0 (14.1-26.7), 26.0 (20.5-34.0) and 44.5 (34.5-48.0), respectively, p<0.0001). Among invasively ventilated patients, RALE scores were significantly associated with worse respiratory mechanics (plateau and driving pressure) and gas exchange metrics (PaO2/FiO2 and ventilatory ratio), as well as higher plasma levels of IL-6, soluble receptor of advanced glycation end-products and soluble tumour necrosis factor receptor 1 (p<0.05). RALE scores were independently associated with 90-day survival in a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model (adjusted HR 1.04 (1.02-1.07), p=0.002). We replicated the significant associations of RALE scores with baseline disease severity and mortality in the independent validation data set. CONCLUSIONS: With a reproducible method to measure radiographic severity in COVID-19, we found significant associations with clinical and physiologic severity, host inflammation and clinical outcomes. The incorporation of radiographic severity assessments in clinical decision-making may provide important guidance for prognostication and treatment allocation in COVID-19.

Radiographic Assessment of Lung Edema (RALE) Scores are Highly Reproducible and Prognostic of Clinical Outcomes for Inpatients with COVID-19.

INTRODUCTION: Chest imaging is necessary for diagnosis of COVID-19 pneumonia, but current risk stratification tools do not consider radiographic severity. We quantified radiographic heterogeneity among inpatients with COVID-19 with the Radiographic Assessment of Lung Edema (RALE) score on Chest X-rays (CXRs). METHODS: We performed independent RALE scoring by ≥2 reviewers on baseline CXRs from 425 inpatients with COVID-19 (discovery dataset), we recorded clinical variables and outcomes, and measured plasma host-response biomarkers and SARS-CoV-2 RNA load from subjects with available biospecimens. RESULTS: We found excellent inter-rater agreement for RALE scores (intraclass correlation co-efficient=0.93). The required level of respiratory support at the time of baseline CXRs (supplemental oxygen or non-invasive ventilation [n=178]; invasive-mechanical ventilation [n=234], extracorporeal membrane oxygenation [n=13]) was significantly associated with RALE scores (median [interquartile range]: 20.0[14.1-26.7], 26.0[20.5-34.0] and 44.5[34.5-48.0], respectively, p<0.0001). Among invasively-ventilated patients, RALE scores were significantly associated with worse respiratory mechanics (plateau and driving pressure) and gas exchange metrics (PaO2/FiO2 and ventilatory ratio), as well as higher plasma levels of IL-6, sRAGE and TNFR1 levels (p<0.05). RALE scores were independently associated with 90-day survival in a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model (adjusted hazard ratio 1.04[1.02-1.07], p=0.002). We validated significant associations of RALE scores with baseline severity and mortality in an independent dataset of 415 COVID-19 inpatients. CONCLUSION: Reproducible assessment of radiographic severity revealed significant associations with clinical and physiologic severity, host-response biomarkers and clinical outcome in COVID-19 pneumonia. Incorporation of radiographic severity assessments may provide prognostic and treatment allocation guidance in patients hospitalized with COVID-19.