First clinical data on artificial intelligence-guided catheter ablation in long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation.

INTRODUCTION: Despite advanced ablation strategies and major technological improvements, treatment of persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) remains challenging and the underlying pathophysiology is not fully understood. This study analyzed the multiple procedure outcome and safety of catheter ablation of spatiotemporal dispersions (DISPERS) detected by artificial intelligence (AI)-guided software in patients with long-standing persistent AF. METHODS AND RESULTS: The Volta VX1 software was used for 50 consecutive patients undergoing catheter ablation for persistent AF. First, high-density mapping (78% biatrial) with a multipolar mapping catheter was performed. In addition to pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), ablation of DISPERS was performed aiming at homogenizing, dissecting, isolating, or connecting DISPERS areas to nonconducting anatomical structures. Follow-up contained regular visits at our outpatient clinic at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months including 7-day Holter electrocardiograms. Patients were mainly suffering from long-standing persistent AF (mean AF duration 50.30 ± 54.28 months). Following PVI, ablation of left atrial and right atrial DISPERS areas led to AF cycle length prolongation (mean of 162.0 ± 16.6 to 202.2 ± 21.6 ms after) and AF termination to atrial tachycardia (AT) or sinus rhythm (SR) in 12 patients (24%). No stroke or pericardial effusion occurred; major groin complications (pseudoaneurysm n = 1, atrioventricular fistula n = 1) were detected in two patients. After a blanking period of 6 weeks, recurrence of any atrial arrhythmia was documented in 26 patients (52%). The majority of patients presented with organized AT (n = 15) while AF was present in n = 9 patients and AT/AF was observed in n = 2 patients. Twenty-two patients underwent reablation. During a mean follow-up of 363.14 ± 187.42 days and after an average of 1.46 ± 0.68 procedures, 82% of patients remained in stable SR. CONCLUSION: DISPERS-guided ablation using machine learning software (the Volta VX1 software) in addition to PVI in long-standing persistent AF ablation resulted in high long-term success rates regarding AF and AT elimination. Most arrhythmia recurrences were reentrant AT. After a total of 1.46 ± 0.68 procedures, freedom from AF/AT was 82%. Despite prolonged procedure times complication rates were low. Randomized studies are necessary to evaluate long-term efficacy of dispersion-guided ablation using AI.

Myocardial injury and inflammation following pulsed-field ablation and very high-power short-duration ablation for atrial fibrillation.

INTRODUCTION: Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is an established treatment strategy for atrial fibrillation (AF). To improve PVI efficacy and safety, high-power short-duration (HPSD) ablation and pulsed-field ablation (PFA) were recently introduced into clinical practice. This study aimed to determine the extent of myocardial injury and systemic inflammation following PFA, HPSD, and standard RFA using established biomarkers. METHODS: We included 179 patients with paroxysmal AF receiving first-time PVI with different ablation technologies: standard RFA (30-40 W/20-30 s, n = 52), power-controlled HPSD (70 W/5-7 s, n = 60), temperature-controlled HPSD (90 W/4 s, n = 32), and PFA (biphasic, bipolar waveform, n = 35). High-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT), creatine kinase (CK), CK MB isoform (CK-MB), and white blood cell (WBC) count were determined before and after ablation. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were well-balanced between groups (age 63.1 ± 10.3 years, 61.5% male). Postablation hs-cTnT release was significantly higher with PFA (1469.3 ± 495.0 ng/L), HPSD-70W (1322.3 ± 510.6 ng/L), and HPSD-90W (1441.2 ± 409.9 ng/L) than with standard RFA (1045.9 ± 369.7 ng/L; p < .001). CK and CK-MB release was increased with PFA by 3.4-fold and 5.8-fold, respectively, as compared to standard RFA (p < .001). PFA was associated with the lowest elevation in WBC (Δ1.5 ± 1.5 × 109 /L), as compared to standard RFA (Δ3.8 ± 2.5 × 109 /L, p < .001), HPSD-70W (Δ2.7 ± 1.7 × 109 /L, p = .037), and HPSD-90W (Δ3.6 ± 2.5 × 109 /L, p < .001). CONCLUSION: Among the four investigated ablation technologies, PFA was associated with the highest myocardial injury and the lowest inflammatory reaction.

Renal function and periprocedural complications in patients undergoing left atrial catheter ablation: A comparison between uninterrupted direct oral anticoagulants and phenprocoumon administration.

BACKGROUND: Data regarding uninterrupted oral anticoagulation in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) during catheter ablation for left atrial arrhythmias is limited. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of periprocedural uninterrupted direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) compared with uninterrupted phenprocoumon in patients with CKD undergoing left atrial catheter ablation. METHODS AND RESULTS: We conducted a retrospective single-center study of patients who underwent left atrial catheter ablation between 2016 and 2019 with underlying chronic kidney disease (glomerular filtration rate (GFR) between 15 and 45 ml/min). The primary objective of this study was to investigate whether direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) therapy or warfarin presents a superior safety profile in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) undergoing left atrial catheter ablation. We compared periprocedural complications (arteriovenous fistula, aneurysm, significant hematoma (> 5 cm)) and/or bleeding (drop in hemoglobin of >2 g/dl, pericardial effusion, retroperitoneal bleeding, other bleeding, stroke) between patients receiving either uninterrupted DOAC or warfarin therapy. Secondary analysis included patient baseline characteristics as well as procedural data. A total of 188 patients (female n = 108 (57%), mean age 75.3 ± 8.1 years, mean GFR 36.8 ± 6 ml/min) were included in this study. Underlying arrhythmias were atrial fibrillation (n = 104, 55.3%) and atypical atrial flutter (n = 84, 44.7%). Of these, n = 132 patients (70%) were under a DOAC medication, and n = 56 (30%) were under phenprocoumon. Major groin complications including pseudoaneurysm and/or AV fistula occurred in 8.9% of patients in the phenprocoumon group vs. 11.3% of patients in the DOAC group, which was not statistically significant (p = 0.62). Incidence of cardiac tamponade (2.3% vs. 0%; p = 0.55) and stroke (0% vs. 0%) were low in both DOAC and phenprocoumon groups with similar post-procedural drops in hemoglobin levels (1.1±1 g/dl vs 1.1±0.9 g/dl; p = 0.71). CONCLUSION: The type of anticoagulation had no significant influence on bleeding or thromboembolic events as well as groin complications in this retrospective study. Despite observing an increased rate of groin complications, the uninterrupted use of DOAC or phenprocoumon during left atrial catheter ablation in patients with CKD appears to be feasible and effective.

Pulsed field ablation in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices: an ex vivo assessment of safety.

BACKGROUND: Pulse field ablation (PFA) is a novel catheter ablation technology with potential safety benefits due to its tissue selectivity. It has the potential to directly damage or interact with the functionality of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) in the form of electromagnetic interference (EMI). The aim of our study was to assess the impact of PFA on CIEDs. METHODS: PFA lesions (45 per CIED) were applied from the Farapulse system to CIEDs (< 5 cm from the lead tip and < 15 cm from the generator). All devices were checked before and after PFA application for proper sensing and pacing functionality as well as for integrity of shock circuits in ICDs using a heart simulator. Moreover, devices were then interrogated for any spontaneous reprogramming, mode switching or other EMI effects. RESULTS: In total, 44 CIEDs were tested (16 pacemaker, 21 ICDs, 7 CRT-P/D) with 1980 PFA applications. There was no change in device settings, functionality and electrical parameters, and there was no macroscopic damage to the devices. The risk of damage to the electric components or leads on a patient-based analysis is 0/44 (95% CI 0-8%) and on a PFA pulse-based analysis is 0/1980 (95% CI 0-0.2%). Clinically relevant EMI appeared with oversensing and pacing inhibition but not tachycardia detection. CONCLUSIONS: Bipolar PFA appears safe and does not result in damage to CIEDs or leads. Clinically relevant EMI does occur, but appropriate peri-procedural programming may mitigate this. In vivo studies are needed to confirm our findings.