Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Neuroradiology ; 62(11): 1411-1419, 2020 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32483725

RESUMO

PURPOSE: In diffusion MRI (dMRI), it remains unclear to know how much increase of b-value is conveying additional biological meaning. We tested the correlations between cortical microarchitecture and diffusion metrics computed from standard (1000 s/mm2), high (3000 s/mm2), to very high (5000 s/mm2) b-value dMRI. METHODS: Healthy volunteers were scanned with a dMRI pulse sequence that was first optimized together with a T1-WI and T2-WI. Averaged cortical surface map of estimated myelin (T1-WI/T2-WI) was compared with surface maps of mean diffusivity (MD) computed from each b-value (MD1000, MD3000, and MD5000) and to surface map of mean kurtosis (MK computed from the 0-, 1000-, to 3000-s/mm2 shells) in 360 cortical parcels using Spearman correlations, multiple linear regressions, and Akaike information criteria (AIC). RESULTS: Surface map from MD1000 showed variations not related to myelin but the MD3000 and MD5000 maps inversely mirrored estimated myelin map; lower MD values being observed in more myelinated cortical areas. MK mirrored myelinated cortical areas. Quantitatively, Spearman correlations between myelin and MD became more and more negative as long as b-values increased while the correlation was positive between myelin and MK. Multiple regression models confirmed negative associations between myelin and MD that were significantly better from MD1000 to MD3000 and MD5000 (R2 = 0.33, p < 0.001; R2 = 0.43, p < 0.001; and R2 = 0.50, p < 0.001) and positive association between myelin and MK (R2 = 0.53, p < 0.001). Comparisons of the 3 statistical models showed the best performances with MK and MD5000 (AICMK < AICMD5000 < AICMD3000 < AICMD1000). CONCLUSION: Higher b-values are more closely related to subtle cellular variations of the cortical microarchitecture.


Assuntos
Mapeamento Encefálico/métodos , Encéfalo/diagnóstico por imagem , Encéfalo/ultraestrutura , Imagem de Difusão por Ressonância Magnética/métodos , Voluntários Saudáveis , Humanos , Processamento de Imagem Assistida por Computador , Razão Sinal-Ruído
2.
J Neurol Sci ; 415: 116929, 2020 Aug 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32460145

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Specific cognitive rehabilitation (SCR) has been suggested for multiple sclerosis (MS). A randomized controlled trial (RCT) evaluating the therapeutic effects of SCR is necessary. OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate the superiority of a SCR program (REACTIV) over nonspecific intervention (NSI) for neuropsychological (NP) assessment, virtual reality (VR) cognitive testing and daily cognitive functioning. METHODS: A single-blind RCT compared SCR and NSI in patients with MS with cognitive complaint. Both programs included 50 individual sessions, 3 times a week for 17 weeks in a real-world setting. The primary end-point was NP assessment. Secondary end-points included semiecological VR tasks (Urban Daily Cog®) and daily cognitive functioning assessment. Maintenance of the effects at 8 months was studied. RESULTS: Of the 35 patients, 18 completed the SCR, and 17 completed the NSI. Several NP and semiecological scores improved significantly more after SCR than after NSI. More NP scores improved significantly after SCR than after NSI. SCR improved daily cognitive functioning. Most improvements were maintained at 8 months. CONCLUSION: SCR performed in a real-world setting is superior to NSI for improving performance in specific cognitive domains and information processing speed, and for improving cognitive functioning, as evaluated by ecological tools close to daily life and a daily cognitive functioning questionnaire.


Assuntos
Esclerose Múltipla , Reabilitação do Acidente Vascular Cerebral , Cognição , Humanos , Esclerose Múltipla/complicações , Testes Neuropsicológicos , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA