Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Pediatr Emerg Care ; 38(3): e1063-e1068, 2022 Mar 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35226632

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Despite evidence-based guidelines, antibiotics prescribed for uncomplicated skin and soft tissue infections can involve inappropriate microbial coverage. Our aim was to evaluate the appropriateness of antibiotic prescribing practices for mild nonpurulent cellulitis in a pediatric tertiary academic medical center over a 1-year period. METHODS: Eligible patients treated in the emergency department or urgent care settings for mild nonpurulent cellulitis from January 2017 to December 2017 were identified by an International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, code for cellulitis. The primary outcome was appropriateness of prescribed antibiotics as delineated by adherence with the Infectious Diseases Society of America guidelines. Secondary outcomes include reutilization rate as defined by revisit to the emergency department/urgent cares within 14 days of the initial encounter. RESULTS: A total of 967 encounters were evaluated with 60.0% overall having guideline-adherent care. Common reasons for nonadherence included inappropriate coverage of MRSA with clindamycin (n = 217, 56.1%) and single-agent coverage with sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim (n = 129, 33.3%). There were 29 revisits within 14 days of initial patient encounters or a reutilization rate of 3.0%, which was not significantly associated with the Infectious Diseases Society of America adherence. CONCLUSIONS: Our data show antibiotic prescription for nonpurulent cellulitis as a potential area of standardization and optimization of care at our center.


Assuntos
Infecções dos Tecidos Moles , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Celulite (Flegmão)/tratamento farmacológico , Criança , Clindamicina/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Prescrição Inadequada , Padrões de Prática Médica , Estudos Retrospectivos , Infecções dos Tecidos Moles/tratamento farmacológico , Combinação Trimetoprima e Sulfametoxazol/efeitos adversos
2.
JAMA Netw Open ; 6(5): e2313354, 2023 05 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37171815

RESUMO

Importance: The prevalence of urinary tract infection (UTI), bacteremia, and bacterial meningitis in febrile infants with SARS-CoV-2 is largely unknown. Knowledge of the prevalence of these bacterial infections among febrile infants with SARS-CoV-2 can inform clinical decision-making. Objective: To describe the prevalence of UTI, bacteremia, and bacterial meningitis among febrile infants aged 8 to 60 days with SARS-CoV-2 vs without SARS-CoV-2. Design, Setting, and Participants: This multicenter cross-sectional study was conducted as part of a quality improvement initiative at 106 hospitals in the US and Canada. Participants included full-term, previously healthy, well-appearing infants aged 8 to 60 days without bronchiolitis and with a temperature of at least 38 °C who underwent SARS-CoV-2 testing in the emergency department or hospital between November 1, 2020, and October 31, 2022. Statistical analysis was performed from September 2022 to March 2023. Exposures: SARS-CoV-2 positivity and, for SARS-CoV-2-positive infants, the presence of normal vs abnormal inflammatory marker (IM) levels. Main Outcomes and Measures: Outcomes were ascertained by medical record review and included the prevalence of UTI, bacteremia without meningitis, and bacterial meningitis. The proportion of infants who were SARS-CoV-2 positive vs negative was calculated for each infection type, and stratified by age group and normal vs abnormal IMs. Results: Among 14 402 febrile infants with SARS-CoV-2 testing, 8413 (58.4%) were aged 29 to 60 days; 8143 (56.5%) were male; and 3753 (26.1%) tested positive. Compared with infants who tested negative, a lower proportion of infants who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 had UTI (0.8% [95% CI, 0.5%-1.1%]) vs 7.6% [95% CI, 7.1%-8.1%]), bacteremia without meningitis (0.2% [95% CI, 0.1%-0.3%] vs 2.1% [95% CI, 1.8%-2.4%]), and bacterial meningitis (<0.1% [95% CI, 0%-0.2%] vs 0.5% [95% CI, 0.4%-0.6%]). Among infants aged 29 to 60 days who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2, 0.4% (95% CI, 0.2%-0.7%) had UTI, less than 0.1% (95% CI, 0%-0.2%) had bacteremia, and less than 0.1% (95% CI, 0%-0.1%) had meningitis. Among SARS-CoV-2-positive infants, a lower proportion of those with normal IMs had bacteremia and/or bacterial meningitis compared with those with abnormal IMs (<0.1% [0%-0.2%] vs 1.8% [0.6%-3.1%]). Conclusions and Relevance: The prevalence of UTI, bacteremia, and bacterial meningitis was lower for febrile infants who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2, particularly infants aged 29 to 60 days and those with normal IMs. These findings may help inform management of certain febrile infants who test positive for SARS-CoV-2.


Assuntos
Bacteriemia , COVID-19 , Meningites Bacterianas , Infecções Urinárias , Lactente , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , SARS-CoV-2 , Prevalência , Estudos Transversais , Teste para COVID-19 , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Bacteriemia/epidemiologia , Bacteriemia/microbiologia , Meningites Bacterianas/epidemiologia , Infecções Urinárias/epidemiologia , Infecções Urinárias/microbiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA