Mid-term outcomes of surgical aortic valve replacement using a mosaic porcine bioprosthesis with concomitant mitral valve repair.

This study retrospectively evaluated the mid-term outcomes of surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) using a stented porcine aortic valve bioprosthesis (Mosaic; Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA) with concomitant mitral valve (MV) repair. From 1999 to 2014, 157 patients (median [interquartile range] age, 75 [70-79] years; 47% women) underwent SAVR with concomitant MV repair (SAVR + MV repair), and 1045 patients (median [interquartile range] age, 76 [70-80] years; 54% women) underwent SAVR only at 10 centers in Japan as part of the long-term multicenter Japan Mosaic valve (J-MOVE) study. The 5-year overall survival rate was 81.5% ± 4.1% in the SAVR + MV repair group and 85.1% ± 1.4% in the SAVR only group, and the 8-year overall survival rates were 75.2% ± 5.7% and 78.1% ± 2.1%, respectively. Cox proportional hazards analysis showed no significant difference in the survival rates between the two groups (hazard ratio, 0.87; 95% confidence interval, 0.54-1.40; P = 0.576). Among women with mild or moderate mitral regurgitation who were not receiving dialysis, those who underwent SAVR + MV repair, were aged > 75 years, and had a preoperative left ventricular ejection fraction of 30-75% tended to have a lower mortality risk. In conclusion, this subgroup analysis of the J-MOVE cohort showed relevant mid-term outcomes after SAVR + MV repair.

[Staged Hybrid Repair of Extensive Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm with Right Aortic Arch and Isolated Left Subclavian Artery:Report of a Case].

A 69-year-old male was referred to our hospital due to extensive thoracic aortic aneurysm with right aortic arch and isolated left subclavian artery. We chose staged hybrid repair to avoid the risk of spinal cord injury and bilateral recurrent nerve paralysis. First, ascending aorta replacement with elephant trunk and reconstruction of the cervical branches were underwent. Second, we performed the thoracic endovascular aortic repair for aortic arch and descending aortic aneurysm. The postoperative course was satisfactory and, computed tomography (CT) showed successful aortic repair without any type of endoleak. He was discharged on the ninth day after the second operation. To our knowledge, this is the first report of surgical repair for an aortic aneurysm with right aortic arch and isolated subclavian artery.

Long-Term Outcomes of the Mosaic Mitral Porcine Bioprosthesis in Japan　- Results From the Japan Mosaic Valve Long-Term Multicenter Study.

BACKGROUND: This study retrospectively evaluated the long-term patient outcomes and durability of the Mosaic mitral porcine bioprosthesis in the Japan Mosaic valve long-term multicenter study.Methods and Results:The medical records of 390 patients who underwent mitral valve replacement with the Mosaic bioprosthesis at 10 centers in Japan (1999-2014) were reviewed. Patient data were collected using the Research Electronic Data Capture software. Patient survival was determined using the Kaplan-Meier method. Freedom from structural valve deterioration (SVD) and valve-related reoperation and death were determined using actuarial methods. The median (interquartile range [IQR]) age of the cohort was 73 (69-77) years. The median (IQR) follow-up period was 4.83 (1.84-8.26) years. The longest follow-up period was 15.8 years. The 30-day mortality rate was 5.4%. The 12-year actuarial survival rate was 54.1±4.5%, and the freedom from valve-related death was 85.3±3.4%. The freedom from reoperation at 12 years was 74.3±5.7%. The freedom from SVD at 12 years was 81.4±6.6% for patients aged ≥65 years and 71.6±11.1% for those aged <65 years. The median (IQR) mean pressure gradient was 4.1 (3.0-6.0) and 5.6 (4.0-6.7) mmHg at 1 and 10 years, respectively. The median (IQR) effective orifice area was 1.7 (1.4-2.0) and 1.4 (1.2-1.6) cm2at 1 and 10 years, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The Mosaic porcine bioprosthesis offered satisfactory long-term outcomes for up to 12 years.

Antithrombotic Therapy for Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Bioprosthetic Valves　- Real-World Data From the Multicenter, Prospective, Observational BPV-AF Registry.

BACKGROUND: Although bioprosthetic valve (BPV) replacements are becoming more common within our aging society, there are limited prospective data on the appropriate antithrombotic therapy for East Asian patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and BPV replacement. Antithrombotic therapy and thrombotic and hemorrhagic event rates in Japanese patients with AF and BPV replacement are investigated.Methods and Results:This multicenter, prospective, observational study enrolled patients with BPV replacement and AF. The primary efficacy outcome was stroke or systemic embolism, and the primary safety outcome was major bleeding. Of the 894 patients analyzed, 54.7%, 29.4%, and 9.6%, were treated with warfarin-based therapy, direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC)-based therapy, or antiplatelet therapy without anticoagulants, respectively; 6.3% did not receive any antithrombotic drugs. The mean observation period was 15.3±4.0 months. The event rates for stroke or systemic embolism and major bleeding were 1.95%/year and 1.86%/year, respectively. The multivariate adjusted hazard ratios for DOAC vs. warfarin were 1.02 (95% confidence intervals [CI], 0.30-3.41 [P=0.979]) for systemic embolic events and 0.96 (95% CI, 0.29-3.16 [P=0.945]) for major bleeding. CONCLUSIONS: Approximately 30% of patients with AF and BPV replacement were treated with DOAC. The risks of major bleeding and stroke or systemic embolism were similar between warfarin- and DOAC-treated patients with AF who had BPV replacement. Treatment with DOACs could be an alternative to warfarin in this population.

Comparison of Direct Oral Anticoagulants and Warfarin in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and an Aortic Bioprosthetic Valve.

BACKGROUND: Current guidelines equally recommend direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and warfarin for atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with a bioprosthetic valve (BPV); however, there are limited data comparing DOACs and warfarin in AF patients with an aortic BPV.Methods and Results: This post-hoc subgroup analysis of a multicenter, prospective, observational registry (BPV-AF Registry) aimed to compare DOACs and warfarin in AF patients with an aortic BPV. The primary outcome was a composite of stroke, systemic embolism, major bleeding, heart failure requiring hospitalization, all-cause death, or BPV reoperation. The analysis included 479 patients (warfarin group, n=258; DOAC group, n=221). Surgical aortic valve replacement was performed in 74.4% and 36.7% of patients in the warfarin and DOAC groups, respectively. During a mean follow up of 15.5 months, the primary outcome occurred in 45 (17.4%) and 32 (14.5%) patients in the warfarin and DOAC groups, respectively. No significant difference was found in the primary outcome between the 2 groups (adjusted hazard ratio: 0.88, 95% confidence interval: 0.51-1.50). No significant multiplicative interaction was observed between the anticoagulant effects and type of aortic valve procedure (P=0.577). CONCLUSIONS: Among AF patients with an aortic BPV, no significant difference was observed in the composite outcome of adverse clinical events between patients treated with warfarin and those treated with DOACs, suggesting that DOACs can be used as alternatives to warfarin in these patients.

Concomitant Mitral Regurgitation in Severe Aortic Stenosis　- A Report From the CURRENT AS Registry.

BACKGROUND: The clinical significance of concomitant mitral regurgitation (MR) has not been well addressed in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS).Methods and Results:We analyzed 3,815 patients from a retrospective multicenter registry of severe AS in Japan (CURRENT AS registry). We compared the clinical outcomes between patients with moderate/severe MR and with none/mild MR according to the initial treatment strategy (initial aortic valve replacement [AVR] or conservative strategy). The primary outcome measure was a composite of aortic valve-related death or heart failure hospitalization. At baseline, moderate/severe MR was present in 227/1,197 (19%) patients with initial AVR strategy and in 536/2,618 (20%) patients with a conservative strategy. The crude cumulative 5-year incidence of the primary outcome measure was significantly higher in patients with moderate/severe MR than in those with none/mild MR, regardless of the initial treatment strategy (25.2% vs. 14.4%, P<0.001 in the initial AVR strategy, and 63.3% vs. 40.7%, P<0.001 in the conservative strategy). After adjusting confounders, moderate/severe MR was not independently associated with higher risk for the primary outcome measure in the initial AVR strategy (hazard ratio [HR] 1.11, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.67-1.83, P=0.69), and in the conservative strategy (HR 1.13, 95% CI 0.93-1.37, P=0.22). CONCLUSIONS: Concomitant moderate/severe MR was not independently associated with higher risk for the primary outcome measure regardless of the initial treatment strategy.

Short- and mid-term outcomes of the frozen elephant-trunk procedure for degenerative aortic arch aneurysm.

PURPOSE: The frozen elephant-trunk (FET) procedure is used widely in total aortic arch replacement (TAR) surgery; however, its safety, effectiveness, and long-term outcomes compared with those of the conventional elephant trunk (cET) procedure for degenerative aneurysms are unclear. METHODS: Between July, 2011 and August, 2019, 126 patients underwent elective total aortic arch replacement at our institution. We compared the short- and mid-term outcomes of 60 patients who underwent the FET procedure (FET group) with those of 66 patients who underwent cET (cET group). RESULTS: The in-hospital mortality rate tended to be lower in the FET group than in the cET group (p = 0.12). There were two cases of paraplegia (3.3%) in the FET group and in none in the cET group. The all-cause mortality at the 3-year follow-up did not differ significantly between the groups (p = 0.31). The FET group required more unexpected interventions at the surgical site in the mid-term period. CONCLUSIONS: FET was associated with a shorter operative time and lower surgical mortality than cET. Although the mid-term total aortic arch replacement outcomes of FET were acceptable, careful imaging observation is necessary because reinterventions were required more frequently.

[Superior Mesenteric Artery Bypass Grafting from the Ascending Aorta Using a Saphenous Vein Graft for Treatment of Acute Aortic Dissection with Abdominal Malperfusion:Report of a Case].

A 50-year-old man presented with abdominal pain and numbness in the right leg. He was diagnosed with type A acute aortic dissection with malperfusion of the superior mesenteric artery(SMA) and the right external iliac artery. Before median sternotomy, we made median celiotomy and anastomosed a saphenous vein graft to SMA. After cardio-pulmonary bypass was instituted, perfusion to the saphenous vein graft was started. After the central repair, we selected the vascular graft of the ascending aorta as the inflow of SMA bypass because leading the vein graft to the external iliac artery was difficult due to obesity and intestinal edema. The graft flow was favorable with 100 ml/minute. He was discharged on postoperative day 56 without any abdominal complications. Some reports suggested that early reperfusion improved the outcomes of surgery for acute aortic dissection with mesenteric ischemia. The ascending aorta may be a viable alternative as an inflow of SMA bypass when the iliac artery is inappropriate.

[Surgical Excision of Calcified Amorphous Tumors on Mitral and Aortic Valves:Report of a Case].

Calcified amorphous tumor (CAT) is a nonneoplastic cardiac tumor that can be located in any of the four cardiac chambers, but is predominantly detected on the mitral valve. We report a rare case of CAT originating from the mitral and aortic valves. A 69-year-old woman with end-stage renal disease, hypertension, and diabetes mellitus was referred to our hospital for the evaluation of cardiac masses found incidentally on screening transthoracic echocardiography. She had no symptoms, including fever and neurological deficits, and her blood cultures were negative. Echocardiography revealed mobile masses arising from the mitral and aortic valves. We performed surgical excision and histopathologically diagnosed the masses with cardiac CATs. Mobile and pedunculated CAT frequently causes systemic embolization, and thus, complete surgical excision is recommended in such a case.

Long-Term Outcomes of the Mosaic Aortic Porcine Bioprosthesis in Japan　- Results From the Japan Mosaic Valve Long-Term Multicenter Study.

BACKGROUND: This study retrospectively evaluated the long-term patient outcomes and durability of the Mosaic aortic porcine bioprosthesis in the Japan Mosaic valve long-term multicenter study.Methods and Results:We reviewed the records of 1,202 patients who underwent aortic valve replacement with the Mosaic bioprosthesis at 10 centers in Japan (1999-2014). Patient data were collected using Research Electronic Data Capture. Patient survival was determined by Kaplan-Meier methodology. Freedom from structural valve deterioration (SVD) and valve-related reoperation and death were determined by actuarial methods. The median (interquartile range [IQR]) age of the cohort was 76 (70-80) years. The median (IQR) follow-up period was 3.52 (1.71-5.35) years. The longest follow-up was 15.8 years. The 30-day mortality rate was 2.3%. The 12-year actuarial survival rate was 59.9±7.5%, and the freedom from valve-related death was 81.1±7.9%. The freedom from reoperation was 86.4±2.6% at 12 years. The freedom from SVD at 12 years was 93.5±2.9% for patients aged ≥65 years and 98.2±1.8% for those aged <65 years. The median (IQR) systolic pressure gradient was 17 (12-23) and 19 (12-25) mmHg at 1 and 10 years, respectively. The median (IQR) effective orifice area was 1.2 (1.1-1.5) and 1.1 (1-1.5) cm2at 1 and 10 years, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The Mosaic porcine bioprosthesis showed satisfactory long-term outcomes over 12 years.

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation vs. Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement for Severe Aortic Stenosis in Real-World Clinical Practice.

BACKGROUND: There are no data comparing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) with surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) outcomes in real clinical practice in Japan. METHODS AND RESULTS: We combined 2 independent registries, the K-TAVI Registry (a 6-center prospective registry of consecutive patients who underwent TAVI) and the CURRENT AS Registry (a large, 27-center registry of 3,815 consecutive patients with severe aortic stenosis [AS]). In the K-TAVI Registry, 338 patients underwent TAVI with SAPIEN XT balloon-expandable valves from October 2013 to January 2016, whereas in the CURRENT AS Registry 237 patients with severe AS underwent SAVR from January 2003 to December 2011. Propensity score matching was conducted, with final cohort comprising 306 patients. The cumulative 2-year incidence of all-cause death and heart failure (HF) hospitalization did not differ significantly between the TAVI and SAVR groups (13.7% vs. 12.4% [P=0.81] and 7.9% vs 3.9% [P=0.13], respectively). After adjusting for residual confounders, there were no significant differences between the TAVI and SAVR groups in the risk for all-cause death (hazard ratio [HR] 0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.35-1.58; P=0.43) or HF hospitalization (HR 1.27; 95% CI 0.40-4.59; P=0.69). CONCLUSIONS: These findings from 2 independent Japanese registries suggest that the 2-year risk of all-cause mortality and HF does not differ significantly between TAVI and SAVR groups in real-world practice in Japan.

Rationale, Design, and Baseline Characteristics of the BioProsthetic Valves with Atrial Fibrillation (BPV-AF) Study.

PURPOSE: To date, clinical data on real-world treatment practices in Japanese patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) after bioprosthetic valve (BPV) replacement are needed. We conducted a large-scale, prospective, multicenter study to understand the actual usage of antithrombotic therapy and the incidence of thromboembolic and bleeding events in these patients, and to eliminate the clinical data gap between Japan and Western countries. METHODS: This was an observational study, in patients who had undergone BPV replacement and had a confirmed diagnosis of AF, with no mandated interventions. We report the baseline demographic and clinical data for the 899 evaluable patients at the end of the enrollment period. RESULTS: Overall, 45.7% of patients were male; the mean age was 80.3 years; AF was paroxysmal, persistent, or permanent in 36.9%, 34.6%, and 28.5% of patients, respectively. Mean risk scores for stroke and bleeding were 2.5 (CHADS2), 4.1 (CHA2DS2-VASc), and 2.5 (HAS-BLED). Many patients (76.2%) had comorbid hypertension and 54.8% had heart failure. Most BPVs (65.5%) were positioned in the aortic valve. Warfarin-based therapy, direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC)-based therapy, and antiplatelet therapy (without warfarin and DOAC) were administered to 55.0%, 29.3%, and 9.7% of patients, respectively. CONCLUSION: Patients enrolled into this study are typical of the wider Japanese AF/BPV population in terms of age and clinical history. Future data accruing from the observational period will contribute to future treatment recommendations and guide therapeutic decisions in patients with BPV and AF. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: UMIN000034485.

[Direct Aortic Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement and Off-pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention;Report of a Case].

An 85-year-old woman with severe aortic stenosis (AS) and coronary artery disease (CAD) was admitted with heart failure 3 times. Direct aorta transcatheter aortic valve replacement( DA-TAVR) and off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB) were performed after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and she was discharged without postoperative complication. Surgical aortic valve replacement and coronary artery bypass grafting(CABG) are recommended for a patient with AS and CAD. Recently, PCI or CABG with transcatheter aortic valve replacement(TAVR) has been reported, although there is no standard treatment for concomitant CAD in patients who undergo TAVR. DA-TAVR and OPCAB after PCI is considered as a reasonable treatment for high-risk patients.

Early Surgery vs. Surgery After Watchful Waiting for Asymptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis.

BACKGROUND: There is no large-scale study comparing postoperative mortality after aortic valve replacement (AVR) for asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis (AS) between initial treatment with AVR vs. eventual AVR after conservative management. Methods and Results: We analyzed data from a multicenter registry enrolling 3,815 consecutive patients with severe AS. Of 1,808 asymptomatic patients, 286 patients initially underwent AVR (initial AVR group), and 377 patients were initially managed conservatively and eventually underwent AVR (AVR after watchful waiting group). Mortality after AVR was compared between the 2 groups. Subgroup analysis according to peak aortic jet velocity (Vmax) at diagnosis was also conducted. There was no significant difference between the 2 groups in 5-year overall survival (OS; 86.0% vs. 84.1%, P=0.34) or cardiovascular death-free survival (DFS; 91.3% vs. 91.1%, P=0.61), but on subgroup analysis of patients with Vmax ≥4.5 m/s at diagnosis, the initial AVR group was superior to the AVR after watchful waiting group in both 5-year OS (88.4% vs. 70.6%, P=0.003) and cardiovascular DFS (91.9% vs. 81.7%, P=0.023). CONCLUSIONS: Asymptomatic severe AS patients who underwent AVR after watchful waiting had a postoperative survival rate similar to those who initially underwent AVR. In a subgroup of patients with Vmax ≥4.5 m/s at diagnosis, however, the AVR after watchful waiting group had worse postoperative survival rate than the initial AVR group.

Short- and long-term outcomes following redo valvular surgery.

AIM: We reviewed our experience in redo valvular surgery to evaluate trends in short- and long-term outcomes. METHODS: We reviewed 414 patients (mean age, 62.8 ± 13.6 years) who underwent redo valvular surgery in the past 25 years. A total of 301 patients (54.2%) underwent first-time redo valvular surgeries; 178 (32.1%) were second redos, 60 (10.8%) were third redos, and 16 were fourth redos (2.9%). The mean follow-up period was 6.8 ± 6.3 years. RESULTS: Hospital mortality was 5.8%. New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III/IV (P = 0.0007, odds ratio = 4.403) and hemodialysis (P = 0.0383, odds ratio = 7.196) were risk factors for hospital death. Long-term survival rates at 15 and 20 years were 64.7% ± 4.3% and 59.1% ± 5.0%, respectively. Predictors of late death were first time redo (P = 0.0076, hazard ratio = 0.422) and age younger than 61 years (P = 0.0005, hazard ratio = 0.229). There were significant differences in long-term survival between NYHA classes I/II and III/IV (log-rank test, P = 0.0419) and between the time from redo surgery (log-rank test, P = 0.0189) and age (log-rank test, P = 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The hospital mortality rate for redo valve surgery has improved. Early referral for redo surgery can contribute to improving early and late outcomes.

[Successful Repair of Acute Aortic Dissection after Stent Placement into the Occluded Left Common Carotid Artery;Report of a Case].

A 63-year old woman was admitted to our hospital due to loss of consciousness [Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) E1V1M4]. Cerebral angiography showed known severe stenosis in the right common carotid artery and acute occlusion of the left common carotid artery. Enhanced computed tomography(CT) revealed Stanford type A acute aortic dissection. We judged an emergency surgery was not indicated for this comatose patient. Neurosurgeons placed stents into the left common and internal carotid arteries. The next day, the patient regained consciousness (GCS E4V2M6), and we performed ascending aorta replacement. There was an intimal tear in the ascending aorta and proximal end of the left carotid artery stent was visible in the aortic arch. Postoperative course was uneventful, and CT revealed successful aortic repair and patent stents in the left carotid artery. She was transferred to a rehabilitation hospital on postoperative day 44. Although stent insertion into carotid arteries in a patient with acute aortic dissection carries some risks such as making a new intimal tear or catheterizing in a false lumen, early cerebral reperfusion may improve prognosis of the patients with acute aortic dissection with cerebral malperfusion.

Five-Year Clinical Outcome of Asymptomatic vs. Symptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis After Aortic Valve Replacement.

BACKGROUND: There is discordance regarding the effect of symptom status before aortic valve replacement (AVR) on long-term outcome after AVR in severe aortic stenosis (AS).Methods and Results:The CURRENT AS registry is a multicenter retrospective registry enrolling 3,815 consecutive patients with severe AS. Among 1,196 patients managed with the initial AVR strategy, long-term clinical outcomes were compared between the symptomatic patients (n=905), and asymptomatic patients (n=291). Median follow-up interval was 1337 days with a 91% follow-up rate at 2 years. AVR was performed in 886 patients (98%) in the symptomatic group and in 287 patients (99%) in the asymptomatic group. Symptomatic patients were older and more often had comorbidities than asymptomatic patients with similar echocardiographic AS severity. The cumulative 5-year incidences of all-cause death and heart failure (HF) hospitalization were significantly higher in symptomatic patients than in asymptomatic patients (25.6% vs. 15.4%, P=0.001, and 14.2% vs. 3.8%, P<0.001, respectively). On landmark analysis at 30 days after AVR, the differences in mortality and HF hospitalization between the 2 groups were mainly observed beyond 30 days. CONCLUSIONS: When managed with the initial AVR strategy, the long-term outcomes of symptomatic severe AS were worse than those of asymptomatic severe AS. Early AVR strategy might be recommended in some selected asymptomatic severe AS patients with reasonable operative risk.

Significance of sequential cardiac rehabilitation program through inter-hospital cooperation between acute care and rehabilitation hospitals in elderly patients after cardiac surgery in Japan.

This study is to evaluate the impact of cooperation between acute care hospital and rehabilitation hospital on physical function, exercise tolerance, activities of daily living (ADL), health-related quality of life (HR-QOL), and psychological function in heart disease patients undergoing cardiac rehabilitation. Among patients undergoing concurrent medical treatment and cardiac rehabilitation starting early in acute care hospitalization, we selected 30 patients who required continued cardiac rehabilitation in rehabilitation hospitals as subjects. At the time of admission and discharge from the rehabilitation hospital, we measured and compared physical function [grip strength, knee extension strength, and the short physical performance battery (SPPB)], ADL ability using the Functional Independence Measure (FIM), exercise tolerance [six-minute walking distance (6MD)], and psychological functions such as the MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36). The average age of the subjects was 76.8 years and 60% were women. In 70% of cases, musculoskeletal causes were the reasons for continued cardiac rehabilitation in a rehabilitation hospital. In evaluations before and after hospitalization, significant improvements were observed in knee extension strength and the results of the SPPB (p < 0.01), FIM, and 6MD (p < 0.01). In SF-36, significant improvements were observed in physical function, role functioning, vitality, and emotional functioning (p < 0.05, p < 0.01). With intensive cardiac rehabilitation in rehabilitation hospitals, physical function, ADL, exercise tolerance, and HR-QOL improved significantly. As the severity and prevalence of heart disease are expected to increase in association with multiple disabilities and aging, the importance of cooperation between acute care hospitals and rehabilitation hospitals will increase; therefore, cardiac rehabilitation should be the basis for such cooperation.

False Aneurysm Formation at Both Anastomotic Sites after Descending Aortic Replacement for Aortic Coarctation.

Prosthetic graft interposition is performed in some patients with coarctation of the aorta (CoA), and all procedures for treating CoA are associated with a risk of aneurysm formation at the site of repair. A 53-year-old woman underwent coarctectomy and descending aortic replacement with a 16-mm Dacron graft for CoA when she was 18 years old. Thirty years later, she was referred to our hospital for a false aneurysm at the proximal anastomotic site, and total arch replacement was performed to resect the false aneurysm. One year after the operation, follow-up computed tomography revealed a dissecting aneurysm on the descending aorta, originating from the distal anastomotic site, namely the first 16-mm Dacron graft and the native descending aorta. The length between the branch of the arch graft and the dissecting aneurysm was adequate for endovascular repair, which was successfully performed.

A Subcutaneous Mass as a Sign of Thoracic Aortic Pseudoaneurysm.

A 39-year-old man on hemodialysis who received total aortic arch repair for dissection of Kommerrel diverticulum 2 months prior, visited an outpatient clinic. He presented with a sudden subcutaneous mass on the anterior chest wall 1 week earlier, that was painless, nonpulsatile, and with a normal skin color. Enhanced computed tomography revealed that the pseudoaneurysm originated from the proximal suture line. At surgery, an aortic intima was observed to be lacking at the native posterior aortic wall located at the proximal suture line with a 10-mm tear. A new graft was implanted after a new proximal suture line was reconstructed.