Medical Record Level-Evaluation of Impact of Demographic and Socioeconomic Factors on Pediatric Neuro-Oncology Outcomes at Children's Hospital Colorado.

Purpose: A medical record-level cohort study to investigate demographic and socioeconomic factors influencing treatment, timing of care, and survival outcomes in pediatric patients diagnosed with central nervous system (CNS) tumors. Methods: Using electronic health records of patients at Children's Hospital Colorado from 1986-2020, we identified 898 patients treated for CNS tumors. The primary outcomes of interest were 5-year survival, timing of diagnosis, and treatment. Multivariable logistic regression and Cox regression were used to identify covariates associated with our outcomes of interest. Results: We found that age, race, tumor type, diagnosis year, and social concerns influenced receipt and timing of treatment. Age, race, patient rural vs. urban residence, and tumor impacted survival outcomes. Time to presentation and treatment were significantly different between White and minority patients. American Indian/Alaska Native and Black patients were less likely to receive chemo compared to White patients (OR 0.28, 0.93 p = 0.037, < 0.001). Patients with 3 + social concerns were more likely to survive after 5 years than children with no or unknown social concerns (OR 1.84, p = 0.011). However, with an adjusted hazards ratio, children with 2 social concerns were less likely to survive to 5 years than children with no or unknown concerns (OR 0.58, p = 0.066). Conclusions: Demographic and socioeconomic factors influence timing of care and survival outcomes in pediatric patients with CNS tumors. Minority status, age, social factors, rural, and urban patients experience differences in care. This emphasizes the importance of considering these factors and addressing disparities to achieve equitable care.

Through the Cracks: The Disposition of Patients With Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders in the Post-Asylum Era.

Description This paper aims to explore current disposition options for patients with psychosis in light of shifts toward community care and changes in mental healthcare funding in the post-asylum era and to propose systemic-level improvements based upon local successes. It evaluates critiques of long-term psychiatric care programs, claims of transinstitutionalization to incarceration, shelters, and emergency rooms, and programs initiated to address deinstitutionalization. The authors conclude that while Assertive Community Treatment, Partial Hospitalization Programs, intermediate-level care, and housing interventions can improve outcomes for many persons with psychotic illness, a significant portion of these patients would still be best served in long-term psychiatric care facilities.