CHROMAgar™ LIN-R as an efficient screening tool to assess the prevalence of linezolid-resistant enterococci in German hospital patients-a multicentre study approach, 2021-2022.

BACKGROUND: In recent years, an increasing number of linezolid-resistant enterococci (LRE) was recognized at the German National Reference Centre (NRC) for Enterococci. National guidelines on infection prevention recommend screening for LRE in epidemiologically linked hospital settings without referring to a reliable and rapid diagnostic method. Since 2020, CHROMAgar™ provide a chromogenic linezolid screening agar, LIN-R, suitable to simultaneously screen for linezolid-resistant staphylococci and enterococci. OBJECTIVES: To assess the applicability of CHROMAgar™ LIN-R in clinical settings for detecting LRE directly from patient material and to infer prevalence rates of LRE amongst German hospital patients. METHODS: During the 3-month trial period, clinical samples were plated on CHROMAgar™ LIN-R. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed using VITEK2 or disc diffusion. At the NRC, linezolid resistance was determined by broth microdilution, multiplex-PCR for cfr/optrA/poxtA and by a restriction-based assay for 23S rDNA mutations. RESULTS: The 12 participating study sites used 13 963 CHROMAgar™ LIN-R plates during the study period. Of 442 presumptive LRE, 192 were confirmed by phenotypic methods. Of these, 161 were received by the NRC and 121 (75%) were verified as LRE. Most of LR-E. faecium 53/81 (65%) exhibited a 23S rRNA gene mutation as the sole resistance-mediating mechanism, whereas optrA constituted the dominant resistance trait in LR-E. faecalis [39/40 (98%)]. Prevalence of LRE across sites was estimated as 1% (ranging 0.18%-3.7% between sites). CONCLUSIONS: CHROMAgar™ LIN-R represents a simple and efficient LRE screening tool in hospital settings. A high proportion of false-positive results demands validation of linezolid resistance by a reference method.

Comparison of VITEK® 2, three different gradient strip tests and broth microdilution for detecting vanB-positive Enterococcus faecium isolates with low vancomycin MICs.

OBJECTIVES: In 2018, EUCAST issued a warning regarding unreliable results of gradient strip tests for confirming vancomycin resistance in enterococci. We compared the performance of various diagnostic standard and confirmatory tests to identify and determine vanB-type vancomycin resistance. METHODS: We analysed a collection of vanB-positive Enterococcus faecium isolates (n = 68) with low vancomycin MICs and compared the performance of VITEK® 2 (bioMérieux), broth microdilution and three gradient strip tests from different providers (Oxoid, Liofilchem and bioMérieux). For the latter we compared the standard procedure with a protocol with increased inoculum, a rich agar medium and a longer incubation time ('macromethod'). RESULTS: The sensitivity of VITEK® 2 was 81% compared with 72% for broth microdilution and 61%-63% for the three gradient strip tests using standard conditions. The macromethod substantially improved the performance of all strip tests resulting in a sensitivity of 89%-96% after 48 h of incubation. CONCLUSIONS: We recommend that EUCAST changes the present warning against the general use of MIC strips. When MIC strips are used to either exclude or confirm suspected vancomycin resistance in E. faecium, and a PCR is not available, the macromethod should be employed. For clinically relevant enterococci, where a rapid therapeutic decision is needed, a molecular test (e.g. PCR) should be favoured in order to save time and to further increase sensitivity.

Mandatory Notification of Panton-Valentine Leukocidin-Positive Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Saxony, Germany: Analysis of Cases from the City of Leipzig in 2019.

In Germany, Saxony is the only federal state where the detection of a Panton-Valentine Leukocidin (PVL)-positive Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) has to be notified to the local health authority (LHA). The LHA reports the case to the state health authority and introduces concrete infection control measures. We analyzed isolates from the respective cases in 2019, which were collected in local microbiological laboratories and sent to the National Reference Centre (NRC) for Staphylococci and Enterococci for strain characterization and typing. Antibiotic resistance testing was done by broth microdilution. Molecular characterization was performed using spa and SCCmec typing, MLST, and the PCR detection of marker genes associated with distinct MRSA lineages. Demographic and clinical data of the individual cases were assessed and the LHA performed epidemiological investigations. Thirty-nine (index) persons, diagnosed with a PVL-positive MRSA, were initially reported to the LHA. Most patients suffered from skin and soft-tissue infections (SSTI). For 21 of the index cases, household contacts were screened for MRSA. Seventeen out of 62 contacts were also colonized with a PVL-positive MRSA. The median age of altogether 58 individuals was 23.5 years. In over half of the cases, the home country was not Germany and/or a history of travel or migration was reported. Molecular characterization revealed the presence of various epidemic community-associated MRSA lineages, with "USA300", including the North American Epidemic (ST8-MRSA-IVa) and the South American Epidemic Clone (ST8-MRSA-IVc), the "Sri Lankan Clone" (ST5-MRSA-IVc), and the "Bengal Bay Clone" (ST772-MRSA-V) being more prevalent. In eight out of nine households, the contact persons were colonized with the same clone as the respective index case, suggesting a close epidemic and microbiological link. The obligation to report PVL-positive MRSA enables us to detect the occurrence of PVL-producing MRSA and its spread in the population as early as possible. Timely detection allows the targeted deployment of reliable anti-infective measures.