Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 64
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Dev Med Child Neurol ; 2024 Jul 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38978330

RESUMO

AIM: To develop a screening tool (the screening Hand Assessment for Infants [s-HAI]) for infants aged from 3.5 months that can identify a high risk of developing unilateral cerebral palsy (CP) based on a selection of items from the HAI. METHOD: Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed on previously collected HAI assessments from 212 infants (104 females, 108 males) aged from 3.5 to 8.5 months, to select items suitable for screening. The area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, and cut-off values were derived for the suggested item combination. The clinical outcome (unilateral CP yes or no) at 24 months or older served as the external criterion. RESULTS: About half of the infants developed unilateral CP. The AUC across the items ranged from 0.63 to 0.80, and from 0.85 to 0.87 for different item combinations. Sensitivity for the selected 6-item set was 91% for 8 points or less and 88% for 7 points or less on the contralesional score of each hand, while specificity was 60% and 73% respectively. INTERPRETATION: The s-HAI, designed from six HAI items, has the potential to be used to screen infants at risk of unilateral CP from 3.5 months of age. It is easy to administer, time-efficient, and can be used in different settings. Its measurement properties and feasibility need to be tested in a new data set.

2.
Dev Med Child Neurol ; 65(4): 571-579, 2023 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36177964

RESUMO

AIM: To describe the use of upper-limb botulinum neurotoxin A (BoNT-A) treatment in a population-based sample of children with cerebral palsy (CP), by investigating whether factors may be related to a first upper-limb BoNT-A treatment and whether passive range of motion (ROM) is related to a first BoNT-A treatment after adjustment for confounders. METHOD: Data from five regions in Sweden, in the national registry and follow-up programme for CP (CPUP), were collected for children with spastic or dyskinetic CP assessed between 2000 and 2017. CP subtypes, functional classification levels, and traffic-light-based passive ROM categories were investigated. Data were analysed with logistic regression (odds ratios). RESULTS: Of a total of 496 children (317 males, 179 females; median 2 years, interquartile range 1-5 years, range 1-15 years at first measurement occasion), 22% (n = 108) had received upper-limb BoNT-A treatment, 45% of whom by 1 to 3 years of age. Those classified in Manual Ability Classification System levels IV and V showed the highest crude odds ratio for a first upper-limb BoNT-A treatment. Children with full passive ROM with tightness at the end of the movement range were most likely to receive an upper-limb BoNT-A treatment, also after adjustment for confounders. Thumb and forearm muscles were the most targeted at the first upper-limb BoNT-A treatment. INTERPRETATION: Full passive ROM with tightness at the end of the movement range increases the likelihood of a first upper-limb BoNT-A treatment. This new traffic-light category is an aspect to consider in the dialogue about upper-limb BoNT-A. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: Among children receiving upper-limb botulinum neurotoxin A (BoNT-A), 45% had their first treatment before the age of 4 years. Thumb and forearm muscles were the most treated with BoNT-A, finger flexor muscles the least. Full passive range of motion with tightness was related to first upper-limb BoNT-A treatment.


Assuntos
Toxinas Botulínicas Tipo A , Paralisia Cerebral , Fármacos Neuromusculares , Masculino , Feminino , Criança , Humanos , Pré-Escolar , Extremidade Superior , Músculo Esquelético , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
Dev Med Child Neurol ; 65(5): 683-690, 2023 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36310446

RESUMO

AIM: To create a shortened, more user-friendly Second Edition of the Dyskinesia Impairment Scale (DIS-II) to assess dystonia and choreoathetosis, and evaluate its construct validity and reliability. METHOD: Scale development included an online expert meeting (n = 21) and iterative discussions within the research group (n = 6). A Rasch measurement model analysis on DIS scores from individuals with dyskinetic cerebral palsy or inherited/idiopathic dystonia (n = 123, 74 males, mean age 14 years, SD 5 years) was performed to evaluate the construct validity and reliability of the DIS-II. RESULTS: The DIS-II evaluates dystonia and choreoathetosis in action and rest in 11 body regions, with action items scored from 0 to 3 and rest items 0 to 2. The number of videos to record are reduced from 26 to 14 and the items to score are reduced from 144 to 88. Rating scale functioning, goodness-of-fit evaluation, principal component analysis, and targeting met the predefined quality criteria of the study and construct validity was therefore considered good. Furthermore, person reliability indicated that the DIS-II can separate individuals into eight distinct ability levels. INTERPRETATION: The DIS-II provides valid and reliable measures for dystonia and choreoathetosis, and reduces the administration and scoring time compared with the DIS. The DIS-II logit scores (interval level data) enhance comparison over time and between individuals in clinical practice and research. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: Compared with the Dyskinesia Impairment Scale (DIS), the shortened edition (DIS-II) requires half of the number of videos to be scored. The DIS-II has a simplified rating scale, requiring scoring of 88 instead of 144 items. The DIS-II has shown excellent reliability and good construct validity. The interval properties of the DIS-II are superior to the ordinal level outcome measures of the DIS.


Assuntos
Paralisia Cerebral , Discinesias , Distonia , Distúrbios Distônicos , Masculino , Humanos , Adolescente , Distonia/diagnóstico , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Discinesias/diagnóstico , Paralisia Cerebral/diagnóstico , Psicometria
4.
Dev Med Child Neurol ; 64(5): 586-592, 2022 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34907525

RESUMO

AIM: To investigate the external validity of the Both Hands Assessment (BoHA), a new test evaluating bimanual performance in children with bilateral cerebral palsy (CP), by analysing its relationship to established measurements of hand function and self-care skills. METHOD: In this cross-sectional study, we recruited children with bilateral CP and manual ability corresponding to Manual Ability Classification System (MACS) levels I to III attending three habilitation units in Norway. All participants completed the BoHA. Unimanual capacity was assessed using the Bimanual Fine Motor Function (BFMF) classification, the Box and Block Test (BBT), and the Melbourne Assessment 2 (MA2). Self-care skills were assessed with the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI). RESULTS: Thirty-nine children (19 males, 20 females; mean age 8y 2mo, SD 2y 8mo; age range 2y 8mo-12y 6mo) were included. Spearman's correlation coefficient (ρ) suggested high correlation between the BoHA and MACS (p=0.89; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.79-0.94), BFMF classification (p=0.84; 95% CI 0.71-0.91), and BBT for the non-dominant (p=0.85; 95% CI 0.68-0.95) and dominant hand (p=0.72; 95% CI 0.53-0.85). The Spearman's ρ between the BoHA and the MA2 subscales varied between 0.48 and 0.83, while the PEDI's ρ was 0.51 (95% CI 0.33-0.67). INTERPRETATION: The BoHA provides valid measures of hand use as suggested by its high correlation with other activity-based measures of hand function.


Assuntos
Paralisia Cerebral , Paralisia Cerebral/diagnóstico , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Estudos Transversais , Avaliação da Deficiência , Feminino , Mãos , Humanos , Masculino , Destreza Motora
5.
Dev Med Child Neurol ; 63(12): 1456-1461, 2021 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34224136

RESUMO

AIM: To evaluate the interrater and test-retest reliability, standard error of measurement (SEM), and the smallest detectable difference (SDD) of the Hand Assessment for Infants (HAI). METHOD: HAI assessments of 55 infants (26 females, 29 males), 25 with clinical signs of unilateral cerebral palsy (CP) and 30 typically developing (mean [SD] age 6.8mo [2.4], range 3-11mo), were scored individually by three therapists. Three clinically experienced occupational therapists (OT 1-OT 3) with extensive experience in using the HAI, independently scored the video recorded HAI play sessions. Analysis of the combined group of infants and just the infants with clinical signs of unilateral CP (12 females, 13 males; mean age 7.6mo [2.1]) were conducted. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC, 2.1), Bland-Altman plots, SEM, and SDD were calculated. RESULTS: Interrater and test-retest reliability were excellent for the Both Hands Measure (BoHM) and the Each Hand Sum score (EaHS), with ICCs of 0.96 to 0.99. For individual items, the interrater and test-retest reliability was good to excellent (ICC 0.81-0.99). The SDD for the EaHS was 2 points, and for the BoHM the SDD it was 3 HAI units for infants with signs of unilateral CP. INTERPRETATION: The HAI results showed good to excellent reliability. The SDDs were low, indicating that results beyond these levels exceed the measurement error and, thus, can be considered true changes. What this study adds The Hand Assessment for Infants (HAI) shows excellent reliability. A change of ≥3 HAI units is considered a true change. The HAI yields reliable measures for research and clinical practice.


Assuntos
Paralisia Cerebral/diagnóstico , Avaliação da Deficiência , Mãos/fisiopatologia , Paralisia Cerebral/fisiopatologia , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes
6.
Dev Med Child Neurol ; 63(4): 436-443, 2021 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33251586

RESUMO

AIM: To evaluate the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value of the Hand Assessment for Infants (HAI) in identifying infants at risk of being diagnosed with unilateral cerebral palsy (CP), and to determine cut-off values for this purpose. METHOD: A convenience sample of 203 infants (106 females, 97 males) was assessed by the HAI at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. Sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and likelihood ratios were calculated using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Cut-off values were derived for different ages. The clinical outcome (unilateral CP yes/no) at 24 months or more served as an external criterion to investigate the predictive validity of HAI. RESULTS: Half of the infants developed unilateral CP. The area under the curve ranged from 0.77 (95% CI [confidence interval] 0.63-0.91) to 0.95 (95% CI 0.90-1.00) across HAI scales and age intervals. Likewise, sensitivity ranged from 63% to 93%, specificity from 62% to 91%, and accuracy from 73% to 94%. INTERPRETATION: HAI scores demonstrated overall accuracy that ranged from very good to excellent in predicting unilateral CP in infants at risk aged between 3.5 and 12 months. This accuracy increased with age at assessment and the earliest possible prediction was at 3.5 months of age, when appropriate HAI cut-off values for different ages were applied. What this paper adds The Hand Assessment for Infants (HAI) predicts unilateral cerebral palsy (CP) with high accuracy. HAI cut-off values can guide clinical practice for early identification and diagnosis of unilateral CP.


Assuntos
Paralisia Cerebral/diagnóstico , Avaliação da Deficiência , Mãos/fisiopatologia , Paralisia Cerebral/fisiopatologia , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Programas de Rastreamento , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
7.
Dev Med Child Neurol ; 61(2): 204-211, 2019 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30203516

RESUMO

AIM: The aim of this study was to investigate the longitudinal development of passive range of motion (ROM) in the upper limbs in a population-based sample of children with cerebral palsy (CP), and to investigate which children are more likely to develop contractures related to functional level, CP subtype, and age. METHOD: Registry data of annual passive ROM measurements of the upper limbs from 771 children with CP (417 males, 354 females; mean age 11y 8mo, [SD 5mo] range 1-18y) were analysed. Mixed models were used to investigate at what age decreased passive ROM occurs. Odds ratios were calculated to compare risks and logistic regression analysis was used to predict contracture development. RESULTS: Thirty-four per cent of the children had developed contractures. Among these children, decreased passive ROM was significant at a mean age of 4 years for wrist extension and 7 years for shoulder flexion, elbow extension, and supination. Children at Manual Ability Classification System (MACS) level V had a 17-times greater risk of contractures than children at MACS level I. INTERPRETATION: One-third of the children in the total population developed upper-limb contractures while passive ROM decreased with age. MACS level was the strongest predictor of contracture development. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: In a population-based sample of 771 children with cerebral palsy, 34% developed an upper-limb contracture. Contracture development started at preschool age. The first affected movements were wrist extension and supination. Passive range of motion decreased with age. High Manual Ability Classification System level was the most important predictor of contractures.


Assuntos
Paralisia Cerebral/complicações , Contratura/etiologia , Deficiências do Desenvolvimento/etiologia , Transtornos Psicomotores/etiologia , Extremidade Superior/fisiopatologia , Adolescente , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Planejamento em Saúde Comunitária , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Amplitude de Movimento Articular/fisiologia , Extremidade Superior/fisiologia
8.
Dev Med Child Neurol ; 61(9): 1087-1092, 2019 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30719697

RESUMO

AIM: To create normative reference values for unilateral and bilateral use of the hands, using the Hand Assessment for Infants (HAI), a newly developed criterion-referenced assessment measuring hand use in infants aged 3 months to 12 months at risk of cerebral palsy (CP). METHOD: In total, 489 HAI assessments of typically developing infants (243 females, 246 males), aged 3 months to 10 months (mean 6mo 14d [SD 2mo 5d]), were collected in Italy and Sweden. Normative growth curves based on mean and SDs were created, as well as skill acquisition curves for each test item. Correlation to age and differences between groups based on sex and nationality, as well as differences between the right and the left hand, were investigated. RESULTS: The growth curves showed a steady increase in mean value and a decrease in SD over age. There were no differences between groups based on sex or nationality. There was a negligible mean difference (0.1 raw score) between the right and left hands. INTERPRETATION: HAI normative reference values are now available, which can assist in identifying deviating hand use for each month of age, as well as a side difference between hands in infants at risk of CP. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: A Hand Assessment for Infants (HAI) result greater than 2SD below the mean indicates atypical hand use. Skill acquisition curves describe the age at which typically developing infants master the HAI items. Most typically developing infants do not demonstrate asymmetry in hand use.


EVALUACIÓN DE LA FUNCIÓN DE LA MANO PARA BEBÉS (HAI): VALORES NORMATIVOS DE REFERENCIA: OBJETIVO: Para crear valores de referencia normativos para el uso unilateral y bilateral de las manos, utilizando la Evaluación de la Mano para Infantes (HAI), una evaluación recientemente desarrollada basada en criterios que mide el uso de las manos en lactantes de 3 a 12 meses con riesgo de parálisis cerebral (PC). MÉTODO: En total, se recolectaron 489 evaluaciones usando el HAI de bebés con desarrollo típico (243 femeninos, 246 masculinos), de 3 a 10 meses (media 6 meses 14 días [DS 2 meses 5 días]), en Italia y Suecia. Se crearon curvas de crecimiento normativas basadas en la media y las desviaciones estándar, así como curvas de adquisición de habilidades para cada elemento de prueba. Se investigó la correlación con la edad y las diferencias entre grupos según el sexo y la nacionalidad, así como las diferencias entre la mano derecha y la mano izquierda. RESULTADOS: Las curvas de crecimiento mostraron un aumento constante en el valor medio y una disminución en el DE a lo largo de la edad. No hubo diferencias entre grupos por sexo o nacionalidad. Hubo una diferencia de medias insignificante (puntaje bruto de 0,1) entre las manos derecha e izquierda. INTERPRETACIÓN: Este estudio aporta los valores de referencia normativos de HAI, los cuales están disponibles, lo que puede ayudar a identificar la función de las manos que se desvía de los parámetros considerados como normales para cada mes de edad, así como una diferencia lateral entre las manos de los bebés en riesgo de PC.


AVALIAÇÃO DA MÃO PARA LACTENTES (AML): VALORES NORMATIVOS DE REFERÊNCIA: OBJETIVO: Criar valores normativos de referência para uso unilateral e bilateral das mãos, usando a Avaliação da mão para lactentes (AML), uma avaliação baseada em critérios que foi desenvolvida recentemente para mensurar o uso da mão em lactentes de 3 a 12 anos em risco para paralisia cerebral (PC). MÉTODO: No total, 489 avaliações da AML de lactentes com desenvolvimento típico (243 do sexo feminino, 246 do sexo masculino), com idades de 3 a 10 meses (média 6m 14d [DP 2m 5]), foram coletadas na Itália e na Suécia. Curvas normativas de crescimento baseadas em médias e desvios padrão foram criadas, assim como curvas de aquisição de habilidades para cada item do teste. Correlação com a idade e diferenças entre grupos baseadas no sexo e na nacionalidade, assim como diferenças entre mão direita e esquerda, foram investigadas. RESULTADOS As curvas de crescimento mostraram aumento contínuo na média e diminuição no DP com a idade. Não houve diferenças enter grupos com base no sexo ou nacionalidade. Houve uma diferença média inexpressiva (0,1 escore bruto) entre mãos direita e esquerda. INTERPRETAÇÃO: Valores normativos de referência da AML agora estão disponíveis, o que pode ajudar a identificar o uso anormal da mão para cada mês de vida, assim como diferenças entre lados em lactentes em risco para PC.


Assuntos
Paralisia Cerebral/diagnóstico , Lateralidade Funcional/fisiologia , Mãos/fisiologia , Destreza Motora/fisiologia , Paralisia Cerebral/fisiopatologia , Feminino , Mãos/fisiopatologia , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Programas de Rastreamento , Valores de Referência
9.
Dev Med Child Neurol ; 60(5): 490-497, 2018 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29392717

RESUMO

AIM: To describe the development of bimanual performance among young children with unilateral or bilateral cerebral palsy (CP). METHOD: A population-based sample of 102 children (53 males, 49 females), median age 28.5 months (interquartile range [IQR] 16mo) at first assessment and 47 months (IQR 18mo) at last assessment, was assessed half-yearly with the Assisting Hand Assessment (AHA) or the Both Hands Assessment (BoHA) for a total of 329 assessments. Developmental limits and rates were estimated by nonlinear mixed-effects models. Developmental trajectories were compared between levels of manual ability (Mini-Manual Ability Classification System [Mini-MACS] and MACS) and AHA or BoHA performance at 18 months of age (AHA-18/BoHA-18) for both CP subgroups, and additionally between children with bilateral CP with symmetric or asymmetric hand use. RESULTS: For both CP subgroups, children classified in Mini-MACS/MACS level I, and those with high AHA-18 or BoHA-18 reached the highest limits of performance. For children with bilateral CP the developmental change was small, and children with symmetric hand use reached the highest limits. INTERPRETATION: Mini-MACS/MACS levels and AHA-18 or BoHA-18 distinguished between various developmental trajectories both for children with unilateral and bilateral CP. Children with bilateral CP changed their performance to a smaller extent than children with unilateral CP. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: Manual Ability Classification System levels and Assisting Hand Assessment/Both Hands Assessment performance at 18 months are important predictors of hand use development in cerebral palsy (CP). Children with bilateral CP improved less than those with unilateral CP. Children with bilateral CP and symmetric hand use reached higher limits than those with asymmetry.


Assuntos
Paralisia Cerebral/complicações , Deficiências do Desenvolvimento/etiologia , Força da Mão/fisiologia , Mãos/fisiopatologia , Destreza Motora/fisiologia , Transtornos Psicomotores/etiologia , Pré-Escolar , Planejamento em Saúde Comunitária , Avaliação da Deficiência , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Noruega , Estudos Retrospectivos
10.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil ; 99(12): 2513-2522, 2018 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29807004

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To investigate interrater and intrarater reliability, measurement error, and convergent and discriminative validity of the Adult Assisting Hand Assessment Stroke (Ad-AHA Stroke). DESIGN: Cross-sectional observational study. SETTING: A total of 7 stroke rehabilitation centers. PARTICIPANTS: Stroke survivors (reliability sample: n=30; validity sample: N=118) were included (median age 67y; interquartile range [IQR], 59-76); median time poststroke 81 days (IQR 57-117). INTERVENTIONS: N/A. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Ad-AHA Stroke, Action Research Arm Test (ARAT), upper extremity Fugl-Meyer Assessment (UE-FMA). The Ad-AHA Stroke is an observation-based instrument assessing the effectiveness of the spontaneous use of the affected hand when performing bimanual activities in adults poststroke. Reliability of Ad-AHA Stroke was examined using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), Bland-Altman plots, and weighted kappa statistics for reliability on item level. SEM was calculated based on Ad-AHA units. Convergent validity was assessed by calculating Spearman rank correlation coefficients between Ad-AHA Stroke and ARA test and UE-FMA. Comparison of Ad-AHA Stroke scores between subgroups of patients according to hand dominance, neglect, and age evaluated discriminative validity. RESULTS: Intrarater and interrater agreement showed an ICC of 0.99 (95% confidence interval, 0.99-0.99), an SEM of 2.15 and 1.64 out of 100, respectively, and weighted kappa for item scores were all above 0.79. The relation between Ad-AHA and other clinical assessments was strong (ρ=0.9). Patients with neglect had significantly lower Ad-AHA scores compared to patients without neglect (P=.004). CONCLUSIONS: The Ad-AHA Stroke captures actual bimanual performance. Therefore, it provides an additional aspect of upper limb assessment with good to excellent reliability and low SEM for patients with subacute stroke. High convergent validity with the ARA test and UE-FMA and discriminative validity were supported.


Assuntos
Avaliação da Deficiência , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/diagnóstico , Avaliação de Sintomas/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Mãos/fisiopatologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Variações Dependentes do Observador , Psicometria , Desempenho Psicomotor , Recuperação de Função Fisiológica , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Estatísticas não Paramétricas , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/fisiopatologia , Avaliação de Sintomas/métodos , Extremidade Superior/fisiopatologia
11.
Phys Occup Ther Pediatr ; 38(2): 113-126, 2018 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28467140

RESUMO

AIMS: To develop a hand function test for children with bilateral cerebral palsy (CP) measuring bimanual performance, including quantification of possible asymmetry of hand use. METHOD: The Both Hands Assessment (BoHA) content was developed through adaptation of the Assisting Hand Assessment (version 5.0). Data from 171 children with bilateral CP, 22-months to 13 years olds (75 females; mean age: 6 years and 6 months) classified at Manual Ability Classification System (MACS) levels I-III, was entered into Rasch measurement model analyses to evaluate internal scale validity and aspects of reliability. RESULTS: Sixteen items (11 unimanual and 5 bimanual) exhibited evidence for good internal scale validity and item and person reliability when analyzed separately for children with asymmetric or symmetric hand use. By calibrating the BoHA logit measures into the same frame of reference through linking, the overall measure of bimanual performance is comparable between children with asymmetric or symmetric hand use, still allowing use of separate item difficulty hierarchies. CONCLUSIONS: The Both Hands Assessment (BoHA), showed strong evidence of internal construct validity for measuring effectiveness of bimanual performance and the extent of asymmetric hand use in children with bilateral cerebral palsy, MACS levels I-III.


Assuntos
Paralisia Cerebral/fisiopatologia , Avaliação da Deficiência , Mãos/fisiopatologia , Destreza Motora/fisiologia , Adolescente , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Índice de Gravidade de Doença
12.
Dev Med Child Neurol ; 59(9): 926-932, 2017 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28555755

RESUMO

AIM: To investigate the interrater and test-retest reliability of the Assisting Hand Assessment in adolescents (Ad-AHA) with cerebral palsy (CP) and to evaluate the alternate-form reliability of different test activities. METHOD: Participants were 112 adolescents with unilateral CP (60 males, 52 females; mean age 14y 5mo [standard deviation {SD} 2y 8mo], Manual Ability Classification System levels I-III). Reliability was evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), smallest detectable change (SDC), and Bland-Altman plots. RESULTS: ICCs for interrater (n=38) and test-retest reliability (n=31) were excellent: 0.97 (95% CI 0.94-0.98) and 0.99 (95% CI 0.98-0.99) respectively. The alternate-form reliability of different test activities was excellent for children (age 10-12y, n=30) performing the School-Kids AHA and Ad-AHA Board Game 0.99 (95% CI 0.98-0.99) and for adolescents (age 13-18y) performing the Ad-AHA Board Game compared to the Ad-AHA Present (n=28) 0.99 (95% CI 0.95-0.98), or the Ad-AHA Sandwich (n=29) 0.99 (95% CI 0.98-0.99) tasks. SDC for test-retest was 4.5 AHA-units. INTERPRETATION: Ad-AHA scores are consistent across different raters and occasions. The good alternate-form reliability indicates that the different test activities can be used interchangeably in adolescents with unilateral CP. Differences greater than or equal to 5 AHA-units can be considered a change beyond measurement error. The use of logit based AHA-units makes change comparable for persons at different ability levels.


Assuntos
Paralisia Cerebral/diagnóstico , Mãos , Destreza Motora , Adolescente , Braço , Paralisia Cerebral/fisiopatologia , Criança , Feminino , Lateralidade Funcional , Jogos Experimentais , Humanos , Masculino , Variações Dependentes do Observador , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes
13.
Dev Med Child Neurol ; 59(1): 72-78, 2017 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27273427

RESUMO

AIM: To develop the Mini-Manual Ability Classification System (Mini-MACS) and to evaluate the extent to which its ratings are valid and reliable when children younger than 4 years are rated by their parents and therapists. METHOD: The Mini-MACS was created by making adjustments to the MACS. The development involved a pilot project, consensus discussions within an expert group, and the creation of a test version of the Mini-MACS that was evaluated for content validity and interrater reliability. A convenience sample of 61 children with signs of cerebral palsy aged 12 to 51 months (mean age 30.2mo [SD 10.1]) were classified by one parent and two occupational therapists across a total of 64 assessments. Agreement between the parents' and therapists' ratings was evaluated using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and the percentage of agreement. RESULTS: The first sentence of the five levels in the MACS was kept, but other descriptions within the Mini-MACS were adjusted to be more relevant for the younger age group. The ICC between parents and therapists was 0.90 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.79-0.92), and for the two therapists it was 0.97 (95% CI 0.78-0.92). Most parents and therapists found the descriptions in the Mini-MACS suitable and easy to understand. INTERPRETATION: The Mini-MACS seems applicable for children from 1 to 4 years of age.


Assuntos
Paralisia Cerebral/fisiopatologia , Avaliação da Deficiência , Mãos/fisiopatologia , Destreza Motora/fisiologia , Fatores Etários , Paralisia Cerebral/classificação , Paralisia Cerebral/reabilitação , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Terapeutas Ocupacionais/psicologia , Pais/psicologia , Projetos Piloto , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes
14.
Dev Med Child Neurol ; 59(12): 1276-1283, 2017 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28984352

RESUMO

AIM: The aim of this study was to develop a descriptive and evaluative assessment of upper limb function for infants aged 3 to 12 months and to investigate its internal scale validity for use with infants at risk of unilateral cerebral palsy. METHOD: The concepts of the test items and scoring criteria were developed. Internal scale validity and aspects of reliability were investigated on the basis of 156 assessments of infants at 3 to 12 months corrected age (mean 7.2mo, SD 2.5) with signs of asymmetric hand use. Rasch measurement model analysis and non-parametric statistics were used. RESULTS: The new test, the Hand Assessment for Infants (HAI), consists of 12 unimanual and five bimanual items, each scored on a 3-point rating scale. It demonstrated a unidimensional construct and good fit to the Rasch model requirements. The excellent person reliability enabled person separation to six significant ability strata. The HAI produced an interval-level measure of bilateral hand use as well as unimanual scores of each hand, allowing a quantification of possible asymmetry expressed as an asymmetry index. INTERPRETATION: The HAI can be considered a valid assessment tool for measuring bilateral hand use and quantifying side difference between hands among infants at risk of developing unilateral cerebral palsy. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: The Hand Assessment for Infants (HAI) measures the use of both hands and quantifies a possible asymmetry of hand use. HAI is valid for infants at 3 to 12 months corrected age at risk of unilateral cerebral palsy.


Assuntos
Paralisia Cerebral/diagnóstico , Mãos/fisiopatologia , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Paralisia Cerebral/fisiopatologia , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes
15.
Phys Occup Ther Pediatr ; 37(5): 528-540, 2017 Oct 20.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28318401

RESUMO

AIM: To describe aspects of hand function in a population-based sample of young children with clinical signs of unilateral or bilateral cerebral palsy (CP). METHOD: A cross-sectional study with data from national CP registers in Norway. Manual ability was classified with the Manual Ability Classification System (MACS) or Mini-MACS. Hand use in bimanual activities was measured with the Assisting Hand Assessment (AHA) for unilateral CP or the newly developed Both Hands Assessment (BoHA) for bilateral CP. RESULTS: From 202 children, 128 (57 females) were included (Mini-MACS/MACS levels I-V, mean age 30.4 months; SD = 12.1). Manual abilities were distributed across levels I-III in unilateral CP and levels I-V in bilateral CP. Variations in AHA and BoHA units were large. One-way ANOVA revealed associations between higher AHA or BoHA units and Mini-MACS/MACS levels of higher ability (p < 0.01) and higher age (p < 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with young children with unilateral CP, children with bilateral CP showed greater variation in Mini-MACS/MACS levels, and both sub-groups showed large variations in AHA or BoHA units. The classifications and assessments used in this study are useful to differentiate young children's ability levels. Such information is important to tailor upper limb interventions to the specific needs of children with CP.


Assuntos
Lesões Encefálicas/diagnóstico , Paralisia Cerebral/fisiopatologia , Mãos/fisiopatologia , Destreza Motora/fisiologia , Lesões Encefálicas/etiologia , Paralisia Cerebral/complicações , Pré-Escolar , Estudos Transversais , Avaliação da Deficiência , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Noruega , Sistema de Registros , Índice de Gravidade de Doença
16.
Dev Med Child Neurol ; 58(6): 618-24, 2016 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26507383

RESUMO

AIM: The aim of this study was to scrutinize the Assisting Hand Assessment (AHA) version 4.4 for possible improvements and to evaluate the psychometric properties regarding internal scale validity and aspects of reliability of a revised version of the AHA. METHOD: In collaboration with experts, scoring criteria were changed for four items, and one fully new item was constructed. Twenty-two original, one new, and four revised items were scored for 164 assessments of children with unilateral cerebral palsy aged 18 months to 12 years. Rasch measurement analysis was used to evaluate internal scale validity by exploring rating-scale functioning, item and person goodness-of-fit, and principal component analysis. Targeting and scale reliability were also evaluated. RESULTS: After removal of misfitting items, a 20-item scale showed satisfactory goodness-of-fit. Unidimensionality was confirmed by principal component analysis. The rating scale functioned well for the 20 items, and the item difficulty was well suited to the ability level of the sample. The person reliability coefficient was 0.98, indicating high separation ability of the scale. A conversion table of AHA scores between the previous version (4.4) and the new version (5.0) was constructed. INTERPRETATION: The new, 20-item version of the Kids-AHA (version 5.0), demonstrated excellent internal scale validity, suggesting improved responsiveness to changes and shortened scoring time. For comparison of scores from version 4.4 to 5.0, a transformation table is presented.


Assuntos
Paralisia Cerebral/diagnóstico , Mãos/fisiopatologia , Exame Neurológico/métodos , Psicometria/métodos , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Exame Neurológico/normas , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes
17.
Dev Med Child Neurol ; 58(12): 1303-1309, 2016 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27291981

RESUMO

AIM: To develop and evaluate a test activity from which bimanual performance in adolescents with unilateral cerebral palsy (CP) can be observed and scored with the Assisting Hand Assessment (AHA), and to evaluate the construct validity of the AHA test items for the extended age range 18 months to 18 years. METHOD: A new test activity was developed and evaluated for its ability to elicit bimanual actions in adolescents with (n=20) and without (n=10) unilateral CP. The AHA scores of 126 adolescents (mean age 14y 3mo, SD 2y 6mo; 71 males, 55 females) and 157 children with unilateral CP (mean age 6y 1mo, SD 2y 10mo; 102 males, 55 females) were analysed using the Rasch measurement model. RESULTS: The test activity elicited bimanual actions in 100% of typically developing adolescents and in 96.8% and 57.9% of adolescents with unilateral CP (moderately and severely limited hand function respectively). The scale demonstrated good construct validity; thus the same scoring criteria can be used for the age range studied. INTERPRETATION: The new Assisting Hand Assessment for adolescents (Ad-AHA) activity is valid for use with 13- to 18-year-olds to elicit bimanual performance in adolescents with unilateral CP. The same AHA scoring criteria can be used both for children and for adolescents within the age range 18 months to 18 years.


Assuntos
Paralisia Cerebral/fisiopatologia , Teste de Esforço/métodos , Mãos/fisiopatologia , Destreza Motora/fisiologia , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Adolescente , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Teste de Esforço/normas , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes
18.
Dev Med Child Neurol ; 58(6): 589-96, 2016 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26374194

RESUMO

AIM: The efficacy of two different goal-setting approaches (children's self-identified goals and goals identified by parents) were compared on a goal-directed, task-oriented intervention. METHOD: In this assessor-blinded parallel randomized trial, 34 children with disabilities (13 males, 21 females; mean age 9y, SD 1y 4mo) were randomized using concealed allocation to one of two 8-week, goal-directed, task-oriented intervention groups with different goal-setting approaches: (1) children's self-identified goals (n=18) using the Perceived Efficacy and Goal-Setting System, or (2) goals identified by parents (n=16) using the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM). Participants were recruited through eight paediatric rehabilitation centres and randomized between October 2011 and May 2013. The primary outcome measure was the Goal Attainment Scaling and the secondary measure, the COPM performance scale (COPM-P). Data were collected pre- and post-intervention and at the 5-month follow-up. RESULTS: There was no evidence of a difference in mean characteristics at baseline between groups. There was evidence of an increase in mean goal attainment (mean T score) in both groups after intervention (child-goal group: estimated mean difference [EMD] 27.84, 95% CI 22.93-32.76; parent-goal group: EMD 21.42, 95% CI 16.16-26.67). There was no evidence of a difference in the mean T scores post-intervention between the two groups (EMD 6.42, 95% CI -0.80 to 13.65). These results were sustained at the 5-month follow-up. INTERPRETATION: Children's self-identified goals are achievable to the same extent as parent-identified goals and remain stable over time. Thus children can be trusted to identify their own goals for intervention, thereby influencing their involvement in their intervention programmes.


Assuntos
Atividades Cotidianas , Transtorno do Espectro Autista/reabilitação , Crianças com Deficiência/reabilitação , Objetivos , Deficiências da Aprendizagem/reabilitação , Transtornos dos Movimentos/reabilitação , Terapia Ocupacional/métodos , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/métodos , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pais , Participação do Paciente
19.
J Neurol Phys Ther ; 40(3): 186-95, 2016 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27214520

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Longitudinal information regarding the prevalence of upper limb somatosensory deficits and the association with motor impairment and activity limitations is scarce. The aim of this prospective cohort study was to map the extent and distribution of somatosensory deficits, and to determine associations over time between somatosensory deficits and motor impairment and activity limitations. METHODS: We recruited 32 participants who were assessed 4 to 7 days after stroke, and reassessed at 6 months. Somatosensory measurements included the Erasmus-modified Nottingham sensory assessment (Em-NSA), perceptual threshold of touch, thumb finding test, 2-point discrimination, and stereognosis subscale of the NSA. Evaluation of motor impairment comprised the Fugl-Meyer assessment, Motricity Index, and Action Research Arm Test. In addition, at 6 months, activity limitation was determined using the adult assisting hand assessment stroke, the ABILHAND, and hand subscale of the Stroke Impact Scale. RESULTS: Somatosensory impairments were common, with 41% to 63% experiencing a deficit in one of the modalities within the first week and 3% to 50% at 6 months. In the acute phase, there were only very low associations between somatosensory and motor impairments (r = 0.03-0.20), whereas at 6 months, low to moderate associations (r = 0.32-0.69) were found for perceptual threshold of touch, thumb finding test, and stereognosis with motor impairment and activity limitations. Low associations (r = 0.01-0.29) were found between somatosensory impairments in the acute phase and motor impairments and activity limitations at 6 months. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that somatosensory impairments are common and suggests that the association with upper limb motor and functional performance increases with time after stroke.Video Abstract available for more insights from the authors (see Supplemental Digital Content 1, http://links.lww.com/JNPT/A138).


Assuntos
Transtornos Motores/diagnóstico , Distúrbios Somatossensoriais/diagnóstico , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/fisiopatologia , Extremidade Superior/fisiopatologia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Mãos/fisiopatologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Transtornos Motores/etiologia , Transtornos Motores/fisiopatologia , Destreza Motora , Doenças do Sistema Nervoso/diagnóstico , Doenças do Sistema Nervoso/etiologia , Doenças do Sistema Nervoso/fisiopatologia , Recuperação de Função Fisiológica , Córtex Sensório-Motor , Distúrbios Somatossensoriais/etiologia , Distúrbios Somatossensoriais/fisiopatologia , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/complicações , Fatores de Tempo
20.
Phys Occup Ther Pediatr ; 36(2): 131-43, 2016.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26325620

RESUMO

AIM: The aim of this study was to develop clinically useful normative scores for the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI) for children in Norway, and provide information on the relative difficulty level of individual test items. METHODS: Using PEDI protocols from 224 Norwegian children without disability, we computed and scrutinized the normative scores for their representativeness, and compared them with scores from 313 children in the original US PEDI sample. Item functioning was compared using Rasch model-based differential item functioning (DIF) analyses and comparisons of item mastery. RESULTS: The normative scores yielded consistent and regular results. The mean scores for each age group in the Norwegian sample were lower than in their US counterparts, and age mean plots ran parallel. However, this difference may be misleading for clinical use, as item comparisons revealed differences in both higher and lower directions between the samples for about a third of all items. Estimates of relative item difficulty for children in Norway were developed. CONCLUSIONS: Identifying potential differences when using an instrument in another culture is important to avoid a risk of over- or underestimating a child's capability. In addition, item response patterns are required to make national normative scores clinically useful.


Assuntos
Avaliação da Deficiência , Crianças com Deficiência , Pediatria/métodos , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Comparação Transcultural , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Noruega , Valores de Referência , Estados Unidos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA