Pitfalls of HIV genotypic tropism testing after treatment interruption.

OBJECTIVES: The genotypic method is reliable enough for the determination of tropism and largely preferred in Europe. However, careful interpretation is essential when assessing HIV genotypic resistance during treatment interruption (TI) due to the possible disappearance of resistant strains. The results of HIV genotypic tropism testing in such a context remain unknown. METHODS: First, we studied changes in tropism in patients included in a structured TI assay: the Reverse study. Second, we investigated the unexpected tropism switches from X4 to R5 recorded in our routine database. RESULTS: Tropism determination was possible in 21 patients of the Reverse study, 9 of whom had an X4 virus (43%) at baseline. Two patients displayed a change of tropism during TI, both switching from X4 to R5. Regarding the database investigation, 7 of the 222 patients with at least two plasma tropism determinations recorded in the database displayed a switch from X4 to R5. TI due to non-compliance at the time of the tropism change was reported for five of these seven patients. CONCLUSIONS: We have shown that the redistribution of the HIV population caused by TI could potentially result in X4 viruses becoming undetected and inappropriate prescription of a CCR5 receptor antagonist. Therefore, genotypic tropism results should be interpreted with caution in such a context.

Highly multidrug-resistant HIV: clonal analysis and therapeutic strategies.

OBJECTIVES: There are today HIV-infected patients in therapeutic impasses because of highly multidrug-resistant (HMDR) viruses. We studied the distribution of resistance mutations at clonal level, and we analysed the therapeutic strategies used in such cases to achieve undetectable viraemia. METHODS: The HMDR profile was defined as a genotypic sensitivity score (GSS) ≤ 1.5 for etravirine and raltegravir with full resistance to darunavir. About 30 clones per gene and per patient were sequenced. Virtual phenotypes were determined. Efficacy of therapeutic strategies was evaluated by follow-up of viral loads, CD4 cell counts and trough concentrations of drugs. RESULTS: Among 1310 patients on treatment and with genotypic resistance testing, 25 (2%) were resistant to darunavir and 11 (0.8%) had an HMDR profile. Five-hundred clones could be analysed for four of them. HMDR profiles were harboured by the great majority of clones and all resistance mutations were located on the same strains for all genes. Despite this and a regimen with a GSS <2.0 in three patients, they achieved a viraemia <20 copies/mL. These results were obtained using different strategies: high doses of drugs; combination of antiretrovirals with full or intermediate susceptibility, such as tipranavir, etravirine or maraviroc; and use of alternative compounds, such as foscarnet or interferon. CONCLUSION: Patients with HMDR HIV were uncommon, but, in such cases, all resistance mutations were borne on the same majority strains. In this study, tipranavir was the only protease inhibitor with full or intermediate susceptibility. Despite very limited therapeutic options, an undetectable viraemia can be achieved by combining different strategies.

Foscarnet salvage therapy for patients with late-stage HIV disease and multiple drug resistance.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of foscarnet on HIV infection in patients with late-stage HIV disease and multiple drug resistance. METHODS: Three drugs experienced patients with plasma viral load (pVL) > 50,000 copies/ml and CD4+ T-cell counts < 100/mm3 were eligible for this open-label, single-arm, add-on pilot study. Foscarnet induction therapy consisted of 5 g intravenously twice daily for 6 weeks, in addition to a stable antiretroviral regimen. Patients with at least 1 log10 decrease in pVL at week 6 (W6), were given foscarnet 5 g intravenously twice daily on two consecutive days each week. Primary endpoint was the virological response rate at W6. RESULTS: Eleven patients were enrolled with a median baseline pVL at 5.16 log10 copies/ml, median CD4+ T-cell count at 10/mm3 and median number of mutations of 9, 2 and 12 associated with resistance to nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs), non-NRTIs and protease inhibitors, respectively. One patient discontinued foscarnet at W2 because of renal toxicity. In an intent-to-treat analysis, the median change in pVL from baseline was -1.99 log10 copies/ml at W2 and -1.79 log10 copies/ml at W6. Eight out of eleven patients had a fall in pVL of at least 1 log10 at W6, and six started maintenance therapy. The median fall in pVL after 12 weeks of maintenance therapy was -0.85 log10 copies/ml in the four patients who reached W12, and the median increase of CD4+ T-cell count was 60/mm3. CONCLUSION: In patients with HIV mutations conferring resistance to all antiretroviral drug classes, foscarnet markedly reduced plasma HIV load and improved immunological status.

No benefit of a structured treatment interruption based on genotypic resistance in heavily pretreated HIV-infected patients.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the potential benefits of a tailored antiretroviral treatment interruption with duration based on the observed reversion of resistance mutations. METHODS: In this open single-arm pilot study, 23 patients with multiple treatment failure interrupted therapy and underwent longitudinal genotypic resistance testing. Salvage gigatherapy was started when resistance mutations to at least two antiretroviral drug classes reverted. The primary endpoint was a fall in viral load by > 1 log10 copies/ml after 12 weeks of salvage therapy. RESULTS: Baseline median viral load was 5.14 log copies/ml and CD4 cell count 43 x 10 cells/l. Genotypic resistance testing showed a median of six, two and nine resistance mutations to nucleoside analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitors, non-nucleoside analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitors and protease inhibitors, respectively; viral strains were susceptible to no more than one drug in 17/23 patients. The median duration of treatment interruption was 24 weeks (range, 12-37), leading to median changes from baseline of + 0.54 log10 copies/ml and -30 x 10(6) cells/l. At the end of treatment interruption, plasma HIV was susceptible to at least three drugs in 16/23 patients. After 12 weeks of salvage multitherapy, only one patient had a decrease in viral load > 1 log copies/ml. All baseline resistance mutations recurred after treatment resumption. AIDS-defining events occurred in two-thirds of patients during the study period. CONCLUSION: In HIV-infected patients with multiple failures and no therapeutic options at baseline, significant reversion of resistance mutations after prolonged treatment interruption failed to restore antiviral efficacy of a salvage regimen and was clinically deleterious.

Characterization of genotypic determinants in HR-1 and HR-2 gp41 domains in individuals with persistent HIV viraemia under T-20.

We analysed the genetic changes in gp41 in a population of 30 heavily pretreated HIV-1-infected patients failing on a T-20-containing salvage therapy. This study confirms the key role of the number of drugs presumed to be still effective associated with T-20 in the magnitude of the virological response. Our results suggest that only HR-1 sequencing is necessary to characterize resistance to T-20, and that HR-2 domain sequencing is probably not required.

Mortality in rheumatoid arthritis over the last fifty years: systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Mortality rates in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) have been reported to be higher than for the general population. Fortunately, efficient therapies have reduced disease activity and may be able to diminish the excess mortality risk. This study was designed to investigate RA mortality over the last 50 years by systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. METHODS: Data to January 2010 in the Medline, Cochrane and Embase databases were searched with the keywords "rheumatoid arthritis", "epidemiologic methods" and "mortality". Inclusion criteria were (i) longitudinal study, (ii) early RA patients, (iii) number of deaths and mean patient follow-up. Incidence mortality rates (IMR) were calculated and standardized mortality rates (SMR) were extracted when available. A meta-analysis by periods of inclusion and a Poisson regression were used to model IMR. Available SMR were computed as a meta-analysis. RESULTS: A total of 11 longitudinal studies starting from 1955 to 1995, representing 51,819 patients, met the inclusion criteria. Mean IMR was 2.7/100 person-years of follow-up (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.2, 3.3) and ranged from 1.0 to 5.2/100 person-years. A decreasing IMR was found in the meta-analyses. Poisson regression analysis indicated a decrease in IMR of 2.3% per year (95%CI: 2.1; 2.6). SMR was available in 8 studies: the meta-SMR was 1.47 (95%CI: 1.19; 1.83) and no decrease was seen over time in the meta-regression. CONCLUSION: Mortality has decreased among RA patients over the past decades but remained higher than in the general population as assessed by the IMR and the SMR over time.

Influence of environmental factors on disease activity in spondyloarthritis: a prospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: Spondyloarthritis (SpA) is a complex inflammatory disorder. We investigated the influence of environmental factors on SpA disease activity. METHODS: A prospective cohort of adults with SpA was followed for 3 years. Patients logged on to a secured Website every 3 months to complete a questionnaire. They reported whether they had been exposed to environmental factors such as stressful or traumatic life events, infections, or vaccinations. Outcome variables included the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI), the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI), and pain and patient global assessment (PGA) on visual numerical scales (each rated 0-10). Analyses were performed using a generalized estimating equation for repeated measures, adjusted for the outcome variable collected by the previous questionnaire. RESULTS: In total, 272 patients were included in the analysis, completing the questionnaire on 2240 occasions. The average time (mean ± SD) between 2 connections to the Website was 4.0 ± 2.0 months. Occurrence of life events was followed by an increase of 0.5 (95% CI 0.4-0.7) in the BASDAI, 0.5 (95% CI 0.3-0.6) in the BASFI, 0.7 (95% CI 0.5-0.9) in the PGA, and 0.8 (95% CI 0.6-1.0) for pain (p < 0.0001 for all variations). A moderately statistically significant link was found between vaccination and an elevation of the BASDAI of 0.3 (95% CI 0.0-0.5; p = 0.032). No influence of other factors was detected. CONCLUSION: This prospective study in a dedicated SpA cohort shows for the first time a link between stressful events and disease activity. Although this link was statistically highly significant, its clinical meaning remains to be determined because the average magnitude of variation of the different variables studied was rather mild.

Efficacy and safety of tenofovir double-dose in treatment-experienced HIV-infected patients: the TENOPLUS study.

Drug resistance is an increasing problem in the treatment of HIV infection. Tenofovir has been shown to inhibit HIV replication even with thymidine-associated resistance mutations (TAMs) if they are limited to two or less. Double-dose of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) (600 mg QD) was used to determine weather the drug could be virologically effective in patients harbouring HIV-strains resistant to nucleoside analogues (NRTI). A pilot, open, non-comparative add-on study, where patients failing a current antiretroviral regimen, with at least two TAMs, and naive for tenofovir, were given tenofovir 600 mg once-daily for 4 weeks, in addition to their current failing antiretroviral regimen. The primary end-point was the percentage of patients with plasma viral load (VL) reduction of at least 0.8 log(10) between baseline and week 4 (W4). Ten patients were enrolled. At baseline, the median viral load was 3.66 log(10) copies/ml (range 3.13-4.03) and the median CD4 cell count was 407/mm(3) (range 136-1102). The percentage of patients with reduction the viral load > or =0.8 log(10) was 40% at W4. After 4 weeks of treatment with tenofovir 600 mg, the median decrease in the viral load was -0.61 log(10) (range -0.05; -0.88) and the median gain of CD4 was +109/mm(3). Despite a twofold increase tenofovir plasma concentrations, no serious drug-related adverse event were recorded except for one patient experiencing an de Fanconi syndrome at week 2. This add-on pilot study supports the concept of double dose tenofovir to virologically overcome the decreased sensitivity of NRTI-resistant viruses. However, the safety of this regimen needs to be considered carefully.

Genotypic inhibitory quotient as predictor of virological response to ritonavir-amprenavir in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 protease inhibitor-experienced patients.

Forty-nine protease inhibitor (PI)-experienced but amprenavir (APV)-naïve patients experiencing virological failure were treated with ritonavir (RTV) (100 mg twice a day [b.i.d.]) plus APV (600 mg b.i.d.). Patients responded to therapy with a median viral load decrease of -1.32 log(10) by week 12. The addition of low-dose RTV enhanced the minimal APV concentration in plasma (APV C(min)) up to 10-fold compared with that obtained with APV (1,200 mg b.i.d.) without RTV. Baseline PI resistance mutations (L10F/I/V, K20M/R, E35D, R41K, I54V, L63P, V82A/F/T/S, I84V) identified by univariate analysis and included in a genotypic score and APV C(min) at week 8 were predictive of the virological response at week 12. The response to APV plus RTV was significantly reduced in patients with six or more of the resistance mutations among the ones defined above. The genotypic inhibitory quotient, calculated as the ratio of the APV C(min) to the number of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 protease mutations, was a better predictor than the virological or pharmacological variables used alone. This genotypic inhibitory quotient could be used in therapeutic drug monitoring to define the concentrations in plasma needed to control replication of viruses with different levels of PI resistance, as measured by the number of PI resistance mutations.

Comparison of the dynamics of resistance-associated mutations to nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, and protease inhibitors after cessation of antiretroviral combination therapy.

The dynamics of mutations associated with resistance to antiretroviral drugs were analyzed after cessation of therapy. The results showed that the kinetics of the shift to wild-type amino acid residues were significantly faster for protease inhibitors, intermediate for nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, and slower for nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors.

Resistance profiles observed in virological failures after 24 weeks of amprenavir/ritonavir containing regimen in protease inhibitor experienced patients.

Amprenavir (APV) is an HIV protease inhibitor (PI) used for the treatment of either naive or PI-experienced HIV-infected patients. Several genotypic resistance pathways in protease gene have been described to be associated to unboosted APV failure (I50V, V32I + I47V, I54L/M, or less commonly I84V, which may be accompanied by one ore more accessory mutations such as L10F, L33F, M46I/L). The aims of this study were to investigate the efficacy up to week 24 of an APV plus ritonavir containing regimen in PI experienced patients and to determine the genotypic resistance profiles emerging in patients failing to this therapy. Forty-nine, PI experienced but APV naïve patients were treated with APV (600 mg bid) plus ritonavir (100 mg bid). By intent-to-treat analysis, the median decrease in viral load (VL) was -1.32 log10 (min +0.6; max -2.8) and -1.46 log10 (min +0.5; max -2.8) 12 and 24 weeks after initiating APV plus ritonavir regimen, respectively. Twelve patients harboured a VL >200 copies/ml at week 24. Among these patients, the selection of mutations previously described with the use of APV as first PI (V32I, L33F, M46I/L, I50V, 54M/L, and I84V) was observed. However, in some cases, mutations classically described after the use of other PIs (V82F and L90M) were selected but always with APV-specific mutations. There was no relation between the resistance pathways selected with either APV or ritonavir plasma minimal concentration, but higher APV plasma minimal concentration were associated with a lower rate of resistance mutations selection.