Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 26
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Dis Colon Rectum ; 67(2): 286-290, 2024 Feb 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37787607

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Multispecialty management should be the preferred approach for the treatment of pelvic floor dysfunction because there is often multicompartmental prolapse. OBJECTIVE: To assess the safety of combined robotic ventral mesh rectopexy and either uterine or vaginal fixation for the treatment of multicompartmental pelvic organ prolapse at our institution. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis. SETTINGS: Tertiary referral academic center. PATIENTS: All patients who underwent a robotic approach and combined procedure and whose cases were discussed at a biweekly pelvic floor multidisciplinary team meeting. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Operative time, intraoperative blood loss and complications, postoperative pelvic organ prolapse quantification score, length of stay, 30-day morbidity, and readmission. RESULTS: From 2018 to 2021, there were 321 operations for patients with multicompartmental prolapse. The mean age was 63.4 years. The predominant pelvic floor dysfunction was rectal prolapse in 170 cases (60%). Pelvic organ prolapse quantification scores were II in 146 patients (53%), III in 121 patients (44%), and IV in 9 patients (3%); 315 of 323 cases included robotic ventral mesh rectopexy (98%). Sacrocolpopexy or sacrohysteropexy was performed in 281 patients (89%). Other procedures included 175 hysterectomies (54%), 104 oophorectomies (32%), 151 sling procedures (47%), 149 posterior repairs (46%), and 138 cystocele repairs (43%). The operative time for ventral mesh rectopexy was 211 minutes and for combined pelvic floor reconstruction was 266 minutes. Average length of stay was 1.6 days. Eight patients were readmitted within 30 days: 1 with a severe headache and 7 with postoperative complications (2.5%), such as pelvic collection and perirectal collection, both requiring radiologic drainage. Four complications required reoperation: epidural abscess, small-bowel obstruction, missed enterotomy requiring resection, and urinary retention requiring sling revision. There were no mortalities. LIMITATIONS: Retrospective single-center study. CONCLUSIONS: A combined robotic approach for multicompartmental pelvic organ prolapse is a safe and viable procedure with a relatively low rate of morbidity and no mortality. This is the highest volume series of combined robotic pelvic floor reconstruction in the literature and demonstrates a low complication rate and short length of stay. See Video Abstract . RECTOPEXIA Y SACROCOLPOPEXIA ROBTICA VENTRAL COMBINADAS CON MALLA PARA EL PROLAPSO DE RGANOS PLVICOS MULTICOMPARTIMENTALES: ANTECEDENTES:El tratamiento multiespecializado debe ser el enfoque preferido para el tratamiento de la disfunción del suelo pélvico, ya que a menudo hay prolapso multicompartimental.OBJETIVO:Evaluar la seguridad de la rectopexia robótica combinada con malla ventral y fijación uterina o vaginal para el tratamiento del prolapso multicompartimental de órganos pélvicos en nuestra institución.DISEÑO:Análisis retrospectivo.AJUSTES:Centro académico de referencia terciarioPACIENTES:Todos los pacientes que se sometieron a un enfoque robótico y un procedimiento combinado y se discutieron en una reunión quincenal del equipo multidisciplinario sobre el piso pélvico.MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Tiempo operatorio, pérdida de sangre intraoperatoria y complicaciones. Puntuación de cuantificación del prolapso de órganos pélvicos posoperatorio, duración de la estancia hospitalaria, morbilidad a 30 días y reingreso.RESULTADOS:De 2018 a 2021, se realizaron 321 operaciones de pacientes con prolapso multicompartimental. La edad media fue 63.4 años. La disfunción del suelo pélvico predominante fue el prolapso rectal en 170 casos (60%). Las puntuaciones de cuantificación del prolapso de órganos pélvicos fueron II en 146 pacientes (53%), III en 121 (44%) y IV en 9 (3%); 315 de los 323 casos incluyeron rectopexia robótica de malla ventral (98%). Se realizó sacrocolpopexia o sacrohisteropexia en 281 pacientes (89%). Otros procedimientos incluyeron 175 histerectomías (54%), 104 ooforectomías (32%), 151 procedimientos de cabestrillo (47%), 149 reparaciones posteriores (46%) y 138 reparaciones de cistocele (43%). El tiempo operatorio para la rectopexia con malla ventral fue de 211 minutos y la reconstrucción combinada del piso pélvico de 266 minutos. La estancia media fue de 1.6 días. Ocho pacientes reingresaron dentro de los 30 días, 1 con dolor de cabeza intenso y 7 pacientes con complicaciones posoperatorias (2.5%): colección pélvica y colección perirrectal, ambas requirieron drenaje radiológico. Cuatro complicaciones requirieron reoperación: absceso epidural, obstrucción del intestino delgado, enterotomía omitida que requirió resección y retención urinaria que requirió revisión del cabestrillo. No hubo mortalidades.LIMITACIONES:Estudio retrospectivo unicéntrico.CONCLUSIONES:Un enfoque robótico combinado para el prolapso multicompartimental de órganos pélvicos es un procedimiento seguro y viable con una tasa relativamente baja de morbilidad y ninguna mortalidad. Esta es la serie de mayor volumen de reconstrucción robótica combinada del suelo pélvico en la literatura y demuestra una baja tasa de complicaciones y una estancia hospitalaria corta. (Traducción-Dr. Aurian Garcia Gonzalez )See Editorial on page 195.


Assuntos
Laparoscopia , Prolapso de Órgão Pélvico , Prolapso Retal , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Telas Cirúrgicas , Laparoscopia/métodos , Resultado do Tratamento , Prolapso de Órgão Pélvico/cirurgia , Prolapso Retal/cirurgia , Prolapso Retal/complicações
2.
Int Urogynecol J ; 32(10): 2693-2702, 2021 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34213600

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The aim of this study is to report cognitive dysfunction with commonly used antimuscarinic overactive bladder medications in patients suffering from overactive bladder disorder with and without baseline neurologic conditions. METHODS: We conducted an Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, and PsycINFO search from January 1998 to December 2018 using PRISMA guidelines. Eighteen studies met the inclusion criteria, including 5 randomized controlled trials and 13 observational studies. RESULTS: Cognitive decline was reported with oxybutynin use (5 of 8 studies) and tolterodine use (4 of 7 studies) among patients with and without baseline cognitive impairment. Oxybutynin use was linked to functional, mental, and behavioral decline among patients with Alzheimer's disease (2 studies). No cognitive decline was detected among patients with and without baseline cognitive impairment taking trospium (6 studies), darifenacin (3 studies), imidafenacin (2 studies), and fesoterodine (1 study). Solifenacin was not associated with cognitive decline (2 studies) but was linked to an increased risk of dementia among patients with diabetes (1 study). CONCLUSION: In this review, cognitive decline was reported with oxybutynin and tolterodine use and should be used with caution in adults over 65 years of age. Solifenacin, fesoterodine, and imidafenacin showed mixed results related to central nervous system effect. Trospium and darifenacin were not associated with cognitive decline among patients with and without baseline cognitive impairment.


Assuntos
Disfunção Cognitiva , Bexiga Urinária Hiperativa , Idoso , Disfunção Cognitiva/induzido quimicamente , Humanos , Antagonistas Muscarínicos/efeitos adversos , Succinato de Solifenacina/efeitos adversos , Tartarato de Tolterodina , Bexiga Urinária Hiperativa/complicações , Bexiga Urinária Hiperativa/tratamento farmacológico
3.
Int Urogynecol J ; 25(11): 1523-31, 2014 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24964761

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: To evaluate an association between hysterectomy and urinary incontinence (UI) in postmenopausal women. METHODS: Women (aged 50-79) with uteri (N = 53,569) and without uteri (N = 38,524) who enrolled in the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) Observational Study between 1993 and 1996 were included in this secondary analysis. Baseline (BL) and 3-year demographic, health/physical forms and personal habit questionnaires were used. Statistical analyses included univariate and logistic regression methods. RESULTS: The baseline UI rate was 66.5 %, with 27.3 % of participants having stress urinary incontinence (SUI), 23 % having urge UI (UUI), and 12.4 % having mixed UI (MUI). 41.8 % of women had undergone hysterectomy, with 88.1 % having had the procedure before age 54. Controlling for health/physical variables, hysterectomy was associated with UI at BL (OR 1.25, 95 % CI 1.19, 1.32) and over the 3-year study period (OR 1.23, 95 % CI 1.11, 1.36). Excluding women with UI at BL, a higher incidence of UUI and SUI episodes was found in hysterectomy at year 3. Among women who had undergone hysterectomy, those with bilateral oophorectomy (BSO) did not have increased odds of developing UI at BL or over the 3-year study period. Hormone use was not associated with a change in UI incidence (estrogen + progesterone, p = 0.17; unopposed estrogen, p = 0.41). CONCLUSIONS: Risk of UI is increased in postmenopausal women who had undergone hysterectomy compared with women with uteri.


Assuntos
Histerectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Incontinência Urinária por Estresse/epidemiologia , Incontinência Urinária de Urgência/epidemiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Terapia de Reposição de Estrogênios , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pós-Menopausa , Fatores de Risco , Inquéritos e Questionários , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
4.
Obstet Gynecol ; 2024 May 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38743951

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To identify the optimal hysterectomy approach for large uteri in gynecologic surgery for benign indications from a perioperative morbidity standpoint. DATA SOURCES: PubMed and Embase databases were searched from inception through September 19, 2022. Meta-analyses were conducted as feasible. METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: This review included studies that compared routes of hysterectomy with or without bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy for large uteri (12 weeks or more or 250 g or more) and excluded studies with any concurrent surgery for pelvic organ prolapse, incontinence, gynecologic malignancy, or any obstetric indication for hysterectomy. TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS: The review included 25 studies comprising nine randomized trials, two prospective, and 14 retrospective nonrandomized comparative studies. Studies were at high risk of bias. There was lower operative time for total vaginal hysterectomy compared with laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH) (mean difference 39 minutes, 95% CI, 18-60) and total vaginal hysterectomy compared with total laparoscopic hysterectomy (mean difference 50 minutes, 95% CI, 29-70). Total laparoscopic hysterectomy was associated with much greater risk of ureteral injury compared with total vaginal hysterectomy (odds ratio 7.54, 95% CI, 2.52-22.58). There were no significant differences in bowel injury rates between groups. There were no differences in length of stay among the laparoscopic approaches. For LAVH compared with total vaginal hysterectomy, randomized controlled trials favored total vaginal hysterectomy for length of stay. When rates of blood transfusion were compared between these abdominal hysterectomy and robotic-assisted total hysterectomy routes, abdominal hysterectomy was associated with a sixfold greater risk of transfusion than robotic-assisted total hysterectomy (6.31, 95% CI, 1.07-37.32). Similarly, single studies comparing robotic-assisted total hysterectomy with LAVH, total laparoscopic hysterectomy, or total vaginal hysterectomy all favored robotic-assisted total hysterectomy for reduced blood loss. CONCLUSION: Minimally invasive routes are safe and effective and have few complications. Minimally invasive approach (vaginal, laparoscopic, or robotic) results in lower blood loss and shorter length of stay, whereas the abdominal route has a shorter operative time. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO, CRD42021233300.

5.
Obstet Gynecol ; 143(4): 539-549, 2024 Apr 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38330397

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the literature on outcomes of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery in patients from various body mass index (BMI) categories to determine the association between obesity and surgical outcomes. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were searched from inception to April 12, 2022; ClinicalTrials.gov was searched in September 2022 (PROSPERO 2022 CRD42022326255). Randomized and nonrandomized studies of urogynecologic POP surgery outcomes were accepted in which categories of BMI or obesity were compared. METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: In total, 9,037 abstracts were screened; 759 abstracts were identified for full-text screening, and 31 articles were accepted for inclusion and data were extracted. TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS: Studies were extracted for participant information, intervention, comparator, and outcomes, including subjective outcomes, objective outcomes, and complications. Outcomes were compared among obesity categories (eg, BMI 30-34.9, 35-40, higher than 40), and meta-analysis was performed among different surgical approaches. Individual studies reported varying results as to whether obesity affects surgical outcomes. By meta-analysis, obesity (BMI 30 or higher) is associated with an increased odds of objective prolapse recurrence after vaginal prolapse repair (odds ratio [OR] 1.38, 95% CI, 1.14-1.67) and after prolapse repair from any surgical approach (OR 1.31, 95% CI, 1.12-1.53) and with complications such as mesh exposure after both vaginal and laparoscopic POP repair (OR 2.10, 95% CI, 1.01-4.39). CONCLUSION: Obesity is associated with increased likelihood of prolapse recurrence and mesh complications after POP repair. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42022326255.


Assuntos
Prolapso de Órgão Pélvico , Prolapso Uterino , Feminino , Humanos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/métodos , Prolapso de Órgão Pélvico/cirurgia , Prolapso Uterino/cirurgia , Vagina/cirurgia , Obesidade/complicações , Telas Cirúrgicas
6.
Int Urogynecol J ; 24(8): 1341-5, 2013 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23247276

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The objective was to determine the effect of uterine fibroid embolization (UFE) on lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and quality of life (QoL). METHODS: This prospective study included women with symptomatic fibroids and LUTS who underwent UFE between March 2008 and May 2010. Subjects underwent pre-procedural pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and completed the Urogenital Distress Inventory (UDI-6), Incontinence Impact Questionnaire (IIQ-7), Prolapse and Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire (PISQ-12), Uterine Fibroid Symptom Quality of Life questionnaire (UFS-QoL), and a standardized 48-h bladder diary at baseline and 3 months after the procedure. Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) assessed post-procedural patient satisfaction. The primary outcome was subjective improvement in LUTS at 3 months, as measured by a decrease in UDI-6 score. Univariate analysis, paired t test and a stepwise regression analysis were appropriately conducted. RESULTS: Fifty-seven patients underwent UFE and completed bladder diaries and questionnaires. At 3 months after UFE, patients reported a significant decrease in UDI-6, IIQ-7, and UFS-QoL, indicating an improvement in urinary symptoms and QoL. Bladder diaries showed a significant reduction in daytime and night-time voids. No difference was found in incontinence episodes. Uterine volume, dominant fibroid size, fibroid location, and MRI-confirmed bladder compression did not affect the difference in UDI-6 scores. In a stepwise regression model, BMI had a significant impact on the change in UDI-6 score, with a decrease of 1.18 points for each 1 unit increase in BMI. CONCLUSION: Uterine fibroid embolization significantly improves LUTS and urinary-related QoL. Obesity seems to attenuate this effect.


Assuntos
Embolização Terapêutica/métodos , Leiomioma/epidemiologia , Leiomioma/terapia , Sintomas do Trato Urinário Inferior/epidemiologia , Sintomas do Trato Urinário Inferior/terapia , Índice de Massa Corporal , Comorbidade , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Obesidade/complicações , Estudos Prospectivos , Qualidade de Vida , Análise de Regressão , Estudos Retrospectivos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Resultado do Tratamento
7.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 206(1): 86.e1-9, 2012 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21974992

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to show 12-month outcomes of a randomized trial that compared vaginal prolapse repair with and without mesh. STUDY DESIGN: Women with stage ≥2 prolapse were assigned randomly to vaginal repair with or without mesh. The primary outcome was prolapse stage ≤1 at 12 months. Secondary outcomes included quality of life and complications. RESULTS: All 65 evaluable participants were followed for 12 months after trial stoppage for mesh exposures. Thirty-two women had mesh repair; 33 women had traditional repair. At 12 months, both groups had improvement of pelvic organ prolapse-quantification test points to similar recurrence rates. The quality of life improved and did not differ between groups: 96.2% mesh vs 90.9% no-mesh subjects reported a cure of bulge symptoms; 15.6% had mesh exposures, and reoperation rates were higher with mesh. CONCLUSION: Objective and subjective improvement is seen after vaginal prolapse repair with or without mesh. However, mesh resulted in a higher reoperation rate and did not improve 1-year cure.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/estatística & dados numéricos , Próteses e Implantes/estatística & dados numéricos , Telas Cirúrgicas/estatística & dados numéricos , Prolapso Uterino/cirurgia , Idoso , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/métodos , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Satisfação do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Próteses e Implantes/efeitos adversos , Qualidade de Vida/psicologia , Reoperação/estatística & dados numéricos , Telas Cirúrgicas/efeitos adversos , Resultado do Tratamento
8.
Int Urogynecol J ; 23(11): 1541-6, 2012 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22527559

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The objective of this study was to describe patient-centered goals and their attainment in vaginal prolapse repair, with and without mesh. METHODS: A secondary analysis of a multicenter randomized controlled trial of prolapse repair with or without vaginal mesh was performed. Participants (n = 65) selected three preoperative goals ranked by importance. At 3 and 12 months postoperatively, patients graded their goal attainment on a scale of 1 (not at all) to 5 (100 % attainment). Goal attainment was compared with anatomical outcome, symptoms, quality of life, and satisfaction scores. Nonparametric tests and the log-rank test were used to determine statistical significance (p < 0.05). RESULTS: A total of 176 goals were selected. The first goal in 37 women (57 %) was improving prolapse symptoms, in 15 (23 %) urinary symptoms, in 7 (11 %) appearance, activity, and self-image, in 2 (3.1 %) bowel symptoms, and in 2 (3.1 %) sexual function. At 3 and 12 months postoperatively, goal achievement for prolapse symptoms was 96.1 and 93.6 %, for urinary symptoms 75.6 and 70.0 %, and for appearance, activity, and self-image 90.5 and 94.7 %, respectively. The effect of anatomical outcome, mesh use, or the presence of mesh erosion on goal attainment could not be demonstrated. Women who achieved their first goal had significantly better symptoms, quality of life, and satisfaction scores than women who did not. CONCLUSIONS: Patient goal attainment after vaginal prolapse repair was high and not consistently related to objective anatomical outcome or mesh use. It persisted between 3 and 12 months postoperatively and was associated with better satisfaction, quality of life, and symptom scores.


Assuntos
Colposcopia/métodos , Objetivos , Satisfação do Paciente , Telas Cirúrgicas , Prolapso Uterino/cirurgia , Colposcopia/instrumentação , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Incidência , Qualidade de Vida , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Autoimagem , Disfunções Sexuais Fisiológicas/epidemiologia , Disfunções Sexuais Fisiológicas/prevenção & controle , Resultado do Tratamento , Incontinência Urinária/epidemiologia , Incontinência Urinária/prevenção & controle
9.
Obstet Gynecol ; 139(2): 277-286, 2022 02 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34991142

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether some, or all, of the mesh needs to be removed when a midurethral sling is removed for complications. DATA SOURCES: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted. MEDLINE, Cochrane, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases from January 1, 1996, through May 1, 2021, were searched for articles that met the eligibility criteria with total, partial, or a combination of anti-incontinence mesh removal. METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: All study designs were included (N≥10), and a priori criteria were used for acceptance standards. Studies were extracted for demographics, operative outcomes, and adverse events. Meta-analysis was performed when possible. TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS: We double-screened 11,887 abstracts; 45 eligible and unique studies were identified. Thirty-five were single-group studies that evaluated partial mesh removal, five were single-group studies that evaluated total mesh removal, and five were studies that compared partial mesh removal with total mesh removal. All of the studies were retrospective in nature; there were no randomized controlled studies. Comparative studies demonstrated that partial mesh removal had lower rates of postoperative stress urinary incontinence (SUI) than total mesh removal (odds ratio 0.46, 95% CI 0.22-0.96). Single-group studies supported lower rates of postoperative SUI with partial mesh removal compared with total mesh removal (19.2% [95% CI 13.5-25.7] vs 48.7% [95% CI 31.2-66.4]). Both methods were similar with respect to associated pain, bladder outlet obstruction, mesh erosion or exposure, and lower urinary tract symptoms. Adverse events were infrequent. CONCLUSION: Postoperative SUI may be lower with partial mesh removal compared with total mesh removal. Other outcomes were similar regardless of the amount of mesh removed. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO, CRD 42018093099.


Assuntos
Remoção de Dispositivo/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/efeitos adversos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/cirurgia , Slings Suburetrais/efeitos adversos , Telas Cirúrgicas/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Incontinência Urinária por Estresse/etiologia , Incontinência Urinária por Estresse/prevenção & controle
10.
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg ; 27(6): 337-343, 2021 06 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34080581

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Using the American Urogynecologic Society multicenter Pelvic Floor Disorder Registry for Research, we (1) compared generic quality of life (QOL) in women planning pelvic organ prolapse (POP) treatment (surgery vs pessary), (2) correlated generic and condition-specific QOL scores, and (3) identified associations between generic QOL and other factors. METHODS: This cross-sectional analysis assessed generic physical and mental QOL using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Global Health Scale at baseline. Global Physical and Mental T-scores center on a representative US population sample (mean [SD], 50 [10]; higher scores, better health). Condition-specific QOL was assessed with Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory, Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire, and POP/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Function Questionnaire. Linear regression models identified associations between clinical factors and Global Physical/Mental scores. RESULTS: Five hundred sixty-eight women (419 surgery, 149 pessary) were included. Surgery patients were younger, heavier, and more often sexually active (all P's ≤ 0.01). Global Physical scores were lower in the surgery versus pessary group, but not likely clinically meaningful (mean [SD], 48.8 [8.1] vs 50.4 [8.5]; P = 0.035); Global Mental scores were similar (51.4 [8.4] vs 51.9 [9.5], P = 0.56). Global Health scores correlated with Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory, Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire, and POP/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Function Questionnaire scores (all P's < 0.0001). In multivariable models, menopause was associated with better physical QOL, and constipation, coronary artery disease, pelvic pain, and increased body mass index with worse physical QOL. Age was associated with better mental QOL, and constipation, fecal incontinence, pelvic pain, and coronary artery disease with worse mental QOL. CONCLUSIONS: Women choosing POP surgery versus pessary had similar physical and mental generic QOL.


Assuntos
Prolapso de Órgão Pélvico/terapia , Qualidade de Vida , Idoso , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prolapso de Órgão Pélvico/psicologia , Prolapso de Órgão Pélvico/cirurgia , Pessários , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Urológicos
11.
Clin Obstet Gynecol ; 53(1): 59-71, 2010 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20142644

RESUMO

Most posterior wall defects occur in combination with other pelvic support disorders. Some patients with rectoceles, the most common posterior wall defect, are asymptomatic, whereas others experience a range of symptoms from a sensation of lower pelvic fullness to defecatory and/or sexual dysfunction. If patients are symptomatic, rectoceles can be treated conservatively with pelvic floor physiotherapy, behavioral therapy, or pessaries. Surgically, the most common rectocele repair is a traditional posterior colporrhaphy which provides excellent cure rates of up to 95%. The studies published to date do not support the use of biologic or synthetic absorbable grafts in reconstructive surgical procedures of the posterior compartment as these repairs have not improved anatomic or functional outcomes over traditional posterior colporrhaphy.


Assuntos
Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica/métodos , Retocele/cirurgia , Prolapso Uterino/cirurgia , Feminino , Humanos , Próteses e Implantes , Retocele/fisiopatologia , Retocele/terapia , Telas Cirúrgicas , Prolapso Uterino/fisiopatologia , Prolapso Uterino/terapia
12.
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg ; 26(3): 212-218, 2020 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30614832

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to report the prevalence of hydronephrosis associated with pelvic organ prolapse (POP). METHODS: We conducted a MEDLINE and PubMed search from 1996 to October 2016 using PRISMA guidelines. Eight studies met criteria for inclusion, including 3 prospective and 5 retrospective studies. RESULTS: The prevalence of hydronephrosis ranged from 3.5% to 30.6% in studies that included multiple stages of prolapse. Hydronephrosis correlated with prolapse severity in multiple studies, but serum creatinine did not consistently predict hydronephrosis. Two studies reported a significantly higher prevalence of hydronephrosis in patients with uterovaginal prolapse compared with vaginal vault prolapse. Complete resolution of hydronephrosis was described in 56% to 83% of patients after undergoing surgical treatment for advanced prolapse. CONCLUSIONS: Hydronephrosis among patients with POP is not rare, and we suggest consideration of upper tract evaluation in patients presenting with POP, particularly in those with advanced uterovaginal prolapse electing to proceed with expectant or conservative management.


Assuntos
Hidronefrose/epidemiologia , Prolapso de Órgão Pélvico/epidemiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Comorbidade , Feminino , Humanos , Hidronefrose/diagnóstico , Hidronefrose/cirurgia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prolapso de Órgão Pélvico/classificação , Prolapso de Órgão Pélvico/cirurgia , Prevalência , Índice de Gravidade de Doença
13.
Obstet Gynecol ; 113(1): 81-88, 2009 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19104363

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relationship between change in weight and pelvic organ prolapse (POP) progression/regression in women during a 5-year period. METHODS: Postmenopausal women with uteri (N=16,608), ages 50 to 79, who were enrolled in the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) Estrogen plus Progestin Clinical Trial between 1993 and 1998 were included in this secondary analysis. Baseline pelvic examination, repeated annually, assessed uterine prolapse, cystocele, and rectocele using the WHI Prolapse Classification System. Statistical analyses included univariate and multiple logistic regression methods. RESULTS: During the 5-year time period, the majority of women (9,251, 55.7%) gained weight (mean 4.43 kg, +/-5.95 kg), and the overall rate of prolapse (WHI Prolapse Classification System: grades 1-3) increased from 40.9% at baseline to 43.8% at year 5 of evaluation. Controlling for age, parity, race, and other health/physical variables, being overweight (body mass index [BMI] between 25 and 29.9) or obese (BMI of at least 30) at baseline was associated with progression in cystocele, rectocele, and uterine prolapse compared with women with healthy BMIs (BMI is calculated as weight (kg)/[height (m)]). Specifically, the risk of prolapse progression in overweight and obese women as compared with the participants with healthy BMIs increased by 32% and 48% for cystocele, by 37% and 58% for rectocele, and by 43% and 69% for uterine prolapse, respectively. Adjusting for women with prolapse at baseline and baseline BMI, a 10% weight change was associated with minimal change in overall POP. Specifically, a 10% weight loss was associated with a borderline worsening of uterine prolapse (odds ratio [OR] 0.93, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.88-0.97) and a minimal regression of cystocele (OR 1.03, 95% CI 1.00-1.05) and rectocele (OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.01-1.07). CONCLUSION: Being overweight or obese is associated with progression of POP. Weight loss does not appear to be significantly associated with regression of POP, suggesting that damage to the pelvic floor related to weight gain might be irreversible. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.


Assuntos
Cistocele/etiologia , Pós-Menopausa , Retocele/etiologia , Prolapso Uterino/etiologia , Aumento de Peso , Idoso , Índice de Massa Corporal , Progressão da Doença , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Obesidade/complicações , Remissão Espontânea , Fatores de Risco , Redução de Peso
14.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet ; 102(2): 165-70, 2008 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18420204

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To examine what effect the major modifiable risk factors for severe perineal trauma have had on the rates of this trauma over time. METHODS: A retrospective observational cohort study of singleton vaginal deliveries taken from a perinatal database for the period 1996 through 2006. RESULTS: A total of 46,239 singleton vertex vaginal deliveries met the inclusion criteria. Major risk factors for severe perineal trauma were increased maternal age (odds ratio [OR] 1.28, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1-1.5), non-African American ethnicity (OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.3-1.7), nulliparity (OR 4.8, 95% CI 4.11-5.6), fetal birth weight (OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.9-2.4), forceps (OR 8.3, 95% CI 5.4-10.8), vacuum (OR 2.9, 95% CI 1.9-4.4), and midline episiotomy (OR 5.7, 95% CI 5.0-6.4). Evaluation of the changes in rates of these factors over the study period revealed that the decline in the rates of episiotomy and the use of forceps accounted for a reduction in severe lacerations of more than 50%. CONCLUSION: Reduction of severe perineal trauma by restricted use of the 2 modifiable clinical variables, episiotomy and forceps, is evident over time.


Assuntos
Parto Obstétrico/efeitos adversos , Lacerações/epidemiologia , Complicações do Trabalho de Parto/epidemiologia , Períneo/lesões , Adulto , Canal Anal/lesões , Peso ao Nascer , Episiotomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Extração Obstétrica/efeitos adversos , Extração Obstétrica/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Lacerações/prevenção & controle , Complicações do Trabalho de Parto/prevenção & controle , Razão de Chances , Gravidez , Fatores de Risco
15.
Curr Geriatr Rep ; 6(2): 74-80, 2017 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33214994

RESUMO

PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW: To describe current understanding and the relationship between urinary incontinence (UI), mobility limitations, and disability in older women with pelvic floor disorders. RECENT FINDINGS: UI is a prevalent pelvic floor disorder in older women and is considered to be one of the most common geriatric problems. There is no clear classification of UI as a disease versus UI as a geriatric syndrome in the current literature. Since the disability is also prevalent in older women, an evaluation of the relationship between UI and disability, may improve ourunderstanding of UI as a disease or a geriatric syndrome. This relationship may be classified through different pathways. Some evidence suggests that mobility disabilities and UI in older women may have bidirectional pathophysiologic mechanisms through generalized muscle dysfunction. SUMMARY: Expanding research on the mechanisms of UI, mobility limitations, and disability in older women as well as their associations will enhance our insight into clinical, pharmacological, environmental, behavioral, and rehabilitative interventions. It will also lead to improved measures for prevention and treatment UI in older women. Thus, understanding UI, mobility limitations, and disability can have substantial implications for both clinical work and research in this area.

16.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 195(3): 749-54, 2006 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16949408

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of operative vaginal delivery (forceps or vacuum) and midline episiotomy on the risk of severe perineal trauma. STUDY DESIGN: In this retrospective cohort study, we assessed the impact of maternal and obstetric factors on the risk of development of severe perineal trauma (third- and fourth-degree perineal lacerations) for all singleton, vertex vaginal live births (n = 33,842) between 1996 and 2003. RESULTS: Among nulliparous women, 12.1% had operative vaginal delivery, 22.4% had midline episiotomy, and 8.1% experienced severe perineal trauma. Among multiparous women, 3.4% had operative vaginal delivery, 4.2% had midline episiotomy, and 1.2% experienced severe perineal trauma. Controlling for maternal age, ethnicity, birth weight and head circumference, evaluation of the interaction of episiotomy and delivery method revealed that forceps (nulliparous women: odds ratio [OR] 8.6, 95% CI 6.5-10.7; multiparous women: OR 26.3, 95% CI 18.1-34.5) and episiotomy (nulliparous women: OR 4.5, 95% CI 3.7-5.4; multiparous women: OR 14.6, 95% CI 10.4-20.5) were consistently associated with the increased risk of anal sphincter trauma. In fact, the magnitude of effect of the statistically significant synergistic interaction was evidenced by more than 3-fold excess of risk of using operative vaginal delivery alone. CONCLUSION: The use of operative vaginal delivery, particularly in combination with midline episiotomy, was associated with a significant increase in the risk of anal sphincter trauma in both primigravid and multigravid women. Given the reported substantial long-term adverse consequences for anal function, this combination of operative modalities should be avoided if possible.


Assuntos
Canal Anal/lesões , Episiotomia/efeitos adversos , Extração Obstétrica/efeitos adversos , Lacerações/epidemiologia , Complicações do Trabalho de Parto/epidemiologia , Períneo/lesões , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Modelos Logísticos , Forceps Obstétrico , Gravidez , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco
17.
Menopause ; 22(5): 483-8, 2015 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25423323

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to estimate the effects of bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO) at the time of hysterectomy and estrogen therapy on vaginal prolapse. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of the Women's Health Initiative estrogen-alone trial was performed. Women who retained their ovaries were compared with women who had BSO at the time of hysterectomy for the presence of cystocele or rectocele at entry into the study. Based on BSO and hormone therapy (HT) status, participants were categorized into groups. We hypothesized that BSO and prolonged hypoestrogenemia may be associated with an increased risk of prolapse. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to determine the effects of BSO and HT status on cystocele and rectocele. RESULTS: Of 10,739 participants in the estrogen-alone trial, 8,879 women were included in the analysis. Older age, higher parity, higher body mass index, higher waist-to-hip ratio, and non-African-American race/ethnicity were associated with increased odds of developing cystocele or rectocele. Women who retained their ovaries had higher rates of cystocele or rectocele at screening (39%) compared with all women who had BSO (31-36%; odds ratio, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.04-1.33). After controlling for multiple variables, our analysis showed that women who retained their ovaries had higher odds of developing cystocele or rectocele compared with women who had BSO and no subsequent HT (odds ratio, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.07-1.41). All other comparisons were nonsignificant. CONCLUSIONS: BSO at the time of hysterectomy is not associated with increased risk of cystocele or rectocele. BSO and no subsequent HT may even have a protective effect against cystocele or rectocele.


Assuntos
Histerectomia/efeitos adversos , Ovariectomia/efeitos adversos , Prolapso de Órgão Pélvico/epidemiologia , Salpingectomia/efeitos adversos , Saúde da Mulher , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Índice de Massa Corporal , Cistocele/epidemiologia , Terapia de Reposição de Estrogênios , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Razão de Chances , Paridade , Gravidez , Grupos Raciais , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Retocele/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Relação Cintura-Quadril
19.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol ; 157(1): 113-5, 2011 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21439707

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To present our case series of concomitant rectal and pelvic organ prolapse (POP) treated with vaginal colpopexy with synthetic mesh. STUDY DESIGN: Charts of patients with full thickness rectal prolapse and POP were reviewed for presenting symptoms, physical examination with POP-Q including rectal prolapse evaluation, and perioperative complications and outcomes. RESULTS: Four patients aged 63-78 were identified with full thickness rectal prolapse and POP. All of them had symptoms related to both conditions. Rectal prolapse protrusion ranged from 2 cm to 3 cm outside the anus. All patients had vaginal mesh colpopexy; two of them with anterior and posterior vaginal mesh and 2 with posterior mesh only. At a follow-up of 6-44 months, all patients had resolution of both POP and rectal prolapse signs and symptoms. CONCLUSION: Vaginal colpopexy with mesh may be a unique treatment to address both POP and full thickness rectal prolapse in selected patients. Further research is needed to determine the safety and efficacy of this method.


Assuntos
Prolapso de Órgão Pélvico/cirurgia , Prolapso Retal/cirurgia , Telas Cirúrgicas , Vagina/cirurgia , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prolapso de Órgão Pélvico/complicações , Prolapso Retal/complicações , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Resultado do Tratamento
20.
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg ; 17(2): 80-90, 2011 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22453694

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: : This study aimed to examine the risk factors for prevalence and incidence of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) in whites, Hispanics, and blacks. METHODS: : This is a secondary analysis of the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) Estrogen plus Progestin Clinical Trial (E + P). Of the original E + P trial population of 16,608, 12,667 women (78.3%; 11,194 whites, 804 blacks, and 669 Hispanics) were included in the final study sample and evaluated during the 5-year period. The outcomes evaluated were any prolapse (WHI prolapse grades 1-3) and WHI prolapse grade 2 or 3. Descriptive analyses, logistic regression, and proportional hazard modeling were performed. RESULTS: : Increasing parity correlates with increasing WHI prolapse grades (0-3) in whites and blacks but not Hispanics. The incidence of grade 2 or 3 POP increased by 250% in white women with 1 child (hazard ratio [HR], 2.50; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.68-3.71) in comparison to nulliparous women and grew with higher parity. For blacks, a weak association between the parity and grade 2 or 3 POP was noted only in women who had 5 or more kids (HR, 10.41; 95% CI, 1.38-78.77). Blacks were less likely (HR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.40-0.71) to develop grade 2 or 3 POP compared with whites. For grade 2 or 3 POP, age was found to be a risk factor in whites (odds ratio [OR], 1.03; 95% CI, 1.02-1.04) only and body mass index (≥25 kg/m, <30 kg/m) in whites (OR, 1.64; 95% CI, 1.34-2.02) and Hispanics (OR, 2.87; 95% CI, 1.03-2.02). CONCLUSIONS: : White women are at a much greater risk for developing grade 2 or 3 POP compared with blacks. Parity correlates most strongly with the risk of prolapse development in whites and possibly in grand multiparous blacks.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA