Trends in Hospital Billing for Mastectomy and Breast Reconstruction Procedures from 2013 to 2020.

BACKGROUND: With greater acceptance of postmastectomy breast reconstruction (PMBR) as a safe and reliable treatment option, the role of plastic surgeons in breast cancer management continues to rise. As Medicare reimbursements for surgical procedures decline, hospitals may increase charges. Excessive markups can negatively affect uninsured and underinsured patients. We aimed to analyze mastectomy and breast reconstruction procedures to gain insights into recent trends in utilization and billing. METHODS: We queried the 2013 to 2020 Medicare Provider Utilization and Payment Data with 14 Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes to collect service count numbers, hospital charges, and reimbursements. We calculated utilization (service counts per million female Medicare enrollees), weighted mean charges and reimbursements, and charge-to-reimbursement ratios (CRRs). We calculated total and annual percentage changes for the included CPT codes. RESULTS: Among the 14 CPT codes, 12 CPT codes (85.7%) with nonzero service counts were included. Utilization of mastectomy and breast reconstruction procedures decreased from 1,889 to 1,288 (-31.8%) procedures per million female Medicare beneficiaries from 2013 to 2020. While the utilization of immediate implant placements (CPT 19340) increased by 36.2%, the utilization of delayed implant placements (CPT 19342) decreased by 15.1%. Reimbursements for the included CPT codes changed minimally over time (-2.9%) but charges increased by 28.9%. These changes resulted in CRRs increasing from 3.3 to 4.4 (+33.3%) from 2013 to 2020. Free flap reconstructions (CPT 19364) had the highest CRRs throughout the study period, increasing from 7.0 in 2013 to 10.3 in 2020 (+47.1%). CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis of mastectomy and breast reconstruction procedures billed to Medicare Part B from 2013 to 2020 showed increasingly excessive procedural charges. Rises in hospital charges and CRRs may limit uninsured and underinsured patients from accessing necessary care for breast cancer management. Legislations that monitor hospital markups for PMBR procedures may be considered by policymakers.

Blood Pressure Challenge Reduces Hematomas in Gender-Affirming Mastectomy: A Retrospective Chart Review of 92 Consecutive Patients.

BACKGROUND: Gender-affirming mastectomy is a common surgery for the treatment of gender incongruence and gender dysphoria and improves quality of life. Hematoma rates for gender-affirming double incision mastectomies are between 2.8% and 8.1%. This study aims to investigate the utility of a blood pressure challenge, whereby the patient's blood pressure is medically increased intraoperatively to reveal bleeding vessels that can be addressed with additional hemostasis before skin closure, to reduce postoperative hematoma. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of patients who underwent gender-affirming double incision mastectomies over a 6-year period by a single surgeon was conducted. Surgeries were separated into a blood pressure challenge experimental group and a non-blood pressure challenge control group. Demographics, surgical characteristics, and postoperative complications were compared between the 2 cohorts using Pearson χ2, Fisher exact, t tests, univariate logistic regression, and multivariable logistical regression. Significance was established at P < 0.05. RESULTS: A total of 92 patients (184 breasts) were included with 32 patients (64 breasts) in the control group and 60 (120 breasts) in the blood pressure challenge group. In the control group, there were 5 hematomas (7.81%) compared with 1 (0.83%) in the blood pressure challenge group (P = 0.02). On univariate logistical regression analysis, blood pressure challenge was the only variable significantly associated with hematoma (odds ratio, 0.1; 95% confidence interval, 0.01-0.63; P = 0.04). On multivariable logistical regression, after controlling for age, body mass index, smoking status, and mass of excised breast tissue, patients who underwent blood pressure challenge demonstrated lower hematoma rates (odds ratio, 0.08; 95% CI, 0.004-0.59; P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Using an intraoperative blood pressure challenge was associated with reduced hematoma rates. Guidelines for blood pressure challenge goals should be established to standardize care and reduce complications in gender-affirming mastectomies.

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparing the Clinical Outcomes of Profunda Artery Perforator Versus Gracilis Thigh Flap as a Second Choice for Autologous Breast Reconstruction.

PURPOSE: Autologous breast reconstruction remains a versatile option to produce a natural appearing breast after mastectomy. The deep inferior epigastric perforator remains the most commonly used flap choice, but when this donor site is unsuitable or unavailable, the transverse upper gracilis (TUG) or profunda artery perforator (PAP) flaps are popular secondary alternatives. We conduct a meta-analysis to better understand patient outcomes and adverse events in secondary flap selection in breast reconstruction. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted on MEDLINE and Embase for all articles published on TUG and/or PAP flaps for oncological breast reconstruction in postmastectomy patients. A proportional meta-analysis was conducted to statistically compare outcomes between PAP and TUG flaps. RESULTS: The TUG and PAP flaps were noted to have similar reported rates of success and incidences of hematoma, flap loss, and flap healing (P > 0.05). The TUG flap was noted to have significantly more vascular complications (venous thrombosis, venous congestion, and arterial thrombosis) than the PAP flap (5.0% vs 0.6%, P < 0.01) and significantly greater rates of unplanned reoperations in the acute postoperative period (4.4% vs 1.8%, P = 0.04). Infection, seroma, fat necrosis, donor healing complications, and rates of additional procedures all exhibited high degree of heterogeneity precluding mathematical synthesis of outcomes across studies. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with TUG flaps, PAP flaps have fewer vascular complications and fewer unplanned reoperations in the acute postoperative period. There is need for greater homogeneity in reported outcomes between studies to enable for synthesis of other variables important in determining flap success.

Trends in Hospital Billing for Mastectomy and Breast Reconstruction Procedures from 2013 to 2020.

BACKGROUND: With greater acceptance of post-mastectomy breast reconstruction (PMBR) as a safe and reliable treatment option, the role of plastic surgeons in breast cancer management continues to rise. As Medicare reimbursements for surgical procedures decline, hospitals may increase charges. Excessive markups can negatively affect uninsured and underinsured patients. We aimed to analyze mastectomy and breast reconstruction procedures to gain insights into recent trends in utilization and billing. METHODS: We queried the 2013-2020 Medicare Provider Utilization and Payment Data with 14 Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes to collect service counts, hospital charges, and reimbursements. We calculated utilization (service counts per million female Medicare enrollees), weighted mean charges and reimbursements, and charge-to-reimbursement ratios (CRRs). We calculated total and annual % changes for the included CPT codes. RESULTS: Among the 14 CPT codes, 12 CPT codes (85.7%) with non-zero service counts were included. Utilization of mastectomy and breast reconstruction procedures decreased from 1,889 to 1,288 (-31.8%) procedures per million female Medicare beneficiaries from 2013 to 2020. While the utilization of immediate implant placements (CPT 19340) increased by 36.2%, the utilization of delayed implant placements (CPT 19342) decreased by 15.1%. Reimbursements for the included CPT codes changed minimally over time (-2.9%), but charges increased by 28.9%. These changes resulted in CRRs increasing from 3.3 to 4.4 (+33.3%) from 2013 to 2020. Free flap reconstructions (CPT 19364) had the highest CRRs throughout the study period, increasing from 7.0 in 2013 to 10.3 in 2020 (+47.1%). CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis of mastectomy and breast reconstruction procedures billed to Medicare Part B from 2013 to 2020 showed increasingly excessive procedural charges. Rises in hospital charges and CRRs may limit uninsured and underinsured patients from accessing necessary care for breast cancer management. Legislations that monitor hospital markups for post-mastectomy breast reconstruction procedures may be considered by policymakers.

Billing and Utilization Trends in Reconstructive Microsurgery Indicate Worsening Access to Care.

BACKGROUND: Within the last 20-years, Medicare reimbursements for microsurgery have been declining, while physician expenses continue to increase. As a result, hospitals may increase charges to offset revenue losses, which may impose a financial barrier to care. This study aimed to characterize the billing trends in microsurgery and their implications on patient care. METHODS: The 2013 to 2020 Provider Utilization and Payment Data Physician and Other Practitioners Dataset was queried for 16 CPT codes. Service counts, hospital charges, and reimbursements were collected. The utilization, weighted mean reimbursements and charges, and charge-to-reimbursement ratios (CRRs) were calculated. The total and annual percent changes were also determined. RESULTS: In total, 13 CPT codes (81.3%) were included. The overall number of procedures decreased by 15.0%. The average reimbursement of all microsurgical procedures increased from $618 to $722 (16.7%). The mean charge increased from $3,200 to $4,340 (35.6%). As charges had a greater increase than reimbursement rates, the CRR increased by 15.4%. At the categorical level, all groups had increases in CRRs, except for bone graft (-49.4%) and other procedures (-3.5%). The CRR for free flap breast procedures had the largest percent increase (47.1%). Additionally, lymphangiotomy (28.6%) had the second largest increases. CONCLUSION: Our analysis of microsurgical procedures billed to Medicare Part B from 2013 to 2020 showed that hospital charges are increasing at a faster rate than reimbursements. This may be in part due to increasing physician expenses, cost of advanced technology in microsurgical procedures, and inadequate reimbursement rates. Regardless, these increased markups may limit patients who are economically disadvantaged from accessing care. Policy makers should consider legislation aimed at updating Medicare reimbursement rates to reflect the increasing complexity and cost associated with microsurgical procedures, as well as regulating charge markups at the hospital level.

Online Patient Resources for Gender Affirmation Surgery: An Analysis of Readability.

BACKGROUND: Gender affirmation surgery is an important treatment for patient with gender dysphoria. It consists of a series of complex procedures, and well-informed patients have been shown to have better outcomes. However, there are no published data regarding the readability of currently available online patient recourses for gender affirmation surgery. This study aims at identifying the most popular online resources and evaluating the readability of these documents in the context of average literacy within the United States. METHODS: An online search with the terms "gender affirmation surgery," "gender reassignment surgery," "top surgery," and "bottom surgery" was performed. Location, cookies, and user account information was disabled before each search to avoid bias in the results. Readability assessment was performed using the 10 commonly used readability scales. RESULTS: The overall mean readability level was 13.4. The mean reading level was 14 (range, 7.6-17.0) for the search term "gender affirmation surgery," 14.2 (range, 11.9-16.7) for the search term "gender reassignment surgery," 13 (range, 8.9-17.5) for the search term "top surgery," and 12.6 (range, 7.1-15.0) for the search term "bottom surgery." There was no statistically significant difference between the search terms. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrate that the articles most commonly seen by patients who perform an Internet search for information on gender reassignment surgery are more difficult than the recommended readability level.

Mechanisms of Action of Novel Influenza A/M2 Viroporin Inhibitors Derived from Hexamethylene Amiloride.

The increasing prevalence of influenza viruses with resistance to approved antivirals highlights the need for new anti-influenza therapeutics. Here we describe the functional properties of hexamethylene amiloride (HMA)-derived compounds that inhibit the wild-type and adamantane-resistant forms of the influenza A M2 ion channel. For example, 6-(azepan-1-yl)-N-carbamimidoylnicotinamide ( 9: ) inhibits amantadine-sensitive M2 currents with 3- to 6-fold greater potency than amantadine or HMA (IC50 = 0.2 vs. 0.6 and 1.3 µM, respectively). Compound 9: competes with amantadine for M2 inhibition, and molecular docking simulations suggest that 9: binds at site(s) that overlap with amantadine binding. In addition, tert-butyl 4'-(carbamimidoylcarbamoyl)-2',3-dinitro-[1,1'-biphenyl]-4-carboxylate ( 27: ) acts both on adamantane-sensitive and a resistant M2 variant encoding a serine to asparagine 31 mutation (S31N) with improved efficacy over amantadine and HMA (IC50 = 0.6 µM and 4.4 µM, respectively). Whereas 9: inhibited in vitro replication of influenza virus encoding wild-type M2 (EC50 = 2.3 µM), both 27: and tert-butyl 4'-(carbamimidoylcarbamoyl)-2',3-dinitro-[1,1'-biphenyl]-4-carboxylate ( 26: ) preferentially inhibited viruses encoding M2(S31N) (respective EC50 = 18.0 and 1.5 µM). This finding indicates that HMA derivatives can be designed to inhibit viruses with resistance to amantadine. Our study highlights the potential of HMA derivatives as inhibitors of drug-resistant influenza M2 ion channels.

The Impact of a Centralized Plastic Surgery Research Infrastructure on Scholarly Productivity and Output.

Although research and innovation is a key within the field of plastic and reconstructive surgery, the impact of team structure, interpersonal dynamics, and/or standardized infrastructure on scholarly output has been infrequently studied. In this work, we present the formation and implementation of a novel plastic surgery research program that aims to unite previously disparate clinical and translational research efforts at our institution to facilitate critical inquiry. From July 2022 to June 2023, our department launched a pilot research program based on three pillars: (1) formalization of a research curriculum (monthly research meetings for agenda setting and discussion for project honing, formal research leadership for meeting facilitation and workflow regulation), (2) development of a centralized database to compile ongoing research (Google Drive repository to house all ongoing research documents, facilitate real-time editing, and provide resources/templates for assisting in the research process), and (3) bolstering of a core research identity built on mentorship and collaboration (more frequent interactions to shift previously siloed faculty-student mentorship into a robust milieu of intercollaboration). During the first year, we saw an increased number of publications and presentations, as well as robust participation and contribution from faculty, residents, and medical students. Future directions will focus on addressing resource limitation, such as project idea availability and funding, to sustain the success and growth of this novel research infrastructure.

Alpha Defensin-1 Level Correlates with Periprosthetic Infection Severity following Implant-based Breast Reconstruction.

Background: Accurate diagnosis of periprosthetic infections following breast reconstructions is paramount to reduce morbidity. Alpha defensin-1 (AD-1) is an antimicrobial peptide released by neutrophils. This study evaluates the relationship between quantitative AD-1 levels and infection severity in patients with suspected periprosthetic infection. Methods: Retrospective review was conducted of patients with prior breast implant reconstruction undergoing surgery for either suspected infection or prosthesis exchange and revision. The AD-1 level in periprosthetic fluid was sent for quantitative analysis. Association between AD-1 levels with outcomes, management, systemic markers of infection, and overall infection severity was evaluated. Results: Thirty-eight breasts were included. Infected breasts had higher AD-1 levels (3.91 versus 0.14, P < 0.01), greater odds of erythema [odds ratio (OR) 2.98 (1.53-5.82), P = 0.01], purulence [OR 2.84 (1.51-5.35), P = 0.01], fever [OR 1.84 (1.15-2.93), P = 0.01], threatened implant exposure [OR 2.97 (1.48-5.95), P < 0.01], and true implant exposure [OR 1.79 (1.04-3.08), P = 0.04]. Increasing AD-1 was an independent risk factor for washout (P < 0.01), and explant [OR 2.48 (1.47-4.2), P < 0.01]. AD-1 positively correlated with white blood cell count (ß = 1.81 cells/µL, P < 0.01), and serum lactate (ß = 0.19 meq/L, P < 0.04). Increasing AD-1 level was an independent predictor of infection severity (χ² = 22.77, P < 0.01). Conclusions: AD-1 levels correlate with infection severity, highlighting its potential both when clinical examination is ambiguous and when treatment response is being monitored. Although further evaluation is warranted, AD-1 may demonstrate utility in novel breast implant salvage algorithms.

United States Health Policies on Gender-Affirming Care in 2022.

BACKGROUND: Within the United States, access to gender-affirming operations covered by health insurance has increased dramatically over the past decade. However, the perpetually changing landscape and inconsistencies of individual state health policies governing private and public insurance coverage present a lack of clarity for reconstructive surgeons and other physicians attempting to provide gender-affirming care. This work systematically reviewed the current U.S. health policies for both private insurance and Medicaid on a state-by-state basis. METHODS: Individual state health policies in effect as of August of 2022 on gender-affirming care were reviewed using the LexisNexis legal database, state legislature publications, and Medicaid manuals. Primary outcomes were categorization of policies as protective, restrictive, or unclear for each state. Secondary outcomes included analyses of demographics covered by current health policies and geographic differences. RESULTS: Protective state-level health policies related to gender-affirming care were present in approximately half of the nation for both private insurance (49.0%) and Medicaid (52.9%). Explicitly restrictive policies were found in 5.9% and 17.6% of states for private insurance and Medicaid, respectively. Regionally, the Northeast and West had the highest rates of protective policies, whereas the Midwest and South had the highest rates of restrictive policies on gender-affirming care. CONCLUSIONS: State-level health policies on gender-affirming care vary significantly across the United States with regional associations. Clarity in the current and evolving state-specific health policies governing gender-affirming care is essential for surgeons and physicians caring for transgender and gender-diverse individuals.