The nightmare ECG of a spontaneously aborted sudden cardiac death.

We present the case of a spontaneously aborted sudden cardiac death related to an high-rate ventricular tachycardia in an healthy man with bileaflet mitral valve prolapse. An effective treatment of the patient, with complete suppression of ventricular ectopic activity, was achieved only combining medical therapy, ICD and catheter ablation, thus overcoming the limitations of each approach.

Device Longevity in a Contemporary Cohort of ICD/CRT-D Patients Undergoing Device Replacement.

INTRODUCTION: The longevity of defibrillators (ICD) is extremely important from both a clinical and economic perspective. We studied the reasons for device replacement, the longevity of removed ICD, and the existence of possible factors associated with shorter service life. METHODS AND RESULTS: Consecutive patients who underwent ICD replacement from March 2013 to May 2015 in 36 Italian centers were included in this analysis. Data on replaced devices were collected. A total of 953 patients were included in this analysis. In 813 (85%) patients the reason for replacement was battery depletion, while 88 (9%) devices were removed for clinical reasons and the remaining 52 because of system failure (i.e., lead or ICD generator failure or a safety advisory indication). The median service life was 5.9 years (25th-75th percentile, 4.9-6.9) for single- and dual-chamber ICD and 4.9 years (25th-75th percentile, 4.0-5.7) for CRT-D. On multivariate analysis, the factors CRT-D device, SC/DC ICD generator from Biotronik, percentage of ventricular pacing, and the occurrence of a system failure were positively associated with a replacement procedure. By contrast, the device from Boston Scientific was an independent protective factor against replacement. Considerable differences were seen in battery duration in both ICD and CRT-D. Specifically, Biotronik devices showed the shortest longevity among ICD and Boston Scientific showed the longest longevity among CRT-D (log-rank test, P < 0.001 for pairwise comparisons). CONCLUSION: Several factors were associated with shorter service life of ICD devices: CRT-D, occurrence of system failure and percentage of ventricular pacing. Our results confirmed significant differences among manufacturers.

Incremental value of larger interventricular conduction time in improving cardiac resynchronization therapy outcome in patients with different QRS duration.

INTRODUCTION: The left ventricular (LV) pacing site and the magnitude of the electrical delay within the LV, as expressed by prolonged QRS duration, are major determinants of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) efficacy. We investigated the incremental value of positioning the LV lead in areas of late activation in order to enhance the response to CRT in patients with different degrees of QRS complex lengthening. METHODS AND RESULTS: This analysis was performed on 301 heart failure patients who received a CRT defibrillator. On implantation, the right ventricular (RV)-to-LV interval was measured as the delay between local activations recorded through the RV and LV leads in the final position. After 1 year, 171 (57%) patients displayed reverse LV remodeling, as measured by a ≥15% reduction in the LV end-systolic volume. Both the RV-to-LV interval and its percentage value corrected for the QRS duration were significantly associated with a positive response to CRT. An RV-to-LV interval >80 milliseconds and an RV-to-LV interval/QRS >58% yielded the best prediction of reverse remodeling. Although the response to CRT decreased with shorter QRS duration in the overall population, patients with an RV-to-LV interval >80 milliseconds showed a response rate >65% in all QRS subgroups. CONCLUSION: A longer RV-to-LV interval is associated with reverse LV remodeling after CRT. On implantation attempts could be made to maximize it when selecting the LV lead position, especially in patients with shorter QRS duration, and thus less likely to respond positively to CRT.

Clinical characteristics, mortality, cardiac hospitalization, and ventricular arrhythmias in patients undergoing CRT-D implantation: results of the ACTION-HF study.

INTRODUCTION: The characteristics and outcomes of patients who undergo cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) device implantation in current clinical practice may differ from those of reference trial populations. Study objectives were to assess 2-year outcomes in a population implanted with a CRT plus defibrillator device in accordance with the standard of care and to evaluate any independent association between clinical variables and outcome. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 406 patients enrolled at 35 centers in Italy were followed up prospectively for 2 years. All patient management decisions were left to the treating physician's discretion, in accordance with clinical practice. ACTION-HF patients had a better baseline clinical status than patients enrolled in the COMPANION study: shorter HF history (1 vs 3.5 years, P < 0.01), less advanced NYHA functional class (III-IV: 73% vs 100%, P < 0.01), higher LVEF (26% vs 21%, P < 0.01), higher SBP (122 vs 112 mmHg, P < 0.01), and less diabetes (27% vs 41%, P < 0.01). This status was reflected in lower mortality (11.5% vs 26%) and a lower incidence of appropriate ICD shocks (12.1% vs 19.3%). AF history was an independent predictor of the combination of all-cause mortality and cardiac-cause hospitalization (HR: 3.31; P < 0.001). Recurrent or new atrial arrhythmias were independently associated with the development of ventricular arrhythmias (HR: 3.4; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This population appears clinically less compromised and had a lower incidence of adverse clinical outcomes than those of reference trials. However, we recorded a substantial burden of atrial arrhythmias, which was independently associated with a higher incidence of ventricular arrhythmias.

Design and rationale of the Impact of MultiPoint pacing in CRT patients with reduced RV-to-LV delay (IMAGE-CRT) study.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an established treatment in patients with heart failure and prolonged QRS duration. A biventricular device is implanted to achieve faster activation and more synchronous contraction of the ventricles. Despite the convincing effect of CRT, 30-40% of patients do not respond. We decided to investigate the role of multipoint pacing (MPP) in a selected group of patients with right ventricle (RV)-to-left ventricle (LV) intervals less than 80 ms that do not respond to traditional CRT. METHODS: We will enrol 248 patients in this patient-blinded, observational, clinical study aiming to investigate if MPP could decrease LV end-systolic volume (ESV) in patients with RV-to-LV interval less than 80 ms. MPP will be activated ON at implant in patients with RV-to-LV delay less than 80 ms and OFF in RV-to-LV at least 80 ms. At follow-up the activation of MPP will be related to CRT response. The primary study endpoint will be the responder rate at 6 months, defined as a decrease in LV ejection fraction, LV end-diastolic volume, LV end-systolic volume (LVESV) at least 15% from baseline. Secondary outcomes include 12 months relative percentage reduction in LVESV and a combined clinical outcome measure of response to CRT defined as the patient being alive, no hospitalization due to heart failure, and experiencing an improvement in New York Heart Association functional class (Composite-Score). CONCLUSION: Reducing the nonresponder rate continues to be an important goal for CRT.If an increase in reverse remodelling can be achieved by MPP, this study supports the conduct of larger trials investigating the role of MPP on clinical outcomes in selected patients treated, right now, only with traditional CRT. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02713308. Registered on 18 March 2016.

Effectiveness of Implantable DEfibrillators Alert Systems: comparison between audible and vibratory alert: IDEAS study.

INTRODUCTION: Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) alarm systems are an important means of monitoring device functioning. The aim of this study was to compare the ability of patients with sense two types of device alert systems: an audible alert and a vibratory alarm. METHODS: The ability to recognize the alarms was assessed in three alarm tests performed in a series of consecutive ICD patients enrolled during routine outpatient device follow-up. To avoid overestimating the rate of patients able to sense the alarm, the first test was performed without forewarning. Subsequently, the second test was performed after the patients had been forewarned. Finally, to assess the learning effect of a demonstration test, a third test was performed, again without forewarning. RESULTS: A total of 528 patients (65.4 ±â€Š14.4 years, 74.6% male) were enrolled: 347 (65.7%) with an audible alert-endowed device and 181 (34.3%) with a vibratory alarm-endowed device. When emitted without warning, the alarms were sensed by 72.4% of patients. When patients were forewarned, the probability of sensing the alarms rose to 92.5% (P < 0.001). In both cases, the vibratory alarm was more likely to be sensed than the audible alert (77.3 vs. 67.7% in the first case; 96.1 vs. 87.9% in the second case; all P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: ICD alarms emitted in an outpatient setting are sensed by a large proportion of patients, but not by all. Training patients by means of demonstration tests significantly increases the rate of patients who recognize the alarm. Vibratory alarm seems to be more effective than audible alert.

A randomized study of cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator versus dual-chamber implantable cardioverter-defibrillator in ischemic cardiomyopathy with narrow QRS: the NARROW-CRT study.

BACKGROUND: Current recommendations require a QRS duration of ≥120 ms as a condition for prescribing cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). This study was designed to test the hypothesis that patients with heart failure (HF) of ischemic origin, current indications for defibrillator implantation, and QRS <120 ms may benefit from CRT in the presence of marked mechanical dyssynchrony. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with intraventricular dyssynchrony on echocardiography were randomly assigned to CRT or dual-chamber defibrillator implantation (CRT defibrillator and dual-chamber implantable cardioverter-defibrillator arm, respectively). The primary end point was the HF clinical composite response, which scores patients as improved, unchanged, or worsened. The secondary end point was the cumulative survival from HF hospitalization and HF death. An additional secondary end point was the composite of HF hospitalization, HF death, and spontaneous ventricular fibrillation. Twenty-three of 56 patients with CRT defibrillator showed an improvement in their clinical composite response at 1 year, compared with 9 of 55 patients with dual-chamber implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (41% versus 16%; P=0.004). After a median follow-up of 16 months, the CRT defibrillator arm showed a nonsignificant higher survival from HF hospitalization and HF death (P=0.077), and a significantly higher survival from the combined end point of HF hospitalization, HF death, and spontaneous ventricular fibrillation (P=0.028). CONCLUSIONS: In this comparison of CRT defibrillator and dual-chamber implantable cardioverter-defibrillator, CRT improved clinical status in some patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy, mild-to-moderate symptoms, narrow QRS duration, and mechanical dyssynchrony on echocardiography. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01577446.