Rational use of ultrasonography with triaging of patients to detect dengue plasma leakage in resource limited settings: a prospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the traditional haematocrit-based criteria (>20% rise above baseline) with ultrasonography for diagnosing plasma leakage in dengue fever and to identify clinical indicators for triaging patients in resource-limited settings when the demand for ultrasonography is high. METHODS: The Colombo Dengue Study is a prospective observational cohort study recruiting dengue patients in the first three days of dengue fever, before plasma leakage. Serial haematocrit assessments and ultrasonography were performed in patients recruited from October 2017 to February 2020. Clinical signs/symptoms and laboratory investigation results independently associated with ultrasound detected plasma leakage were identified with a derivation cohort and confirmed in a validation cohort. RESULTS: 129 of 426 patients had ultrasonography-confirmed plasma leakage while 146 had a haematocrit rise >20%. Those positive on ultrasonography were also likely to fulfil the haematocrit-based criteria (OR: 4.42, 95% CI: 2.85-6.86), but the two groups did not overlap fully. In the derivation cohort (n = 317), platelet count <97 000/µl, AST/ALT > 51 IU/l and having abdominal pain in the first three days of fever were independent predictors of ultrasound-detected plasma leakage. In the validation cohort (n = 109), the combination of low platelet count and high aminotransferase level had better predictive capacity in terms of sensitivity and specificity. CONCLUSION: Dengue patients should be monitored with both serial haematocrit and ultrasonography whenever possible and plasma leakage should be diagnosed by either one of these criteria. If accessibility to scans is limited, platelet count, serum transaminase levels and presence of abdominal pain are useful to triage patients.

High dose corticosteroids in severe leptospirosis: a systematic review.

The role of corticosteroids in the treatment of severe leptospirosis is unclear. The rationale for their use is that, in severe leptospirosis, there is a severe immunological response that is harmful to the host resulting in multi-organ dysfunction, which is potentially offset by the nonspecific immunosuppression of high dose steroids. We conducted a systematic review of studies that have assessed the use of high dose corticosteroids in patients with severe leptospirosis by searching MEDLINE and Scopus SciVerse without any language or time restrictions. We identified five studies, including one open randomized clinical trial, which had assessed the use of high dose steroids in severe leptospirosis. Four studies demonstrated a benefit of corticosteroids in treating severe disease with pulmonary involvement when administered early in the course of the disease, but these studies had several methodological constraints as highlighted in the text. Only the randomized controlled trial study showed that corticosteroids are ineffective and may increase the risk of nosocomial infections. There is no robust evidence to suggest that high dose corticosteroids are effective in severe leptospirosis, and a well-designed randomized clinical trial is needed to resolve this.