Disparities in chronic spontaneous urticaria: Eligibility for drug reimbursement associated with clinical outcomes.

Background: Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is an immunologic condition with an estimated prevalence of 0.1%. For CSU that is poorly controlled despite the use of antihistamines, omalizumab is the only treatment approved and recommended by international guidelines. Objective: Our aim was to outline the impact of treatment accessibility on CSU outcomes in the real world. Methods: Serial data on adult patients with CSU receiving care for at least 6 months at a dedicated, immunologist-led urticaria clinic at Grantham Hospital in Hong Kong between 2018 and 2023 were analyzed. Patients' clinicodemographic data, drug eligibility status (eligible for reimbursement or not), treatment step, and disease activity (weekly Urticaria Activity Score [UAS7]) were collected and compared according to drug eligibility status. Results: This study included 238 patients, 80 (33.6%) of whom were eligible for reimbursement and 158 of whom were not. No significant clinicodemographic differences, including disease activity, were found at baseline. At latest follow-up, significantly more patients in the eligible group were receiving omalizumab (28.7% vs 5.7% [P < .001]), which is equivalent to a multivariate odds ratio of 9.35 (95% CI = 3.689-23.703 [P < .001]). The discrepancy persisted even in patients with moderate-to-severe CSU whose UAS7 was 16 or higher (40.6% [13 of 32] vs 10.2% [6 of 59]; P < .001). In addition, there was significantly less dose reduction (<300 mg every 4 weeks) in the eligible omalizumab users (4.3% vs 44.4% [P = .015]). Clinically, significantly greater improvements in UAS7 were reported by the eligible group (median change -8.0 vs -5.0 [P = .021]). Conclusion: Patterns of management varied largely among patients with different drug eligibility statuses and led to disparities in health outcomes. More efforts to secure equitable access to guideline-based CSU care are warranted.

Enhancing Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Drug Hypersensitivity: A Validated 6-Item Quality-of-Life Questionnaire for Patients With Drug Hypersensitivity.

BACKGROUND: Drug hypersensitivity reactions (DHRs) can significantly impair patients' health-related quality of life (HRQoL). However, tools for HRQoL assessment for patients with DHR are time-consuming and remain underutilized. OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate an optimized version of the Drug Hypersensitivity Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (DrHy-Q) designed for everyday clinical use. METHODS: Item response theory (IRT), a statistical framework for psychometric measurement, was used to evaluate the 15 questions from the original DrHy-Q for their respective item difficulty, discrimination, and information using prospective data from 243 patients with histories of suspected/confirmed DHR before allergy workup. Accordingly, the best-performing items were identified to develop a 6-item optimized version (DrHy-Q6), which was subsequently validated with another prospective cohort of 156 patients. RESULTS: All 15 items of the original DrHy-Q demonstrated satisfactory parameters in IRT analysis, including very high discrimination (>1.7), appropriate difficulty (in between -1.5 and 1.5), and good information (a high and broad peak in the information curve). Six items with top-ranked IRT parameters were identified to construct an optimized version, which we named the DrHy-Q6. The DrHy-Q6 demonstrated a 1-factor structure with an improved fit compared with the original DrHy-Q (comparative fit index = 0.985, Tucker-Lewis index = 0.974), excellent convergent validity (unadjusted Pearson correlation with the full version = 0.955; adjusted = 0.894, P < .001), reliability (Cronbach's α and McDonald's ω = 0.93), divergent validity (Pearson correlation with all Short Form 12-item Health Survey Version 2 subscales <0.60, P < .001), and discriminant validity (significantly higher scores with multiple DHR labels [42.45 ± 27.26 vs 32.93 ± 26.66], P = .013). CONCLUSIONS: From an IRT perspective, the DrHy-Q and all its constituent items are psychometrically valid for HRQoL assessment. We propose an optimized 6-item version (DrHy-Q6) as an abbreviated alternative for assessing HRQoL in patients with DHR, especially for routine use in clinical practice. Patients and physicians may benefit from its streamlined length and simpler scoring algorithm.

Validation of the Chinese drug hypersensitivity quality of life questionnaire: Role of delabeling.

The Drug Hypersensitivity Quality of Life Questionnaire (DrHy-Q) is not currently available in Chinese. Besides, penicillin allergy (PA) is a worldwide public health challenge, and delabeling inauthentic PA can improve clinical and economic outcomes. However, its effect on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) remains poorly known. Objective: The study objective is to translate and validate a Chinese version of DrHy-Q and investigate the effect of PA delabeling on HRQoL using DrHy-Q. Methods: A Chinese DrHy-Q was translated then completed by patients with drug allergy labels for psychometric validation. Afterwards, another cohort of patients finished the Chinese DrHy-Q before and after their PA workup for pre-post comparison. Results: A total of 130 patients were studied. Sixty-three patients (79.4% female; median age = 59 ± 15 years) completed the Chinese DrHy-Q for validation (mean score = 38.9 ± 23.5). It demonstrated excellent internal consistency (Cronbach α = 0.956; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.939-0.971) and test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.993 [95% CI, 0.969-0.998]). Construct validity was confirmed by its one-dimensional structure in factor analysis. Divergent validity was established because only 2 (out of 9) SF-36 scales showed weak negative correlations to DrHy-Q. Patients with multiple implicated drugs presented significantly higher DrHy-Q scores than those with only a single drug (42.0 ± 22.5 vs 28.7 ± 24.4; P = 0.038), showing discriminant validity. Subsequently, another 67 patients (73.1% female; median age = 56 ± 15 years) underwent PA investigations and completed their pre-post DrHy-Q. A significant drop in DrHy-Q score was shown (40.8 ± 21.7 vs 26.6 ± 22.5; Cohen's d = 0.964; P < 0.001), reflecting improvement in HRQoL. Conclusion: The Chinese DrHy-Q is reliable and valid for HRQoL assessment. PA delabeling significantly benefits patients' HRQoL. Future larger-scale studies are warranted to corroborate our findings.

Long-term prophylaxis for hereditary angioedema: Initial experiences with garadacimab and lanadelumab.

Background: With no approved long-term prophylaxis (LTP) for the prevention of hereditary angioedema (HAE) attacks in Hong Kong, patients rely on compassionate use programs and drug trials. Moreover, studies regarding the use and efficacy of LTP in Asia are lacking. Objectives: Our aim was to assess 2 LTP medications for HAE in Hong Kong: lanadelumab and garadacimab. Methods: A prospective study was performed. Adult patients with a diagnosis of type I or type II HAE with 1 or more expert-confirmed attacks per month were consecutively recruited. The patients had been receiving treatment for at least 6 months. Clinical data were obtained, and questionnaires were administered before treatment periodically for at least 6 months following initiation of LTP. Results: Almost one-third of the patients with HAE experienced frequent attacks and began receiving LTP (8 of the 11 received garadacimab and 3 of the 11 received lanadelumab). At baseline, the time-normalized number of HAE attacks was 2.5 plus or minus 1.3 per month. At month 6, there was an overall reduction of time-normalized number of attacks per month of -2.4 attacks per month (95% CI = -3.3 to -1.5. [P < .01]). The time-normalized number of HAE attacks at month 6 was 0.1 plus or minus 0.1 per month. More than 70% of the patients (8 of 11) were completely attack-free during the 6-month period while receiving LTP, and no patients required hospitalization. LTP improved patients' scores of the Angioedema Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (P < .001) and reduced activity impairment due to health (P = .008). Patients experienced significant improvement across all dimensions of the Treatment Satisfaction for Medication Questionnaire (54.5%-76.8% [P = .002]), and no adverse events were reported. Conclusion: The patients receiving LTP with garadacimab and lanadelumab experienced a significant reduction in number of HAE attacks and improvement in quality of life, and they were satisfied with treatment.