Familial history of cancer and childhood acute leukemia: a French population-based case-control study.

A case-control study was conducted to investigate the role of a familial history of cancer in the etiology of childhood acute leukemia. The history of cancer in the relatives of 472 cases was compared with that of 567 population-based controls. Recruitment was frequency matched on age, sex and region. The familial history of cancer in each child's relatives was reported by the mother in response to a standardized self-administered questionnaire. A familial history of solid tumor in first or second-degree relatives was associated with an increased risk of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (odds ratio (OR)=1.6 [95% confidence interval, 1.2-2.1]), while a familial history of hematopoietic malignancies in first or second-degree relatives was associated with an increased risk of acute myeloid leukemia (OR=4.3 [1.4-13]). The ORs for the histories of cancer increased with the number of relatives with cancer (OR=1.5 [1.1-2.0] for one relative and OR=2.3 [1.3-3.8] for two relatives or more; Ptrend<0.0001). Significant associations between childhood acute leukemia and familial history of genital cancers and brain tumor were also observed (OR=2.7 [1.2-5.8] and OR=10.7 [1.3-86], respectively). This study supports the hypothesis that a familial history of cancer may play a role in the etiology of childhood acute leukemia. It also evidences some specific associations that require further investigation.

Impact of addition of maintenance therapy to intensive induction and consolidation chemotherapy for childhood acute myeloblastic leukemia: results of a prospective randomized trial, LAME 89/91. Leucámie Aiqüe Myéloïde Enfant.

PURPOSE: To determine whether the use of maintenance therapy (MT) delivered after intensive induction and consolidation therapy confers any advantage in childhood acute myeloid leukemia (AML). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 268 children with AML were registered in the Leucámie Aiquë Myéloïde Enfant (LAME) 89/91 protocol. This regimen included an intensive induction phase (mitoxantrone plus cytarabine) and, for patients without allograft, two consolidation courses, one containing timed-sequential high-dose cytarabine, asparaginase, and amsacrine. In the LAME 89 pilot study, patients were given an additional MT consisting of mercaptopurine and cytarabine for 18 months. In the LAME 91 trial, patients were randomized to receive or not receive MT. RESULTS: A total of 241 (90%) of 268 patients achieved a complete remission. The overall survival and event-free survival at 6 years were 60% +/- 6% and 48% +/- 6%, respectively. For the complete responders after consolidation therapy, the 5-year disease-free survival was not significantly different in MT-negative and in MT-positive randomized patients (respectively, 60% +/- 19% v 50% +/- 15%; P =.25), whereas the 5-year overall survival was significantly better in MT-negative randomized patients (81% +/- 13% v 58% +/- 15%; P =.04) due to a higher salvage rate after relapse. CONCLUSION: More than 50% of patients can be cured of AML in childhood. Either drug intensity or each of the induction and postremission phases may have contributed to the outstanding improvement in outcome. Low-dose MT is not recommended. Exposure to this low-dose MT may contribute to clinical drug resistance and treatment failure in patients who experience relapse.

Economic evaluation of recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in very high-risk childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

PURPOSE: In a previous randomized study, the authors reported that granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) increased the chemotherapy dose-intensity delivered during the consolidation therapy of high-risk childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). The aim of the current study was to perform an economic evaluation in the same cohort. METHODS: In this open-label multicenter randomized trial, prophylactic G-CSF was administered after consolidation therapy courses. Economic data were retrospectively quantified for each patient: hospital stays, drugs, and blood products. RESULTS: Sixty-seven children were enrolled in the very high-risk branch of the FRALLE 93 protocol. Chemotherapy dose-intensity was significantly increased (105 +/- 5% in the G-CSF group vs. 91 +/- 4% in the non-G-CSF group, P < 0.001). The mean total costs per child were not statistically different: 32,309 dollars in the G-CSF group versus 31,569 dollars in the non-G-CSF group. Further analysis per child and per course (R3 or COPADM) demonstrated that the mean cost of hospitalization and the mean cost of intravenous antibiotics were significantly decreased in the G-CSF group after R3 courses (3,857 dollars vs. 4,993.80 dollars, P < 0.001; 171.40 dollars vs. 306.20 dollars, P = 0.029, respectively), but the cost of platelet transfusion was significantly increased (P = 0.03). Conversely, post-COPADM costs were similar. Finally, mean costs per course in the two randomized groups were not significantly different: 5,848.80 dollars versus 6,181 dollars and 7,388.10 dollars versus 6,475.70 dollars for R3 and COPADM, respectively. The 3-year probability of event-free survival between the two groups was not different. CONCLUSIONS: G-CSF can increase chemotherapy dose-intensity in very high-risk ALL without raising costs, but event-free survival was not improved. The cost benefit of prophylactic treatment by G-CSF relies on the chemotherapeutic regimen given prior to G-CSF administration.