Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
2.
Chest ; 2024 May 29.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38821183

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Despite the known interplay between blood flow and function, there is currently no minimally invasive method to monitor diaphragm hemodynamics. We used contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) to quantify relative diaphragm blood flow (Q˙DIA) in humans and assessed the technique's efficacy and reliability during graded inspiratory pressure threshold loading. We hypothesized that: (1) Q˙DIA would linearly increase with pressure generation: and (2) that there would be good test-retest reliability and interanalyzer reproducibility. RESEARCH QUESTION: Can the first minimally invasive method to measure relative diaphragm blood flow be validated in humans? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Quantitative contrast-enhanced ultrasound of the costal diaphragm was performed in healthy participants (10 male subjects, 6 female subjects; mean age 28 ± 5 years; BMI 22.8 ± 2.0 kg/m) during unloaded breathing and three stages of loaded breathing on two separate days. Gastric and esophageal balloon catheters measured diaphragmatic pressure. Ultrasonography was performed during a constant-rate IV infusion of lipid-stabilized microbubbles following each stage. Ultrasound images were acquired after a destruction-replenishment sequence and diaphragm specific time-intensity data were used to determine Q˙DIA by two individuals. RESULTS: Transdiaphragmatic pressure for unloaded and each loading stage were 15.2 ± 0.8, 26.1 ± 0.8, 34.6 ± 0.8, and 40.0 ± 0.8 percentage of the maximum, respectively. Q˙DIA increased with each stage of loading (3.1 ± 3.1, 6.9 ± 3.6, 11.0 ± 4.9, and 13.5 ± 5.4 AU/s; P < .0001). The linear relationship between diaphragmatic flow and pressure was reproducible from day to day. Q˙DIA had good to excellent test-retest reliability (0.86 [0.77, 0.92]; P < .0001) and excellent interanalyzer reproducibility (0.93 [0.90, 0.95]; P < .0001) with minimal bias. INTERPRETATION: Relative Q˙DIA measurements have valid physiological underpinnings, are reliable day to day, and reproducible analyzer-to-analyzer. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound is a viable, minimally invasive method for assessing costal Q˙DIA in humans and may provide a tool to monitor diaphragm hemodynamics in clinical settings.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA