Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
J Hepatol ; 74(4): 801-810, 2021 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33220331

RESUMO

BACKGROUND & AIMS: There are limited data on patients with chronic HCV infection in whom combination voxilaprevir (VOX), velpatasvir (VEL), sofosbuvir (SOF) retreatment fails. Thus, we aimed to assess treatment failure and rescue treatment options in these patients. METHODS: Samples from 40 patients with HCV genotypes (GT) 1-4 in whom VOX/VEL/SOF retreatment failed were collected within the European Resistance Study Group. Population-based resistance analyses were conducted and clinical parameters and retreatment efficacies were evaluated retrospectively in 22 patients. RESULTS: Most VOX/VEL/SOF failure patients were infected with HCV GT3a (n = 18, 45%) or GT1a (n = 11, 28%) and had cirrhosis (n = 28, 70%). Previous treatments included an NS3-inhibitor (30%), an NS5A-inhibitor (100%) and SOF (85%). Baseline RAS data from a subgroup of patients before VOX/VEL/SOF retreatment (78%) showed few NS3 RASs apart from Q80K in GT1a (40%), typical NS5A RAS patterns in most patients (74%) and no S282T in NS5B. Sequencing after VOX/VEL/SOF failure was available in 98% of patients and showed only minor changes for NS3 and NS5A RASs. In 22 patients, rescue treatment was initiated with glecaprevir, pibrentasvir alone (n = 2) or with SOF±ribavirin (n = 15), VOX/VEL/SOF±ribavirin (n = 4) or VEL/SOF and ribavirin (n = 1) for 12 to 24 weeks. Sustained virologic response was achieved in 17/21 (81%) patients with a final treatment outcome. Of these, 2 GT3a-infected patients had virologic failure after rescue treatment with VEL/SOF or glecaprevir/pibrentasvir+SOF+ribavirin, and 2 patients with cirrhosis died during treatment or before reaching SVR12. CONCLUSIONS: VOX/VEL/SOF failure was mainly observed in HCV GT3- and GT1a-infected patients with cirrhosis and was not associated with specific RAS patterns within NS3, NS5A or NS5B target regions. Rescue treatment with multiple targeted therapies was effective in most patients. LAY SUMMARY: The advent of direct-acting antivirals has enabled the effective cure of chronic hepatitis C in most patients. However, treatment failure occurs in some patients, who are often retreated with a combination regimen called VOX/VEL/SOF, which is associated with very high rates of cure. However, VOX/VEL/SOF retreatment also fails in some patients. Herein, we analysed samples from patients in whom VOX/VEL/SOF retreatment failed and we assessed the efficacy of different rescue therapies, showing that rescue treatment is effective in most patients (81%).


Assuntos
Antivirais , Carbamatos , Farmacorresistência Viral Múltipla , Quimioterapia Combinada/métodos , Hepacivirus , Hepatite C Crônica , Compostos Heterocíclicos de 4 ou mais Anéis , Compostos Macrocíclicos , Retratamento , Sofosbuvir , Sulfonamidas , Antivirais/administração & dosagem , Antivirais/efeitos adversos , Antivirais/classificação , Antivirais/farmacocinética , Carbamatos/administração & dosagem , Carbamatos/efeitos adversos , Combinação de Medicamentos , Farmacorresistência Viral Múltipla/efeitos dos fármacos , Farmacorresistência Viral Múltipla/genética , Europa (Continente)/epidemiologia , Feminino , Hepacivirus/efeitos dos fármacos , Hepacivirus/genética , Hepacivirus/isolamento & purificação , Hepatite C Crônica/diagnóstico , Hepatite C Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Hepatite C Crônica/epidemiologia , Hepatite C Crônica/virologia , Compostos Heterocíclicos de 4 ou mais Anéis/administração & dosagem , Compostos Heterocíclicos de 4 ou mais Anéis/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Cirrose Hepática/diagnóstico , Cirrose Hepática/epidemiologia , Compostos Macrocíclicos/administração & dosagem , Compostos Macrocíclicos/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Retratamento/métodos , Retratamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Sofosbuvir/administração & dosagem , Sofosbuvir/efeitos adversos , Sulfonamidas/administração & dosagem , Sulfonamidas/efeitos adversos , Resposta Viral Sustentada , Falha de Tratamento , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin ; 27(3): 148-52, 2009 Mar.
Artigo em Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19306714

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Staphylococcus lugdunensis is a coagulase-negative staphylococcus associated with a variety of clinical infections. In this paper we present the results of a comparative study using 4 methods to determine antimicrobial susceptibility to oxacillin and penicillin in 60 S. lugdunensis isolates. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We studied 60 S. lugdunensis isolates obtained from clinical specimens sent to our laboratory over an 8-year period. All isolates were free coagulase-negative and DNase-negative, and biochemically identified by API ID 32 STAPH (bioMérieux). Presence of mecA and ss-lactamase production were studied in all cases. Antimicrobial susceptibility was determined by the Vitek 2 System (bioMérieux) and broth microdilution (Wider) (Soria Melguizo) for penicillin and oxacillin, and the E-test (AB Biodisk) and cefoxitin disk diffusion test (BD BBLTM) for oxacillin. RESULTS: All isolates lacked the mecA gene and were susceptible to oxacillin by broth microdilution, E-test, and cefoxitin disk diffusion test. Only two isolates were oxacillin-resistant by the Vitek 2 System. Twenty-four isolates (40%) were ss-lactamase-positive, 4 after induction. Susceptibility testing to penicillin determined that 48 isolates showed concordance between the results obtained by broth microdilution and Vitek 2, but 12 isolates (20%), showed divergent results. CONCLUSIONS: We detected no resistance to oxacillin in S. lugdunensis. All the methods evaluated were adequate for determining oxacillin resistance. The Vitek 2 System is useful for detecting penicillin resistance, but the ss-lactamase test should be applied to isolates with a MIC=0.25microg/ml to avoid the interpretation of false resistance to this antibiotic.


Assuntos
Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana/métodos , Oxacilina/farmacologia , Penicilinas/farmacologia , Staphylococcus/efeitos dos fármacos , Proteínas de Bactérias/análise , Proteínas de Bactérias/genética , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana Múltipla , Humanos , Resistência às Penicilinas , Infecções Estafilocócicas/microbiologia , Staphylococcus/genética , Staphylococcus/isolamento & purificação , beta-Lactamases/análise , beta-Lactamases/genética
6.
Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin ; 25(6): 387-93, 2007.
Artigo em Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17583652

RESUMO

Upper respiratory tract (URT) infections are common and account for more medical visits than any other type of infectious disease. Diagnostic procedures for the following syndromes are included in this report: Streptococcal and nonstreptococcal pharyngitis, laryngeal syndromes, otitis, sinusitis, and others caused by unusual and/or uncommon bacteria or fungi, including Lemierre's disease, Vincent's angina, pharyngeal and peritonsillar abscesses, diphtheria, candidiasis, and zygomycoses. Detailed information is provided on specimen collection and processing, selection of laboratory tests, interpretation of findings, reporting results, additional procedures for uncommon infections, and the use of new techniques. All the information included in this article is contained in the Standard Operating Procedures for Clinical Microbiology (http://www.seimc.org/protocolos/microbiologia/).


Assuntos
Técnicas Microbiológicas , Infecções Respiratórias/diagnóstico , Infecções Respiratórias/microbiologia , Manejo de Espécimes , Humanos , Laringite/microbiologia , Otite/microbiologia , Faringite/microbiologia , Sinusite/microbiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA