Metachronous peritoneal metastases following curative resection for colon cancer: Understanding risk factors and patterns of recurrence.

BACKGROUND: A subset of metachronous colon cancer recurrence manifests as peritoneal metastases (PM). Risk factors for metachronous PM recurrence are not well-defined in patients with stage II or III colon cancers after curative resection and standard adjuvant treatments. METHODS: Population data from the California Cancer Registry for patients with Stage II or III colon cancer were collected between 2004 and 2012. Multivariate analysis was used to identify factors associated with metachronous PM. RESULTS: Of the 2077 patients with stage II or III colon cancer, female patients (odds ratio [OR] = 1.84, p = 0.02), T4 primary tumor (OR = 2.36, p = 0.02), mucinous (OR = 3.97, p < 0.01) or signet-ring histology (OR = 6.01, p = 0.01), and right-sided cancer (OR = 2.2, p < 0.01) were found with increased risk of metachronous isolated PM recurrence after curative resection. Median survival after diagnosis for patients without PM recurrence was 22 months, compared with 12 months for PM recurrence (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: PM recurrence groups have a worse overall survival than patients with recurrent disease in other sites. A better understanding of the tumor biology and molecular characteristics of colon cancers likely to recur as PM is needed to explain behavior and identify potential targeted therapy.

Outcomes of neoadjuvant therapy for cholangiocarcinoma: A review of existing evidence assessing treatment response and R0 resection rate.

Adjuvant chemotherapy for cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) has not been shown to gain significant improvements in survival. Factors contributing to suboptimal treatment response include aggressive disease biology and late clinical presentation. When feasible, surgical resection is the first line of treatment. Yet, recurrence remains high and long-term survival is rare. Neoadjuvant therapy is an appealing approach, with oncologic advantages in allowing the treatment of occult systemic disease and selection of patients most likely to benefit from radical surgery. However, given the surgery-first treatment paradigm for CCA, there is a paucity of data supporting neoadjuvant therapy. This review summarizes the current evidence on treatment response and margin-negative (R0) resection rate associated with neoadjuvant therapy for CCA.

Survival and cancer recurrence after short-course perioperative probiotics in a randomized trial.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The long-term impact of perioperative probiotics remains understudied while mounting evidence links microbiome and oncogenesis. Therefore, we analyzed overall survival and cancer recurrence among patients enrolled in a randomized trial of perioperative probiotics. METHODS: 6-year follow-up of surgical patients participating in a randomized trial evaluating short-course perioperative oral probiotic VSL#3 (n = 57) or placebo (n = 63). RESULTS: Study groups did not differ in age, preoperative hemoglobin, ASA status, and Charlson comorbidity index. There was a significant difference in preoperative serum albumin (placebo group 4.0 ± 0.1 vs. 3.7 ± 0.1 g/dL in the probiotic group, p = 0.030). Thirty-seven deaths (30.8 %) have occurred during a median follow-up of 6.2 years. Overall survival stratified on preoperative serum albumin and surgical specialty was similar between groups (p = 0.691). Age (aHR = 1.081, p = 0.001), serum albumin (aHR = 0.162, p = 0.001), and surgical specialty (aHR = 0.304, p < 0.001) were the only predictors of overall survival in the multivariate model, while the placebo/probiotic group (aHR = 0.808, p = 0.726) was not predictive. The progression rate among cancer patients was similar in the probiotic group (30.3 %, 10/33) compared to the placebo group (21.2 %, 7/33; p = 0.398). The progression-free survival was not significantly different (unstratified p = 0.270, stratified p = 0.317). CONCLUSIONS: Perioperative short-course use of VSL#3 probiotics does not influence overall or progression-free survival after complex surgery for visceral malignancy.

Rising Incidence of Peri-Operative Bactibilia among Patients Undergoing Complex Biliopancreatic Surgery.

Background: Biliary instrumentation is associated with bactibilia and post-operative infection. Bactibilia incidence over time remains unknown. Patients and Methods: Consecutive patients with bilioenteric anastomosis surgery and available surveillance intra-operative bile duct cultures were evaluated for post-operative infection. The study period (2008-2019) was divided into quartiles to examine time-based trends. Results: Among 101 cases, 60 intra-operative bile duct cultures had no growth and 41 patients had documented at least one culture-positive isolate in their bile. Frequency of patients with culture-positive intra-operative bile increased over the study period (period 1, 1/28, 3.6% vs. period 2, 7/21, 33.3% vs. period 3, 15/26, 57.7% vs. period 4, 18/26, 69.2%; p < 0.001). Culture-positive post-operative infection (17/101; 16.8%) was not associated with intra-operative bile duct culture (p = 0.552), however, the same micro-organism isolate was identified on post-operative infection and intra-operative culture of bile duct bile among six of 17 patients (35.3%). Conclusions: We found an increasing incidence of bactibilia and post-operative culture-positive infections over the last decade. One-third of patients with a positive intra-operative bile duct culture experienced post-operative infection with the same organism, yet a clear link between bile colonization and post-operative infection was not established.

Chemotherapy-induced early transient increase and surge of CA 19-9 level in patients with pancreatic Adenocarcinoma✰.

This study aimed to characterize chemotherapy-induced transient increase and surge of CA 19-9 level to treatment response in patients with advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). A retrospective case series was performed of advanced PDAC patients treated with first-line chemotherapy at City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center from Jan 2017 to May 2020. CA 19-9 surge was defined as an increase of >20% from baseline followed by a >20% drop in one or more subsequent CA 19-9 levels compared to baseline. Out of 106 advanced PDAC patients, 38 were evaluable for CA 19-9 surge. Fourteen (51.9%) patients treated with FOLFIRINOX and 3 (27.3%) patients treated with nab-P + Gem chemotherapy demonstrated an early transient rise in CA 19-9 level. A CA 19-9 surge was documented in 9 (23.7%) patients, all with duration of surge lasting < 16 weeks. Five out of 9 (55.6%) patients (4: FOLFIRINOX, 1: nab-P + Gem) with CA 19-9 surge demonstrated partial objective response rate on surveillance cross-sectional imaging. One patient (FOLFIRINOX) had stable disease, and 2 patients (1: FOLFIRINOX, 1: nab-P + Gem) were found to have disease progression after treatment interruption. The initial early rise of CA 19-9 levels during chemotherapy in patients with advanced PDAC may not indicate tumor progression. Rather, it may represent a chemotherapy-induced transient increase or surge phenomenon of the tumor marker in patients responding to treatment.

Signet ring cell carcinoma of the gastrointestinal tract: National trends on treatment effects and prognostic outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Signet ring cell carcinoma (SRCC) is a distinct malignancy occurring across the tubular gastrointestinal tract (tGIT). We comprehensively examined the outcomes of patients diagnosed with SRCC across tGIT. METHODS: SRCC and not-otherwise-specified adenocarcinoma (NOS) patients reported to the National Cancer Database from 2004 to 2015 were included. Baseline characteristics, outcomes and site-specific adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) derived from Cox models of SRCC patients were compared to those of NOS patients. Overall survival (OS) was primary endpoint. RESULTS: A total of 41,686 SRCC (4.6%) and 871,373 NOS patients (95.4%) were included. SRCC patients were younger (63.1 ± 14.7 vs. 67.0 ± 13.4 y, p < 0.001) and more likely to present with Stage IV disease than NOS patients (42.5% vs. 24.5%, p < 0.001). Stomach (n = 24,433) and colon (n = 9,914) contributed highest frequency of SRCC. SRCC histology was associated with shorter OS (aHR = 1.377, p < 0.001) in multivariate model. There was an interaction between SRCC and chemotherapy effects on risk of death (interaction aHR = 1.072, pinteraction< 0.001) and between SRCC histology and disease site, suggesting that the effect of SRCC on OS is site-dependent, with a higher increased risk of death in patients with rectal SRCC (aHR = 2.378, pinteraction< 0.001). CONCLUSION: Significant negative prognostic effect associated with SRCC is site-dependent across the GIT. Surgical and or systemic therapy was associated with improved OS among SRCC patients, but remained lower than NOS patients. Further understanding of gastrointestinal SRCC molecular profile is needed to better inform future treatment strategies.

The impact of the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group (ACOSOG) Z0011 trial: An institutional review.

BACKGROUND: Axillary dissection (AD) was historically recommended for all patients with breast tumor involvement discovered by sentinel lymph node biopsy (+SLNB). However, after the ACOSOG Z0011 trial, omission of AD became the recommendation for selected patients with a +SLNB. We report the impact of ACOSOG Z0011 on the completion AD rate in patients with +SLNB at our institution. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all patients diagnosed with breast cancer between March 2009 and February 2013 (n = 1781). This cohort was divided into two groups: 1) those diagnosed BEFORE Z0011 and 2) those diagnosed AFTER Z0011. We calculated both the percentage of patients with a +SNLB who underwent AD and, from those patients, the percentage who did and did not meet the Z0011 criteria. RESULTS: The BEFORE group contained 849 patients; 144 had +SLNB and from those 113 underwent AD. The AFTER group contained 932 patients: 139 had +SLNB and from those 73 underwent AD. The completion AD rate in the BEFORE group was 78.5%, compared to 52.5% in the AFTER group (p < 0.001). From the patients who met the Z0011 criteria, 75.6% of the BEFORE patients underwent AD, compared to only 2.2%% in the AFTER group (p < 0.001). Among those who did not meet the Z0011 criteria, a similar percentage of patients underwent AD in each group (BEFORE 79.8%, AFTER 74.4%, p = 0.384). CONCLUSION: Following the publication of the ACOSOG Z0011 trial, we experienced a significant decrease in the completion AD rate among patients with a +SLNB who met the Z0011 inclusion criteria.

Conversion of laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy in the current era of laparoscopic surgery.

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the gold standard treatment for benign gallbladder pathologies. In certain circumstances, the procedure must be converted to open to safely complete the operation. This study aims to evaluate the reasons for conversion of this operation in the current era of laparoscopic surgery. A retrospective review of medical records was undertaken to identify all laparoscopic converted to open cholecystectomy performed at a single center over a 2-year period. Reasons for conversion, surgeon's preoperative indications, and specimen pathologic results were documented. A review of published data from the previous two decades was also conducted for comparison of contemporary versus historical reasons for intraoperative conversion. Between May 2008 and April 2010, 3371 laparoscopic cholecystectomies were performed at Greenville Hospital System University Medical Center. Eighty-six patients (2.6%) required conversion to open cholecystectomy during the study period. A diagnosis of acute cholecystitis (58.8%) was more common among converted cases. Inflammation (35%), adhesions (28%), and anatomic difficulty (22%) were the three most common intraoperative findings leading to conversion. In the years since laparoscopic cholecystectomy was introduced, there has been a noted improvement in the quality of laparoscopic equipment affording a near wholesale shift toward the laparoscopic approach in the surgical management of this condition. However, inflammation, adhesions, and anatomic difficulty continue to challenge the use and safety of this approach in a small number of patients. The willingness and ability of surgeons to convert to open cholecystectomy continues to be important to the safety of this operation.