Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
J Mol Cell Cardiol ; 170: 121-123, 2022 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35764120

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: There is growing recognition that COVID-19 does cause cardiac sequelae. The underlying mechanisms involved are still poorly understood to date. Viral infections, including COVID-19, have been hypothesized to contribute to autoimmunity, by exposing previously hidden cryptic epitopes on damaged cells to an activated immune system. Given the high incidence of cardiac involvement seen in COVID-19, our aim was to determine the frequency of anti-DSG2 antibodies in a population of post COVID-19 patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: 300 convalescent serum samples were obtained from a group of post COVID-19 infected patients from October 2020 to February 2021. 154 samples were drawn 6 months post-COVID-19 infection and 146 samples were drawn 9 months post COVID infection. 17 samples were obtained from the same patient at the 6- and 9- month mark. An electrochemiluminescent-based immunoassay utilizing the extracellular domain of DSG2 for antibody capture was used. The mean signal intensity of anti-DSG2 antibodies in the post COVID-19 samples was significantly higher than that of a healthy control population (19 ± 83.2 in the post-COVID-19 sample vs. 2.1 ± 7.2 (p < 0. 0001) in the negative control healthy population). Of note, 29.3% of the post COVID-19 infection samples demonstrated a signal higher than the 90th percentile of the control population and 8.7% were higher than the median found in ARVC patients. The signal intensity between the 6-month and 9-month samples did not differ significantly. CONCLUSIONS: We report for the first time that recovered COVID-19 patients demonstrate significantly higher and sustained levels of anti-DSG2 autoantibodies as compared to a healthy control population, comparable to that of a diagnosed ARVC group.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Autoanticorpos/imunologia , COVID-19/sangue , COVID-19/complicações , COVID-19/imunologia , Desmogleína 2/imunologia , Humanos , Síndrome de COVID-19 Pós-Aguda
2.
Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol ; 24(3): e12634, 2019 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30707472

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Routine use of pre-participation electrocardiograms (ECGs) has been used by the Singapore Armed Forces, targeting early detection of significant cardiac diseases. We aim to describe the impact of demographic and anthropometric factors on ECG variables and establish a set of electrocardiographic reference ranges specific to a young male multiethnic Southeast Asian cohort. METHODS AND RESULTS: Between November 1, 2009, and December 31, 2014, 144,346 young male conscripts underwent pre-participation screening that included a 12-lead ECG, demographic and anthropometric measurements. The Chinese population had the longest PR interval (146.7 ± 19.7 vs. 145.21 ± 19.2 in Malays vs. 141.2 ± 18.8 ms in Indians), QRS duration (94.5 ± 9.8 vs. 92.6 ± 9.7 in Malays vs. 92.5 ± 9.4 ms in Indians) and QTcB interval (408.3 ± 21.3 vs. 403.5 ± 21.6 in Malays vs. 401.2 ± 21.4 ms in Indians) (all p < 0.001). Body mass index (BMI) >25 kg/m2 and body fat >25% were independently associated with lower prevalence of increased QRS voltage on ECG. Systolic blood pressure of >140 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure of >90 mmHg independently increased the prevalence of increased QRS voltage on ECG. CONCLUSIONS: Electrocardiographic parameters vary across different ethnicities and in comparison with international norms. In our population, diagnosis of increased QRS voltage by ECG is less prevalent with obesity and increased body fat. Further analysis of gold standard measurements for the diagnosis of LVH in our population is ongoing, to improve the accuracy of the ECG screening process.


Assuntos
Antropometria , Arritmias Cardíacas/diagnóstico por imagem , Povo Asiático/estatística & dados numéricos , Eletrocardiografia/métodos , Cardiopatias/diagnóstico por imagem , Programas de Rastreamento/métodos , Adulto , Arritmias Cardíacas/etnologia , Estudos de Coortes , Diagnóstico Precoce , Cardiopatias/epidemiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Militares , Valores de Referência , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Singapura , Adulto Jovem
4.
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis ; 10(6)2023 May 25.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37367396

RESUMO

(1) Background: Little is known about how left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) affects functional and clinical outcomes in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients undergoing thrombolysis; (2) Methods: A retrospective observational study conducted between 2006 and 2018 included 937 consecutive AIS patients undergoing thrombolysis. LVSD was defined as left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 50%. Univariate and multivariate binary logistic regression analysis was performed for demographic characteristics. Ordinal shift regression was used for functional modified Rankin Scale (mRS) outcome at 3 months. Survival analysis of mortality, heart failure (HF) admission, myocardial infarction (MI) and stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA) was evaluated with a Cox-proportional hazards model; (3) Results: LVSD patients in comparison with LVEF ≥ 50% patients accounted for 190 and 747 patients, respectively. LVSD patients had more comorbidities including diabetes mellitus (100 (52.6%) vs. 280 (37.5%), p < 0.001), atrial fibrillation (69 (36.3%) vs. 212 (28.4%), p = 0.033), ischemic heart disease (130 (68.4%) vs. 145 (19.4%), p < 0.001) and HF (150 (78.9%) vs. 46 (6.2%), p < 0.001). LVSD was associated with worse functional mRS outcomes at 3 months (adjusted OR 1.41, 95% CI 1.03-1.92, p = 0.030). Survival analysis identified LVSD to significantly predict all-cause mortality (adjusted HR [aHR] 3.38, 95% CI 1.74-6.54, p < 0.001), subsequent HF admission (aHR 4.23, 95% CI 2.17-8.26, p < 0.001) and MI (aHR 2.49, 95% CI 1.44-4.32, p = 0.001). LVSD did not predict recurrent stroke/TIA (aHR 1.15, 95% CI 0.77-1.72, p = 0.496); (4) Conclusions: LVSD in AIS patients undergoing thrombolysis was associated with increased all-cause mortality, subsequent HF admission, subsequent MI and poorer functional outcomes, highlighting a need to optimize LVEF.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA