RESUMO
Bioelectric medicine leverages natural signaling pathways in the nervous system to counteract organ dysfunction. This novel approach has potential to address conditions with unmet needs, including heart failure, hypertension, inflammation, arthritis, asthma, Alzheimer's disease, and diabetes. Neural therapies, which target the brain, spinal cord, or peripheral nerves, are already being applied to conditions such as epilepsy, Parkinson's, and chronic pain. While today's therapies have made exciting advancements, their open-loop design-where stimulation is administered without collecting feedback-means that results can be variable and devices do not work for everyone. Stimulation effects are sensitive to changes in neural tissue, nerve excitability, patient position, and more. Closing the loop by providing neural or non-neural biomarkers to the system can guide therapy by providing additional insights into stimulation effects and overall patient condition. Devices currently on the market use recorded biomarkers to close the loop and improve therapy. The future of bioelectric medicine is more holistically personalized. Collected data will be used for increasingly precise application of neural stimulations to achieve therapeutic effects. To achieve this future, advances are needed in device design, implanted and computational technologies, and scientific/medical interpretation of neural activity. Research and commercial devices are enabling the development of multiple levels of responsiveness to neural, physiological, and environmental changes. This includes developing suitable implanted technologies for high bandwidth brain/machine interfaces and addressing the challenge of neural or state biomarker decoding. Consistent progress is being made in these challenges toward the long-term vision of automatically and holistically personalized care for chronic health conditions.
RESUMO
In this review, the first of two parts, we first provide an overview of the orthodox analgesics used commonly against cancer pain. Then, we examine in more detail the emerging evidence for the potential impact of analgesic use on cancer risk and disease progression. Increasing findings suggest that long-term use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, particularly aspirin, may reduce cancer occurrence. However, acetaminophen may raise the risk of some hematological malignancies. Drugs acting upon receptors of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) and GABA "mimetics" (eg, gabapentin) appear generally safe for cancer patients, but there is some evidence of potential carcinogenicity. Some barbiturates appear to slightly raise cancer risks and can affect cancer cell behavior in vitro. For cannabis, studies suggest an increased risk of squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue, larynx, and possibly lung. Morphine may stimulate human microvascular endothelial cell proliferation and angiogenesis; it is not clear whether this might cause harm or produce benefit. The opioid, fentanyl, may promote growth in some tumor cell lines. Opium itself is an emerging risk factor for gastric adenocarcinoma and possibly cancers of the esophagus, bladder, larynx, and lung. It is concluded that analgesics currently prescribed for cancer pain can significantly affect the cancer process itself. More futuristically, several ion channels are being targeted with novel analgesics, but many of these are also involved in primary and/or secondary tumorigenesis. Further studies are needed to elucidate possible cellular and molecular effects of orthodox analgesics and their possible long-term impact, both positive and negative, and thus enable the best possible clinical gain for cancer patients.