RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Adverse events (AEs) in acute care hospitals are frequent and associated with significant morbidity, mortality, and costs. Measuring AEs is necessary for quality improvement and benchmarking purposes, but current detection methods lack in accuracy, efficiency, and generalizability. The growing availability of electronic health records (EHR) and the development of natural language processing techniques for encoding narrative data offer an opportunity to develop potentially better methods. The purpose of this study is to determine the accuracy and generalizability of using automated methods for detecting three high-incidence and high-impact AEs from EHR data: a) hospital-acquired pneumonia, b) ventilator-associated event and, c) central line-associated bloodstream infection. METHODS: This validation study will be conducted among medical, surgical and ICU patients admitted between 2013 and 2016 to the Centre hospitalier universitaire de Sherbrooke (CHUS) and the McGill University Health Centre (MUHC), which has both French and English sites. A random 60% sample of CHUS patients will be used for model development purposes (cohort 1, development set). Using a random sample of these patients, a reference standard assessment of their medical chart will be performed. Multivariate logistic regression and the area under the curve (AUC) will be employed to iteratively develop and optimize three automated AE detection models (i.e., one per AE of interest) using EHR data from the CHUS. These models will then be validated on a random sample of the remaining 40% of CHUS patients (cohort 1, internal validation set) using chart review to assess accuracy. The most accurate models developed and validated at the CHUS will then be applied to EHR data from a random sample of patients admitted to the MUHC French site (cohort 2) and English site (cohort 3)-a critical requirement given the use of narrative data -, and accuracy will be assessed using chart review. Generalizability will be determined by comparing AUCs from cohorts 2 and 3 to those from cohort 1. DISCUSSION: This study will likely produce more accurate and efficient measures of AEs. These measures could be used to assess the incidence rates of AEs, evaluate the success of preventive interventions, or benchmark performance across hospitals.
Assuntos
Cateterismo Venoso Central/efeitos adversos , Infecção Hospitalar/epidemiologia , Respiração Artificial/efeitos adversos , Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Processamento de Linguagem Natural , Pneumonia/epidemiologia , Melhoria de QualidadeRESUMO
Objective: Bottlenecks in the personal protective equipment (PPE) supply chain have contributed to shortages of PPE during the COVID-19 pandemic, resulting in fractures in the functionality of healthcare systems. This study was conducted with the aim of determining the effectiveness of retrofitted commercial snorkel masks as an alternative respirator for healthcare workers during infectious disease outbreaks.Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed, analyzing qualitative and quantitative fit test results of the retrofitted Aria Ocean Reef® full-face snorkeling mask on healthcare workers at the McGill University Health Centre between April-June 2020. Historical fit test results, using medical-grade respirators, for healthcare workers were also analyzed.Results: During the study period, 71 participants volunteered for fit testing, 60.6% of which were nurses. The overall fit test passing rate using the snorkel mask was 83.1%. Of the participants who did not previously pass fit testing with medical-grade respirators, 80% achieved a passing fit test with the snorkel respirator.Conclusions: The results suggest that this novel respirator may be an effective and feasible alternative solution to address PPE shortages, while still providing healthcare workers with ample protection. Additional robust testing will be required to ensure that respirator fit is maintained, after numerous rounds of disinfection.
RESUMO
Measurement of safety can be difficult. Given that incident reporting systems rely primarily on voluntary reporting and some types of medication incidents may occur rarely, lack of reports about a particular type of incident cannot be interpreted as evidence that the underlying causes are resolved. Proxy measurements, such as the level of implementation of evidence-based practices known to reduce the risk of a particular incident, may provide an indication of progress toward safer systems. This article includes an overview of some proxy measurements influencing medication use systems in patient care areas, including critical care, as reported in the biennial Hospital Pharmacy in Canada survey.
Assuntos
Sistemas de Notificação de Reações Adversas a Medicamentos , Hospitais , Erros de Medicação/estatística & dados numéricos , Canadá , Humanos , Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde , Gestão da SegurançaRESUMO
PURPOSE: To characterize the maximum-tolerated dose, recommended dose, dose-limiting toxicities (DLT), pharmacokinetic profile, and food effect of orally administered irinotecan formulated as new semisolid matrix capsules. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Irinotecan was given orally in fasted patients once daily for 5 consecutive days and repeated every 3 weeks. Patients were randomly assigned to take the drug along with a high-fat, high-calorie breakfast for the administration at day 1 of the first or second cycle. Dosages tested were 70 and 80 mg/m(2)/day. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients received 101 cycles of therapy (median two cycles, range 1-15). During the first cycle, grade 3 delayed diarrhea and grade 3 fever were the DLTs at the dosage of 80 mg/m(2)/day in three out of five patients. Hematologic and nonhematologic toxicities were mild to moderate. Exposure to the active metabolite SN-38 was relatively high compared with i.v. infusion, but no relevant accumulation was observed. Food had no significant effect on irinotecan pharmacokinetics. One confirmed partial remission and 10 disease stabilizations were observed in previously treated patients. No association was found between the UGT1A1*28 genotype and the risk of severe irinotecan-induced toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: For oral irinotecan, a dose of 70 mg/m(2)/day for 5 consecutive days every 3 weeks is recommended for further studies. Delayed diarrhea was the main DLT, similar to that observed with intravenously administered irinotecan. This study confirms that oral administration of irinotecan is feasible and may have favorable pharmacokinetic characteristics.
Assuntos
Antineoplásicos Fitogênicos/farmacocinética , Camptotecina/análogos & derivados , Camptotecina/farmacocinética , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Administração Oral , Adulto , Idoso , Anemia/induzido quimicamente , Antineoplásicos Fitogênicos/administração & dosagem , Antineoplásicos Fitogênicos/efeitos adversos , Área Sob a Curva , Camptotecina/administração & dosagem , Camptotecina/efeitos adversos , Cápsulas , Citocromo P-450 CYP3A , Sistema Enzimático do Citocromo P-450/genética , Diarreia/induzido quimicamente , Gorduras na Dieta/administração & dosagem , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Esquema de Medicação , Feminino , Genótipo , Glucuronosiltransferase/genética , Humanos , Irinotecano , Leucopenia/induzido quimicamente , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Náusea/induzido quimicamente , Neoplasias/genética , Neoplasias/metabolismo , Neutropenia/induzido quimicamente , Polimorfismo Genético , Regiões Promotoras Genéticas/genética , Trombocitopenia/induzido quimicamente , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Vômito/induzido quimicamenteRESUMO
A phase I study was conducted with oral irinotecan given daily for 14 days every 3 weeks in 45 patients with solid tumours to establish the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), toxicity, preliminary antitumour response and pharmacokinetics. Irinotecan was administered orally as a powder-filled capsule at doses ranging from 7.5 to 40 mg/m2 per day. Tumours were predominantly colorectal (30) together with 10 other gastrointestinal, 2 breast, 2 small cell lung and 1 ovarian. All but three patients had received prior chemotherapy. The median number of administered cycles was 3 (range 1-19). Gastrointestinal toxicities (grade 3 nausea, grade 3/4 vomiting and diarrhoea) and one incidence of grade 3 asthenia were dose limiting. There were no grade 3/4 haematological toxicities. The MTD was 30 mg/m2 per day. There were two documented partial responses, one in a patient with cancer of the small intestine and the other in a patient with colon cancer. Stable disease was seen in 16 patients (35.5%). Peak concentrations of irinotecan and metabolite SN-38 were reached within 2.0-2.4 h. The metabolic ratio of SN-38 AUC to irinotecan AUC was 0.17+/-0.10 (mean+/-SD). The dose recommended for phase II studies is 30 mg/m2 per day administered daily for 14 days every 3 weeks.
Assuntos
Antineoplásicos Fitogênicos/administração & dosagem , Camptotecina/análogos & derivados , Camptotecina/administração & dosagem , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Administração Oral , Adulto , Idoso , Antineoplásicos Fitogênicos/efeitos adversos , Camptotecina/efeitos adversos , Camptotecina/farmacocinética , Esquema de Medicação , Inibidores Enzimáticos/administração & dosagem , Inibidores Enzimáticos/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Trato Gastrointestinal/efeitos dos fármacos , Humanos , Irinotecano , Masculino , Dose Máxima Tolerável , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Inibidores da Topoisomerase IRESUMO
We investigated the prevalence, molecular epidemiology, and clinical significance of heterogeneous glycopeptide-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus (hGISA) isolates in 48 liver transplant recipients infected or colonized with methicillin-resistant S. aureus over a 5-year period. Strains were screened for hGISA on Mueller-Hinton agar containing 5 mg of teicoplanin per liter. Heterogeneous glycopeptide resistance was confirmed by the E-test method with a dense inoculum and a simplified method of population analysis. hGISA strains were found in 13 (27%) of the 48 patients studied. Eleven of the 13 strains shared a common multiresistant phenotype with homogeneous methicillin resistance and gentamicin resistance, and they were closely related according to the results of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. Only 2 of the 13 patients infected or colonized with hGISA strains had previously received glycopeptide therapy. Most patients were successfully treated with vancomycin, but one patient who failed to respond to vancomycin subsequently died. These results suggest that the high prevalence of hGISA among our patients was due to the clonal spread of a multiresistant strain.