Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Heart Surg Forum ; 26(6): E694-E704, 2023 Dec 13.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38178348

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Costs and readmissions associated with type A aortic dissection repairs are not well understood. We investigated statewide readmissions, costs, and outcomes associated with the surgical management of type A aortic dissection repairs at low- and high-volume centers. METHODS: We identified all adult type A aortic dissection patients who underwent operative repair in the Maryland Health Services Cost Review Commission's database (2012-2020). Hospitals were stratified into high- (top quartile of total repairs) or low-volume centers. RESULTS: Of the 249 patients included, 193 (77.5%) were treated at a high-volume center. Patients treated at high- and low-volume centers had no differences in age, sex, race, primary payer, or severity (all p > 0.5). High- compared to low-volume centers had a greater proportion of patients transferred in (71.5% vs. 17.9%, p < 0.001). High-volume centers also had longer lengths of stay (12 vs. 8 days, p < 0.001), similar inpatient mortality (13.0% vs. 16.1%, p = 0.6), and similar proportion of patients readmitted (54.9% vs. 51.8%, p = 0.7). High-volume centers had greater index admission costs ($114,859 vs. $72,090, p < 0.001) and similar readmission costs ($48,367 vs. $42,204, p = 0.5). At high-volume centers, transferred patients compared to direct admissions had greater severity of illness (p = 0.05), similar mortality (p = 0.53), and greater lengths of stay (p = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: High-volume centers had a greater number of patients transferred from other institutions compared to low-volume centers. High-volume centers were associated with increased index admission resource utilization, with transfer patients having higher illness severity and greater resource utilization, yet similar mortality, compared to direct admission patients.


Assuntos
Dissecção Aórtica , Readmissão do Paciente , Adulto , Humanos , Hospitalização , Dissecção Aórtica/diagnóstico , Dissecção Aórtica/cirurgia , Admissão do Paciente , Hospitais , Estudos Retrospectivos
2.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg ; 171(2): 408-417, 2024 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38591747

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: In September 2017, the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (AAO-HNS) added 2 questions querying panel organizers if gender/racial diversity was considered in selecting panel presenters, beginning with the 2018 Annual Meeting (AM). This study examines how this checklist impacted the gender diversity of panel presenters at the AAO-HNS AM. STUDY DESIGN: This was a cross-sectional investigation comparing female representation before and after the addition of questions inquiring about diversity in 2018. SETTING: A review of abstract submissions for the AMs from 2015 to 2021. METHODS: AM Official Program Abstracts were used to obtain presenter names and specialty area for each panel. The percentage of female presenters, in total and stratified by specialty area, were compared before and after 2018 to quantify changes following the addition of the checklist. RESULTS: There was a significant increase in the proportion of female panel presenters from 22.3% (total n = 1199) in 2015 to 2017 to 33.0% (total n = 1868) in 2018 to 2021 (P < .001) and in all panel specialties. The number of female moderated panels also significantly increased after checklist implementation from 22% to 38% (P < .001). Correspondingly, the number of panels with no female representation decreased from 42% in 2015 to 2017 to 23% in 2018 to 2021 (P < .001). CONCLUSION: The addition of a checklist asking panel organizers to consider diversity in selecting panelists was associated with an increased proportion of female presenters at the AM. This simple strategy can be implemented by all medical conferences to help close the gender gap.


Assuntos
Lista de Checagem , Congressos como Assunto , Otolaringologia , Sociedades Médicas , Humanos , Feminino , Estudos Transversais , Masculino , Estados Unidos , Médicas/estatística & dados numéricos
3.
Nat Commun ; 15(1): 3839, 2024 May 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38714659

RESUMO

Pre-mRNA splicing, a key process in gene expression, can be therapeutically modulated using various drug modalities, including antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs). However, determining promising targets is hampered by the challenge of systematically mapping splicing-regulatory elements (SREs) in their native sequence context. Here, we use the catalytically inactive CRISPR-RfxCas13d RNA-targeting system (dCas13d/gRNA) as a programmable platform to bind SREs and modulate splicing by competing against endogenous splicing factors. SpliceRUSH, a high-throughput screening method, was developed to map SREs in any gene of interest using a lentivirus gRNA library that tiles the genetic region, including distal intronic sequences. When applied to SMN2, a therapeutic target for spinal muscular atrophy, SpliceRUSH robustly identifies not only known SREs but also a previously unknown distal intronic SRE, which can be targeted to alter exon 7 splicing using either dCas13d/gRNA or ASOs. This technology enables a deeper understanding of splicing regulation with applications for RNA-based drug discovery.


Assuntos
Sistemas CRISPR-Cas , Éxons , Íntrons , Splicing de RNA , RNA Guia de Sistemas CRISPR-Cas , Proteína 2 de Sobrevivência do Neurônio Motor , Humanos , Splicing de RNA/genética , Proteína 2 de Sobrevivência do Neurônio Motor/genética , RNA Guia de Sistemas CRISPR-Cas/genética , Íntrons/genética , Éxons/genética , Células HEK293 , Oligonucleotídeos Antissenso/genética , Atrofia Muscular Espinal/genética , Sequências Reguladoras de Ácido Nucleico/genética , Precursores de RNA/genética , Precursores de RNA/metabolismo
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA