Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
Clin Infect Dis ; 36(9): 1157-61, 2003 May 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12715311

RESUMO

Prosthetic joint infections (PJIs) occur in approximately 1.5%-2.5% of all primary hip or knee arthroplasties. The mortality rate attributed to PJIs may be as high as 2.5%. Substantial morbidity is associated with a loss of mobility, although this is temporary. The costs associated with a single episode of PJI are approximately $50,000 per episode, exclusive of lost wages. Risk factors that increase the occurrence of PJI include revision arthroplasty, time in the operating room, postoperative surgical site infection, and malignancy. Pain is the most consistent symptom. Staphylococcus species are the most common organisms isolated from PJI sites. Two-stage revision is superior to single-stage revision or to debridement with prosthesis retention. Long-term antibiotic suppression and/or arthrodesis are useful for patients too frail to undergo extensive surgery. Using an optimal approach, recurrent infection occurs in <10% of previously infected joints.


Assuntos
Artroplastia de Quadril/efeitos adversos , Artroplastia do Joelho/efeitos adversos , Artropatias/epidemiologia , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/epidemiologia , Doenças Transmissíveis , Humanos , Artropatias/etiologia , Artropatias/microbiologia , Artropatias/mortalidade , Dor/etiologia , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/etiologia , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/microbiologia , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/mortalidade , Fatores de Risco
2.
Int J Antimicrob Agents ; 19(1): 61-6, 2002 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11814769

RESUMO

This investigation assessed the impact of initial empirical antimicrobial therapy on the outcome of therapy for community acquired pneumonia (CAP) patients and on patients' length of stay (LOS) in the hospital. Hospital records for 165 patients with pneumonia admitted to the Edward Hines, Jr. VA Hospital between 1 October 1997, and 31 March 2000, were reviewed. Criteria for CAP were met for 92 of 165 patients. Comparisons were made between patients treated with azithromycin and with other parenteral antibiotics (the reference group). No statistical differences were observed between the treatment groups for the risk factors. The azithromycin group patients were slightly older with a mean age of 69 years versus 66 years (P=0.23). Patients treated with parenteral azithromycin had on average, a shorter length of hospitalization namely 4.6 days compared with 9.7 days for patients treated with the other antibiotics (log-rank test, P=0.0001). In order to make the two groups of patients more alike we considered patients' data set without intensive care unit (ICU) admissions. The conclusion was the same namely azithromycin monotherapy was associated with a decreased duration of hospital stay.


Assuntos
Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/tratamento farmacológico , Tempo de Internação , Pneumonia Bacteriana/tratamento farmacológico , Veteranos , Idoso , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Azitromicina/uso terapêutico , Estudos de Coortes , Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/microbiologia , Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/mortalidade , Haemophilus influenzae/isolamento & purificação , Humanos , Illinois , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Pneumonia Bacteriana/microbiologia , Pneumonia Bacteriana/mortalidade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Staphylococcus aureus/isolamento & purificação , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
Int J Clin Pharm ; 36(6): 1282-9, 2014 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25186790

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Standard of care therapy (SOCT) for the treatment of methicillin susceptible staphylococcal aureus (MSSA) infections requires multiple daily infusions. Despite questionable efficacy due to high protein binding, ceftriaxone (CTX) is frequently used for treatment of MSSA at Hines VA Hospital. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine clinical and microbiological outcomes in patients with MSSA bacteremia treated with CTX compared to SOCT. SETTING: This retrospective study was conducted at the Edward Hines, Jr. VA Hospital which is a comprehensive health care center serving the veteran population of the greater metropolitan Chicago and northwest Indiana regions and is institutionally affiliated with the Loyola University Medical Center. The Hines VA provides medical care to over 56,000 veterans and operates approximately 500 hospital beds, including acute care and nursing home beds. METHOD: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with MSSA bacteremia treated at Hines VA Hospital between January 2000 and September 2009. Patients who received either SOCT or CTX for >50% of the treatment course and for the appropriate duration were included. Patients who were on multiple antibiotics concurrently or who received <14 days of therapy were excluded. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The primary outcome of this study is to compare clinical outcomes of patients with MSSA bacteremia who were treated with CTX compared to those who received standard of care agents. RESULTS: Ninety-three patients with MSSA bacteremia were included in the analysis. Fifty-one were treated with SOCT and 42 with CTX. There were no differences in microbiological cure between SOCT (94.1%) and CTX (95.2%) (p = 0.812). Clinical cure was similar between groups (74.5% for SOCT, 83.3% for CTX) (p = 0.303). CTX was used more often to treat Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia associated with osteomyelitis whereas endocarditis and central line associated infections were treated more frequently with SOCT (p = 0.01). More patients treated with CTX were managed in the ambulatory setting (64 vs. 24%; p = <0.001). There was a trend toward a longer hospital stay with SOCT. CONCLUSION: Clinical outcomes for MSSA bacteremia did not differ significantly between patients treated with CTX and SOCT. Findings suggest that CTX may be an alternative for outpatient management of MSSA bacteremia.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Bacteriemia/tratamento farmacológico , Ceftriaxona/administração & dosagem , Meticilina/administração & dosagem , Infecções Estafilocócicas/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Bacteriemia/diagnóstico , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Infecções Estafilocócicas/diagnóstico , Resultado do Tratamento
4.
Curr Infect Dis Rep ; 6(5): 388-392, 2004 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15461890

RESUMO

Arthroplasty of the knee and hip is a common procedure. There is a risk of infection with primary arthroplasty, with an incidence of 1% to 2%. Significant cost and morbidity are associated with infection of the prosthetic joint. Most infections (60% to 70%) are caused by staphylococci, but approximately 10% are caused by streptococci and/or enterococci, whereas the remainder are caused by gram-negative enteric aerobes or anaerobic flora. Surgical revision is often required for cure because the biofilm that adheres to the infected prosthesis precludes antibiotic therapy from being effective. Biofilm formation occurs consistently as a consequence of host protein deposition on the prostheses, which serve as ligands for bacterial receptors. Once established, biofilm infections require removal of the prosthesis in order to effect a cure. Clinical and radiologic features are not specific for the diagnosis. Culture is specific but not sensitive enough to establish a pathogen in all cases. Surgical approaches are varied and range from debridement with retention of the prostheses to amputation of the limb. The most favored approach is the two-stage delayed reimplantation, in which patients receive specific antibiotic therapy for 6 weeks or more. Several additional antibiotics other than vancomycin are available for methicillin-resistant staphylococcal infection, but these are still unproven in the treatment of osteomyelitis or prosthetic joint infection.

5.
Curr Infect Dis Rep ; 3(3): 266-273, 2001 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11384557

RESUMO

We reviewed literature published from 1995 through 2000 on developments in ventilator-associated pneumonia. There is no gold standard with which to compare the accuracy of various invasive procedures performed for diagnosis. Moreover, leaders in the field are calling for an outcomes-based analysis to assess the utility of invasive procedures. Two things are clear: 1) adequate empiric therapy is beneficial, and 2) changes in therapy based on recovery of pathogens by invasive means do not affect outcome. Clinicians are urged to review local antimicrobial resistance patterns and to initiate empiric therapy on the basis of those data.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA