RESUMO
Accurate assessment of LDL-C levels is important, as they are often used for treatment recommendations. For many years, plasma LDL-C levels were calculated using the Friedewald equation, but there are limitations to this method compared with direct measurement via beta-quantification (BQ). Here, we assessed differences between the Friedewald, Martin-Hopkins, and NIH equation 2 methods of calculating LDL-C and the "gold standard" BQ method using pooled phase 3 data with alirocumab. All randomized patients were included irrespective of the treatment arm (n = 6,122). We compared pairs of LDL-C values (n = 17,077) determined by each equation and BQ. We found that BQ-derived LDL-C values ranged from 1 to 397 mg/dl (mean 90.68 mg/dl). There were strong correlations between Friedewald-calculated, Martin-Hopkins-calculated, and NIH equation 2-calculated LDL-C with BQ-determined LDL-C values (Pearson's correlation coefficient = 0.985, 0.981, and 0.985, respectively). Importantly, for BQ-derived LDL-C values ≥70 mg/dl, only 3.2%, 1.4%, and 1.8% of Friedewald-calculated, Martin-Hopkins-calculated, and NIH equation 2-calculated values were <70 mg/dl, respectively. When triglyceride (TG) levels were <150 mg/dl, differences between calculated and BQ-derived LDL-C values were minimal, regardless of the LDL-C level (<40, <55, or <70 mg/dl). However, when TG levels were >150 mg/dl, NIH equation 2 provided greater accuracy than Friedewald or Martin-Hopkins. When TGs were >250 mg/dl, inaccuracies were seen with all three methods, although NIH equation 2 remained the most accurate. In conclusion, LDL-C calculated by any of the three methods can guide treatment decisions for most patients, including those treated with proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors.
Assuntos
LDL-ColesterolRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Behçet disease (BD) is a chronic systemic inflammatory disorder of unknown aetiology. The aim of this study was to determine the orientation of T cell subpopulations in paediatric BD and more precisely to look for a regulatory T lymphocyte (Treg)/Th17 imbalance. METHODS: T cell subpopulations were analysed by flow cytometry in the peripheral blood of paediatric patients with acute BD (aBD; n = 24), remitting BD (rBD; n = 12) and in healthy controls (HCs; n = 24). Tregs (CD4+CD25hiCD127-/loFoxp3+), activated Tregs (GITR, LAP, CTLA-4 and HLA-DR expression), CD4+ and CD8+ T cells producing IFN-γ (Th1 and Tc1) or IL-17 (Th17 and Tc17) under polyclonal (OKT3/IL-2) or antigenic (Streptococcus sanguis KTH-1 peptides and heat shock protein 60) stimulation were enumerated. RESULTS: Th17 (1.9- and 5.1-fold) and Tc17 (4.0- and 2.0-fold) frequency under mitogenic stimulation was significantly increased in aBD and rBD patients as compared with HCs. Th17 frequency under antigenic stimulation was also higher in patients than in HCs. The percentage and number of Tregs and activated Tregs in patients and in HCs were similar. However, when Tregs were removed, antigen-driven differentiation into Th1 and Th17 was significantly boosted in BD but not in HC CD4+ T cells. CONCLUSION: There is a bias towards Th17 polarization in aBD and rBD in children. Although we did not observe an increase in the number of Tregs in these patients, their Tregs limit CD4+ T cell differentiation into Th1 and Th17 cells. Thus, in paediatric BD, Tregs seem to incompletely counterbalance a Th17 orientation of the Th cell response.
Assuntos
Síndrome de Behçet/imunologia , Linfócitos T Reguladores , Células Th17 , Adolescente , Contagem de Linfócito CD4 , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Humanos , MasculinoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Mixed dyslipidemia [elevated non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) and triglycerides (TGs), and decreased HDL-C] is common in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and is associated with increased cardiovascular risk. Non-HDL-C and apolipoprotein B (ApoB) are the preferred therapeutic targets for mixed dyslipidemia. Alirocumab is a monoclonal antibody to proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) that effectively reduces low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), non-HDL-C, ApoB, and lipoprotein(a) (Lp[a]), and is well-tolerated in individuals with T2DM. METHODS: The previously reported open-label ODYSSEY DM-DYSLIPIDEMIA trial data demonstrated the effects of alirocumab on individuals with non-HDL-C ≥ 100 mg/dL and TGs ≥ 150 and < 500 mg/dL receiving stable maximally tolerated statin (n = 413). This post hoc subgroup analysis of the primary trial investigated the effects of alirocumab [75 mg every 2 weeks (Q2W) with possible increase to 150 mg Q2W at Week 12] versus usual care [ezetimibe, fenofibrate, or no additional lipid-lowering therapy (LLT)] on non-HDL-C and other lipids in individuals with T2DM and baseline TGs ≥ 200 mg/dL and HDL-C < 40 mg/dL (men) or < 50 mg/dL (women). RESULTS: Alirocumab significantly reduced non-HDL-C [LS mean difference (standard error (SE)), - 35.0% (3.9)], ApoB [LS mean difference (SE), - 34.7% (3.6)], LDL-C [LS mean difference (SE), - 47.3% (5.2)], LDL particle number [LS mean difference (SE), - 40.8% (4.1)], and Lp(a) [LS mean difference (SE), - 29.9% (5.4)] versus usual care from baseline to Week 24 (all P < 0.0001). Results were similar for alirocumab versus usual care. TG reductions were similar between alirocumab and usual care (no significant difference), but greater with fenofibrate versus alirocumab (P = 0.3371). Overall, alirocumab significantly increased HDL-C versus usual care [LS mean difference (SE), 7.9% (3.6); P < 0.05], although differences with alirocumab versus ezetimibe or fenofibrate were non-significant. Most individuals receiving alirocumab achieved ApoB < 80 mg/dL (67.9%) and non-HDL-C < 100 mg/dL (60.9%). Adverse event frequency was similar between alirocumab (67.2%) and usual care (70.7%). Additionally, no clinically relevant effect of alirocumab on change in glycemic parameters or use of antihyperglycemic agents was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Alirocumab is an effective therapeutic option for individuals with T2DM, TGs ≥ 200 mg/dL, and HDL-C < 40 mg/dL (men) or < 50 mg/dL (women). Atherogenic lipid (ApoB and non-HDL) reductions were greater with alirocumab than ezetimibe, fenofibrate, or no LLT. Consistent with previous studies, alirocumab was generally well tolerated. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02642159. Registered December 24, 2015, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02642159.
Assuntos
Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/uso terapêutico , Anticolesterolemiantes/uso terapêutico , HDL-Colesterol/sangue , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamento farmacológico , Dislipidemias/tratamento farmacológico , Inibidores de PCSK9 , Inibidores de Proteases/uso terapêutico , Triglicerídeos/sangue , Idoso , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/efeitos adversos , Anticolesterolemiantes/efeitos adversos , Biomarcadores/sangue , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/sangue , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/diagnóstico , Dislipidemias/sangue , Dislipidemias/diagnóstico , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Inibidores de Proteases/efeitos adversos , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Allergic rhinitis is a prevalent disease, which can be classed as seasonal (SAR) or perennial. In addition to nasal symptoms, up to 75% of sufferers experience itching, redness, and tearing of the eyes. Intranasal corticosteroids are effective in controlling the allergic nasal symptoms, and increasing evidence suggests that they also can relieve some of the allergic ocular symptoms. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the magnitude of efficacy of triamcinolone acetonide (TAA) compared with placebo or fluticasone propionate (FP) on ocular symptom improvement in patients with SAR. METHODS: A meta-analysis of summary data from 8 randomized, double- or single-blind trials, assessing mean change in total or individual (tearing, redness, and itching) eye symptoms was conducted. Trials that administered a daily dose of 220 µg TAA vs placebo or 200 µg FP over at least 2 weeks' duration, in patients aged 12 years or older with SAR, were analyzed. RESULTS: Total eye symptom reduction after 2 weeks was greater with TAA than placebo, with a mean treatment difference of -0.32 (95% CI, -0.444 to -0.203). In addition, significant reductions in tearing, but not itching or redness, were observed after TAA treatment compared with placebo. No significant treatment difference was seen between TAA and FP in total ocular symptoms at any of the time points measured (weeks 1, 2, 3, and overall). All treatments exhibited similar safety profiles and were deemed well tolerated. CONCLUSION: The meta-analysis demonstrated the positive clinical improvements TAA has on total ocular allergy symptoms, especially tearing, in addition to its recognized nasal symptom efficacy in SAR.
Assuntos
Antialérgicos/administração & dosagem , Fluticasona/administração & dosagem , Imunossupressores/administração & dosagem , Rinite Alérgica Sazonal/diagnóstico , Rinite Alérgica Sazonal/tratamento farmacológico , Triancinolona Acetonida/administração & dosagem , Administração Intranasal , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Avaliação de Sintomas , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
PURPOSE: During the alirocumab open-label extension study ODYSSEY OLE (open-label extension; NCT01954394), physicians could adjust alirocumab dosing for enrolled patients, who were diagnosed with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH) and who had completed previous phase III clinical trials with alirocumab. This post hoc analysis evaluated the differences in physician-patient dosing decisions between the regions of Western Europe, Eastern Europe, North America, and the rest of the world (ROW). METHODS: Patients (n = 909) who received starting dose alirocumab 75 mg every 2 weeks (Q2W) during ODYSSEY OLE (patients from FH I, FH II, and LONG TERM parent studies) were included. Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels were blinded until week 8; subsequently, LDL-C values were communicated to physicians. From week 12, dose adjustment from 75 to 150 mg Q2W, or vice versa, was possible. RESULTS: Mean LDL-C values used for the decision to increase dose from 75 to 150 mg Q2W were higher in Eastern Europe (3.7 mmol/L; 144.0 mg/dL) and ROW (3.8 mmol/L; 145.2 mg/dL) compared with Western Europe (3.1 mmol/L; 118.6 mg/dL) and North America (3.3 mmol/L; 126.6 mg/dL). Irrespective of region, the mean LDL-C at the time of decision to maintain at 75 mg Q2W was approximately 1.8 mmol/L (70 mg/dL). During ODYSSEY OLE (median treatment duration of 131.7 weeks), alirocumab was shown to have no unexpected long-term safety concerns. CONCLUSIONS: In this OLE study, the observed variations in clinical treatment decisions suggest that physicians may perceive the severity of HeFH and/or the treatment of HeFH differently depending on their region.
Assuntos
Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/administração & dosagem , Anticolesterolemiantes/administração & dosagem , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/tendências , Hiperlipoproteinemia Tipo II/tratamento farmacológico , Padrões de Prática Médica/tendências , Inibidores de Serina Proteinase/administração & dosagem , Adulto , Idoso , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/efeitos adversos , Anticolesterolemiantes/efeitos adversos , Biomarcadores/sangue , LDL-Colesterol/sangue , Cálculos da Dosagem de Medicamento , Uso de Medicamentos/tendências , Feminino , Predisposição Genética para Doença , Heterozigoto , Humanos , Hiperlipoproteinemia Tipo II/sangue , Hiperlipoproteinemia Tipo II/diagnóstico , Hiperlipoproteinemia Tipo II/genética , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Inibidores de PCSK9 , Fenótipo , Inibidores de Serina Proteinase/efeitos adversosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Individuals with diabetes often have high levels of atherogenic lipoproteins and cholesterol reflected by elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C), apolipoprotein B (ApoB), and LDL particle number (LDL-PN). The presence of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) increases the risk of future cardiovascular events. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of the proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitor, alirocumab, among individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2DM), high LDL-C or non-HDL-C, and established ASCVD receiving maximally tolerated statin in ODYSSEY DM-DYSLIPIDEMIA (NCT02642159) and DM-INSULIN (NCT02585778). METHODS: In DM-DYSLIPIDEMIA, individuals with T2DM and mixed dyslipidemia (non-HDL-C ≥ 100 mg/dL; n = 413) were randomized to open-label alirocumab 75 mg every 2 weeks (Q2W) or usual care (UC) for 24 weeks, with UC options selected before stratified randomization. In DM-INSULIN, insulin-treated individuals with T2DM (LDL-C ≥ 70 mg/dL; n = 441) were randomized in a double-blind fashion to alirocumab 75 mg Q2W or placebo for 24 weeks. Study participants also had a glycated hemoglobin < 9% (DM-DYSLIPIDEMIA) or < 10% (DM-INSULIN). Alirocumab dose was increased to 150 mg Q2W at week 12 if week 8 LDL-C was ≥ 70 mg/dL (DM-INSULIN) or non-HDL-C was ≥ 100 mg/dL (DM-DYSLIPIDEMIA). Lipid reductions and safety were assessed in patients with ASCVD from these studies. RESULTS: This analysis included 142 DM-DYSLIPIDEMIA and 177 DM-INSULIN participants with ASCVD, including 95.1% and 86.4% with coronary heart disease, and 32.4% and 49.7% with microvascular diabetes complications, respectively. At week 24, alirocumab significantly reduced LDL-C, non-HDL-C, ApoB, and LDL-PN from baseline versus control. This translated into a greater proportion of individuals achieving non-HDL-C < 100 mg/dL (64.6% alirocumab/23.8% UC [DM-DYSLIPIDEMIA]; 65.4% alirocumab/14.9% placebo [DM-INSULIN]) and ApoB < 80 mg/dL (75.1% alirocumab/35.4% UC and 76.8% alirocumab/24.8% placebo, respectively) versus control at week 24 (all P < 0.0001). In pooling these studies, 66.4% (alirocumab) and 67.0% (control) of individuals reported treatment-emergent adverse events. The adverse event pattern was similar with alirocumab versus controls. CONCLUSIONS: Among individuals with T2DM and ASCVD who had high non-HDL-C/LDL-C levels despite maximally tolerated statin, alirocumab significantly reduced atherogenic cholesterol and LDL-PN versus control. Alirocumab was generally well tolerated. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov. NCT02642159. Registered 30 December 2015 and Clinicaltrials.gov. NCT02585778. Registered 23 October 2015.
Assuntos
Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/uso terapêutico , Anticolesterolemiantes/uso terapêutico , Aterosclerose/tratamento farmacológico , HDL-Colesterol/sangue , LDL-Colesterol/sangue , Doença das Coronárias/tratamento farmacológico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamento farmacológico , Dislipidemias/tratamento farmacológico , Inibidores de Serina Proteinase/uso terapêutico , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/efeitos adversos , Anticolesterolemiantes/efeitos adversos , Aterosclerose/sangue , Aterosclerose/diagnóstico , Aterosclerose/epidemiologia , Biomarcadores/sangue , Ensaios Clínicos Fase III como Assunto , Ensaios Clínicos Fase IV como Assunto , Doença das Coronárias/sangue , Doença das Coronárias/diagnóstico , Doença das Coronárias/epidemiologia , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/sangue , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/diagnóstico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiologia , Quimioterapia Combinada , Dislipidemias/sangue , Dislipidemias/diagnóstico , Dislipidemias/epidemiologia , Humanos , Inibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Redutases/uso terapêutico , Estudos Multicêntricos como Assunto , Inibidores de PCSK9 , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Fatores de Risco , Inibidores de Serina Proteinase/efeitos adversos , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Individuals with chronic kidney disease are at increased risk of premature cardiovascular disease. Among them, many with elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) are unable to achieve optimal LDL-C on statins and require additional lipid-lowering therapy. To study this, we compared the LDL-C-lowering efficacy and safety of alirocumab in individuals with hypercholesterolemia with impaired renal function, defined as eGFR 30-59 ml/min/1.73 m2, to those without impaired renal function eGFR ≥60 ml/min/1.73 m2. A total of 4629 hypercholesterolemic individuals without or with impaired renal function, pooled from eight phase 3 ODYSSEY trials (double-blind treatments of 24-104 weeks), were on alirocumab 150 mg or 75/150 mg every two weeks vs. placebo or ezetimibe. Overall, 10.1% had impaired renal function and over 99% were receiving statin treatment. Baseline LDL-C in alirocumab and control groups was comparable in subgroups analyzed. LDL-C reductions at week 24 ranged from 46.1 to 62.2% or 48.3 to 60.1% with alirocumab among individuals with or without impaired renal function, respectively. Similar reductions were observed for lipoprotein (a), non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, apolipoprotein B, and triglycerides. Safety data were similar in both treatment subgroups, regardless of the degree of CKD. Renal function did not change over time in response to alirocumab. This post hoc efficacy analysis is limited by evaluation of alirocumab treatment effects on renal and lipid parameters by serum biochemistry. Thus, alirocumab consistently lowered LDL-C regardless of impaired renal function, with safety comparable to control, among individuals with hypercholesterolemia who nearly all were on statin treatment.
Assuntos
Anticorpos Monoclonais/uso terapêutico , Anticolesterolemiantes/uso terapêutico , LDL-Colesterol/sangue , Hipercolesterolemia/tratamento farmacológico , Insuficiência Renal Crônica/complicações , Idoso , Anticorpos Monoclonais/efeitos adversos , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados , Anticolesterolemiantes/efeitos adversos , Biomarcadores/sangue , Ensaios Clínicos Fase III como Assunto , Regulação para Baixo , Quimioterapia Combinada , Feminino , Taxa de Filtração Glomerular , Humanos , Inibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Redutases/uso terapêutico , Hipercolesterolemia/sangue , Hipercolesterolemia/complicações , Hipercolesterolemia/diagnóstico , Rim/fisiopatologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Inibidores de PCSK9 , Pró-Proteína Convertase 9/metabolismo , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Insuficiência Renal Crônica/diagnóstico , Insuficiência Renal Crônica/fisiopatologia , Fatores de Risco , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
AIMS: Individuals with both diabetes mellitus (DM) and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) are at very high risk of cardiovascular events. This post-hoc analysis evaluated efficacy and safety of the PCSK9 inhibitor alirocumab among 984 individuals with DM and ASCVD pooled from 9 ODYSSEY Phase 3 trials. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Changes in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and other lipids from baseline to Week 24 were analysed (intention-to-treat) in four pools by alirocumab dosage (150 mg every 2 weeks [150] or 75 mg with possible increase to 150 mg every 2 weeks [75/150]), control (placebo/ezetimibe) and background statin usage (yes/no). RESULTS: At Week 24, LDL-C changes from baseline in pools with background statins were -61.5% with alirocumab 150 (vs -1.0% with placebo), -46.4% with alirocumab 75/150 (vs +6.3% with placebo) and -48.7% with alirocumab 75/150 (vs -20.6% with ezetimibe), and -54.9% with alirocumab 75/150 (vs +4.0% with ezetimibe) without background statins. A greater proportion of alirocumab recipients achieved LDL-C < 70 and < 55 mg/dL at Week 24 vs controls. Alirocumab also resulted in significant reductions in non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, apolipoprotein B and lipoprotein(a) vs controls. Alirocumab did not appear to affect glycaemia over 78-104 weeks. Overall safety was similar between treatment groups, with a higher injection-site reaction frequency (mostly mild) with alirocumab. CONCLUSION: Alirocumab significantly reduced LDL-C and other atherogenic lipid parameters, and was generally well tolerated in individuals with DM and ASCVD.
Assuntos
Anticorpos Monoclonais/uso terapêutico , Aterosclerose/tratamento farmacológico , Doenças Cardiovasculares/tratamento farmacológico , Ensaios Clínicos Fase III como Assunto/estatística & dados numéricos , Diabetes Mellitus/tratamento farmacológico , Angiopatias Diabéticas/tratamento farmacológico , Ezetimiba/uso terapêutico , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados , Aterosclerose/complicações , Aterosclerose/epidemiologia , Doenças Cardiovasculares/complicações , Doenças Cardiovasculares/epidemiologia , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
AIMS: This analysis assessed the efficacy and safety of alirocumab, a proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitor, in patients with or without metabolic syndrome (MetS) using pooled data from 10 phase 3 ODYSSEY trials. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from 4983 randomized patients (1940 with MetS; 1642 with diabetes excluded) were assessed in subgroups by MetS status. Efficacy data were analysed in 4 pools per study design: 2 placebo-controlled pools (1 using alirocumab 150 mg every 2 weeks [Q2W], 1 using 75/150 mg Q2W) with background statin, and 2 ezetimibe-controlled pools (both alirocumab 75/150 mg Q2W), 1 with and 1 without background statin. Alirocumab 75/150 mg indicates possible dose increase from 75 to 150 mg at Week 12 based on Week 8 LDL-C. RESULTS: LDL-C percentage reduction from baseline at Week 24 with alirocumab was 63.9% (MetS) and 56.8% (non-MetS) in the pool of alirocumab 150 mg Q2W, and 42.2% to 52.2% (MetS) and 45.0% to 52.6% (non-MetS) in 3 pools using 75/150 mg Q2W. Levels of other lipid and lipoprotein parameters were also improved with alirocumab treatment, including apolipoprotein B, non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C), lipoprotein(a) and HDL-C. Overall, the percentage change at Week 24 in LDL-C and other lipids and lipoproteins did not vary by MetS status. Adverse event rates were generally similar between treatment groups, regardless of MetS status; injection-site reactions occurred more frequently in alirocumab vs control groups. CONCLUSIONS: Across study pools, alirocumab-associated reductions in LDL-C, apolipoprotein B, and non-HDL-C were significant vs control, and did not vary by MetS status.
Assuntos
Anticorpos Monoclonais/uso terapêutico , Anticolesterolemiantes/uso terapêutico , Apolipoproteínas B/metabolismo , HDL-Colesterol/metabolismo , LDL-Colesterol/metabolismo , Dislipidemias/tratamento farmacológico , Lipoproteína(a)/metabolismo , Síndrome Metabólica/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Idoso , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados , Ensaios Clínicos Fase III como Assunto , Método Duplo-Cego , Quimioterapia Combinada , Dislipidemias/metabolismo , Ezetimiba/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Humanos , Inibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Redutases/uso terapêutico , Masculino , Síndrome Metabólica/metabolismo , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Inibidores de PCSK9 , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como AssuntoRESUMO
AIM: To compare alirocumab, a proprotein convertase subtilisin-kexin type 9 inhibitor, with usual care (UC) in individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) and mixed dyslipidaemia not optimally managed by maximally tolerated statins in the ODYSSEY DM-DYSLIPIDEMIA trial (NCT02642159). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The UC options (no additional lipid-lowering therapy; fenofibrate; ezetimibe; omega-3 fatty acid; nicotinic acid) were selected prior to stratified randomization to open-label alirocumab 75 mg every 2 weeks (with increase to 150 mg every 2 weeks at week 12 if week 8 non-HDL cholesterol concentration was ≥2.59 mmol/L [100 mg/dL]) or UC for 24 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was percentage change in non-HDL cholesterol from baseline to week 24. RESULTS: The randomized population comprised 413 individuals (intention-to-treat population, n = 409; safety population, n = 412). At week 24, the mean non-HDL cholesterol reductions were superior with alirocumab (-32.5% difference vs UC, 97.5% confidence interval -38.1 to -27.0; P < .0001). Overall, 63.6% of alirocumab-treated individuals were maintained on 75 mg every 2 weeks. Alirocumab also reduced LDL cholesterol (-43.0%), apolipoprotein B (-32.3%), total cholesterol (-24.6%) and LDL particle number (-37.8%) at week 24 vs UC (all P < .0001). Consistent with the overall trial comparison, alirocumab reduced non-HDL cholesterol to a greater degree within each UC stratum at week 24. The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events was 68.4% (alirocumab) and 66.4% (UC). No clinically meaningful effect on glycated haemoglobin, or change in number of glucose-lowering agents, was seen. CONCLUSIONS: In individuals with T2DM and mixed dyslipidaemia on maximally tolerated statin, alirocumab showed superiority to UC in non-HDL cholesterol reduction and was generally well tolerated.
Assuntos
Anticorpos Monoclonais/administração & dosagem , Anticolesterolemiantes/administração & dosagem , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamento farmacológico , Dislipidemias/tratamento farmacológico , Inibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Redutases/administração & dosagem , Hipoglicemiantes/administração & dosagem , Anticorpos Monoclonais/efeitos adversos , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados , Anticolesterolemiantes/efeitos adversos , Glicemia/metabolismo , HDL-Colesterol/metabolismo , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/sangue , Método Duplo-Cego , Esquema de Medicação , Quimioterapia Combinada , Feminino , Hemoglobinas Glicadas/metabolismo , Humanos , Inibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Redutases/efeitos adversos , Hipoglicemiantes/efeitos adversos , Metabolismo dos Lipídeos/efeitos dos fármacos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pró-Proteína Convertase 9/metabolismo , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is often associated with mixed dyslipidaemia, where non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) levels may more closely align with cardiovascular risk than low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). We describe the design and rationale of the ODYSSEY DM-DYSLIPIDEMIA study that assesses the efficacy and safety of alirocumab, a proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitor, versus lipid-lowering usual care in individuals with T2DM and mixed dyslipidaemia at high cardiovascular risk with non-HDL-C inadequately controlled despite maximally tolerated statin therapy. For the first time, atherogenic cholesterol-lowering with a PCSK9 inhibitor will be assessed with non-HDL-C as the primary endpoint with usual care as the comparator. METHODS: DM-DYSLIPIDEMIA is a Phase 3b/4, randomised, open-label, parallel group, multinational study that planned to enrol 420 individuals. Main inclusion criteria were T2DM and mixed dyslipidaemia (non-HDL-C ≥100 mg/dl [≥2.59 mmol/l], and triglycerides ≥150 and <500 mg/dl [≥1.70 and <5.65 mmol/l]) with documented atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease or ≥1 additional cardiovascular risk factor. Participants were randomised (2:1) to alirocumab 75 mg every 2 weeks (Q2W) or lipid-lowering usual care on top of maximally tolerated statin (or no statin if intolerant). If randomised to usual care, investigators were able to add their pre-specified choice of one of the following to the patient's current statin regimen: ezetimibe, fenofibrate, omega-3 fatty acids or nicotinic acid, in accordance with local standard-of-care. Alirocumab-treated individuals with non-HDL-C ≥100 mg/dl at week 8 will undergo a blinded dose increase to 150 mg Q2W at week 12. The primary efficacy endpoint is non-HDL-C change from baseline to week 24 with alirocumab versus usual care; other lipid levels (including LDL-C), glycaemia-related measures, safety and tolerability will also be assessed. Alirocumab will be compared to fenofibrate in a secondary analysis. RESULTS: Recruitment completed with 413 individuals randomised in 14 countries worldwide. Results of this trial are expected in the second quarter of 2017. CONCLUSIONS: ODYSSEY DM-DYSLIPIDEMIA will provide information on the efficacy and safety of alirocumab versus lipid-lowering usual care in individuals with T2DM and mixed dyslipidaemia at high cardiovascular risk using non-HDL-C as the primary efficacy endpoint. Trial registration NCT02642159 (registered December 24, 2015).
Assuntos
Anticorpos Monoclonais/uso terapêutico , Anticolesterolemiantes/uso terapêutico , Colesterol/sangue , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicações , Hiperlipoproteinemia Tipo V/tratamento farmacológico , Anticorpos Monoclonais/efeitos adversos , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados , Anticolesterolemiantes/efeitos adversos , Biomarcadores/sangue , Protocolos Clínicos , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/sangue , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/diagnóstico , Humanos , Hiperlipoproteinemia Tipo V/sangue , Hiperlipoproteinemia Tipo V/complicações , Hiperlipoproteinemia Tipo V/diagnóstico , Inibidores de PCSK9 , Pró-Proteína Convertase 9/imunologia , Projetos de Pesquisa , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Albumin dialysis with the Molecular Adsorbent Recirculating System (MARS) (Gambro, Lund, Sweden), a noncell artificial liver support device, may be beneficial in acute liver failure (ALF). OBJECTIVE: To determine whether MARS improves survival in ALF. DESIGN: Randomized, controlled trial. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00224705). SETTING: 16 French liver transplantation centers. PATIENTS: 102 patients with ALF. INTERVENTION: Conventional treatment (n = 49) or MARS with conventional treatment (n = 53), stratified according to whether paracetamol caused ALF. MEASUREMENTS: 6-month survival and secondary end points, including adverse events. RESULTS: 102 patients (mean age, 40.4 years [SD, 13]) were in the modified intention-to-treat (mITT) population. The per-protocol analysis (49 conventional, 39 MARS) included patients with at least 1 session of MARS of 5 hours or more. Six-month survival was 75.5% (95% CI, 60.8% to 86.2%) with conventional treatment and 84.9% (CI, 71.9% to 92.8%) with MARS (P = 0.28) in the mITT population and 75.5% (CI, 60.8% to 86.2%) with conventional treatment and 82.9% (CI, 65.9% to 91.9%) with MARS (P = 0.50) in the per-protocol population. In patients with paracetamol-related ALF, the 6-month survival rate was 68.4% (CI, 43.5% to 86.4%) with conventional treatment and 85.0% (CI, 61.1% to 96.0%) with MARS (P = 0.46) in the mITT population. Sixty-six of 102 patients had transplantation (41.0% among paracetamol-induced ALF; 79.4% among non-paracetamol-induced ALF) (P < 0.001). Adverse events did not significantly differ between groups. LIMITATION: The short delay from randomization to liver transplantation (median, 16.2 hours) precludes definitive efficacy or safety evaluations. CONCLUSION: This randomized trial of MARS in patients with ALF was unable to provide definitive efficacy or safety conclusions because many patients had transplantation before administration of the intervention. Acute liver failure not caused by paracetamol was associated with greater 6-month patient survival. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris.
Assuntos
Falência Hepática Aguda/terapia , Fígado Artificial , Diálise Renal/instrumentação , Diálise Renal/métodos , Adulto , Albuminas , Feminino , Encefalopatia Hepática/terapia , Humanos , Análise de Intenção de Tratamento , Testes de Função Renal , Falência Hepática Aguda/fisiopatologia , Falência Hepática Aguda/cirurgia , Testes de Função Hepática , Transplante de Fígado , Fígado Artificial/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Diálise Renal/efeitos adversos , Análise de Sobrevida , Taxa de Sobrevida , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The KBP studies are real-life nationwide, prospective, multicenter cohort studies of patients diagnosed with primary lung cancer that have been conducted in French non-academic public hospitals each decade since 2000. METHODS: Patients were analyzed in three prospective cohorts using the same methodology. In this study, we describe and compare the characteristics and outcomes of patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC), with a focus on treatments in the 2020 cohort. FINDINGS: 8999 patients with lung cancer were included in the 2020 cohort, of whom 1137 had SCLC. From 2000 to 2010 and 2020, the proportion of patients with SCLC decreased from 16.4 % to 13.5 % and 12.6 % respectively. Between 2000 and 2020, the proportion of women increased from 15.5 % to 35.7 %. 15.4 % of patients with SCLC had limited-stage (LS) disease and 84.6 % of patients had extensive-stage (ES) disease. The 1-year overall survival (OS) rate for all patients with SCLC increased from 34.4 % in 2000 to 38.4 % in 2020. For ES-SCLC, multivariate analysis weighted with "entropy balancing" by including age, sex, performance status, number of metastatic sites, and brain metastases indicated an improvement in median OS from 8.1 months in patients receiving chemotherapy only to 11.1 months in patients receiving chemotherapy plus immunotherapy (HR 0.62, p < 0.001). INTERPRETATION: The proportion with SCLC has decreased over time, but the proportion of women has increased. The 1-year OS rates have improved over 20 years. The KBP-2020 cohort suggests a benefit of immunotherapy on OS in patients with ES-SCLC in the real-life setting.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The ETAPES program is a national telemedicine experiment conducted in France between 2018 and 2023 to investigate whether home non-invasive ventilation (NIV) telemonitoring improves healthcare pathways in patients with chronic respiratory failure (CRF) and impacts healthcare organization. The program provides a combination of therapeutic education and NIV telemonitoring with data processed by an algorithm generating alerts. The TELVENT study objective was to analyze the evolution of ventilation quality in patients included in the ETAPES program. METHODS: Multicentric cohort study on patients undergoing long-term NIV included in the ETAPES program between September 2018 and December 2020 and who did not refuse the use of their data for this research. Data were obtained from homecare provider databases. The primary endpoint was to attain successful NIV treatment, which was determined by a combination of daily NIV usage for > 4 h per day, low leaks, and a low apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) identified by the NIV device. Respiratory disability was assessed using the DIRECT questionnaire. RESULTS: 329 patients were included in the study of which 145 had COPD and 83 had started NIV and ETAPES within one-month delay. Approximately 25% of patients did not achieve the criteria for successful NIV at ETAPES entry. The proportion of patients with successful NIV treatment increased to 86.8% at six months (p = 0.003, Cochran-Armitage trend test) regardless of NIV history and continued to increase at 12 months in newly equipped NIV patients (93.8%, at month 12, p = 0.0026 for trend test). Over time, a significant increase in NIV use and compliance was observed, while AHI significantly decreased in the overall population. No significant decrease was observed for non-intentional leaks. Approximately 4.9 alerts were generated per patient per 6 months. Their number and type (low NIV use, high AHI or leaks) differed among patients based on their NIV history. Respiratory disability score decreased over time compared with baseline. CONCLUSION: The TELVENT study highlights the importance of remote NIV monitoring to rapidly identify patients with unsuccessful ventilation. The combination of remote monitoring and therapeutic education may improve the quality of home NIV, especially in the first months of treatment.
Assuntos
Acidose Respiratória , Ventilação não Invasiva , Insuficiência Respiratória , Humanos , Ventilação não Invasiva/efeitos adversos , Estudos de Coortes , Insuficiência Respiratória/terapia , Insuficiência Respiratória/etiologia , Pulmão , Acidose Respiratória/etiologiaRESUMO
AIMS: To obtain safety and efficacy data of alirocumab, a proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitor, in a real-life setting in high cardiovascular (CV) risk patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia (HeFH) or very-high low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels despite maximally tolerated dose of statin ± other lipid-lowering therapies (MTD ± LLTs). ODYSSEY APPRISE was a prospective, single-arm, Phase 3b open-label (≥12 weeks to ≤ 30 months) European/Canadian study with alirocumab. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients received alirocumab 75 or 150 mg every 2 weeks, with dose adjustment based on physician's judgment. In total, 994 patients were enrolled and treated. The mean [standard deviation (SD)] duration of alirocumab exposure was 72.4 (42.5) weeks. Patients with HeFH were younger [mean (SD) age of 53.8 (11.6) vs. 61.6 (10.1) years], more likely to be female (41.7% vs. 29.1%) and had higher baseline LDL-C compared with non-familial hypercholesterolaemia (non-FH) patients [mean (SD) of 5.1 (1.7) vs. 4.1 (1.1) mmol/L]. The overall incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) was 71.6%; common TEAEs included nasopharyngitis (7.8%), myalgia (7.1%), and headache (6.2%). At Week 12, mean (SD) LDL-C was reduced by 54.8 (20.1)% from baseline [2.6 (1.2) mmol/L], maintained for the trial duration. LDL-C was reduced below 1.8 mmol/L and/or by ≥50% reduction from baseline in 69.1% of patients overall, and for 64.7 and 77.4% of the HeFH and non-FH subgroups, respectively. CONCLUSION: In a real-life setting in patients with hypercholesterolaemia and high CV risk, alirocumab was generally well tolerated and resulted in clinically significant LDL-C reductions.
Assuntos
Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados , Adulto , Idoso , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/efeitos adversos , Canadá/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Background: Long-term changes in lung cancer (LC) patients are difficult to evaluate. We report results from the French KBP-2020 real-life cohort. Methods: KBP-2020 was a prospective cohort that included all patients diagnosed with LC in 2020, in nonacademic public hospital in France. Patient and tumour characteristics were described and compared with similarly designed cohorts in 2000 and 2010. Findings: In 2020, 82 centers included 8,999 patients diagnosed with LC. The proportion of women increased: 34·6% (3114/8999) compared to, 24·3% (1711/7051) and 16·0% (904/5667) in 2010 and 2000 (p<0·0001). The proportion of non-smokers was higher in 2020 (12·6%, 1129/8983) than in previous cohorts (10·9% (762/7008) in 2010; 7·2% (402/5586) in 2000, p<0·0001). In 2020, at diagnosis, 57·6% (4405/7648) of patients had a metastatic/disseminated stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (58·3% (3522/6046) in 2010; 42·6% (1879/4411) in 2000, p<0·0001). Compared with 2000 and 2010 data, early survival improved slightly. In 2020, 3-month mortality of NSCLC varied from 3·0% [2·2 - 3·8] for localized to 9·6% [8·1 - 11·0] for locally advanced to 29·2% [27·8 - 30·6] for metastatic and was 24·8% [22·3 - 27·3] for SCLC. Interpretation: To our knowledge KBP cohorts have been the largest, prospective, real-world cohort studies involving LC patients conducted in worldwide. The trend found in our study shows an increase in LC in women and still a large proportion of patients diagnosed at metastatic or disseminated stage. Funding: The study was promoted by the French College of General Hospital Pulmonologists with financial support of industrials laboratories.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate to which extent the systemic arterial pulse pressure could be used as a surrogate of cardiac output for assessing the effects of a fluid challenge and of norepinephrine. DESIGN: Observational study. SETTING: Medical intensive care unit. PATIENTS: Patients with an acute circulatory failure who received a fluid challenge (228 patients, group 1) or in whom norepinephrine was introduced or increased (145 patients, group 2). INTERVENTIONS: We measured the systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial pressure, pulse pressure, and the transpulmonary thermodilution cardiac output before and after the therapeutic interventions. MAIN RESULTS: In group 1, the fluid challenge significantly increased cardiac output by 24% ± 25%. It significantly increased cardiac output by ≥15% (+35% ± 27%) in 142 patients ("responders"). The fluid-induced changes in cardiac output were correlated with the changes in pulse pressure (r = .56, p < .0001), systolic arterial pressure (r = .55, p < .0001), diastolic arterial pressure (r = .37, p < .0001), and mean arterial pressure (r = .52, p < .0001). At multivariate analysis, changes in pulse pressure were significantly related to changes in stroke volume (multiple r = .52) and to age (r = .12). A fluid-induced increase in pulse pressure of ≥17% allowed detecting a fluid-induced increase in cardiac output of ≥15% with a sensitivity of 65[56-72]% and a specificity of 85[76-92]%. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curves for the fluid-induced changes in mean arterial pressure and in diastolic arterial pressure was significantly lower than for pulse pressure. In group 2, the introduction/increase of norepinephrine significantly increased cardiac output by 14% ± 18%. The changes in cardiac output induced by the introduction/increase in the dose of norepinephrine were correlated with the changes in pulse pressure and systolic arterial pressure (r = .21 and .29, respectively, p = .001) but to a significantly lesser extent than in group 1. CONCLUSIONS: Pulse pressure and systolic arterial pressure could be used for detecting the fluid-induced changes in cardiac output, in spite of a significant proportion of false-negative cases. By contrast, the changes in pulse pressure and systolic arterial pressure were unable to detect the changes in cardiac output induced by norepinephrine.
Assuntos
Pressão Sanguínea/fisiologia , Débito Cardíaco/fisiologia , Norepinefrina/uso terapêutico , Choque/fisiopatologia , Choque/terapia , Vasoconstritores/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Idoso , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Choque/diagnósticoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To set-up an international cohort of patients suspected with Behçet's disease (BD). The cohort is aimed at defining an algorithm for definition of the disease in children. METHODS: International experts have defined the inclusion criteria as follows: recurrent oral aphthosis (ROA) plus one of following-genital ulceration, erythema nodosum, folliculitis, pustulous/acneiform lesions, positive pathergy test, uveitis, venous/arterial thrombosis and family history of BD. Onset of disease is <16 years, disease duration is ≤3 years, future follow-up duration is ≥4 years and informed consent is obtained. The expert committee has classified the included patients into: definite paediatric BD (PED-BD), probable PED-BD and no PED-BD. Statistical analysis is performed to compare the three groups of patients. Centres document their patients into a single database. RESULTS: At January 2010, 110 patients (56 males/54 females) have been included. Mean age at first symptom: 8.1 years (median 8.2 years). At inclusion, 38% had only one symptom associated with ROA, 31% had two and 31% had three or more symptoms. A total of 106 first evaluations have been done. Seventeen patients underwent the first-year evaluation, and 36 had no new symptoms, 12 had one and 9 had two. Experts have examined 48 files and classified 30 as definite and 18 as probable. Twenty-six patients classified as definite fulfilled the International Study Group criteria. Seventeen patients classified as probable did not meet the international criteria. CONCLUSION: The expert committee has classified the majority of patients in the BD group although they presented with few symptoms independently of BD classification criteria.
Assuntos
Síndrome de Behçet/fisiopatologia , Doenças Musculoesqueléticas/fisiopatologia , Sistema de Registros , Adolescente , Idade de Início , Algoritmos , Síndrome de Behçet/genética , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Estudos de Coortes , Bases de Dados Factuais , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Progressão da Doença , Feminino , Seguimentos , Predisposição Genética para Doença , Humanos , Cooperação Internacional , Masculino , Doenças Musculoesqueléticas/genética , Linhagem , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Fatores Sexuais , Estatística como Assunto , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a rare indication for liver transplantation (LT). Data on the long-term outcomes of living-related LT for AIH are limited and inconsistent. The present study aimed to assess the long-term outcomes of deceased donor LT (DDLT) and living donor LT (LDLT) for AIH. METHODS: All patients who received transplants for AIH-related cirrhosis from 2001 to 2018 were included in this study. RESULTS: Seventy-four patients (31 male, 43 female) received LT. The average follow-up was 7.9 ± 6.9 years (medianâ¯=â¯7.2 years), average age was 34.3 ± 13.8 years, and average Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score was 23.6 ± 8.5. Thirty-six (49.3%) patients received a graft from a living donor, and 83% of patients were maintained on steroids. The 1-, 3-, 5-, and 10-year survival rates of patients were 91%, 89%, 87%, and 82% and of grafts were 89%, 88%, 86%, and 76%, respectively. In univariate analysis, MELD score (odds ratio [OR], 1.08; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-1.17; Pâ¯=â¯.028), donor age (OR per 5 years, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.07-2.02; Pâ¯=â¯.021), donor type (OR LDLT vs DDLT, 0.19; 95% CI, 0.04-0.67; Pâ¯=â¯.017), and renal function (OR glomerular filtration rate <60 vs ≥60 mL/min/m2, 7.41; 95% CI, 1.88-31.25; Pâ¯=â¯.004) were significant predictors of graft survival; however, none of the factors remained significant in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: We have shown the highest reported long-term survival rates in LT for AIH, including a large number of patients who underwent LDLT. Standardized management and immunosuppressive therapy, including the maintenance of a low-dose steroid protocol, may have contributed to this outcome.
Assuntos
Doença Hepática Terminal , Hepatite Autoimune , Transplante de Fígado , Adulto , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Hepatite Autoimune/cirurgia , Humanos , Doadores Vivos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto JovemRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to validate the new paediatric criteria for diagnosis of FMF in a mixed population of 100 French patients. METHODS: The study group included 100 FMF children from the French reference centre for auto-inflammatory disorders. A control group of 40 patients with unexplained recurrent fever was reviewed in parallel. Both groups of patients were assessed for both the Tel Hashomer and the new paediatric criteria published by Yalcinkaya et al. RESULTS: Comparison of Tel Hashomer vs Yalcinkaya's criteria in both groups gave a sensitivity of 99 vs 100%, a specificity of 45 vs 50%, a positive predictive value (PPV) of 81.8 vs 83.3% and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 94.7 vs 100%. However, when we used at least three Yalcinkaya's criteria we obtained a sensitivity of 77% and a specificity of 95% with a PPV of 97.3% and an NPV of 62.3%. The number of mutations in the MEFV gene did not modify results for both sets of criteria. CONCLUSION: The new paediatric Turkish criteria did not make a better contribution to FMF diagnosis than the Tel Hashomer criteria in our mixed population of French children while using an appropriate control group. However, if needed, they can be applied using at least three criteria, which slightly decreases their sensitivity but markedly increases their specificity.