RESUMO
Type I interferon pathway is a crucial component of innate immune signaling upon pathogen infection or endogenous instability. An imbalance of type I interferon can lead to many diseases, such as autoimmune diseases and inflammatory diseases. Meanwhile, the side effects of clinical drugs on type I interferon signaling may result in impaired outcomes in clinical treatment, especially in cancer immunotherapy which is associated with type I interferon signaling. Here, we found that sorafenib, an FDA-approved drug for HCC chemotherapy, suppresses both DNA- and RNA-sensing mediated type I interferon pathway. Mechanistically, sorafenib treatment induces the autophagic degradation of MAVS, cGAS, TBK1, and IRF3, and attenuates the signaling transduction. In addition, sorafenib also inhibits the recruiting of STING or MAVS with TBK1 and IRF3. This work reveals the negative role of sorafenib in the regulation of type I interferon pathway. Sorafenib treatment is not only a potential drug for autoimmune disease and inflammation diseases, but also needs to be noticed in HCC chemotherapy.
Assuntos
Carcinoma Hepatocelular , Interferon Tipo I , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Humanos , Imunidade Inata , Fator Regulador 3 de Interferon/metabolismo , Interferon Tipo I/metabolismo , Nucleotidiltransferases/metabolismo , Proteínas Serina-Treonina Quinases , Sorafenibe/farmacologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND & AIMS: T-cell receptor (TCR) repertoire is ambiguously changed in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients during antivirus therapy. We tried to assess TCR repertoire dynamics and its clinical significance upon HBeAg seroconversion in CHB patients. METHODS: Twenty CHB patients undergoing 1-year entecavir (ETV) treatment were enrolled, including 10 complete response (CR) vs 10 non-complete response (NCR) patients based on HBeAg seroconversion at week 48. The TCRß complementarity-determining region 3 (CDR3) of peripheral CD4+ and CD8+ T cells at weeks 0, 12 and 48 was analyzed by unbiased high-throughput sequencing. The TCR repertoire profiles and their correlations with serological parameters were analyzed. RESULTS: The diversity of TCRß repertoires was decreasing in CR patients but increasing in NCR patients. The distribution pattern of TCR repertoires stratified according to clonotype frequencies changed in the opposite direction between CR and NCR patients. Narrow amounts of newly appearing clonotypes in CR patients experienced a more intensive and robust expansion and this phenomenon could occur as early as week 12 for the CD4+ subset but later at week 48 for the CD8+ subset. There existed some CR-exclusive clonotypes with a relatively low but increasing frequency at week 48. The number of unique TCRß clonotypes was positively correlated with the ALT or HBV DNA level in CR patients but showed no or negative correlation in NCR patients. CONCLUSION: Distinct TCR profiles contribute to predicting HBeAg seroconversion in CHB patients during ETV treatment and certain TCRß CDR3 motif may be utilized for CHB immunotherapy in the future.