Declining incidence of imported malaria in the Netherlands, 2000-2007.

BACKGROUND: To describe the epidemiology and trends of imported malaria in the Netherlands from 2000 through 2007. METHODS: Based on national surveillance data regarding all reported infections of imported malaria, diagnosed 2000 through 2007, incidence and trends of imported malaria in the Netherlands were estimated. Travellers statistics were used to estimate incidence, and data on malaria chemoprophylaxis prescriptions were used to estimate the number of unprotected travellers. RESULTS: Importation of malaria to the Netherlands is declining even as more travellers visit malaria-endemic countries. On average, 82% were acquired in sub-Saharan Africa, and 75% were caused by Plasmodium falciparum. The overall incidence in imported falciparum malaria fell from 21.5 to 6.6/10,000 of unprotected travellers. The percentage of unprotected travellers rose from 47% to 52% of all travellers. The incidence of imported falciparum infections is greatest from Middle and West Africa, and decreased from 121.3 to 36.5/10,000 travellers. The import of malaria from this region by immigrants visiting friends and relatives (VFR) decreased from 138 infections in 2000, to 69 infections in 2007. CONCLUSION: The annual number of imported malaria shows a continuing declining trend, even with an increasing number of travellers visiting malaria endemic countries. VFR import less malaria than previously, and contribute largely to the declining incidence seen. The decline is not readily explained by increased use of chemoprophylaxis and may reflect a reduced risk of infection due to decreasing local malaria transmission as observed in some malaria endemic areas. Nevertheless, the increasing number of unprotected travellers remains worrisome.

Importance of observational studies in clinical practice.

BACKGROUND: In this era of evidence-based medicine, clinicians require a comprehensive range of well-designed studies to support prescribing decisions and patient management. In recent years, data from observational studies have become an increasingly important source of evidence because of improvements in observational-study methods and advances in statistical analysis. OBJECTIVE: This article reviews the current literature and reports some of the key studies indicating that observational studies can both complement and build on the evidence base established by randomized controlled trials (RCTs). METHODS: A literature search using the MEDLINE/ PubMed database (years: 1966-present) was carried out using the search terms observational or observational study(ies), historical control, nonrandomized, and postmarketing surveillance. All references comparing observational studies with randomized controlled trials were obtained and reviewed and were also hand-checked for studies not identified in the database searches. RESULTS: Observational studies play an important role in investigating treatment outcomes. Data from large observational studies can clarify the tolerability profile of marketed medicines. In particular, observational studies can be of benefit in the study of large, heterogeneous patient populations with complex, chronic diseases such as diabetes mellitus. Observational studies have played a key role in supporting the results of Phase III studies of insulin analogues for the treatment of patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes. Future observational studies in the field of diabetes such as PREDICTIVE (Predictable Results and Experience in Diabetes through Intensification and Control to Target: an International Variability Evaluation) and IMPROVE will further our understanding of this global pandemic. CONCLUSIONS: Well-designed observational studies can play a key role in supporting the evidence base for drugs and therapies. Current evidence suggests that observational studies can be conducted using the same exacting and rigorous standards as are used for RCTs. The observational study design should be considered as a complementary rather than a rival analytic technique.

MDR1 gene polymorphisms are associated with neuropsychiatric adverse effects of mefloquine.

BACKGROUND: Mefloquine, a drug used for treatment and prophylaxis of malaria, is known for its neuropsychiatric adverse effects. We hypothesized that neuropsychiatric adverse effects of mefloquine are associated with polymorphisms in the MDR1/ABCB1 gene that encodes for the efflux pump P-glycoprotein. METHODS: The association between MDR1 C1236T, G2677T, and C3435T single-nucleotide polymorphisms and the occurrence of neuropsychiatric adverse effects was examined in a prospective cohort study of 89 healthy white travelers taking mefloquine. RESULTS: Of the subjects, 27 (28%) reported neuropsychiatric adverse effects, women significantly more frequently than men. Allele frequencies of the C1236T, G2677T, and C3435T polymorphisms were similar to those found in other white populations, and there was no significant association between any of the individual polymorphisms and neuropsychiatric adverse effects. However, women with the 1236TT, 2677TT, and 3435TT genotypes had a higher risk of neuropsychiatric adverse effects than the reference groups of women with heterozygous and homozygous CC or GG genotypes, with odds ratios of 6.3 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1-36.9), 10.5 (95% CI, 1.1-100.6), and 5.4 (95% CI, 1.1-30.0), respectively. The association for women homozygous for the 1236-2677-3435 TTT haplotype was even stronger (P = .004) than the effect of any of the individual polymorphisms. No associations with mefloquine blood levels were observed. CONCLUSION: In this study the MDR1 1236TT, 2677TT, and 3435TT genotypes, along with the 1236-2677-3435 TTT haplotype, were associated with neuropsychiatric adverse effects of mefloquine in women. MDR1 polymorphisms may play an important role in predicting the occurrence of neuropsychiatric adverse effects of mefloquine, particularly in female travelers.

A probable case of Irukandji syndrome in Thailand.

The Irukandji syndrome is a jellyfish envenomation caused by Carukia barnesi or related jellyfish. In literature, the distribution of "Irukandji-like" syndromes is restricted to Australia. We report a case of probable Irukandji syndrome in Thailand. With this report, we hope to promote awareness to aid sting prevention and stimulate research.

Epidemiology of hepatitis B infection among expatriates in Nigeria.

Adult expatriates in countries where hepatitis B virus (HBV) is highly endemic have an increased risk of HBV infection, but little is known about risks to their children or about patterns of spread. The epidemiology of HBV infection was studied among 124 unvaccinated Dutch missionaries and family members who lived in a rural area of Nigeria. Antibodies to hepatitis B core antigen were found in 5 (9.8%) of 51 adults (incidence rate, 1.7 per 1000 person-months at risk [PMAR]) and 9 (12.3%) of 73 children (incidence rate, 2.8 per 1000 PMAR). Vertical transmission of HBV was a likely source of infection in 1 child and was a possible source of infection in 2 others. The prevalence of HBV infection showed strong family clustering (P<.0001), was associated with a history of temporary adoption of Nigerian children (P=.004), and increased with both the number of adoptive children (P=.009) and the total time that these children had stayed in the family (P=.036). Horizontal transmission from adoptive Nigerian children probably played an important role in the spread of HBV infection in this expatriate community.

Safety of once-daily insulin detemir in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with oral hypoglycemic agents in routine clinical practice.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the present study was to identify demographic and treatment factors that were predictive of hypoglycemia in a large cohort of type 2 diabetic patients initiating insulin detemir. METHODS: The present 24-week observational study of insulin initiation included 17 374 participants from 10 countries. Severe hypoglycemia was defined as an event requiring third party assistance; minor hypoglycemia was defined as a daytime or nocturnal glucose measurement <3.1 mmol/L. RESULTS: Prior to initiating insulin therapy, 4.9% of the cohort reported hypoglycemia (pre-insulin hypoglycemia), with most (94.2%) reporting minor events and 9.6% reporting severe events. Compared with patients without pre-insulin hypoglycemia, those with pre-insulin hypoglycemia had a higher incidence of events of minor hypoglycemia (1.72 vs 4.46 events per patient-year [ppy], respectively), nocturnal hypoglycemia (0.25 vs 1.09 events ppy, respectively), and severe hypoglycemia (<0.01 vs 0.04 events ppy, respectively) at final visit. Age (P < 0.047), body mass index (P < 0.001), a prior history of microvascular disease (P < 0.001), pre-insulin hypoglycemia (P < 0.001), increased number of oral hypoglycemic agents (OHAs; P < 0.001), OHA intensification (P < 0.001), and the use of glinides (P = 0.004) were all found to be independently associated with the occurrence of hypoglycemia during the study. CONCLUSIONS: Once-daily insulin detemir therapy was safe and effective, and rates of hypoglycemia were low. Concerns about hypoglycemia should not deter the initiation of basal insulin analogs.

Management of Type 2 diabetes in Ramadan: Low-ratio premix insulin working group practical advice.

The challenge of insulin use during Ramadan could be minimized, if people with diabetes are metabolically stable and are provided with structured education for at least 2-3 months pre-Ramadan. Although, American diabetes association (ADA) recommendations 2010 and South Asian Consensus Guideline 2012 deal with management of diabetes in Ramadan and changes in insulin dosage, no specific guidance on widely prescribed low-ratio premix insulin is currently available. Hence, the working group for insulin therapy in Ramadan, after collective analysis, evaluation, and opinion from clinical practice, have formulated a practical advice to empower physicians with pre-Ramadan preparation, dose adjustment, and treatment algorithm for self-titration of low-ratio premix insulin.

Observational study of once-daily insulin detemir in people with type 2 diabetes aged 75 years or older: a sub-analysis of data from the Study of Once daily LeVEmir (SOLVE).

OBJECTIVES: Older patients are particularly vulnerable to hypoglycaemia. The aim of this study was to evaluate the response to initiation of once-daily insulin detemir in patients aged ≥75 years with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) treated with one or more oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs). METHODS: A sub-analysis was conducted using data from SOLVE (Study of Once daily LeVEmir), a 24-week observational study involving 3,219 investigators and 2,817 project sites from ten countries. Routine clinical practice was followed; there were no study-prescribed procedures. The total cohort comprised 17,374 participants, of whom 2,398 (14 %) were aged ≥75 years. The physicians collected information from patient recall, the patients' medical records and their self-monitored blood glucose diaries (if kept). RESULTS: Pre-insulin glycated haemoglobin (HbA(1c)) was similar between participants aged ≥75 years and those aged <75 years (HbA(1c) 8.8 ± 1.5 % vs. 8.9 ± 1.6 % [mean ± SD], respectively). After 24 weeks of treatment, similar reductions in HbA(1c) were observed in the two subgroups: 7.6 ± 1.1 % and 7.5 ± 1.2 % in participants aged ≥75 years and those aged <75 years, respectively. The incidence of severe hypoglycaemia (episodes per patient-year) decreased during the study in both age groups (from 0.057 to 0.007 in patients aged ≥75 years; from 0.042 to 0.005 in patients aged <75 years), while minor hypoglycaemia increased from 1.1 to 2.0 and from 1.7 to 1.8 episodes per patient-year in the older and younger age groups, respectively. Average weight reduction was similar in both groups: -0.5 kg (≥75 years) and -0.6 kg (<75 years). CONCLUSION: In both the older and younger age groups, the addition of once-daily insulin detemir to existing OAD regimens was effective and safe. In older patients, an improvement in HbA(1c) of 1.2 % was not associated with an increased risk of severe hypoglycaemia or weight gain.

Predictors of postprandial blood glucose response to biphasic insulin analogue therapy.

Biphasic insulin aspart 30 (BIAsp 30) has been shown in randomised controlled trials and the IMPROVE™ observational study to reduce postprandial blood glucose (PPBG) - thought to be an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease. We used multivariate regression analysis to identify predictors of PPBG reduction in the IMPROVE™ study. A total of 52,419 type 2 diabetes patients were enrolled in the IMPROVE™ study (pre-study therapy subgroups: no pharmaceutical therapy, n = 8966; oral antidiabetic drugs [OADs] only, n = 33,797; insulin ± OADs, n = 9568; missing information on pre-study therapy, n = 88). Mean change from baseline in PPBG (mean of three meals) in the global cohort was -6.3 mmol/L; reductions in subgroups were: no pharmaceutical therapy, -8.8 mmol/L; OADs only, -6.0 mmol/L; insulin ± OADs, -5.1 mmol/L. High baseline PPBG was consistently and strongly predictive of PPBG response; lower baseline HbA1c and body mass index, greater age and shorter diabetes duration were also significant predictors of PPBG change. The novel findings from this study indicate that most patients can be expected to achieve a PPBG response with BIAsp 30 irrespective of baseline characteristics or previous therapy with an expected larger PPBG reduction when baseline PPBG is higher.

Insulin use in elderly adults: risk of hypoglycemia and strategies for care.

Hypoglycemia is a significant problem in elderly adults with diabetes mellitus. Elderly individuals with diabetes mellitus are at greater risk than younger adults for hypoglycemic events. Several factors contribute to this risk, including the high prevalence of comorbidities, polypharmacy, cognitive impairment, and concomitant use of agents that interfere with glucose metabolism. To minimize the risk of hypoglycemia and maximize the benefits of glycemic control, guidelines typically recommend individualizing glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) targets based on life expectancy, functional status, and individual goals. Although many individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus will ultimately require insulin therapy to achieve and maintain glycemic control, earlier insulin initiation in elderly individuals may be warranted, particularly in those with renal, cardiovascular, or hepatic concerns that could interfere with the use of oral agents. There are few data on the use of insulin-or other glucose-lowering agents-in elderly adults, but limited evidence suggests that the use of insulin, especially insulin analogs, may be appropriate in this population. Insulin analogs offer a better pharmacokinetic profile, greater convenience, and less variable glycemic control than human insulin. Because of the high prevalence of cognitive impairment and other geriatric syndromes in elderly adults, clinicians should perform a comprehensive assessment of patients' ability to administer and monitor insulin therapy and recognize and treat hypoglycemia.

Ten years of experience with biphasic insulin aspart 30: from drug development to the latest clinical findings.

Biphasic insulin aspart 30 (BIAsp 30) includes 30% soluble rapid-acting insulin aspart (IAsp) along with an intermediate-acting 70% protaminated IAsp that provides coverage of prandial and basal insulin in a single injection. As BIAsp 30 has been available internationally for 10 years, this review provides a comprehensive overview of the discovery of BIAsp 30, its pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile, safety and efficacy outcomes from the clinical trial programme, 'real-life' clinical insights provided by observational study data, and cost effectiveness and quality-of-life information. These studies have demonstrated that BIAsp 30 once or twice daily is an appropriate option for insulin initiation. BIAsp 30 also provides a switch option in patients on biphasic human insulin (BHI). Switching from BHI to BIAsp 30 is associated with improved postprandial glucose (PPG) and reduced nocturnal and major hypoglycaemia, although daytime hypoglycaemia is higher with BIAsp 30. Intensification of BIAsp 30 can be achieved by increasing the number of daily doses up to three times daily with meals. Therefore, BIAsp 30 provides an intensification option for individuals who are not achieving control with basal insulin and would prefer the simplicity of a single biphasic insulin instead of progressing to a basal-bolus approach. BIAsp 30 has a simple dose-titration algorithm, which enables patients to effectively self-titrate their insulin dose. Cost-effectiveness analyses have demonstrated that BIAsp 30 is cost effective or dominant compared with BHI 30 or insulin glargine in a number of healthcare settings. In conclusion, BIAsp 30 offers a simple and flexible option for insulin initiation and intensification that provides coverage of both fasting and prandial glucose.

Insulin analogues: how observational studies provide key insights into management of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this commentary was to evaluate the current evidence regarding the use of synthetic insulin analogues in the 'real-world' clinic setting for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). METHODS: Relevant publications were searched on PubMed MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials Google Scholar, NLM Gateway, Science Direct, Web of Science and OVID for the period of January 2007 to June 2010. Articles were included if they (a) provided specific study results on the use of insulin analogues in T2DM and (b) gave sufficiently clear methodology details to establish treatment strategies, diagnosis and diagnostic criteria using an observational study (OS) design. RESULTS: Twenty one articles specifically addressing both type 2 diabetes management and the use of synthetic insulin analogues were identified. Results from recently published OS in patients with T2DM have shown, in the patient populations tested, the effective initiation, optimization and switch to use of insulin analogues in routine clinical settings (day-to-day common practice), with a good safety profile. CONCLUSIONS: OS can provide clinicians with additional insights into the management of T2DM patients in their practices. However, the selection and initiation of insulin analogue regimens should be tailored to the individual patient and be one that the physician is comfortable using.

A comparison of twice-daily biphasic insulin aspart 70/30 and once-daily insulin glargine in persons with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled on basal insulin and oral therapy: a randomized, open-label study.

OBJECTIVE: To compare efficacy and safety of biphasic insulin aspart 70/30 (BIAsp 30) with insulin (glargine) in type 2 diabetic patients who were not maintaining glycemic control on basal insulin and oral antidiabetic drugs. METHODS: In a 24-week, open-label, parallel-group trial, type 2 diabetic patients who were not maintaining glycemic control on basal insulin (glargine or neutral protamine Hagedorn) + oral antidiabetic drugs were randomly assigned to twice-daily BIAsp 30 + metformin or once-daily glargine + metformin + secretagogues (secretagogues were discontinued in the BIAsp 30 arm). RESULTS: One hundred thirty-seven patients were randomly assigned to the BIAsp 30 group and 143 patients were randomly assigned to the glargine group. Of 280 patients randomized, 229 (81.8%) completed the study. End-of-trial hemoglobin A1c reductions were -1.3% (BIAsp 30) vs -1.2% (glargine) (treatment difference: 95% confidence interval, -0.06 [-0.32 to 0.20]; P = .657). Of patients taking BIAsp 30, 27.3% reached a hemoglobin A1c level <7.0% compared with 22.0% of patients taking glargine (treatment difference: P = .388). Glucose increment averaged over 3 meals was lower in the BIAsp 30 arm (treatment difference: -17.8 mg/dL, P = .001). Fasting plasma glucose reductions from baseline were -13.8 mg/dL (BIAsp 30) vs -42.5 mg/dL (glargine) (P = .0002). Final minor hypoglycemia rate, insulin dose, and weight change were higher in the BIAsp 30 arm (6.5 vs 3.4 events/patient per year, P<.05; 1.19 vs 0.63 U/kg; and 3.1 vs 1.4 kg, P = .0004, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Despite not receiving secretagogues, patients taking BIAsp 30 + metformin achieved similar hemoglobin A1c levels and lower postprandial plasma glucose compared with those receiving glargine + metformin + secretagogues. The large improvement in the glargine group suggests the patients were not true basal failures at randomization. While switching to BIAsp 30 improves glycemic control in this patient population, remaining on basal insulin and optimizing the dose may be equally effective in the short term.

Impact of weight gain on outcomes in type 2 diabetes.

BACKGROUND: The majority of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) are overweight or obese. Obesity is a significant risk factor for increased morbidity and mortality in people with T2DM, and increased weight has been shown to worsen glycemic control and increase the risk of diabetes progression. METHODS: A search was conducted of the National Library of Medicine (PubMed) for articles published from 1990 to 2009 about the treatments of T2DM, relationship between T2DM and weight gain, obesity-related comorbidities of T2DM, and T2DM therapies associated with increased weight. Reference lists of retrieved articles were reviewed for additional publications. FINDINGS: Results from large, prospective clinical trials have shown that weight reduction significantly improves glycemic control and blood pressure in T2DM patients and lowers the risk of progression of T2DM as well as CV disease and cancer. Treatment-related weight gain is a side effect of many oral antidiabetes agents and insulin. The thiazolidinediones (TZD), sulfonylureas, and glinides are associated with weight gain. Despite the weight gain, TZDs also redistribute fat from the central to peripheral compartments, which may lead to a beneficial effect on insulin resistance. Among insulin products, the basal insulin analog detemir is typically associated with a smaller weight increase than human insulin and insulin analog preparations, including glargine, biphasic, and prandial insulin regimens. Alpha-glucosidase inhibitors and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors are weight neutral, whereas glucagon-like peptide1-R agonists and metformin are associated with weight loss. DISCUSSION: An effective approach to management of the obese patient with diabetes is to communicate the significant benefits of a 1 kg reduction in body weight or prevention of weight gain on glycemic control and reduced morbidity and mortality. LIMITATION: This article is based on an extensive literature review rather than the prospective studies needed to define further the effect of weight gain on the management of T2DM. CONCLUSION: Weight management should be an integral part of a T2DM treatment strategy that includes selecting oral antidiabetes medications and insulin products that are weight beneficial.

Intensifying existing premix therapy (BIAsp 30) with BIAsp 50 and BIAsp 70: A consensus statement.

In 2009, consensus guidelines were published on intensification of insulin therapy using the premix analog biphasic insulin aspart (BIAsp) 30 in the treatment of type 2 diabetes, based on the recommendations of an international, independent expert panel. The guidelines included recommendations and titration algorithms for intensification from basal insulin once (OD) or twice daily (BID) to BIAsp 30 BID, from OD BIAsp 30 to BID, and from BID BIAsp 30 to three times daily (TID). Building on these recommendations, the objective was to develop similar, simple and effective guidelines for intensification switch from a BIAsp 30 to a mid-/high-ratio premix regimen for the vast majority of patients with type 2 diabetes. A panel of independent experts with extensive clinical experience in premix analog therapy met in October 2009 to review the therapeutic role of mid- and high-ratio premixes (BIAsp 50 and 70, respectively). The panel outlined a series of algorithms for intensifying BIAsp 30 BID and TID with mid-/high-ratio premixes, along with practical suggestions relating to intensification for individual patients. A simple tool to aid dose adjustment was also developed. The guidelines suggested here should assist physicians in introducing mid-/high-ratio premixes to optimize the insulin therapy of patients with type 2 diabetes who are failing to achieve glycemic targets on a BIAsp 30 BID or TID regimen.

Practical guidance to insulin management.

The practical guidance to insulin management is a simple tool for health care providers, particularly primary care physicians (PCPs). Developed by experts in diabetes care at an international meeting, it aims to help physicians make key decisions to optimize insulin management and decrease long-term morbidity risk. With a growing role for PCPs in type 2 diabetes, the practical guidance focuses on confident, appropriate and timely insulin initiation. Using the acronym 'TIME' (Targets, Insulin, Managing weight, Encouragement and support) the practical guidance aims, in a visually appealing format, to help physicians address the challenges of insulin management with their patients, from diagnosis through insulin initiation to follow-up.

Self-titration of biphasic insulin aspart 30/70 improves glycaemic control and allows easy intensification in a Dutch clinical practice.

AIMS: This 18-month study assessed the improvement in glycaemic control and proportion of patients reaching glycated haemoglobin (HbA(1c)) targets with biphasic insulin aspart 30/70 (BIAsp 30) in clinical practice. METHODS: Type-2 diabetes patients failing on oral antidiabetic drugs (n=90) or existing insulin regimens (n=59) started or switched to BIAsp 30. Thiazolidinediones were stopped, metformin was continued. BIAsp 30 was given once daily (n=41), twice daily (n=96), or three times daily (n=12). Patients were taught self-monitoring and self-titration using an algorithm, adding daily doses of BIAsp 30 when necessary. RESULTS: Mean baseline HbA(1c) was 8.4%, weight 85.4 kg, and age 57.9 years. All patients experienced significant reductions in HbA(1c) (mean 1.9%+/-0.1), fasting plasma glucose (mean 2.8 mmol/l), and post-prandial glycaemia (mean 2.9 mmol/l); 91% of patients achieved HbA(1c)<7% and 52% achieved HbA(1c) < or=6.5%. No major or nocturnal hypoglycaemia were reported; 15% of patients reported minor hypoglycaemia. Insulin-naïve patients gained mean 2.7 kg; patients who switched from another insulin lost weight (mean -0.6kg). CONCLUSION: The results from this study from routine care suggest that BIAsp 30 may allow a large proportion of type-2 diabetes patients (90%) to improve glycaemic control and reach target HbA(1c)<7%, using self-titration.

Risk for nocturnal hypoglycemia with biphasic insulin aspart 30 compared with biphasic human insulin 30 in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Insulin is recommended as a second-line treatment after diet and metformin fail to reach and/or maintain glycemic targets considered to minimize the risk for long-term diabetic complications. Hypoglycemia and the fear of developing hypoglyce-mia, however, remain substantial barriers to the initiation and optimal use of insulin. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare biphasic insulin aspart 30 (BIAsp 30) with biphasic human insulin 30 (BHI 30) with respect to glycemic control and the risk for hypoglycemia using a meta-analysis of clinical trials comparing these insulins in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). METHODS: We included all published and unpublished, randomized, controlled trials in adult patients with T2DM (treatment duration > or = 12 weeks) for which individual patient data were available. All clinical databases and local trial registries of Novo Nordisk A/S (Soeborg, Denmark) were searched to identify clinical trials comparing the 2 products. The predefined primary end point of the study was the overall rate of nocturnal hypoglyce-mia (major, minor, and symptoms-only hypoglycemia occurring from 12:00-6:00 AM). Hypoglycemia was analyzed using a negative binomial distribution model, accounting for exposure time. Glycemic end points were analyzed at 12 to 16 weeks of treatment using ANCOVA, adjusting for baseline. Secondary safety end points were the rates of major hypoglycemia (hypoglycemia requiring third-party assistance), minor hypoglycemia (symptoms confirmed by plasma glucose [PG] <3.1 mmol/L), daytime hypoglycemia (major, minor, and symptoms-only hypoglycemia occurring from 6:01 AM-11:59 PM), overall hypoglycemia (the sum of all major, minor, and symptoms-only episodes), and change in weight from baseline to 12 to 16 weeks of treatment. Secondary efficacy end points were changes in glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA(1c)), fasting PG (FPG), postprandial PG increment (averaged over breakfast, lunch, and dinner), and insulin dose. RESULTS: Nine randomized, parallel or crossover trials were included (N = 1674; male sex, 57%; mean [SD] age, 61.0 [10.6] years; body mass index, 26.7 [4.6] kg/m(2); HbA(1c), 8.1% [1.4%]; duration of diabetes, 10.9 [7.9] years). Rates of overall hypoglycemia were not significantly different (rate ratio [RR] = 1.08; 95% CI, 0.94-1.24; P = NS) between treatments. BIAsp 30 had a 50% lower rate of nocturnal hypoglycemia than BHI 30 (RR = 0.50; 95% CI, 0.38-0.67; P < 0.01), whereas the rate of daytime hypoglycemia was 24% lower for BHI 30 (RR = 1.24; 95% CI, 1.08-1.43; P < 0.01). The likelihood of major hypo-glycemia was significantly lower with BIAsp 30 compared with BHI 30 (odds ratio = 0.45; 95% CI, 0.22-0.93; P < 0.05). BIAsp 30 was associated with reduced PPG increment (averaged over breakfast, lunch and dinner) compared with BHI 30 (treatment difference, -0.31; 95% CI, -0.49 to -0.07; P < 0.01). There was a significantly larger reduction in FPG associated with BHI 30 (treatment difference, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.31-0.95; P < 0.01). However, no significant treatment difference was found for HbA(1c) (treatment difference, 0.04; 95% CI, -0.02 to 0.10; P = NS). CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis found BIAsp 30 to be associated with a significantly lower rate of nocturnal and major hypoglycemia, but a significantly increased risk for daytime hypoglycemia, compared with BHI 30 at a similar level of HbA(1c) in patients with T2DM.

Improved glycaemic control with BIAsp 30 in insulin-naïve type 2 diabetes patients inadequately controlled on oral antidiabetics: subgroup analysis from the IMPROVE study.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this subanalysis of the IMPROVE study was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of initiating biphasic insulin aspart 30/70 (BIAsp 30) in type 2 diabetes patients uncontrolled on oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs). METHODS: IMPROVE is a 26-week, open-label, non-randomised, international observational study in type 2 diabetes patients prescribed BIAsp 30 in routine clinical practice. The total cohort comprised 52 419 patients from various pre-study therapies. Here results from the subgroup of previously insulin-naïve patients are reported. Changes in glycated haemoglobin (HbA(1c)), fasting blood glucose (FBG), postprandial blood glucose (PPBG), weight, dose, proportion of patients achieving HbA(1c) < 7.0%, and rates of major and minor hypoglycaemic events were recorded. Treatment satisfaction was assessed using a validated questionnaire. RESULTS: A total of 29 160 insulin-naïve patients were included; mean age 55.6 years, diabetes duration 7.3 years, baseline HbA(1c) 9.24%. Significant reductions were seen for HbA(1c) (-2.12%; p < 0.0001), FBG (-4.07 mmol/L; p < 0.0001) and PPBG after all meals (mean: -5.27 mmol/L; p < 0.0001); 39.2% of patients achieved HbA(1c) < 7.0% without hypoglycaemia. Better glycaemic control was seen in patients treated with BIAsp 30 twice-daily (BID) both at baseline and final visit, or BID at baseline and three-times daily at final visit, compared with other regimens. The rate of major hypoglycaemic events decreased significantly, while the rate of minor hypoglycaemic events increased. Better glycaemic control and a lower rate of minor hypoglycaemia were observed in patients using BIAsp 30 without OADs than with OADs. There was no clinically relevant change in weight (-0.07 kg; p < 0.0001). At final visit, 59.7% of patients were extremely/very satisfied with treatment, compared with 10.2% at baseline. CONCLUSIONS: This open-label, non-randomised, observational study demonstrated that initiating insulin therapy with BIAsp 30 significantly improved glycaemic control in insulin-naïve patients previously poorly controlled on OADs. The rate of major hypoglycaemia was reduced and treatment satisfaction increased after initiation of BIAsp 30. Furthermore, better glycaemic control was achieved with BIAsp 30 without OAD compared to with OAD.

Initiating insulin in primary care--the role of modern premixed formulations.

Starting insulin therapy earlier can help reduce the risk of micro- and macrovascular complications associated with the progression of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). However, barriers to the initiation of insulin have been identified. Premixed insulins offer a simpler regimen than basal-bolus therapy for T2DM. Modern premixes, which combine a rapid-acting soluble insulin with a protaminated form of the same insulin, have become increasingly popular. As primary care practitioners and diabetes specialists are encouraged to initiate insulin, premixes that can be used within flexible dosing regimens to improve glycaemic control could be beneficial.