Impact of Microplastics on the Ocular Surface.

Plastics are synthetic materials made from organic polymers that are ubiquitous in daily living and are especially important in the healthcare setting. However, recent advances have revealed the pervasive nature of microplastics, which are formed by degradation of existing plastic products. Although the impact on human health has yet to be fully characterised, there is increasing evidence that microplastics can trigger inflammatory damage, microbial dysbiosis, and oxidative stress in humans. Although there are limited studies investigating their effect on the ocular surface, studies of microplastics on other organs provide some insights. The prevalence of plastic waste has also triggered public outcry, culminating in the development of legislation aimed at reducing microplastics in commercial products. We present a review outlining the possible sources of microplastics leading to ocular exposure, and analyse the possible mechanisms of ocular surface damage. Finally, we examine the utility and consequences of current legislation surrounding microplastic regulation.

Glaucoma drainage implant exposure: A review of aetiology, risks and repair considerations.

In recent years, there has been a paradigm shift in glaucoma surgical procedures. Glaucoma drainage implant (GDI) surgeries are being performed much more commonly. Thus, it is important for surgeons to be cognisant of potential complications and their management. Exposure of a GDI is a well-known complication, and prompt recognition and treatment are required to prevent endophthalmitis, a potentially blinding condition. In this review, we discuss the mechanisms and risk factors for GDI exposure, highlight important considerations for repair, and discuss repair techniques, with the aim of improving patient outcomes and minimising the risk of re-exposure.

The Management of Ocular Surface Squamous Neoplasia (OSSN).

The rise of primary topical monotherapy with chemotherapeutic drugs and immunomodulatory agents represents an increasing recognition of the medical management of ocular surface squamous neoplasia (OSSN), which may replace surgery as the standard of care in the future. Currently, there is no consensus regarding the best way to manage OSSN with no existing guidelines to date. This paper seeks to evaluate evidence surrounding available treatment modalities and proposes an approach to management. The approach will guide ophthalmologists in selecting the most appropriate treatment regime based on patient and disease factors to minimize treatment related morbidity and improve OSSN control. Further work can be done to validate this algorithm and to develop formal guidelines to direct the management of OSSN.

Quantitative assessment of changes in anterior segment morphology after argon laser peripheral iridoplasty: findings from the EARL study group.

IMPORTANCE: Argon laser peripheral iridoplasty (ALPI) could be effective in widening residual angle closure following laser peripheral iridotomy (LPI). BACKGROUND: We investigated changes in angle parameters following ALPI and its safety profile in this study. DESIGN: Retrospective, observational case series. PARTICIPANTS: The records from a single centre, of 36 patients (60 eyes) who underwent ALPI, for residual angle closure following LPI, were reviewed. METHODS: We analysed anterior chamber parameters in anterior segment optical coherence tomography (ASOCT) images using customized software pre- and post-ALPI. Paired t-test was used to compare changes. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: ASOCT parameters analysed included angle opening distance (AOD 500 and 750), trabecular iris surface area (TISA 500 and 750), anterior chamber width (ACW), anterior chamber volume (ACV), angle recess area (ARA), anterior chamber area (ACA), anterior chamber depth (ACD) and lens vault (LV). RESULTS: There was a mean increase in AOD 500 (0.05 vs. 0.16 mm, P < 0.001), AOD 750 (0.15 vs. 0.27 mm, P < 0.001), TISA 500 (0.010 vs. 0.038 mm2 , P < 0.001), TISA 750 (0.039 vs. 0.102 mm2 , P < 0.001), ACV (89.76 vs. 102.25 mm3 , P = 0.01), ARA 500 (0.015 vs. 0.033 mm2 , P < 0.001) and ARA 750 (0.044 vs. 0.088 mm2 , P < 0.001). There was no significant change in ACW, ACD, ACA and LV. Mean intraocular pressure (IOP) decreased post-ALPI (17.2 vs. 15.7 mmHg, P = 0.002). The mean follow-up duration was 2.1 years (range 0.5-5 years). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: ALPI results in changes to the angle morphology and lowered IOP in eyes with residual angle closure. Our findings suggest a possible role for ALPI in eyes with residual angle closure following peripheral iridotomy.

Prophylactic non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for the prevention of macular oedema after cataract surgery.

BACKGROUND: Macular oedema (MO) is the accumulation of extracellular fluid in the central retina (the macula). It may occur after cataract surgery and may give rise to poor visual outcome, with reduced visual acuity and distortion of the central vision. MO is often self-limiting with spontaneous resolution, but a small proportion of people with chronic persistent MO may be difficult to treat. Chronic oedema may lead to the formation of cystic spaces in the retina termed 'cystoid macular oedema' (CMO). Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are commonly used in cataract surgery and may reduce the chances of developing MO. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this review is to answer the question: is there evidence to support the prophylactic use of topical NSAIDs either in addition to, or instead of, topical steroids postoperatively to reduce the incidence of macular oedema (MO) and associated visual morbidity. SEARCH METHODS: We searched a number of electronic databases including CENTRAL, MEDLINE and Embase. Date last searched 2 September 2016. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in which adult participants had undergone surgery for age-related cataract. We included participants irrespective of their baseline risk of MO, in particular we included people with diabetes and uveitis. We included trials of preoperative and/or postoperative topical NSAIDs in conjunction with postoperative topical steroids. The comparator was postoperative topical steroids alone. A secondary comparison was preoperative and/or postoperative topical NSAIDs alone versus postoperative topical steroids alone. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently selected studies for inclusion, assessed risk of bias and extracted data using standard methods expected by Cochrane. We pooled data using a random-effects model. We graded the certainty of the evidence using GRADE and considered the following: risk of bias of included studies, precision of the effect estimate, consistency of effects between studies, directness of the outcome measure and publication bias. MAIN RESULTS: We identified 34 studies that were conducted in the Americas, Europe, the Eastern Mediterranean region and South-East Asia. Over 5000 people were randomised in these trials. The majority of studies enrolled one eye per participant; a small subset (4 trials) enrolled a proportion of people with bilateral surgery. Twenty-eight studies compared NSAIDs plus steroids with steroids alone. Six studies compared NSAIDs with steroids. A variety of NSAIDs were used, including ketorolac, diclofenac, nepafenac, indomethacin, bromfenac, flurbiprofen and pranopfen. Follow-up ranged from one to 12 months. In general, the studies were poorly reported. We did not judge any of the studies at low risk of bias in all domains. Six studies were funded by industry, seven studies were funded from non-industry sources, and the rest of the studies did not report the source of funding.There was low-certainty evidence that people receiving topical NSAIDs in combination with steroids may have a lower risk of poor vision due to MO at three months after cataract surgery compared with people receiving steroids alone (risk ratio (RR) 0.41, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.23 to 0.76; eyes = 1360; studies = 5; I2 = 5%). We judged this to be low-certainty evidence because of risk of bias in the included studies and indirectness, as the extent of visual loss was not always clear. Only one study reported poor vision due to MO at 12 months and we judged this to be very low-certainty evidence as there were only two events. Quality of life was only reported in one of the 34 studies comparing NSAIDs plus steroids versus steroids alone, and it was not fully reported, other than to comment on lack of differences between groups. There was evidence of a reduced risk of MO with NSAIDs at three months after surgery, but we judged this to be low-certainty due to risk of bias and publication bias (RR 0.40, 95% CI 0.32 to 0.49; eyes = 3638; studies = 21). There was inconsistent evidence on central retinal thickness at three months (I2 = 87%). Results ranged from -30.9 µm in favour of NSAIDs plus steroids to 7.44 µm in favour of steroids alone. Similarly, data on best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) were inconsistent, but nine out of 10 trials reporting this outcome found between-group differences in visual acuity of less than 0.1 logMAR.None of the six studies comparing NSAIDs alone with steroids reported on poor vision due to MO at three or 12 months. There was low-certainty evidence that central retinal thickness was lower in the NSAIDs group at three months (mean difference (MD) -22.64 µm, 95% CI -38.86 to -6.43; eyes = 121; studies = 2). Five studies reported on MO and showed a reduced risk with NSAIDs, but we judged this evidence to be of low-certainty (RR 0.27, 95% CI 0.18 to 0.41; eyes = 520). Three studies reported BCVA at three months and the results of these trials were inconsistent, but all three studies found differences of less than 0.1 logMAR between groups.We did not note any major adverse events - the main consistent observation was burning or stinging sensation with the use of NSAIDs. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Using topical NSAIDs may reduce the risk of developing macular oedema after cataract surgery, although it is possible that current estimates as to the size of this reduction are exaggerated. It is unclear the extent to which this reduction has an impact on the visual function and quality of life of patients. There is little evidence to suggest any important effect on vision after surgery. The value of adding topical NSAIDs to steroids, or using them as an alternative to topical steroids, with a view to reducing the risk of poor visual outcome after cataract surgery is therefore uncertain. Future trials should address the remaining clinical uncertainty of whether prophylactic topical NSAIDs are of benefit, particularly with respect to longer-term follow-up (at least to 12 months), and should be large enough to detect reduction in the risk of the outcome of most interest to patients, which is chronic macular oedema leading to visual loss.

Polymicrobial versus monomicrobial keratitis: a retrospective comparative study.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the risk factors, clinical characteristics, microbiological profile, and treatment outcomes of polymicrobial versus monomicrobial keratitis. METHODS: In this retrospective comparative case series, eyes with polymicrobial and monomicrobial keratitis were identified from microbiological records at a tertiary academic referral center, from January 2002 to December 2010. Only culture positive cases were included. Eyes with infectious keratitis involving two or more pathogens were included in the polymicrobial group, whereas eyes infected solely by Pseudomonas aeruginosa were included in the monomicrobial group. Various parameters including demographics, risk factors, clinical and microbiological characteristics, and treatment outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: Twenty-one eyes each with polymicrobial and monomicrobial keratitis were included in this study. The mean age of polymicrobial patients was significantly higher than monomicrobials. Use of contact lens was the commonest predisposing factor in both groups. Systemic (23.8%) and multiple (33.3%) risk factors were involved in eyes with polymicrobial keratitis only. The mean size of corneal infiltrates and mean duration for resolvement of infection were significantly greater in the polymicrobial group. Medical treatment was successful only in 80.9% eyes with polymicrobial keratitis, whereas all monomicrobial keratitis patients responded to it. A total of 44 organisms belonging to 18 species (bacteria = 13, fungi = 5) were isolated from the polymicrobial group. P. aeruginosa and Candida albicans were the most frequently isolated bacteria (n = 12) and fungi (n = 5), respectively. In the polymicrobial group, gram-negative organisms were most sensitive to gentamicin (87.8%), followed by ciprofloxacin (78.7%), whereas gram-positive organisms were 100% sensitive to ciprofloxacin and cefazolin. CONCLUSIONS: A high index of suspicion of polymicrobial keratitis should be made in patients with multiple and systemic risk factors. Contact lens usage was the most common risk factor in both groups. Size of corneal infiltrate is a fairly reliable indicator for suspecting polymicrobial keratitis. Prolonged course of the disease and decreased antibiotic sensitivity were the other notable features of polymicrobial keratitis.

Use of anterior segment imaging and direct cyclopexy repair of cyclodialysis cleft.

We aim to describe different imaging modalities to localize cyclodialysis clefts and direct cyclopexy repair of cyclodialysis clefts. We reviewed the record of a patient with traumatic cyclodialysis cleft who underwent direct cyclopexy retrospectively. Preoperative and postoperative visual acuity and intraocular pressure (IOP) were recorded. Gonioscopy, ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM) and 360° swept-source anterior segment optical coherence tomography (SS-ASOCT) were used to localize the cyclodialysis cleft. We concluded that UBM is the current gold standard imaging modality in localization of cyclodialysis clefts, and that SS-ASOCT is potentially useful as alternative imaging modality. Direct cyclopexy is an effective treatment for large cyclodialysis cleft with good IOP control and visual outcomes.

Dupilumab-associated ocular manifestations: A review of clinical presentations and management.

Dupilumab is a first-in-class biologic approved by the European Medicines Agency and the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of multiple atopic diseases, including atopic dermatitis, asthma, and chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis. Since gaining traction as an effective treatment modality, multiple reports have highlighted the many ocular side effects associated with dupilumab usage. These range from mild diseases, such as conjunctivitis, dry eyes, and blepharitis, to more severe manifestations such as intraocular inflammation and cicatrizing conjunctivitis. The pathogenesis behind these manifestations remains controversial, but are likely multi-factorial. We review the current evidence surrounding ocular manifestations of dupilumab-associated disease and proposed treatments to provide an overview of this unique disease entity. With increasing usage of dupilumab, formal recommendations regarding the treatment of dupilumab-associated ocular disease are warranted to provide standardized clinical guidance. Furthermore, it is important for health care practitioners to remain abreast with existing literature to counsel and empower patients with the knowledge surrounding contemporary treatments for atopic diseases and their associated sideeffects.

Efficacy and Safety of Repeated Micropulse Transscleral Diode Cyclophotocoagulation in Advanced Glaucoma.

PRECIS: Repeat micropulse transscleral cyclophotocoagulation (MPTCP) has some benefit in lowering intraocular pressure (IOP). There was a small risk of loss of vision, prolonged hypotony, and phthisis bulbi. AIM: This study aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of repeated MPTCP for an Asian population with refractory glaucoma. METHODS: This is a retrospective case series of 43 eyes (43 patients) with severe glaucoma which underwent repeated MPTCP. Baseline parameters were taken from the visit just before the second MPTCP session. Success was defined as IOP of 6 to 21 mm Hg or ≥20% reduction in IOP without an increase in glaucoma medication from baseline, without further glaucoma reoperation, and ≤3 total MPTCP episodes. The IOP, number of IOP-lowering medications, and best-corrected visual acuity were documented preoperatively and postoperatively. Postoperative complications were also analyzed. RESULTS: The mean age±SD was 57.4±18.2 years with a mean follow-up duration of 28.9±27.5 months. Neovascular glaucoma was the most common type of glaucoma [18 eyes (41.9%)]. The success rates at postoperative years 1, 2, and 3, and the latest follow-up were 36.4%, 42.9%, 32.0%, and 39.5%, respectively. The median survival time of repeat MPTCP was 4.6 months. Compared with the preoperative mean IOP (35.2±11.0 mm Hg), the mean IOP at postoperative years 1, 2, and 3, and latest follow-up, was 27.8±13.7 mm Hg (P=0.004), 27.4±12.4 (P=0.003), 31.8±13.2 (P=0.35), and 27.1±13.8 mm Hg (P=0.002), respectively. The mean number of IOP-lowering medications was reduced from 3.3±0.9 preoperatively to 2.8±1.3 at the final follow-up (P=0.007). Postoperative complications included prolonged hypotony [3 eyes (7.0%)] and phthisis bulbi [2 eyes (4.7%)]. CONCLUSION: Repeated MPTCP is at best moderately effective in lowering IOP for eyes with advanced glaucoma.

Clinical Efficacy and Safety Outcomes of Micropulse Transscleral Diode Cyclophotocoagulation in Patients With Advanced Glaucoma.

PRECIS: Micropulse transscleral cyclophotocoagulation (MPTCP) is only moderately effective in lowering intraocular pressure (IOP) and is useful as an adjunct procedure to other glaucoma surgeries. There was a small risk of loss of vision, prolonged hypotony, and phthisis bulbi. AIM: The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy and safety of a single MPTCP treatment for an Asian population with advanced glaucoma. METHODS: This is a retrospective single-center study of 207 eyes (207 patients) with advanced glaucoma which underwent first-time MPTCP between January 1, 2008, and March 31, 2018. Success was defined as IOP of 6 to 21 mm Hg or ≥20% reduction in IOP without an increase in glaucoma medication from baseline, and without glaucoma reoperation. The IOP, best-corrected visual acuity, and number of glaucoma medications were also analyzed. RESULTS: The mean (SD) age was 64.9±16.9 years. The mean follow-up duration was 18.7±16.2 months. The rate of success at postoperative years 1 and 2 follow-up was 44.1% and 32.6%, respectively. The median survival time of MPTCP was 9.0 months and 85 (40.9%) eyes received reoperation. The mean IOP decreased from 31.5±12.0 mm Hg preoperatively to 22.1±10.3 and 23.8±11.8 mm Hg at postoperative years 1 and 2, respectively (P<0.0001). The mean number of glaucoma medications was reduced from 3.3±1.0 preoperatively to 2.6±1.1 and 2.4±1.1 at postoperative years 1 and 2, respectively (P<0.0001). Significant complications included prolonged hypotony [1 eye (0.5%)], phthisis bulbi [7 eyes (3.4%)], and best-corrected visual acuity reduction [29 eyes (13.9%)]. CONCLUSION: Single first-time MPTCP for advanced glaucoma eyes was moderately effective in lowering IOP but >50% failed by 1 year.

Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio Predicts Development of Immune-Related Adverse Events and Outcomes from Immune Checkpoint Blockade: A Case-Control Study.

The utility of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) utility in predicting immune-related adverse events (irAEs) and survival have not been well studied in the context of treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). We performed a case-control study of cancer patients who received at least one dose of ICI in a tertiary hospital. We examined NLR and PLR in irAE cases and controls. Logistic and Cox regression models were used to identify independent risk factors for irAEs, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). The study included 91 patients with irAEs and 56 controls. Multiple logistic regression showed that NLR < 3 at baseline was associated with higher occurrence of irAEs. Multivariate Cox regression showed that development of irAEs and reduction in NLR from baseline to week 6 were associated with longer PFS. Higher NLR values at baseline and/or week 6 were independently associated with shorter OS. A reduction in NLR from baseline to week 6 was associated with longer OS. In this study of cancer patients treated with ICIs, NLR has a bidirectional relationship with adverse outcomes. Lower NLR was associated with increased occurrence of irAEs while higher NLR values were associated with worse clinical outcomes.