Symptoms of Depression in Patients with Chemosensory Disorders.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with chemosensory dysfunction frequently report symptoms of depression. The current study aims to clarify whether the type (smell dysfunction, taste dysfunction, and mixed smell and taste dysfunction), severity, duration, or cause of dysfunction have differential impacts on the symptoms of depression. METHODS: 899 patients with chemosensory disorders and 62 controls were included. Following a structured interview and an otorhinolaryngological examination, subjects underwent olfactory tests (Sniffin' Sticks), gustatory tests (taste sprays) and an assessment of depressive symptoms (Beck Depression Inventory). Information on the cause and duration of disorders was also collected. RESULTS: Patients with combined olfactory/gustatory dysfunction had higher depression scores than patients with smell dysfunction only and controls, and no significant difference was found between the smell dysfunction and controls. Anosmia patients, but not hyposmia patients, exhibited higher depression scores than controls. Among various causes of chemosensory disorders, patients from the posttraumatic group had higher depression scores than patients with other causes of chemosensory dysfunction (sinonasal, idiopathic, or postinfectious). Multiple linear regression analyses suggested that reduced olfactory function was associated with enhanced depression scores in the olfactory disorders group (B = -0.326, t = -2.294, and p = 0.02) and in all patients with chemosensory disorders (B = -0.374, t = -2.550, p = 0.017). DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: Simultaneously decreased input of olfaction and gustation seems to have an additive effect on the exacerbation of emotional dysfunction. Early intervention should be considered for depression symptoms in patients with mixed olfactory/gustatory dysfunction in clinical practice.

Effects of "trigeminal training" on trigeminal sensitivity and self-rated nasal patency.

PURPOSE: Patients with the feeling of a congested nose not always suffer from an anatomical obstruction but might just have a low trigeminal sensibility, which prevents them from perceiving the nasal airstream. We examined whether intermittent trigeminal stimulation increases sensitivity of the nasal trigeminal nerve and whether this effect is accompanied by subjective improvement of nasal breathing. METHOD: Thirty-five patients (Mage = 58.4 years; SD = 14.8; Minage = 21 years; Maxage = 79 years; 43% females) and 30 healthy controls (Mage = 36.7 years, SD = 14.5; Minage = 20 years; Maxage = 73 years; 60% females) participated in a study comprised of two sessions separated by "trigeminal training". During each session, trigeminal sensitivity towards CO2, trigeminal lateralization abilities and ratings of nasal patency were assessed. Age and training compliance were controlled. RESULTS: "Trigeminal training" had a positive effect on trigeminal sensitivity in both groups, (p = .027) and this effect depended on the training compliance (p < .001). "Trigeminal training" had no effect on lateralization abilities of the subjects (p > .05). Ratings of nasal patency increased in patients (p = .03), but not in controls. CONCLUSIONS: "Trigeminal training" consisting of intermittent presentation of diverse stimulants leads to an increase of trigeminal sensitivity, but this effect depended on the training compliance. Importantly, in patients, this training is also associated with an increase in self-rated nasal patency.