RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: In low-income settings, there is a high unmet need for hernia surgery, and most procedures are performed with tissue repair techniques. In preparation for a randomized clinical trial, medical doctors and associate clinicians received a short-course competency-based training on inguinal hernia repair with mesh under local anaesthesia. The aim of this study was to evaluate feasibility, safety and effectiveness of the training. METHODS: All trainees received a one-day theoretical module on mesh hernia repair under local anaesthesia followed by hands-on training. Performance was assessed using the American College of Surgeon's Groin Hernia Operative Performance Rating System. Patients were followed up two weeks and one year after surgery. Outcomes of the patients operated on during the training trial were compared to the 229 trial patients operated on after the training. RESULTS: During three surgical camps, seven medical doctors and six associate clinicians were trained. In total, 129 patients were operated on as part of the training. Of the 13 trainees, 11 reached proficiency. Patients in the training group had more wound infections after two weeks (8.5% versus 3.1%; p = 0.041). There was no difference in recurrence and mortality after one year, and none of the deaths were attributed to the surgery. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Mesh repair is the international standard for inguinal hernia repair worldwide. Nevertheless, this is not widely accessible in low-income settings. This study has demonstrated that short-course intensive hands-on training of MDs and ACs in mesh hernia repair is effective and safe. TRIAL REGISTRATION: International Clinical Trial Registry ISRCTN63478884.
Assuntos
Hérnia Inguinal , Humanos , Hérnia Inguinal/cirurgia , Virilha/cirurgia , Telas Cirúrgicas , Serra Leoa , Herniorrafia/métodos , RecidivaRESUMO
Giant pseudocyst is a very rare complication after incisional hernia repair with mesh. We present a case of 54-year-old male patient with a giant pseudocyst, which developed after incisional hernia repair with mesh. A patient was discussed during multidisciplinary team meeting and operative treatment was suggested to the patient. Extirpation of the cyst was accomplished. There was observed no defect in the abdominal wall. The patient was discharged on the 7th postoperative day. Ultrasonography two weeks after discharge again showed fluid collection. There were 6 aspirations every week starting from 400 ml serous fluid at the beginning and 60 ml at the end. There were no signs of fluid collection one month after the last aspiration. Surgical plastic treatment of giant pseudocyst after incisional hernia mesh repair is safe and feasible despite its low prevalence.
RESUMO
Leiomyoma of the lower third of the esophagus is a relatively rare disorder but the most common benign tumor of the esophagus. We present a case of an involuted esophageal leiomyoma, 11 cm in size, treated by the laparoscopic approach. The preoperative computed tomogram visualized a mass 3 × 1.5 cm in diameter in the lower esophagus without an eccentric lumen or compression of nearby organs. Resection of the tumor was indicated according to the patient's symptoms and to exclude malignancy. Laparoscopic enucleation of esophageal leiomyoma was performed. The overall operative time was 205 min. The diagnosis of leiomyoma was established on histopathology and immunohistochemistry staining. The patient resumed the intake of a normal diet on the 5th postoperative day and was discharged from hospital 8 days after the surgery. We have found this minimally invasive operation to be an effective and well-tolerated treatment option, determined by the experience of the surgeon.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most common mesenchymal tumors of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. Although the therapy targeted at inhibiting tyrosine kinases has shown dramatic results in metastatic and inoperable GISTs, the mainstay of treatment in primary localized forms remains surgical resection. AIM: To provide an overview of our experience of GIST diagnosis and management, with emphasis on comparison of minimally invasive and open surgical resection for primary GISTs. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of all patients who underwent surgical removal of GISTs from 2008 to 2012. Patient demographics, clinical data, surgery, complications, histopathological data and clinical course were analyzed. RESULTS: Forty-four patients were identified. Average age at diagnosis was 63 years. Minimally invasive (MIS) and open surgery (OS) were each attempted in 22 (50.0%) patients. Laparoscopic removal was performed in 20, laparoendoscopic in 1, and laparoscopy-assisted endoscopic removal in 1. Conversion to an open procedure was performed in 4 (18.2%). We found significant differences in postoperative length of stay (8.5 days vs. 10.1 days, p < 0.001) and tumor size (2.93 cm vs. 5.78 cm, p = 0.018) between MIS and OS groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic removal is safe and effective for GISTs not exceeding 6 cm. Gastroesophageal junction and cardia GISTs require careful preoperative evaluation and planning to remove safely. We recommend avoiding laparoscopic removal of these tumors due to the high rate of conversion (100.0%) to an open procedure. Laparoendoscopic surgical approach is an appropriate technique for removal of small-sized intraluminal benign GISTs not involving the muscularis propria layer.