Understanding cervical cancer after the age of routine screening: Characteristics of cases, treatment, and survival in the United States.

OBJECTIVE: Given that cervical cancer incidence rates do not decline in women >65, there is generally limited screening, and these women have a poor prognosis, it is imperative to better understand this population. We aim to describe the characteristics, treatment, and survival of women >65 diagnosed with cervical cancer. METHODS: SEER-Medicare 2004-2013 data was used to describe 2274 patients >65 diagnosed with cervical cancer. Five-year cancer-specific survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariable Poisson and Cox regression analyses identified characteristics associated with treatment and mortality. RESULTS: The median age was 76.1 years, with nearly one-third of cases occurring in women >80 years. Most patients were non-Hispanic White (64.8%), had comorbidity scores ≥ 1 (53.9%) and squamous histology (66.3%). Most women were diagnosed at stage II or higher (62.7%), including nearly one-quarter at Stage IV (23.1%). Nearly 15% of patients were not treated (14.6%). Lack of treatment was associated with oldest age (>80), comorbidity scores ≥3, and stage IV disease. Five-year cancer-specific survival was 50%. Increasing age and stage at diagnosis were significantly associated with lower cancer-specific survival whereas treatment was strongly associated with increased survival. CONCLUSION: Most women >65 with cervical cancer are diagnosed with locally advanced or metastatic disease and many do not receive treatment. Survival is improved with early-stage diagnosis and treatment. These findings, coupled with the fact that women >65 constitute an increasing proportion of the population, highlight the need to re-evaluate screening and treatment practices in this population to detect cervical cancer at earlier stages and increase survival. NOVELTY AND IMPACT STATEMENT: In SEER-Medicare linked data from 2004 to 2013, most women >65 with cervical cancer were diagnosed with locally advanced or metastatic disease. Both receipt of treatment and survival decreased with increasing age. These findings, coupled with the fact that women aged >65 constitute an increasing proportion of the population, highlight the need to re-evaluate screening and treatment practices in older women to detect cervical cancer at earlier stages and increase survival.

Surviving and thriving: What do survivors of gynecologic cancer want?

The purpose of this study was to characterize survivorship concerns and survivorship program preferences among gynecologic cancer survivors. Women treated for gynecologic malignancy at our cancer center were surveyed from 1/2019 to 10/2020 on concerns and preferences using a 5-point Likert scale. Descriptive analysis and multivariable logistic regression were performed to describe survivors' concerns/preferences. The most frequent survivorship concerns were fear of cancer recurrence (49.6%), desire to lose weight (40.0%), and long-term side effects (30.7%). The highest ranked survivorship program components included assistance with nutrition (36.5%), weight loss (30.4%), and stress reduction (29.0%). Older patients (≥64 y) were less likely to report concern with losing weight (OR 0.26, p < 0.05), sex life (OR 0.18, p < 0.01), and strain in family relationships (OR 0.27, p < 0.05) compared with younger patients. Compared with ovarian/fallopian tube/primary peritoneal cancer survivors, endometrial cancer survivors were less likely to desire nutritional education (OR 0.06, p < 0.01). Participants with advanced cancer were less likely to desire assistance with weight loss than those with early stage cancer (OR 0.23, p < 0.05). A significant portion of gynecologic cancer survivors reported a fear of cancer recurrence. Assistance with nutrition and weight loss were the most desired survivorship program components. Variation in patient preferences and differences among clinical subgroups highlight the need for tailored survivorship care.

Optimizing Perioperative Venous Thromboembolism Chemoprophylaxis on a Gynecologic Oncology Service.

BACKGROUND: Perioperative venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality after gynecologic cancer surgery. Here we report a quality improvement intervention to increase perioperative VTE chemoprophylaxis compliance. STUDY DESIGN: All operations performed by a gynecologic oncologist at a tertiary urban university medical center admitted to the hospital for at least one midnight were included. Using a pre/post design with a washout period, we sought to increase perioperative VTE chemoprophylaxis compliance from 22% in the historical control (HC) cohort to 90% in the quality improvement (QI) cohort. The perioperative VTE chemoprophylaxis process was standardized by addressing four domains: preoperative VTE chemoprophylaxis, surgical time-out, postoperative VTE chemoprophylaxis, and intervention education and compliance tracking. Pearson's chi-square test was used to compare HC vs QI cohort compliance. RESULTS: There were 130 surgical cases in the HC cohort and 131 in the QI cohort. Forty-two percent underwent laparotomy, and 57% had cancer at the time of operation. VTE chemoprophylaxis compliance improved from 22% in the HC cohort to 82% in the QI cohort (p < 0.001). Preoperative VTE chemoprophylaxis compliance improved from 76% in the HC cohort to 94% in the QI cohort (p < 0.001), and postoperative VTE chemoprophylaxis compliance improved from 27% to 87% (p < 0.001). Thirty-day postoperative VTE occurred in three patients (2%) in the HC cohort and none in the QI cohort (p = 0.08). CONCLUSIONS: A low-cost and low-technology QI initiative intervention improved perioperative compliance with VTE chemoprophylaxis.

Outcomes Associated With a Five-Point Surgical Site Infection Prevention Bundle in Women Undergoing Surgery for Ovarian Cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To identify risk factors for surgical site infection and to define rates associated with cytoreductive surgery before and after implementation of an infection prevention bundle. METHODS: We conducted a prospective quality improvement study. Patients who underwent ovarian, fallopian tube, or peritoneal cancer cytoreductive surgery at an academic tertiary care center from April 2014 to April 2016 were prospectively enrolled. Patient demographics, surgical variables, and surgical site infection rates were compared with a historical cohort after introduction of a 5-point infection prevention bundle, including: 1) preoperative and intraoperative skin preparation with 4% chlorhexidine and intraoperative vaginal preparation with 4% chlorhexidine; 2) preoperative use of oral antibiotics and mechanical bowel preparation; 3) appropriate timing of intraoperative antibiotics; 4) adoption of enhanced sterile surgical techniques for colon procedures and incisional closure; and 5) perioperative incision management. RESULTS: During the study period, 219 women underwent surgery: 91 prebundle and 128 treated in the postbundle period. Stage, body mass index, proportion of patients undergoing colon or upper abdominal surgery, and estimated blood loss were not different between the cohorts. Overall, the surgical site infection rate prebundle was 18 (20%); this was reduced to four (3%) postbundle (odds ratio [OR] 0.13, 95% CI 0.037-0.53; P<.001). Patients who underwent a colon resection prebundle had an infection rate of 14 (33%) compared with three (7%) in the postbundle group (OR 0.14, 95% CI 0.037-0.53; P<.001). Additionally, rates of surgical site infection-related hospital readmission were also lower in the postbundle (4/128 [3%]) compared with the prebundle group (12/91 [13%]; P=.005). CONCLUSION: Infection is common after ovarian cancer cytoreductive surgery. Implementation of a 5-point surgical site infection prevention bundle in women undergoing ovarian cancer operations was associated with dramatically decreased infection rates and lower hospital readmission rates.