A PHGDH inhibitor reveals coordination of serine synthesis and one-carbon unit fate.

Serine is both a proteinogenic amino acid and the source of one-carbon units essential for de novo purine and deoxythymidine synthesis. In the canonical pathway of glucose-derived serine synthesis, Homo sapiens phosphoglycerate dehydrogenase (PHGDH) catalyzes the first, rate-limiting step. Genetic loss of PHGDH is toxic toward PHGDH-overexpressing breast cancer cell lines even in the presence of exogenous serine. Here, we used a quantitative high-throughput screen to identify small-molecule PHGDH inhibitors. These compounds reduce the production of glucose-derived serine in cells and suppress the growth of PHGDH-dependent cancer cells in culture and in orthotopic xenograft tumors. Surprisingly, PHGDH inhibition reduced the incorporation into nucleotides of one-carbon units from glucose-derived and exogenous serine. We conclude that glycolytic serine synthesis coordinates the use of one-carbon units from endogenous and exogenous serine in nucleotide synthesis, and we suggest that one-carbon unit wasting thus may contribute to the efficacy of PHGDH inhibitors in vitro and in vivo.

Concurrent Sorafenib and Radiotherapy versus Radiotherapy Alone for Locally Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Propensity-Matched Analysis.

PURPOSE: Evidence is lacking concerning the benefit of the combination of sorafenib and radiotherapy to treat advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). To date, no publication has reported the outcomes of radiotherapy alone versus concurrent therapy. We aimed to compare the effectiveness of radiotherapy alone versus concurrent radiotherapy and sorafenib for locally advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a propensity score matching (PSM) cohort study comparing the effectiveness of the concurrent use of sorafenib and external beam radiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone in Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage B or C, nonsurgically managed, nonmetastatic patients with HCC. Two subpopulations were matched based on baseline characteristics. Stratified analysis was also performed to assess the heterogeneous effects of the two arms. Overall survival (OS) was compared. Radiation-induced liver disease (RILD) and overt gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding events were also recorded. RESULTS: Seven hundred thirty-one BCLC stage B or C nonmetastatic HCC patients were identified from 2007 to 2017. Of these, 347 patients met the inclusion criteria (Radiotherapy alone: 269 patients; concurrent therapy: 78 patients). Propensity score matching yielded 73 patients each in the radiotherapy and concurrent groups. The median OS was 9.6 months in the radiotherapy-alone group and 9.9 months in the concurrent group (hazard ratio (HR): 1.12; 95% CI=0.78-1.62; p=0.544). Posttreatment toxicities, including radiation-induced liver disease and overt gastrointestinal bleeding, showed no significant differences between the groups. CONCLUSION: In our study, the concurrent use of sorafenib and conventional external beam radiotherapy shows no survival benefit over radiotherapy alone for locally advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

Proton versus photon radiotherapy for primary hepatocellular carcinoma: a propensity-matched analysis.

BACKGROUND: Proton radiotherapy has a dosimetric advantage over photon radiotherapy. Many retrospective studies have shown promising results with proton radiotherapy in treating hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, clinical evidence demonstrating the benefit of protons over photons is still limited. We therefore compared the clinical outcomes of the two modalities using medical research databases from our medical foundation. METHODS: We conducted a propensity score-matched cohort study based on our multi-institution medical organization research database. From January 2007 to January 2018, a total of 413 patients (photon: 349; proton: 64) who were diagnosed with HCC and primarily treated with radiotherapy with curative intent were enrolled. Overall survival (OS) and radiation-induced liver disease (RILD) were assessed. Stratified analysis was also performed to evaluate the heterogeneous effects of the two arms. RESULTS: A total of 110 patients (photon: 55; proton: 55) were analyzed in the propensity-matched series. The matched groups were balanced for baseline tumor risk factors. Cox regression analysis revealed a significant survival benefit in the proton group (p = 0.032, HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.33-0.96). The median overall survival in the proton group was not reached and that in the photon group was 17.4 months. The biological equivalent dose of radiotherapy was significantly higher in the proton group than in the photon group (median, 96.56 Gray [relative biological effectiveness] vs. 62.5 Gray, p < 0.001). The risk of RILD was significantly lower in the proton group (11.8% vs. 36%, p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Proton radiotherapy could deliver a higher radiation dose than photon radiotherapy without increasing the risk of RILD and result in a better overall survival rate for those diagnosed with HCC and treated with radiotherapy with curative intent.