Heterotopic Ossification Prophylaxis After Total Hip Arthroplasty: Randomized Trial of 400 vs 700 cGy.

BACKGROUND: Heterotopic ossification (HO) is a known complication following total hip arthroplasty. Radiation is an effective prophylaxis, but an optimal protocol has yet to be determined. We performed a randomized, double-blinded clinical trial in high-risk patients to determine the efficacy of 400 vs 700 cGy doses of radiation. METHODS: One hundred forty-seven patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty and at high risk for HO at an urban medical center were randomized to receive either a single 400 or 700 cGy dose of radiation postoperatively. High risk was defined as a diagnosis of diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis, hypertrophic osteoarthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, or history of previous HO. Radiation was administered on the first or second postoperative day. A single blinded reviewer graded radiographs taken immediately postoperatively and at a minimum of 6 months postoperatively using the Brooker classification. Progression was defined as an increase in Brooker classification. Operative data including surgical approach, implant fixation, revision surgery, and postoperative range of motion data were also collected. RESULTS: A significantly greater portion of patients who received the 400 cGy dose demonstrated progression of HO than patients who received the 700 cGy dose. There were no wound complications. No preoperative factors were associated with a higher rate of progression. Patients who progressed had less flexion on physical examination than patients who did not progress, but this was not clinically significant. CONCLUSION: Seven hundred centigray was superior to 400 cGy in preventing HO formation following total hip arthroplasty in high-risk patients and may be the more effective treatment in this population. Further studies comparing 700 cGy to dosages between 400 and 700 cGy may help to clarify if a more optimal dose can be identified.

Serum inflammatory markers for periprosthetic knee infection in obese versus non-obese patients.

Accurate diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is challenging. Most infection diagnosis criteria define elevated serum C-reactive protein (CRP) as >1.0mg/dL and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) as >30mm/hour. Obesity has been reported as a pro-inflammatory state with elevated baseline CRP values. We hypothesized that higher cut-off values would be more accurate to diagnose PJI in obese patients due to their elevated baseline CRP. BMI, serum inflammatory markers, and synovial fluid were collected for 102 revision total knee arthroplasty patients, and analyzed for the highest area under the curve. We found a CRP of 3.6mg/dL was more accurate to diagnose PJI in obese patients versus traditional values. Clinicians should be judicious and use additional criteria when diagnosing PJI in obese patients.

Surgical considerations in total knee replacement for the obese patient.

Total knee replacement (TKR) is one of the most commonly performed and successful orthopedic surgeries in the modern era. The rising prevalence of obesity has contributed to the need for TKR, but the anatomy of obese patients presents unique challenges during surgery. In this article, we will focus on surgical techniques and tools to maximize the success of TKR in this patient population. We will also cover the relationship between obesity and the development of knee osteoarthritis, postoperative care, and prosthetic outcomes.

Coated nails: is their use supported by the literature?

Antibiotic-coated intramedullary nails have been popularized in recent decades for treating long-bone infections. They are especially useful in treating diaphyseal infections requiring stability, such as those involving fractures and nonunions. The nails are made by injecting antibiotic-impregnated polymethylmethacrylate or "cement" around a metal core using a silicone tube as a mold. There are a variety of techniques that can be used to customize the nail to the affected site. Antibiotic cement has long been demonstrated as an effective local antibiotic delivery system. It is able to elute high concentrations of antibiotics while having little systemic toxicity. Several case series have reported good outcomes using this technique, defined by bone union and infection control. Further research is needed to determine the amount of weight that can safely be transferred through the nail and to optimize antibiotic elution.

Eponymous Instruments in Orthopaedic Surgery.

Every day surgeons call for instruments devised by surgeon trailblazers. This article aims to give an account of commonly used eponymous instruments in orthopaedic surgery, focusing on the original intent of their designers in order to inform how we use them today. We searched PubMed, the archives of longstanding medical journals, Google, the Internet Archive, and the HathiTrust Digital Library for information regarding the inventors and the developments of 7 instruments: the Steinmann pin, Bovie electrocautery, Metzenbaum scissors, Freer elevator, Cobb periosteal elevator, Kocher clamp, and Verbrugge bone holding forceps. A combination of ingenuity, necessity, circumstance and collaboration produced the inventions of the surgical tools numbered in our review. In some cases, surgical instruments were improvements of already existing technologies. The indications and applications of the orthopaedic devices have changed little. Meanwhile, instruments originally developed for other specialties have been adapted for our use. Although some argue for a transition from eponymous to descriptive terms in medicine, there is value in recognizing those who revolutionized surgical techniques and instrumentation. Through history, we have an opportunity to be inspired and to better understand our tools.