Long-term outcomes and failure patterns after laparoscopic intersphincteric resection in ultralow rectal cancers.

BACKGROUND: Intersphincteric resection (ISR), the ultimate anus-preserving technique for ultralow rectal cancers, is an alternative to abdominoperineal resection (APR). The failure patterns and risk factors for local recurrence and distant metastasis remain controversial and require further investigation. AIM: To investigate the long-term outcomes and failure patterns after laparoscopic ISR in ultralow rectal cancers. METHODS: Patients who underwent laparoscopic ISR (LsISR) at Peking University First Hospital between January 2012 and December 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Correlation analysis was performed using the Chi-square or Pearson's correlation test. Prognostic factors for overall survival (OS), local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) were analyzed using Cox regression. RESULTS: We enrolled 368 patients with a median follow-up of 42 mo. Local recurrence and distant metastasis occurred in 13 (3.5%) and 42 (11.4%) cases, respectively. The 3-year OS, LRFS, and DMFS rates were 91.3%, 97.1%, and 90.1%, respectively. Multivariate analyses revealed that LRFS was associated with positive lymph node status [hazard ratio (HR) = 5.411, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.413-20.722, P = 0.014] and poor differentiation (HR = 3.739, 95%CI: 1.171-11.937, P = 0.026), whereas the independent prognostic factors for DMFS were positive lymph node status (HR = 2.445, 95%CI: 1.272-4.698, P = 0.007) and (y)pT3 stage (HR = 2.741, 95%CI: 1.225-6.137, P = 0.014). CONCLUSION: This study confirmed the oncological safety of LsISR for ultralow rectal cancer. Poor differentiation, (y)pT3 stage, and lymph node metastasis are independent risk factors for treatment failure after LsISR, and thus patients with these factors should be carefully managed with optimal neoadjuvant therapy, and for patients with a high risk of local recurrence (N + or poor differentiation), extended radical resection (such as APR instead of ISR) may be more effective.

Short- and long-term results of open vs laparoscopic multisegmental resection and anastomosis for synchronous colorectal cancer located in separate segments.

BACKGROUND: It remains unclear whether laparoscopic multisegmental resection and anastomosis (LMRA) is safe and advantageous over traditional open multisegmental resection and anastomosis (OMRA) for treating synchronous colorectal cancer (SCRC) located in separate segments. AIM: To compare the short-term efficacy and long-term prognosis of OMRA as well as LMRA for SCRC located in separate segments. METHODS: Patients with SCRC who underwent surgery between January 2010 and December 2021 at the Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and the Peking University First Hospital were retrospectively recruited. In accordance with the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 109 patients who received right hemicolectomy together with anterior resection of the rectum or right hemicolectomy and sigmoid colectomy were finally included in the study. Patients were divided into the LMRA and OMRA groups (n = 68 and 41, respectively) according to the surgical method used. The groups were compared regarding the surgical procedure's short-term efficacy and its effect on long-term patient survival. RESULTS: LMRA patients showed markedly less intraoperative blood loss than OMRA patients (100 vs 200 mL, P = 0.006). Compared to OMRA patients, LMRA patients exhibited markedly shorter postoperative first exhaust time (2 vs 3 d, P = 0.001), postoperative first fluid intake time (3 vs 4 d, P = 0.012), and postoperative hospital stay (9 vs 12 d, P = 0.002). The incidence of total postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo grade: ≥ II) was 2.9% and 17.1% (P = 0.025) in the LMRA and OMRA groups, respectively, while the incidence of anastomotic leakage was 2.9% and 7.3% (P = 0.558) in the LMRA and OMRA groups, respectively. Furthermore, the LMRA group had a higher mean number of lymph nodes dissected than the OMRA group (45.2 vs 37.3, P = 0.020). The 5-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates in OMRA patients were 82.9% and 78.3%, respectively, while these rates in LMRA patients were 78.2% and 72.8%, respectively. Multivariate prognostic analysis revealed that N stage [OS: HR hazard ratio (HR) = 10.161, P = 0.026; DFS: HR = 13.017, P = 0.013], but not the surgical method (LMRA/OMRA) (OS: HR = 0.834, P = 0.749; DFS: HR = 0.812, P = 0.712), was the independent influencing factor in the OS and DFS of patients with SCRC. CONCLUSION: LMRA is safe and feasible for patients with SCRC located in separate segments. Compared to OMRA, the LMRA approach has more advantages related to short-term efficacy.

USP20 regulates the stability of EMT transcription factor SOX4 and influences colorectal cancer metastasis.

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a familiar malignancy accompanied by higher morbidity and mortality. The deubiquitination enzyme USP20 has been discovered to be one key factor in several cancers progression. SOX4 is a critical transcription factor to regulate the expression of various genes, and participates into the occurrence and progression of cancers. In this study, it was aimed to illustrate the role of USP20 and the regulatory relationship between USP20 and SOX4 in CRC. METHODS: The protein expressions of USP20, SOX4, E-cadherin, N-cadherin, Snail and slug were tested through western blot. The cell proliferation ability was verified through CCK-8 assay. The migration and invasion abilities were detected through Transwell assay. The mRNA expression of SOX4 was confirmed through RT-qPCR. The interaction between USP20 and SOX4 was notarized through Co-IP assay. RESULT: Our study demonstrated that USP20 displayed higher expression, and facilitated CRC progression through regulating cell proliferation, migration, invasion and EMT process markers. USP20 was found to modulate SOX4 protein expression. Next, it was verified that USP20 regulated SOX4 degradation through deubiquitination. Finally, through rescue assays, we revealed that USP20 mediated SOX4 expression to accelerate CRC progression. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, USP20 regulated the stability of EMT transcription factor SOX4 and aggravated colorectal cancer metastasis. This finding might highlight the function of USP20 in the treatment of CRC.

Hospitalisation, care plans and not for resuscitation orders in older people in the last year of life.

BACKGROUND: over 60% of older people have at least one admission to hospital in their last year of life, with the majority of people having multiple admissions. In Bankstown, New South Wales, Australia, we have a diverse ethnic and cultural population. We were interested in bed utilisation, documentation, and follow through of "care plans" as well as "not for resuscitation" orders in the last year of life of the older people in our area. METHODS: we reviewed and collected data from the medical records of patients over 65 years of age who died in our hospital. Reviewers included a medical registrar, a research officer and two geriatricians. We collected a wide range of information pertaining to the 12 months before death. This included demographics, chronic illnesses, geriatric syndromes, number of admissions, bed days, care plans, and not for resuscitation orders as well as other relevant data. RESULTS: 110 patients' records were reviewed. The mean age was 80 years and 31% were from a non English-speaking background. The average number of admissions was 2.4 and the average number of bed days in the last year of life was 25. Sixty-one of the patients had a care plan and a not for resuscitation order, 91% of which were written shortly before death. Using bi-variate analysis of old age (over 80), number of chronic illnesses, or geriatric syndromes present, the number of bed days was positively correlated to care plan and not for resuscitation orders. Logistic multivariate analysis of chronic illnesses revealed that stroke (P=0.024) as well as stroke and fracture (P=0.008) were strongly correlated with care plan and not for resuscitation orders. Only 8 patients had an advanced care plan documented prior to last admission. When advanced care plans were documented, they were generally clearly written and followed through appropriately (7 out of 8). CONCLUSION: this study showed that in our diverse population there were multiple admissions and utilisation of hospital beds for older people in their last year of life. Care plans and not for resuscitation orders were rarely documented prior to last admission. However, when advanced care plans were done, they were usually well documented and followed through appropriately.