Orbital metastasis or idiopathic orbital pseudotumor? A case report from a patient previously diagnosed with primary breast cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Cancer metastatic to the orbit may be difficult to distinguish from idiopathic orbital pseudotumor at clinical and radiological examination. This case report describes clinical, radiological features, differential diagnosis, and treatment options for orbital neoplasms of unknown origin. PRESENTATION OF CASE: A 63-year-old woman presented to our Unit because of orbital swelling, ocular pain, globe displacement, conjunctival chemosis, and progressive vision loss. The patient had been seen by an ophthalmologist at another hospital. The initial diagnosis was idiopathic orbital pseudotumor. Steroid therapy did not resolve clinical symptoms. Her medical history held decisive clues: ten years before this presentation she had been diagnosed with double primary breast cancer, invasive lobular breast carcinoma, and invasive ductal breast carcinoma. Orbital biopsy was performed for differential diagnosis. DISCUSSION: Considering the rapid onset and severity of symptoms, the radiological features of the orbit, and the patient's medical history of breast cancer, orbital metastasis should have been the most likely diagnosis. Orbital biopsy was performed because of the history of multiple primary cancers and because metastatic origin had to be determined to define the best treatment strategy. CONCLUSION: Biopsy is necessary under specific circumstances in the diagnosis of orbital metastasis, especially when presentation is ambiguous and when differential diagnosis is challenging. A patient's medical history may hold vital clues to correct diagnosis.

A comparative prospective study between the outcomes of one-stage Pelnac reconstruction and full thickness skin graft on donor site healing in the radial forearm and fibula flaps.

OBJECTIVES: Dermal substitutes are classically used in a 2-stage procedure followed by skin graft for wound healing. This study aims to evaluate the possibility to use an alternative technique for radial forearm and fibula donor sites coverage using one-stage Pelnac reconstruction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 21 patients who underwent radial forearm and fibula flaps harvest for reconstruction of head and neck defects after oncological surgery were enroled in the study. 13 patients were treated by one-stage Pelnac reconstruction of the donor site defect, 8 patients underwent full thickness skin graft. The Vancouver Scar Scale was used to evaluate the scar quality. RESULTS: Most patients treated with one-stage Pelnac reconstruction showed good healing of the flap donor site, with minor complications, scar quality comparable to other treatment options and unimpaired function of the implicated limb. One patient had wound dehiscence at the radial forearm site, which was treated with secondary full thickness skin graft. In the group treated with FTSG we had three patients that developed complications, such as dehiscence of the graft and seroma. Overall, we reported comparable satisfaction with donor sites both for aesthetic and functional outcomes, in both groups of patients. CONCLUSION: The use of Pelnac without a following skin graft provides a viable method for the reconstruction of radial forearm and fibula flaps donor site. A longer postoperative care is needed, but the long-term aesthetic and functional results are satisfactory in comparison with full thickness skin graft.

Sequencing in Orthognathic Bimaxillary Surgery: Which Jaw Should Be Operated First? A Scoping Review.

Bimaxillary orthognathic surgery is widely used for the correction of dentoskeletal deformities. Surgery sequencing (maxilla or mandible first) remains debated, and guidelines and consensus are lacking. This scoping review summarizes the state of the art and compares the advantages and disadvantages of both approaches. The review was conducted following PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Three electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science) were searched using the PICO protocol and key words in orthognathic surgical sequencing. Four reviewers screened the records independently, and disagreement was resolved by consensus. A total of 23 records met the inclusion criteria. The advantages and disadvantages of the two approaches were compared and assessed for accuracy of reporting. Within the limitations of the present study, available evidence for the intrinsic advantages and the accuracy of the mandible-first sequence supports the choice of this approach in most cases. Nevertheless, each clinical case needs to be evaluated individually, as no dogmatic recommendations can be given for sequencing in bimaxillary orthognathic surgery.