Mutations in EBF3 Disturb Transcriptional Profiles and Cause Intellectual Disability, Ataxia, and Facial Dysmorphism.

From a GeneMatcher-enabled international collaboration, we identified ten individuals affected by intellectual disability, speech delay, ataxia, and facial dysmorphism and carrying a deleterious EBF3 variant detected by whole-exome sequencing. One 9-bp duplication and one splice-site, five missense, and two nonsense variants in EBF3 were found; the mutations occurred de novo in eight individuals, and the missense variant c.625C>T (p.Arg209Trp) was inherited by two affected siblings from their healthy mother, who is mosaic. EBF3 belongs to the early B cell factor family (also known as Olf, COE, or O/E) and is a transcription factor involved in neuronal differentiation and maturation. Structural assessment predicted that the five amino acid substitutions have damaging effects on DNA binding of EBF3. Transient expression of EBF3 mutant proteins in HEK293T cells revealed mislocalization of all but one mutant in the cytoplasm, as well as nuclear localization. By transactivation assays, all EBF3 mutants showed significantly reduced or no ability to activate transcription of the reporter gene CDKN1A, and in situ subcellular fractionation experiments demonstrated that EBF3 mutant proteins were less tightly associated with chromatin. Finally, in RNA-seq and ChIP-seq experiments, EBF3 acted as a transcriptional regulator, and mutant EBF3 had reduced genome-wide DNA binding and gene-regulatory activity. Our findings demonstrate that variants disrupting EBF3-mediated transcriptional regulation cause intellectual disability and developmental delay and are present in ∼0.1% of individuals with unexplained neurodevelopmental disorders.

Genomic sequencing identifies secondary findings in a cohort of parent study participants.

PURPOSE: Clinically relevant secondary variants were identified in parents enrolled with a child with developmental delay and intellectual disability. METHODS: Exome/genome sequencing and analysis of 789 "unaffected" parents was performed. RESULTS: Pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants were identified in 21 genes within 25 individuals (3.2%), with 11 (1.4%) participants harboring variation in a gene defined as clinically actionable by the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics. These 25 individuals self-reported either relevant clinical diagnoses (5); relevant family history or symptoms (13); or no relevant family history, symptoms, or clinical diagnoses (7). A limited carrier screen was performed yielding 15 variants in 48 (6.1%) parents. Parents were also analyzed as mate pairs (n = 365) to identify cases in which both parents were carriers for the same recessive disease, yielding three such cases (0.8%), two of which had children with the relevant recessive disease. Four participants had two findings (one carrier and one noncarrier variant). In total, 71 of the 789 enrolled parents (9.0%) received secondary findings. CONCLUSION: We provide an overview of the rates and types of clinically relevant secondary findings, which may be useful in the design and implementation of research and clinical sequencing efforts to identify such findings.

Clinical relevance of small copy-number variants in chromosomal microarray clinical testing.

PURPOSE: The 2010 consensus statement on diagnostic chromosomal microarray (CMA) testing recommended an array resolution ≥400 kb throughout the genome as a balance of analytical and clinical sensitivity. In spite of the clear evidence for pathogenicity of large copy-number variants (CNVs) in neurodevelopmental disorders and/or congenital anomalies, the significance of small, nonrecurrent CNVs (<500 kb) has not been well established in a clinical setting. METHODS: We investigated the clinical significance of all nonpolymorphic small, nonrecurrent CNVs (<500 kb) in patients referred for CMA clinical testing over a period of 6 years, from 2009 to 2014 (a total of 4,417 patients). We excluded from our study patients with benign or likely benign CNVs and patients with only recurrent microdeletions/microduplications <500 kb. RESULTS: In total, 383 patients (8.67%) were found to carry at least one small, nonrecurrent CNV, of whom 176 patients (3.98%) had one small CNV classified as a variant of uncertain significance (VUS), 45 (1.02%) had two or more small VUS CNVs, 20 (0.45%) had one small VUS CNV and a recurrent CNV, 113 (2.56%) had one small pathogenic or likely pathogenic CNV, 17 (0.38%) had two or more small pathogenic or likely pathogenic CNVs, and 12 (0.27%) had one small pathogenic or likely pathogenic CNV and a recurrent CNV. Within the pathogenic group, 80 of 142 patients (56% of all small pathogenic CNV cases) were found to have a single whole-gene or exonic deletion. The themes that emerged from our study are presented in the Discussion section. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates the diagnostic clinical relevance of small, nonrecurrent CNVs <500 kb during CMA clinical testing and underscores the need for careful clinical interpretation of these CNVs.Genet Med 19 4, 377-385.

Eliciting preferences on secondary findings: the Preferences Instrument for Genomic Secondary Results.

PURPOSE: Eliciting and understanding patient and research participant preferences regarding return of secondary test results are key aspects of genomic medicine. A valid instrument should be easily understood without extensive pretest counseling while still faithfully eliciting patients' preferences. METHODS: We conducted focus groups with 110 adults to understand patient perspectives on secondary genomic findings and the role that preferences should play. We then developed and refined a draft instrument and used it to elicit preferences from parents participating in a genomic sequencing study in children with intellectual disabilities. RESULTS: Patients preferred filtering of secondary genomic results to avoid information overload and to avoid learning what the future holds, among other reasons. Patients preferred to make autonomous choices about which categories of results to receive and to have their choices applied automatically before results are returned to them and their clinicians. The Preferences Instrument for Genomic Secondary Results (PIGSR) is designed to be completed by patients or research participants without assistance and to guide bioinformatic analysis of genomic raw data. Most participants wanted to receive all secondary results, but a significant minority indicated other preferences. CONCLUSIONS: Our novel instrument-PIGSR-should be useful in a wide variety of clinical and research settings.Genet Med 19 3, 337-344.

Recurrent ACADVL molecular findings in individuals with a positive newborn screen for very long chain acyl-coA dehydrogenase (VLCAD) deficiency in the United States.

Very long chain acyl-coA dehydrogenase deficiency (VLCADD) is an autosomal recessive inborn error of fatty acid oxidation detected by newborn screening (NBS). Follow-up molecular analyses are often required to clarify VLCADD-suggestive NBS results, but to date the outcome of these studies are not well described for the general screen-positive population. In the following study, we report the molecular findings for 693 unrelated patients that sequentially received Sanger sequence analysis of ACADVL as a result of a positive NBS for VLCADD. Highlighting the variable molecular underpinnings of this disorder, we identified 94 different pathogenic ACADVL variants (40 novel), as well as 134 variants of unknown clinical significance (VUSs). Evidence for the pathogenicity of a subset of recurrent VUSs was provided using multiple in silico analyses. Surprisingly, the most frequent finding in our cohort was carrier status, 57% all individuals had a single pathogenic variant or VUS. This result was further supported by follow-up array and/or acylcarnitine analysis that failed to provide evidence of a second pathogenic allele. Notably, exon-targeted array analysis of 131 individuals screen positive for VLCADD failed to identify copy number changes in ACADVL thus suggesting this test has a low yield in the setting of NBS follow-up. While no genotype was common, the c.848T>C (p.V283A) pathogenic variant was clearly the most frequent; at least one copy was found in ~10% of all individuals with a positive NBS. Clinical and biochemical data for seven unrelated patients homozygous for the p.V283A allele suggests that it results in a mild phenotype that responds well to standard treatment, but hypoglycemia can occur. Collectively, our data illustrate the molecular heterogeneity of VLCADD and provide novel insight into the outcomes of NBS for this disorder.

BMP4 loss-of-function mutations in developmental eye disorders including SHORT syndrome.

BMP4 loss-of-function mutations and deletions have been shown to be associated with ocular, digital, and brain anomalies, but due to the paucity of these reports, the full phenotypic spectrum of human BMP4 mutations is not clear. We screened 133 patients with a variety of ocular disorders for BMP4 coding region mutations or genomic deletions. BMP4 deletions were detected in two patients: a patient affected with SHORT syndrome and a patient with anterior segment anomalies along with craniofacial dysmorphism and cognitive impairment. In addition to this, three intragenic BMP4 mutations were identified. A patient with anophthalmia, microphthalmia with sclerocornea, right-sided diaphragmatic hernia, and hydrocephalus was found to have a c.592C >T (p.R198X) nonsense mutation in BMP4. A frameshift mutation, c.171dupC (p.E58RfsX17), was identified in two half-siblings with anophthalmia/microphthalmia, discordant developmental delay/postaxial polydactyly, and poor growth as well as their unaffected mother; one affected sibling carried an additional BMP4 mutation in the second allele, c.362A > G (p.H121R). This is the first report indicating a role for BMP4 in SHORT syndrome, Axenfeld-Rieger malformation, growth delay, macrocephaly, and diaphragmatic hernia. These results significantly expand the number of reported loss-of-function mutations, further support the critical role of BMP4 in ocular development, and provide additional evidence of variable expression/non-penetrance of BMP4 mutations.

Clinically relevant single gene or intragenic deletions encompassing critical neurodevelopmental genes in patients with developmental delay, mental retardation, and/or autism spectrum disorders.

Recent studies suggest that copy number variations (CNVs) encompassing several genes involved in neurodevelopmental pathways are associated with a variety of neuropsychiatric phenotypes, including developmental delay (DD), mental retardation (MR), and autism spectrum disorders (ASDs). Here we present eight patients in a cohort of approximately 1,200 patients referred for clinical array CGH testing for various neurodevelopmental phenotypes,whowere identified to carry small (<1.0Mb with the majority <500 kb) either total gene or intragenic deletions encompassing critical synaptic and other neurodevelopmental genes. The presentations of these patients included variable degrees of DD, speech problems, learning disabilities, MR, autistic-like features, and mild non-specific dysmorphic features. These genes belong to four functional categories, including neuronal transcription factor genes (NFIA at 1p31.3, MEF2C at 5q14.3, andCAMAT1at 1p36.23p36.31), neuron-specific splicing factor genes (RBFOX1 at 16p13.2p13.3), genes involved in synapse formation and maintenance (CNTNAP2 at 7q35 and LRFN5 at 14q21.2), and genes involved in neurotransmission (CHRNA7 at 15q13.3 and IL1RAPL1 at Xp21.2p21.3). Our report expands the list of neurodevelopmental genes deleted in various neurobehavioral phenotypes, expands the phenotypes caused by haploinsufficiency of previously reported critical neurodevelopmental genes, and elucidates the clinical relevance and need for careful clinical interpretation of some small CNVs<500 kb. This report also suggests that small clinically relevant deletions encompassing critical synaptic and other neurodevelopmental genes can present clinically with various neurobehavioral phenotypes, which implies the existence of overlapping neuronal pathways in the pathogenesis of these phenotypes.

The Therapeutic Odyssey: Positioning Genomic Sequencing in the Search for a Child's Best Possible Life.

Background: The desire of parents to obtain a genetic diagnosis for their child with intellectual disability and associated symptoms has long been framed as a diagnostic odyssey, an arduous and sometimes perilous journey focused on the goal of identifying a cause for the child's condition.Methods: Semi-structured interviews (N = 60) were conducted with parents of children (N = 59, aged 2-24 years) with intellectual disability and/or developmental delay (IDD) who underwent genome sequencing at a single pediatric multispecialty clinic. Interviews were conducted after parents received their child's sequencing result (positive findings, negative findings, or variants of unknown significance). Thematic analysis was performed on all interviews.Results: Parents reported that obtaining a genetic diagnosis was one important step in their overall goal of helping their child live their best life possible life. They intended to use the result as a tool to help their child by seeking the correct school placement and obtaining benefits and therapeutic services.Conclusions: For the parents of children with IDD, the search for a genetic diagnosis is best conceptualized as a part of parents' ongoing efforts to leverage various diagnoses to obtain educational and therapeutic services for their children. Cleaving parents' search for a genetic diagnosis from these broader efforts obscures the value that some parents place on a sequencing result in finding and tailoring therapies and services beyond the clinic. Interviews with parents reveal, therefore, that genomic sequencing is best understood as one important stage of an ongoing therapeutic odyssey that largely takes place outside the clinic. Findings suggest the need to expand translational research efforts to contextualize a genetic diagnosis within parents' broader efforts to obtain educational and therapeutic services outside clinical contexts.

Molecular cytogenetic characterization of two cases with constitutional distal 11q duplication/triplication.

Here, we report two cases with isolated distal 11q rearrangement and multiple congenital anomalies. The first patient is a two-and-a-half year old male referred to our genetics clinic due to dysmorphic features and developmental delay including speech delay. Using conventional and molecular cytogenetic techniques, we demonstrate that he carries a recombinant chromosome with duplication of the 11q23.3q24.2 region resulting from an intrachromosomal insertion in the father. The second patient was originally reported by Partida-Perez, et al. [Partida-Perez et al., 2006] as having a tandem duplication of the 11q23.3 region. We performed array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) on this patient in order to map the exact region of the duplication, and demonstrated that the patient actually had a triplication within 11q23.3. We compare the clinical features of our two patients with those previously reported to further delineate the phenotype of isolated distal 11q duplication. Our study also demonstrates the clinical usefulness of whole genome high resolution aCGH analysis as a powerful molecular cytogenetic tool capable of detecting genomic imbalances due to cytogenetically visible but uncertain rearrangements.

The use by Alabama pediatricians of genetics consultation in the evaluation of developmental delay.

Developmental delay (DD) is among the most common serious problems encountered by the general pediatrician. Published guidelines exist that recommend a genetics evaluation be a routine part of the evaluation of these children [Curry et al. (1997) Am J Med Genet 72:468-477; American Academy of Pediatrics (2001) Peds 108:192-195]. In an effort to determine if this recommendation is widely followed, we surveyed Alabama general pediatrics to learn how they utilize a genetic assessment in their evaluation of unexplained DD, and to identify any barriers to a genetics evaluation. A questionnaire was developed that asked about various factors that might influence how pediatricians use genetic evaluations. It was mailed to all members of the Alabama chapter of the American Academy of Pediatrics. The data were tabulated and analyzed by standard methods. One hundred thirty-seven of 653 surveys were returned. The respondents were evenly divided among urban (35%), suburban (33%), and rural (32%) practice settings. Most were in a non-academic group practice (71%) and not fellowship trained (76%). Most felt that a genetic evaluation will help define recurrence risk (96%), determine prognosis (96%), and guide patient management (95%). There was limited concern that a genetics evaluation would increase the cost of evaluation (24%) and that it would not eliminate unnecessary testing (64%). The most common indications for referral were the presence of birth defects (93%), positive family history of DD (88%), unusual facial appearance (88%), and parent request (71%). Poor growth was not as strong an indicator. Lack of meaningful results (20%) and expense (18%) were common reasons not to refer, and 48% also cited "other" reasons. Likelihood to refer did not differ by practice location (rural vs. suburban), but distance from a genetics center was a factor. Alabama general pediatricians appreciated the benefits of a genetic evaluation for DD, but several barriers were identified. These issues that must be addressed in order to make a genetics evaluation available to all children with DD.

The emerging role of primary care in genetics.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Advances in genetics are occurring at a rapid pace. It will ultimately be the primary care pediatrician who assimilates this knowledge and applies it to patient care. This article is written in a patient encounter format with which the pediatrician is familiar. The vignettes are from the author's own experiences in 13 years of general pediatric practice. RECENT FINDINGS: The current literature reinforces the idea that changes in the complexity of the diagnostic evaluation and the time spent explaining the recommended testing will be required by the pediatrician. With this responsibility comes the need of new training strategies for medical students and established pediatricians. SUMMARY: Pediatricians will be called upon to incorporate new genetic findings into patient care. This task will ultimately be no different than it was for past pediatricians to incorporate new immunizations or antibiotics into the care plan for each patient. Patient care will improve because therapy will be tailor-made for both the disease and the patient.

A case report of chromosome 17q22-qter trisomy with distinct clinical presentation and review of the literature.

Terminal 17q trisomy is very rare but a recognizable genetic syndrome. The majority of cases reported are inherited from a balanced translocation carrier. This syndrome involves many organs and the severity ranges from mild to severe depending on the size of the 17q gain.

Genomic diagnosis for children with intellectual disability and/or developmental delay.

BACKGROUND: Developmental disabilities have diverse genetic causes that must be identified to facilitate precise diagnoses. We describe genomic data from 371 affected individuals, 309 of which were sequenced as proband-parent trios. METHODS: Whole-exome sequences (WES) were generated for 365 individuals (127 affected) and whole-genome sequences (WGS) were generated for 612 individuals (244 affected). RESULTS: Pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants were found in 100 individuals (27%), with variants of uncertain significance in an additional 42 (11.3%). We found that a family history of neurological disease, especially the presence of an affected first-degree relative, reduces the pathogenic/likely pathogenic variant identification rate, reflecting both the disease relevance and ease of interpretation of de novo variants. We also found that improvements to genetic knowledge facilitated interpretation changes in many cases. Through systematic reanalyses, we have thus far reclassified 15 variants, with 11.3% of families who initially were found to harbor a VUS and 4.7% of families with a negative result eventually found to harbor a pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant. To further such progress, the data described here are being shared through ClinVar, GeneMatcher, and dbGaP. CONCLUSIONS: Our data strongly support the value of large-scale sequencing, especially WGS within proband-parent trios, as both an effective first-choice diagnostic tool and means to advance clinical and research progress related to pediatric neurological disease.